Predictors of Length-of-Stay Among Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm

Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JACC. Advances (Online) Vol. 4; no. 8; p. 101902
Main Authors: Judson, Gregory L., Luck, Jeff, Lawrence, Skye, Khaki, Rakan, Agrawal, Harsh, Soni, Krishan, Tolstrup, Kirsten, Jaganathan, Vijayadithyan, Mahadevan, Vaikom S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2025
Elsevier
Subjects:
ISSN:2772-963X, 2772-963X
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR. Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS. Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week. ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR. [Display omitted]
AbstractList AbstractBackgroundLength of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR. MethodsUsing the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS. ResultsTwenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week. ConclusionsML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.
Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR. Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS. Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week. ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR. [Display omitted]
Background: Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. Objectives: This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR. Methods: Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS. Results: Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week. Conclusions: ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.
Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR.BACKGROUNDLength of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR.This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR.OBJECTIVESThis study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR.Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS.METHODSUsing the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS.Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week.RESULTSTwenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week.ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.CONCLUSIONSML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.
Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay following TAVR. This study aimed to develop a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm that would facilitate the understanding of the predictors of early and late hospital discharge in patients who have undergone TAVR. Using the Biome data set, 9,172 outpatient TAVR procedures were analyzed from 21 centers between 2017 and 2021 across the United States. Supervised random forest ML algorithms were developed to identify variables involved in short length of stay (SLOS) (length of stay <36 hours) and long length of stay (LLOS) (length of stay ≥72 hours) in a 70% sample of the Biome data set. The models were then tested on the remaining 30% of the data set and results compared to standard multivariable models in predicting LOS. Twenty and 22 variables were identified and included as important predictors for the SLOS and LLOS multivariable models, respectively. The predictive power of both the SLOS (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.70, area under the curve [AUC] 0.82) and LLOS (sensitivity 0.45, specificity 0.94, AUC 0.85) ML models were more robust than the standard multivariable model (SLOS AUC 0.65, LLOS AUC 0.65). Our study uncovered several previously unreported predictors for length of stay following TAVR, such as procedural duration, postprocedure physical therapy, and procedure day of the week. ML algorithms may have an important role in identifying novel predictors of short and prolonged length of stay following TAVR. These efforts may facilitate targeted quality improvement programs to decrease length of stay post-TAVR.
ArticleNumber 101902
Author Lawrence, Skye
Agrawal, Harsh
Judson, Gregory L.
Soni, Krishan
Tolstrup, Kirsten
Mahadevan, Vaikom S.
Luck, Jeff
Jaganathan, Vijayadithyan
Khaki, Rakan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gregory L.
  surname: Judson
  fullname: Judson, Gregory L.
  organization: Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jeff
  surname: Luck
  fullname: Luck, Jeff
  organization: Biome Analytics, Chicago, Illinois, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Skye
  surname: Lawrence
  fullname: Lawrence, Skye
  organization: Biome Analytics, Chicago, Illinois, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rakan
  surname: Khaki
  fullname: Khaki, Rakan
  organization: Biome Analytics, Chicago, Illinois, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Harsh
  surname: Agrawal
  fullname: Agrawal, Harsh
  organization: Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Krishan
  surname: Soni
  fullname: Soni, Krishan
  organization: Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kirsten
  surname: Tolstrup
  fullname: Tolstrup, Kirsten
  organization: Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Vijayadithyan
  surname: Jaganathan
  fullname: Jaganathan, Vijayadithyan
  organization: University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Vaikom S.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6354-1873
  surname: Mahadevan
  fullname: Mahadevan, Vaikom S.
