The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke
Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of ca...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine Ročník 23; číslo 1; s. 606 - 15 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
London
BioMed Central
27.07.2022
BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1745-6215, 1745-6215 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Background
Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.
Methods
Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.
Discussion
ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.
Trial registration
ISRCTN registry
ISRCTN97744893
. Registered on 05 July 2012 |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Abstract Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque. Methods Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death. Discussion ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012 Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque. Methods Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death. Discussion ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893. Registered on 05 July 2012 Keywords: Carotid stenosis, Ischaemic stroke, Carotid endarterectomy, Carotid stenting, Risk prediction, Magnetic resonance imaging, Plaque imaging, Randomised controlled trial BackgroundCarotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.MethodsPatients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.DiscussionECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.Trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893. Registered on 05 July 2012 Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque. Methods Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death. Discussion ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012 Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.BACKGROUNDCarotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis ≥50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque.Patients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.METHODSPatients are randomised between immediate revascularisation plus OMT versus OMT alone. Suitable patients are those with asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50% with an estimated 5-year risk of stroke of <20%, as calculated using the Carotid Artery Risk score. MRI of the brain at baseline and during follow-up will be used as a blinded measure to assess the incidence of silent infarction and haemorrhage, while carotid plaque MRI at baseline will be used to investigate the hypotheses that plaque characteristics determine future stroke risk and help identify a subgroup of patients that will benefit from revascularisation. An initial analysis will be conducted after recruitment of 320 patients with baseline MRI and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, to provide data to inform the design and sample size for a continuation or re-launch of the study. The primary outcome measure of this initial analysis is the combined 2-year rate of any clinically manifest stroke, new cerebral infarct on MRI, myocardial infarction or periprocedural death.ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.DISCUSSIONECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis.ISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012.TRIAL REGISTRATIONISRCTN registry ISRCTN97744893 . Registered on 05 July 2012. Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years ago. Several factors such as carotid plaque ulceration, age and associated comorbidities might influence the risk-benefit ratio of carotid revascularisation. A model developed in previous trials that calculates the future risk of stroke based on these features can be used to stratify patients into low, intermediate or high risk. Since the original trials, medical treatment has improved significantly. Our hypothesis is that patients with carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50% associated with a low to intermediate risk of stroke will not benefit from additional carotid revascularisation when treated with optimised medical therapy. We also hypothesise that prediction of future risk of stroke in individual patients with carotid stenosis can be improved using the results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the carotid plaque. ECST-2 will provide new data on the efficacy of modern optimal medical therapy alone versus added carotid revascularisation in patients with carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of future stroke selected by individualised risk assessment. We anticipate that the results of baseline brain and carotid plaque MRI will provide data to improve the prediction of the risk of stroke and the effect of treatment in patients with carotid stenosis. |
| ArticleNumber | 606 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | de Borst, Gert J. Richards, Toby Kooi, M. Eline Brown, Martin M. Nederkoorn, Paul J. Gregson, John Bonati, Leo H. van Velzen, Twan J. Jäger, Hans Rolf Simister, Robert Cheng, Suk Fun Pizzini, Francesca B. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Suk Fun surname: Cheng fullname: Cheng, Suk Fun organization: Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London – sequence: 2 givenname: Twan J. surname: van Velzen fullname: van Velzen, Twan J. organization: Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam – sequence: 3 givenname: John surname: Gregson fullname: Gregson, John organization: Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine – sequence: 4 givenname: Toby surname: Richards fullname: Richards, Toby organization: Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Surgery, University of Western Australia – sequence: 5 givenname: Hans Rolf surname: Jäger fullname: Jäger, Hans Rolf organization: Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – sequence: 6 givenname: Robert surname: Simister fullname: Simister, Robert organization: Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Comprehensive Stroke Service, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – sequence: 7 givenname: M. Eline surname: Kooi fullname: Kooi, M. Eline organization: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University – sequence: 8 givenname: Gert J. surname: de Borst fullname: de Borst, Gert J. organization: Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center – sequence: 9 givenname: Francesca B. surname: Pizzini fullname: Pizzini, Francesca B. organization: Radiology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona – sequence: 10 givenname: Paul J. surname: Nederkoorn fullname: Nederkoorn, Paul J. organization: Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam – sequence: 11 givenname: Martin M. orcidid: 0000-0002-3273-1356 surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Martin M. email: martin.brown@ucl.ac.uk organization: Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London – sequence: 12 givenname: Leo H. surname: Bonati fullname: Bonati, Leo H. organization: Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Research Department, Reha Rheinfelden |
