Credible communication and cooperation: Experimental evidence from multi-stage Games

► This paper experimentally investigates cooperation and non-binding communication in a two-stage game. ► Two treatments are considered: one with only pre-play communication and one where subjects can also communicate intra-play between the stages of the game. ► Pre-play communication has a signific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic behavior & organization Jg. 81; H. 1; S. 207 - 219
Hauptverfasser: Andersson, Ola, Wengström, Erik
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Elsevier B.V 2012
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0167-2681, 1879-1751, 1879-1751
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► This paper experimentally investigates cooperation and non-binding communication in a two-stage game. ► Two treatments are considered: one with only pre-play communication and one where subjects can also communicate intra-play between the stages of the game. ► Pre-play communication has a significantly lower impact on cooperation when intra-play communication is possible. ► The results suggest that the credibility of pre-play messages may depend crucially on future communication opportunities. It is well known that communication often serves as a facilitator for cooperation in static games. Yet, communication can serve entirely different purposes in dynamic settings as communication during the game may work as a means for renegotiation, potentially undermining the credibility of cooperative strategies. To explore this issue, this paper experimentally investigates cooperation and non-binding communication in a two-stage game. More specifically, two treatments are considered: one with only pre-play communication and one where subjects can also communicate intra-play between the stages of the game. The results highlight a nontrivial difference concerning the effects of pre-play communication between the two treatments. Sending or receiving pre-play messages has a positive and significant effect on cooperation if there is no possibility of intra-play communication. However, this effect is significantly reduced when when intra-play communication is allowed. The results suggest that the credibility of pre-play messages may depend crucially on future communication opportunities.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-2681
1879-1751
1879-1751
DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.10.002