Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review
Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumpti...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | BMC musculoskeletal disorders Ročník 22; číslo 1; s. 1 - 7 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
London
BioMed Central
28.05.2021
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 1471-2474, 1471-2474 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Background
Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies.
Methods
We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words “cox and “hazard*” and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis.
Results
The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (
n
= 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (
n
= 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required.
Conclusions
Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Abstract Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies. Methods We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words “cox and “hazard*” and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis. Results The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required. Conclusions Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies. We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words "cox and "hazard*" and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis. The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required. Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies.BACKGROUNDSurvival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies.We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words "cox and "hazard*" and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis.METHODSWe conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words "cox and "hazard*" and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis.The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required.RESULTSThe PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required.Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed.CONCLUSIONSReporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies. Methods We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words “cox and “hazard*” and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis. Results The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots ( n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model ( n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required. Conclusions Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies. Methods We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words “cox and “hazard*” and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis. Results The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required. Conclusions Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in the survival analysis. The Cox model relies on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) across different covariates. PH assumptions should be assessed and handled if violated. Our aim was to investigate the reporting of the Cox regression model details and testing of the PH assumption in survival analysis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) studies. Methods We conducted a review in the PubMed database on 28th August 2019. A total of 1154 studies were identified. The abstracts of these studies were screened for words "cox and "hazard*" and if either was found the abstract was read. The abstract had to fulfill the following criteria to be included in the full-text phase: topic was knee or hip TJA surgery; survival analysis was used, and hazard ratio reported. If all the presented criteria were met, the full-text version of the article was then read. The full-text was included if Cox method was used to analyze TJA survival. After accessing the full-texts 318 articles were included in final analysis. Results The PH assumption was mentioned in 114 of the included studies (36%). KM analysis was used in 281 (88%) studies and the KM curves were presented graphically in 243 of these (87%). In 110 (45%) studies, the KM survival curves crossed in at least one of the presented figures. The most common way to test the PH assumption was to inspect the log-minus-log plots (n = 59). The time-axis division method was the most used corrected model (n = 30) in cox analysis. Of the 318 included studies only 63 (20%) met the following criteria: PH assumption mentioned, PH assumption tested, testing method of the PH assumption named, the result of the testing mentioned, and the Cox regression model corrected, if required. Conclusions Reporting and testing of the PH assumption and dealing with non-proportionality in hip and knee TJA studies was limited. More awareness and education regarding the assumptions behind the used statistical models among researchers, reviewers and editors are needed to improve the quality of TJA research. This could be achieved by better collaboration with methodologists and statisticians and introducing more specific reporting guidelines for TJA studies. Neglecting obvious non-proportionality undermines the overall research efforts since causes of non-proportionality, such as possible underlying pathomechanisms, are not considered and discussed. Keywords: Methodology, Survival analysis, Reproducibility |