  email: Vaikom.Mahadevan@umassmed.edu
  organization: Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40561612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVkktrFEEQxweJmBjzDUTm6GXWfsyrQZQl-AisGNxEvDX9qNntcaZ77e5dyM2Pbo8TQ3IQ8VRN179-RVX9n2ZH1lnIsucYLTDC9at-0Qsl9GFBEKmmL4bIo-yENA0pWE2_Hd17H2dnIfQIIcIYrUv6JDsuUVXjGpOT7OelB21UdD7krstXYDdxW7iuWEdxky9HZzf5lRc2KBG3EMHnS-ejUflXMRwg_wK7QSgYwcb8UkSTYsivg0lVIl_vd-APJoDOPwm1NRYSX3g7ZZfDxnkTt-Oz7HEnhgBnt_E0u37_7ur8Y7H6_OHifLkqVNWyWDCEACuCG81alYaWQtWipF3VMFJhqRnTWrZSNQ1ipBMSaKmglZ2kRGuQip5mFzNXO9HznTej8DfcCcN_fzi_4WIabADe0ZogqBFqq6okEiTGmlIqEKaYUdkk1tuZtdvLEbRKU3sxPIA-zFiz5Rt34JiQqqaEJMLLW4J3P_YQIh9NUDAMwoLbB540JanKtsZJ-uJ-s7suf26YBOUsUN6F4KG7k2DEJ7fwns9u4ZNb-OyWVPZmLoO09YMBz4NK91PJDh5UTGsx_wtQg7FGieE73EDo3d7bdFGOeSAc8fVkyMmPpEIozccS4PXfAf_u_wv4ffRP
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595
10.1080/21642583.2014.956265
10.1007/s00392-020-01647-4
10.21037/cdt-21-717
10.1080/14779072.2021.1920926
10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.028
10.1186/s12872-017-0573-7
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.016
10.25270/jic/18.00280
10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.040
10.1007/s10554-020-01944-z
10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.005
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 The Authors
The Authors
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2025 The Authors 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 The Authors
– notice: The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
– notice: 2025 The Authors 2025
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2772-963X
EndPage 101902
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_f3620e60085542beb11d333a013193b7
PMC12256322
40561612
10_1016_j_jacadv_2025_101902
S2772963X25003229
1_s2_0_S2772963X25003229
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID .1-
.FO
0R~
53G
AALRI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AEXQZ
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AIGII
AITUG
AKBMS
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
EBS
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
M41
M~E
ROL
RPM
Z5R
6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c589t-900e1c217d98c202bac6a43f579251bd99ddb8bc77092fabe34ce8bfb32ddebc3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001519979300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 2772-963X
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:42:59 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:04:05 EST 2025
Fri Jul 11 17:00:03 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 14 01:40:34 EDT 2025
Thu Nov 27 00:51:41 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 17:03:47 EST 2025
Sat Oct 04 15:01:27 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 06:56:25 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords RFECV
KCCQ
LLOS
machine learning
TAVR
AUC
BSA
LOS
STS
length of stay
SLOS
BMI
ML
long length of stay
recursive feature elimination with cross-validation
body mass index
short length of stay
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
area under curve
Society of Thoracic Surgeon
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
body surface area
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c589t-900e1c217d98c202bac6a43f579251bd99ddb8bc77092fabe34ce8bfb32ddebc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6354-1873
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/f3620e60085542beb11d333a013193b7
PMID 40561612
PQID 3224254861
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f3620e60085542beb11d333a013193b7
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12256322
proquest_miscellaneous_3224254861
pubmed_primary_40561612
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacadv_2025_101902
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jacadv_2025_101902
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S2772963X25003229
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jacadv_2025_101902
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle JACC. Advances (Online)
PublicationTitleAlternate JACC Adv
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Alkhalil, Lamba, Deo (bib15) 2018; 91
Wiggins, Dion, Formanski (bib13) 2021; 2
Qureshi, Kundu, Mir (bib17) 2021; 19
Chauhan, Haik, Merlo (bib11) 2016; 182
Writing Committee Members, Otto, Nishimura (bib1) 2021; 77
Fawagreh, Gaber, Elyan (bib4) 2014; 2
Arbel, Zivkovic, Mehta (bib6) 2017; 17
Okoh, Fugar, Kang (bib8) 2019; 31
Babaliaros, Devireddy, Lerakis (bib7) 2014; 7
Shah, Welt, Mahmud (bib3) 2020; 96
Nagai, Horinouchi, Ohno (bib14) 2021; 37
Durand, Avinée, Gillibert (bib16) 2021; 110
Bansal, Garg, Hariri (bib18) 2022; 12
bib5
Hall, O’Donnell, Mathew (bib9) 2019; 12
Carroll, Mack, Vemulapalli (bib2) 2020; 76
Simard, Alqahtani, Hibbert (bib10) 2021; 98
Dahya, Xiao, Prado (bib12) 2016; 182
Babaliaros (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib7) 2014; 7
Bansal (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib18) 2022; 12
Okoh (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib8) 2019; 31
Durand (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib16) 2021; 110
Writing Committee Members (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib1) 2021; 77
Fawagreh (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib4) 2014; 2
Dahya (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib12) 2016; 182
Hall (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib9) 2019; 12
Chauhan (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib11) 2016; 182
Carroll (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib2) 2020; 76
Alkhalil (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib15) 2018; 91
Shah (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib3) 2020; 96
Nagai (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib14) 2021; 37
Wiggins (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib13) 2021; 2
Qureshi (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib17) 2021; 19
Arbel (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib6) 2017; 17
Simard (10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib10) 2021; 98
References_xml – volume: 7
  start-page: 898
  year: 2014
  end-page: 904
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 12
  start-page: 2186
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2194
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Outcomes of veterans undergoing TAVR within veterans affairs medical centers: insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
– ident: bib5
  article-title: IBM. Random forest. IBM
– volume: 76
  start-page: 2492
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2516
  ident: bib2
  article-title: STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 2
  start-page: 602
  year: 2014
  end-page: 609
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements
  publication-title: Systems Sci Control Eng
– volume: 98
  start-page: 176
  year: 2021
  end-page: 183
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Sex-specific in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with third generation transcatheter heart valves
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 2
  start-page: 110
  year: 2021
  end-page: 121