| ArticleNumber | 489 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Kuitunen, Ilari Ponkilainen, Ville T. Reito, Aleksi Eskelinen, Antti Uimonen, Mikko M. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ilari orcidid: 0000-0001-8178-9610 surname: Kuitunen fullname: Kuitunen, Ilari email: ilari.kuitunen@uef.fi organization: Mikkeli Central Hospital, University of Eastern Finland, School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Ville T. surname: Ponkilainen fullname: Ponkilainen, Ville T. organization: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Central Finland Hospital Nova – sequence: 3 givenname: Mikko M. surname: Uimonen fullname: Uimonen, Mikko M. organization: Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Central Finland Hospital Nova – sequence: 4 givenname: Antti surname: Eskelinen fullname: Eskelinen, Antti organization: COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University – sequence: 5 givenname: Aleksi surname: Reito fullname: Reito, Aleksi organization: COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Tampere, Tampere University Hospital |
| BookMark | eNp9ks1unDAUhVGVqvlpX6ArpG66IbWxMbiLSlHUn0iRuknXlrEv4BGDqe2ZNH2yPl4vM6mSiaoIIeDec76L7XOaHU1-gix7S8k5pY34EGnZSFqQEm_OalmUL7ITymtalLzmR4_ej7PTGFeE0Lph8lV2zDjhsiqbk-zPDcTkpj5PA-Rz8LMPyflJj_mgf-tgY65j3KznpZi7KTf-Vx6gDxDjUtGTzS3ocSHcujTks8dGO0KO_1o85rl0t_iTT8heeTelXIc0oGLUEXtIBB3M8DFfQxq89aPvnUHtDCHOYJLbQtzNC7B1cPs6e9npMcKb--dZ9uPL55vLb8X1969XlxfXhakanorGlMZoA7LjxErQrGpa1tGaESJsVYuqoqXRlNHWolLWRFvdsNYIibulCWFn2dWea71eqTm4tQ53ymundgUfeoXrcGYERagVxtQNsaLjAicJw4kpW44fAiqJrE971rxp12ANTCno8QB62JncoHq_VQ0VtKoZAt7fA4L_ucGTU2sXDYyjnsBvoiorxgWtpRQoffdEuvKbgAexqDjjUnIqH1S9xgW4qfM41yxQdSFExata0hJV5_9R4WVh7QyGsnNYPzA0e4MJmIcAnTIu6SUIaHSjokQtCVb7BCtMsNolWC3W8on13_Y8a2J7U0Tx1EN4WOwzrr_CvQjF |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1161_JAHA_122_026014 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_024_02103_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0310712 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2025_107713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2024_108125 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12561_024_09461_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dadr_2022_100121 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2024_108513 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_024_03022_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_02664763_2024_2444649 crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_30046 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43546_025_00854_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0276440 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11152194 crossref_primary_10_1002_sta4_497 crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehae170 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2021_106857 crossref_primary_10_2147_JIR_S440425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaad_2024_01_078 crossref_primary_10_1093_jopart_muaf021 crossref_primary_10_3233_SJI_240073 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healun_2024_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40620_025_02339_w crossref_primary_10_1177_01945998221095720 crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCULATIONAHA_124_071418 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_023_07371_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_025_06408_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13690_024_01489_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2022_859401 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuchi_2024_101567 crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2022_2108617 crossref_primary_10_1097_TXD_0000000000001529 crossref_primary_10_5847_wjem_j_1920_8642_2024_096 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e28780 crossref_primary_10_1177_15412040231222425 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_52675 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_5586353 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_24_01169 crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2022_987205 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42399_022_01367_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10899_025_10415_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2025_01_048 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000039582 crossref_primary_10_1080_14796694_2024_2426443 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1029165 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2022_977034 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2023_075062 crossref_primary_10_1002_brb3_3478 crossref_primary_10_1080_19427867_2024_2391168 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_025_05237_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2023_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_sifp_12222 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envint_2025_109403 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40959_024_00269_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcdd10020042 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0047279422000563 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_29167_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiochem_2025_110891 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2025_1645046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tbs_2025_100989 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2023_03_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2024_10_302 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00198_024_07051_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tra_2024_103994 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14182076 crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciac824 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajt_2024_12_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2023_e20942 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ypmed_2024_108214 crossref_primary_10_1177_10732748251359401 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_024_07017_6 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0329000 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjms_2024_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_048784 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11764_023_01503_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrimjus_2024_102234 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14020280 crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_6256 crossref_primary_10_1080_15287394_2023_2181249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exger_2024_112641 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2024_12_018 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_025_07264_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9259 crossref_primary_10_1002_cesm_70041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacc_2023_07_012 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16234033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajpc_2025_100994 crossref_primary_10_62347_DWPA1730 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2024_117180 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_110118 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001 10.1002/sim.4274 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x 10.1186/1471-2288-13-152 10.1371/journal.pone.0239598 10.21037/atm.2018.02.12 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376423 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271 10.1001/jama.2020.1267 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170064 10.2307/2532873 10.1056/NEJMp1011024 10.1186/s12878-016-0055-7 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X 10.1371/journal.pone.0154870 10.3109/17453674.2011.588862 10.1002/sim.3623 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.003 10.1136/bmj.b2535 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 10.3109/17453671003587168 10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.017 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO;2-B 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986753 10.1126/science.283.5403.789 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QP 7RV 7TK 7TS 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. KB0 M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12891-021-04379-2 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China Physical Education Index ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1471-2474 |