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Proof of concept: digital clock drawing behaviors prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement may predict length of hospital stay and cost of care
  publication-title: Explor Med
– volume: 19
  start-page: 565
  year: 2021
  end-page: 574
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Meta-analysis of minimalist versus standard care approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther
– volume: 96
  start-page: 659
  year: 2020
  end-page: 663
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Triage considerations for patients referred for structural heart disease intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ACC/SCAI position statement
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 17
  start-page: 137
  year: 2017
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Factors associated with length of stay following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter study
  publication-title: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
– volume: 182
  start-page: 146
  year: 2016
  end-page: 154
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Quantitative increase in frailty is associated with diminished survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Am Heart J
– volume: 12
  start-page: 464
  year: 2022
  end-page: 474
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
– volume: 77
  start-page: e25
  year: 2021
  end-page: e197
  ident: bib1
  article-title: 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 182
  start-page: 21
  year: 2016
  end-page: 27
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Computed tomography-derived skeletal muscle index: a novel predictor of frailty and hospital length of stay after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Am Heart J
– volume: 110
  start-page: 40
  year: 2021
  end-page: 49
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Analysis of length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the France TAVI registry
  publication-title: Clin Res Cardiol
– volume: 37
  start-page: 47
  year: 2021
  end-page: 58
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Predictors for non-delayed discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: utility of echocardiographic parameters
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 31
  start-page: 153
  year: 2019
  end-page: 158
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Predictors of extended postoperative length of stay after uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol
– volume: 91
  start-page: 345
  year: 2018
  end-page: 353
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 76
  start-page: 2492
  issue: 21
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib2
  article-title: STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595
– volume: 2
  start-page: 602
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib4
  article-title: Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements
  publication-title: Systems Sci Control Eng
  doi: 10.1080/21642583.2014.956265
– volume: 110
  start-page: 40
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib16
  article-title: Analysis of length of stay after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the France TAVI registry
  publication-title: Clin Res Cardiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01647-4
– volume: 12
  start-page: 464
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib18
  article-title: Machine learning models predict total charges and drivers of cost for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
  doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-717
– volume: 19
  start-page: 565
  issue: 6
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib17
  article-title: Meta-analysis of minimalist versus standard care approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther
  doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1920926
– volume: 98
  start-page: 176
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib10
  article-title: Sex-specific in-hospital outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with third generation transcatheter heart valves
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 182
  start-page: 146
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib11
  article-title: Quantitative increase in frailty is associated with diminished survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Am Heart J
  doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.028
– volume: 96
  start-page: 659
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib3
  article-title: Triage considerations for patients referred for structural heart disease intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic: an ACC/SCAI position statement
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 17
  start-page: 137
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib6
  article-title: Factors associated with length of stay following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter study
  publication-title: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
  doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0573-7
– volume: 2
  start-page: 110
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib13
  article-title: Proof of concept: digital clock drawing behaviors prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement may predict length of hospital stay and cost of care
  publication-title: Explor Med
– volume: 77
  start-page: e25
  issue: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib1
  article-title: 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of Cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.018
– volume: 91
  start-page: 345
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib15
  article-title: Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
– volume: 182
  start-page: 21
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib12
  article-title: Computed tomography-derived skeletal muscle index: a novel predictor of frailty and hospital length of stay after transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: Am Heart J
  doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.08.016
– volume: 31
  start-page: 153
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib8
  article-title: Predictors of extended postoperative length of stay after uncomplicated transcatheter aortic valve replacement
  publication-title: J Invasive Cardiol
  doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00280
– volume: 12
  start-page: 2186
  issue: 21
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib9
  article-title: Outcomes of veterans undergoing TAVR within veterans affairs medical centers: insights from the veterans affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking program
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.040
– volume: 37
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib14
  article-title: Predictors for non-delayed discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: utility of echocardiographic parameters
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01944-z
– volume: 7
  start-page: 898
  issue: 8
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902_bib7
  article-title: Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.005
SSID ssj0002993643
Score 2.2990305
Snippet Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length of stay...
AbstractBackgroundLength of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the...
Background: Length of stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to improve, but significant gaps remain in predicting the length...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 101902
SubjectTerms Cardiovascular
length of stay
machine learning
Original Research
TAVR
Title Predictors of Length-of-Stay Among Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients Using a Supervised Machine Learning Algorithm
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S2772963X25003229
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S2772963X25003229
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101902
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40561612
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3224254861
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12256322
https://doaj.org/article/f3620e60085542beb11d333a013193b7
Volume 4
WOSCitedRecordID wos001519979300001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2772-963X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002993643
  issn: 2772-963X
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 2772-963X
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002993643
  issn: 2772-963X
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20220101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagQogL4k0KVEbiGpHEedjHBbXi0K1WKqC9WX5ld6s2qTbZlbig_nRm7KTaBaRy4BJFeTjJzPibb5zxmJAPNjGlVUUOYUmu4lylLubaVLGqbFbqMq-U8xOFT6uzMz6fi9nOUl-YExbKAwfBfawBYRNXhnyqTAO0pJYxprBOjGDazyMH1rMTTCEGA8gy8LXjXDmf0HWhjLJbCAmzAg-JYSRl9EW-ZP-eS_qTcv6eObnjik6ekMcDh6ST8O5PyT3XPCMPp8Nf8ufkZrbGfVxHh7Y1PXXNol_GbR0Ds_xBJ7i8EPU-ytdsBcHSSYtt0e_qcusocHIcW8dhQzoLZVc76lMLqKLnm2tEl85ZOvV5mI4OJVoXdHK5aNerfnn1gnw7Of76-Us8rLQQm4KLPhZJ4lID0YkV3ICAtDKlylldVAL4j7ZCWKtRh1Uislppx3LjuK41ywAetWEvyUHTNu41oVzpQrnaJYBcOXeV0KA8DMuc0IKnLCLxKHN5HQpqyDHT7EIGHUnUkQw6isgnVMzttVgO2x8AI5GDkci7jCQixahWOc44BYyEhlZ3PLz6232uGzp6J1PZZTKR5xlGKSWbA6NMACPF7p0Dlwkc5R-e-X60OwldHf_fqMa1m05Cu4CwOS_TiLwKdngrlhwjQWCrEeF7Front_0zzWrpy4mnAOkltH34PyT9hjzCbwkpkm_JQb_euHfkgdn2q259RO5Xc37kuypspz-PfwEpZkRL
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors+of+Length-of-Stay+Among+Transcatheter+Aortic+Valve+Replacement+Patients+Using+a+Supervised+Machine+Learning+Algorithm&rft.jtitle=JACC.+Advances+%28Online%29&rft.au=Gregory+L.+Judson%2C+MD&rft.au=Jeff+Luck%2C+PhD&rft.au=Skye+Lawrence%2C+BA&rft.au=Rakan+Khaki%2C+MPH&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.eissn=2772-963X&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=101902&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jacadv.2025.101902&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_f3620e60085542beb11d333a013193b7
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F2772963X%2FS2772963X25X00089%2Fcov150h.gif