| EndPage | 7 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_01d6cc780d6f463586c40c2b44636e59 PMC8161573 A665457912 10_1186_s12891_021_04379_2 |
| GeographicLocations | Finland |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Finland |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX AFFHD CITATION 3V. 7QP 7TK 7TS 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-8c2ccace9f40d9ea358b3f173006d5765512ca131bdc2c970ada83bc69001a003 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 109 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000659116100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1471-2474 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 14 19:03:05 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:59:49 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 06:24:06 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 09 21:51:24 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:20:20 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:30:41 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 02:27:44 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:53:41 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:29:13 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Methodology Survival analysis Reproducibility |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c584t-8c2ccace9f40d9ea358b3f173006d5765512ca131bdc2c970ada83bc69001a003 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8178-9610 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/01d6cc780d6f463586c40c2b44636e59 |
| PMID | 34049528 |
| PQID | 2543499419 |
| PQPubID | 44767 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_01d6cc780d6f463586c40c2b44636e59 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8161573 proquest_miscellaneous_2534617996 proquest_journals_2543499419 gale_infotracmisc_A665457912 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A665457912 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12891_021_04379_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_021_04379_2 springer_journals_10_1186_s12891_021_04379_2 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2021-05-28 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-05-28 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2021 text: 2021-05-28 day: 28 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC musculoskeletal disorders |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Musculoskelet Disord |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | A Turkiewicz (4379_CR17) 2018; 26 4379_CR25 FE Bloom (4379_CR27) 1999; 283 4379_CR6 S Greenland (4379_CR16) 2016; 31 P Royston (4379_CR11) 2011; 30 ME Porter (4379_CR1) 2010; 363 JP Vandenbroucke (4379_CR22) 2009; 62 P Bacchetti (4379_CR26) 2002; 324 D Moher (4379_CR14) 2009; 339 EL Kaplan (4379_CR18) 1958; 53 DR Cox (4379_CR5) 1972; 34 M Schemper (4379_CR8) 2009; 28 A Lübbeke (4379_CR2) 2018; 3 N Mantel (4379_CR19) 1959; 22 E von Elm (4379_CR24) 2007; 370 DJ Biau (4379_CR20) 2007; 462 P Royston (4379_CR9) 2013; 13 J Ranstam (4379_CR15) 2012; 20 DW Murray (4379_CR3) 1993; 75 J Ranstam (4379_CR23) 2011; 82 DG Altman (4379_CR28) 1998; 17 J Ranstam (4379_CR4) 2010; 81 AC Plint (4379_CR21) 2006; 185 4379_CR12 C Chai-Adisaksopha (4379_CR13) 2016; 16 Z Zhang (4379_CR7) 2018; 6 MJ Stensrud (4379_CR10) 2020; 323 |
| References_xml | – volume: 20 start-page: 805 issue: 8 year: 2012 ident: 4379_CR15 publication-title: Osteoarthr Cartil doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001 – volume: 30 start-page: 2409 issue: 19 year: 2011 ident: 4379_CR11 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4274 – volume: 185 start-page: 263 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 4379_CR21 publication-title: Med J Aust doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x – volume: 13 start-page: 152 year: 2013 ident: 4379_CR9 publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-152 – ident: 4379_CR25 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239598 – volume: 6 start-page: 121 issue: 7 year: 2018 ident: 4379_CR7 publication-title: Ann Transl Med doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.02.12 – volume: 31 start-page: 337 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 4379_CR16 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 – volume: 75 start-page: 697 issue: 5 year: 1993 ident: 4379_CR3 publication-title: J Bone Joint Surg Br doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376423 – volume: 22 start-page: 719 issue: 4 year: 1959 ident: 4379_CR19 publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 324 start-page: 1271 issue: 7348 year: 2002 ident: 4379_CR26 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7348.1271 – volume: 323 start-page: 1401 issue: 14 year: 2020 ident: 4379_CR10 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1267 – volume: 3 start-page: 160 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 4379_CR2 publication-title: EFORT Open Rev. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170064 – ident: 4379_CR6 doi: 10.2307/2532873 – volume: 363 start-page: 2477 issue: 26 year: 2010 ident: 4379_CR1 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024 – volume: 16 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 4379_CR13 publication-title: BMC Hematol doi: 10.1186/s12878-016-0055-7 – volume: 370 start-page: 1453 issue: 9596 year: 2007 ident: 4379_CR24 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X – ident: 4379_CR12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154870 – volume: 82 start-page: 253 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 4379_CR23 publication-title: Acta Orthop. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.588862 – volume: 28 start-page: 2473 issue: 19 year: 2009 ident: 4379_CR8 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.3623 – volume: 62 start-page: 594 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 4379_CR22 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.003 – volume: 339 start-page: b2535 issue: jul21 1 year: 2009 ident: 4379_CR14 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535 – volume: 53 start-page: 457 issue: 282 year: 1958 ident: 4379_CR18 publication-title: J Amer Stat Assoc doi: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 – volume: 81 start-page: 10 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 4379_CR4 publication-title: Acta Orthop doi: 10.3109/17453671003587168 – volume: 26 start-page: 1409 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: 4379_CR17 publication-title: Osteoarthr Cartil doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.07.017 – volume: 17 start-page: 2661 issue: 23 year: 1998 ident: 4379_CR28 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981215)17:23<2661::AID-SIM33>3.0.CO;2-B – volume: 462 start-page: 229 year: 2007 ident: 4379_CR20 publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986753 – volume: 283 start-page: 789 issue: 5403 year: 1999 ident: 4379_CR27 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.283.5403.789 – volume: 34 start-page: 187 issue: 2 year: 1972 ident: 4379_CR5 publication-title: J R Stat Soc B (Methodological) doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x |
| SSID | ssj0017839 |
| Score | 2.5971744 |
| Snippet | Background
Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold... Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold... Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as a gold standard in... Abstract Background Survival analysis and effect of covariates on survival time is a central research interest. Cox proportional hazards regression remains as... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Arthroplasty Complications Epidemiology Estimates Event history analysis Hip Internal Medicine Joint surgery Knee Mathematical models Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methodology Methods Musculoskeletal diseases Orthopedics Orthopedics and biomechanics Regression analysis Rehabilitation Reproducibility Research Article Rheumatology Risk assessment Sports Medicine Statistical analysis Surgery Surgery, Experimental Surgical research Survival Survival analysis Systematic review |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Nb9QwELWgcODCV0EECjISggNETZxsbHNBC6LiVHEo0t4sx_Z-oOKEJK0Kv4yfx4yT7BIqeuGwl9hO7Ozz-I3jeUPIC1YK7QprY2YxJEcmNhZmWcTA_XWuUQ2P2ZBsgh8fi8VCfh423NrhWOVoE4OhtpXBPfJDDNoGdp6n8l39PcasUfh1dUihcZ3cwLTZiHO-2DpcKYfVfwyUEcVhC7YYz_kw-KEMX8wmi1HQ7L9smS-flvzrk2lYiY7u_O8Y7pLbAwel8x4098g15--T_bkH__vbD_qShlOhYbt9n_w6QRkOv6JAFGmNKRWafveQrvVPDNiiwL4BEniRbjw11QVt3Ko_Xeup9pZa4KJ4B9zypXWFk_DUUV_5-M_7gTeA7bsKvAH6tdr4jgKqMYkD8HsoG1SJ1m9pn_R6NNq03oWLtuF5fTTOA_Ll6OPJh0_xkO0hNkCCOoAIAzQZJ5d5YqXT2UyU2TJFPf3CglcE1I4ZnWZpaaGm5Im2WmSlAfcecAXG6SHZg667R4TmHFX7MqklN0AQMw28R2tbAtUBB02nEUnHv12ZQQodM3KcquASiUL1UFEAFRWgolhEXm_b1L0QyJW13yOatjVRxDtcqJqVGmyCSlJbGMNFYotlDsRPFCZPDCtzFHFzMxmRV4hFhaYGugcvp4-YgEGiaJeaY-boGZcpPO5gUhNMhJkWj3hUg4lq1Q6MEXm-LcaWeOzOu-oM62R5gZqBRUT4ZBZMRjYt8Zt1kCkX6EzwLCJvxvmye_i_39zjq_v6hNxiYQLPYiYOyF7XnLmn5KY57zZt8yxM_98cmmc3 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZQQYgLjxZEoKBBQnCAiMRJHIfbgqi4UCFRUG-WY3sfqDirbIqAX8bPY8ZJtoQCEhxyie3YiceTb-yZbxh7yGupnbA25pZCcqrExtLMRYzYX-ea2PC4DckmysNDeXxcvR2Cwjajt_t4JBk0dVjWUjzboCYlLx2OF5Hoxah4LxbENkM2-rsP27ODEv_5Y3jMb9tNfkGBqf-8Pj7vI_nLQWn4_xxc-7-RX2dXB7wJs15AbrALzu-yvZlHW_vTV3gEwQM0bK3vsstvhoP2Pfb9iNg3_AIQH8KaMim0_aYhLPU3itMCBN0oCXQTVh5M8wVat-idaj1ob8EiBKUn0E4vrBtaeycOfOPjn5-HRgC17xo0AuBjs_IdoDBT7gaE9Vg2kBEtn0Of63rU1bA-ixLdhP76IJyb7P3Bq6OXr-MhyUNsEPt0KBkchci4ap4ntnI6K2SdzVOi0RcWjSFEdNzoNEtrizWrMtFWy6w2aNWjOKFOusV2cOjuNoO8JLK-rNJVaRAXZhrhjta2RoSDdplOI5aO867MwIBOiThOVLCEpFD9TCmcKRVmSvGIPdm2Wff8H3-t_YLEaVuTuLvDjaZdqEEVqCS1wphSJlbMc8R7Upg8MbzOibvNFVXEHpMwKtIwODz8OH2gBL4kcXWpGSWMLsoqxe72JzVRM5hp8SjOatBMG0XkB2jl5in282BbTC3J28675pTqZLkgqkARsXKyDCZvNi3xq2VgJ5dkQ5RZxJ6Oi-Gs8z9_uTv_Vv0uu8LDeipiLvfZTteeunvskvncrTbt_aAPfgDf8WCP priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-021-04379-2 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2543499419 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2534617996 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8161573 https://doaj.org/article/01d6cc780d6f463586c40c2b44636e59 |
| Volume | 22 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000659116100001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMedCentral customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20000101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature Consortium list (Orbis Cascade Alliance) customDbUrl: eissn: 1471-2474 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017839 issn: 1471-2474 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20001201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Bb9MwFLZgcOCCgIEIjMpICA4QLXFS2-HWoU1woKrKmMrJcmx3LRpO1WYI-GX8PN5zkm5hAi4cEimxEzt-z_b3HL_vEfKMlVI7bm3MLLrkFImNpZnzGLC_zjWy4TEbgk2I8VjOZsXkUqgv3BPW0AM3DbefpJYbI2Ri-TyH2VFykyeGlTkyXblhcN1LRNEZU-3_AwHzfuciI_n-BkZh3OHD4EACvpj1pqHA1n91TL66T_K3n6VhDjq6Q2634JGOmkrfJdecv0d2Rx4M5y_f6XMatnOGdfJd8vMY-TP8KQWER1cYC2HdLPvRhf6BnlYUYDPIEm_Spaem-kbX7rTZFuup9pZaAJH4BlyrpasKe8-Zo77y8eX3AYzH5-sKYDz9XC19TaFVMfoCAHNIa-mEFq9pE626G23p6sLPcxPKa9xo7pOPR4fHb97GbZiG2AB6qUG2DNTAuGKeJ7ZwGmRUZvMUifC5BXMGMBkzOs3S0kLOQiTaapmVBuxyUAgYVR6QHai6e0hoLpBuLyt0IQwgu0wDYNHaloBRwLLSaUTSTmrKtBzmGErjTAVbRnLVSFqBpFWQtGIRebl9ZtUwePw19wEqwzYnsm-HG6CTqtVJ9S-djMgLVCWFYwRUDxqncXWAj0S2LTXCkM9DUaRQ3F4vJ_Rt00_ulFG1Y8tGIX0B2Kl5CuU83Sbjk7hfzrvqHPNkOUeyPx4R0VPi3pf1U_xyEfjFJVoBIovIq07dLwr_c8s9-h8t95jcYqGXDmMm98hOvT53T8hN87VebtYDcl1MT_A8E-EsB-TGweF4Mh2E3g9Xk3fvJ5_gavrh5Be0RV9d |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEB6VFAkuvArCUGCReBzAqr12_EBCKDyqVm2jHIJUTst6d_NAxQ6JC5QfxZmfx8zaTjAVvfXAIRfvw-PNzOzM7sw3AI94lkgTae1yTSk5qafdRI0iF21_GUpCw-PaFpuI-_3k8DAdrMHPJheGwiobnWgVtS4UnZFvUdI2Wuehn76afXGpahTdrjYlNCq22DMn39BlW7zcfYv_72POt98N3-y4dVUBV-FmWyIpHKlWJh2Fnk6NDLpJFox8wm2PNFrfaEJwJf3AzzT2TGNPapkEmUI3EulHIcB5L8B6iMzudWB9sHsw-LC8t4jR3mhSc5Joa4HanyKLOP4I-M_lre3PVgk4vRecjs_865LW7n3bV_-3VbsGV2orm_UqsbgOaya_ARu9XJbF5xP2hNm4V3uhsAG_hgQ0ko8ZmsJsRkUj5tX5KJvIH5SSxtC_QKanh2yaM1V8Z3MzruKHcyZzzTRa2zQDHWqzWUFq5siwvMjdP-dDf4fGlwX6O-xTMc1LhnJLZSrQg8G2Gndp8oJVZb2bbYnNVgmxC_u-Kt_oJrw_lzW8BR0k3dwGFsaESxikMo0VmsCBRMtOSp2hMYcuqPQd8Bs2E6oGe6eaI0fCOn1JJCrWFMiawrKm4A48W46ZVVAnZ_Z-Tdy77Ekw5fZBMR-LWusJz9eRUnHi6WgUommbRCr0FM9Cgqkz3dSBp8T7gpQpkoeLU-WE4EcSLJnoUW3sbpz6-LrNVk9Ugqrd3PC_qJXwQqyY34GHy2YaSYGFuSmOqU8QRoSKGDkQt6Su9WXtlnw6sUDsCblLceDA80Y-Vy__98rdOZvWB3BpZ3iwL_Z3-3t34TK3yqPr8mQTOuX82NyDi-prOV3M79fKh8HH85bc37_ZxY4 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELZQQRUXHi2IbQsYCcEBoiZONnG4LY8VCFhVUFBvlmM7u4uKE2VTBPwyfh4zdrJtKCAhDrnEdhzH48k39sw3hNxnBZcm1TpgGkNy8lAHXJVpANhfJhLZ8Jh2ySay2YwfHeUHZ6L4nbd7fyTpYxqQpcm2-7Uu_RLn6f4KtCp67DC4kFAvACV8MQFLBp263r3_uD5HyOD_34fK_Lbd4HfkWPvP6-bz_pK_HJq6f9H06v-P4hq50uFQOvGCc51cMHaLbE8s2OCfv9EH1HmGui33LbL5tjuA3yY_DpGVw84p4EZaY4aFxm8m0oX8jvFbFMA4SAjepEtLVfWVNmbunW0tlVZTDdAUn4A7wLSucE0eG2orG5x9HhgH2L6twDign6qlbSkIOeZ0ALgPZR1J0eIJ9Tmwex1O69Po0ZXrzwfn3CAfpi8On70MuuQPgQJM1ILEMBAuZfIyCXVuZDzmRVxGSK-fajCSAOkxJaM4KjTUzLNQasnjQoG1D2IGuuom2YBXN7cITTIk8YtzmWcK8GIsAQZJqQtAPmCvyWhEol4GhOqY0TFBx7FwFhJPhZ8pATMl3EwJNiKP1m1qzwvy19pPUbTWNZHT292omrnoVIQII50qlfFQp2UCOJCnKgkVKxLkdDPjfEQeomAK1DzwevBxfAAFDBI5vMQEE0mPszyC7vYGNUFjqGFxL9qi01grgaQIYP0mEfRzb12MLdELz5rqBOvESYoUgumIZIMlMRjZsMQuF461nKNtkcUj8rhfGKed__nL7fxb9btk8-D5VLx5NXu9Sy4zt7TGAeN7ZKNtTsxtckl9aZer5o5TEz8ByalsVw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing+the+proportional+hazards+assumption+in+cox+regression+and+dealing+with+possible+non-proportionality+in+total+joint+arthroplasty+research%3A+methodological+perspectives+and+review&rft.jtitle=BMC+musculoskeletal+disorders&rft.au=Ilari+Kuitunen&rft.au=Ville+T.+Ponkilainen&rft.au=Mikko+M.+Uimonen&rft.au=Antti+Eskelinen&rft.date=2021-05-28&rft.pub=BMC&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12891-021-04379-2&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_01d6cc780d6f463586c40c2b44636e59 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2474&client=summon |