| BookMark | eNp9k01v1DAQhgMqoh_wA-BkiUs5pDh27DgckKpVgUqVOHQ5W45j77pN4mA7rba_ntlsVdoKVTk4Gr_vY49n5jDbG_xgsuxjgU-KQvAvsaCY0xwTkmNekjq_e50dFFXJck4Ktvfofz87jPEK45LWtHyb7VMm6qooyoNXH5Zrg8jQorMp-NGoAS1U8Mm16HIKKxM2aBmc6tDx2eJymZPPX1FQyflBdQYpsI0g9tp3yPqAFGwOre9dNC3SnRucBmuaAdr3owpuWCHX96Z1KhkUzI2KeuogHmcqujEhThH5MbkdZSudIWsT1LhBqoM3QG5AIxjMkCK6dWmN4qYfk-8hpudrqccBfZ9RTGbw0UWkEur8LUoeQMmEh-u4eI28BV3w1-Zd9saqLpr39-tR9vv72XLxM7_49eN8cXqRaybKlJe2JZWuYaGsYZWlvG6sKrTgShDGNLENLgnUwDaNsCURxlaCY1uRlrCmqulRdr7jtl5dyTG4XoWN9MrJOeDDSqoAaXRGKs5oayiuKt6UtKwbIZQoTS0oplbVJbC-7Vjj1EBWGh4oqO4J9OnO4NZy5W9kTYnghAHg-B4Q_J_JxCShDNp0nRqMn6IkvOYYc8YISD89k175KUBjgEpgwaqyoo9UK-gY6Qbr4Vy9hcpT6MCKs5psVSf_UcHXmt5pqLh1EH9iIDuDDj7GYOxDjgWW2-GQu-GQMBxyHg55BybxzKRdmvsOTnPdy1a6s8Zx28Mm_Ev2Bddf-iEq2g |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_23736_S0021_9509_23_12624_3 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0392_9590_25_05424_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2024_09_042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_024_01146_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_025_03112_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcin_2024_03_014 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_122_042172 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hjc_2025_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_CRD_0000000000000497 crossref_primary_10_1177_17474930241264734 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2023_11_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics15131679 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_124_050020 crossref_primary_10_3390_life14010073 crossref_primary_10_1161_SVIN_125_001844 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_13951 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2023_03_502 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_124_048689 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_124_046129 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_avsg_2025_09_013 crossref_primary_10_1136_pn_2023_003918 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0392_9590_25_05308_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvs_2024_02_035 crossref_primary_10_1161_STROKEAHA_125_051981 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2175_4029 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1474_4422_25_00107_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_01616412_2025_2523907 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16146-1 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.01.011 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016051 10.1056/NEJMoa1802712 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61009-4 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.151 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.579888 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X 10.3174/ajnr.A5488 10.1161/01.STR.0000054671.71777.C7 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015 10.4414/cvm.2017.00499 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309115 10.1007/s00270-005-0384-6 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 10.1093/brain/awq127 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 10.1159/000313614 10.1161/01.STR.26.7.1231 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01309-4 10.1161/01.STR.22.6.711 10.1159/000477501 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837 10.1056/NEJMoa070972 10.1001/archneur.63.12.1730 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70156-2 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555052 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11415-0 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.005 10.1177/1747493019833017 10.1056/NEJMoa061894 10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035 10.1212/01.WNL.0000169031.39264.ff 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516450 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007870 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 10.1161/hc4201.097839 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30035-3 10.1002/bjs.11136 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500603 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a711cb |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022 COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022. The Author(s). |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022. The Author(s). |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. KB0 M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-022-06429-z |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1745-6215 |
| EndPage | 15 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_a653de30776b4349b88a84e98303fa94 PMC9328625 A711765922 10_1186_s13063_022_06429_z |
| GeographicLocations | United States United Kingdom--UK Netherlands |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: Netherlands – name: United Kingdom--UK |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institute for Health Research grantid: PB-PG-0609-19216 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272 – fundername: ; grantid: PB-PG-0609-19216 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 2-G 29Q 2WC 53G 5VS 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEGXH AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHYZX AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OVT PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP WOQ WOW ~8M AAYXX AFFHD CITATION 3V. 5GY 7XB 8FK AHMBA AZQEC COVID DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS XSB 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c584t-4fd27c94fd35b57f369bfa1c86a8255c2fb042215fbb8f428ef7860f72d25b793 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 30 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000831214700008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1745-6215 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 14 19:04:26 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:51:22 EST 2025 Sun Nov 09 12:58:42 EST 2025 Sun Oct 19 01:29:31 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:17:59 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 17:52:32 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:10:05 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:40:40 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:26:41 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Carotid stenosis Plaque imaging Carotid stenting Carotid endarterectomy Magnetic resonance imaging Randomised controlled trial Risk prediction Ischaemic stroke |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c584t-4fd27c94fd35b57f369bfa1c86a8255c2fb042215fbb8f428ef7860f72d25b793 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-3 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3273-1356 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/a653de30776b4349b88a84e98303fa94 |
| PMID | 35897114 |
| PQID | 2808574732 |
| PQPubID | 44365 |
| PageCount | 15 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a653de30776b4349b88a84e98303fa94 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9328625 proquest_miscellaneous_2696006552 proquest_journals_2808574732 gale_infotracmisc_A711765922 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A711765922 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_022_06429_z crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13063_022_06429_z springer_journals_10_1186_s13063_022_06429_z |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-07-27 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-07-27 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2022 text: 2022-07-27 day: 27 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Trials |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd Springer Nature B.V BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: BMC |
| References | P Dolan (6429_CR40) 1997; 35 HJ Barnett (6429_CR3) 1998; 339 HJ Milionis (6429_CR25) 2009; 72 6429_CR1 MD Müller (6429_CR31) 2019; 12 TG Brott (6429_CR44) 2010; 363 M Sitzer (6429_CR35) 1995; 26 L Biasco (6429_CR22) 2017; 20 RM Kwee (6429_CR36) 2009; 40 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (6429_CR47) 1991; 325 T Saam (6429_CR48) 2013; 62 P Amarenco (6429_CR26) 2006; 355 J Ederle (6429_CR46) 2010; 375 AL Abbott (6429_CR28) 2009; 40 C Yuan (6429_CR37) 2001; 104 DJ McCabe (6429_CR39) 2005; 36 A Schindler (6429_CR18) 2020; 13 A Halliday (6429_CR6) 2004; 363 MW Vernooij (6429_CR12) 2007; 357 P Amarenco (6429_CR20) 2018; 378 A Halliday (6429_CR7) 2010; 376 PM Rothwell (6429_CR4) 2005; 365 GA Mensah (6429_CR21) 2017; 120 T Reiff (6429_CR51) 2020; 15 SB Coutts (6429_CR42) 2005; 65 JH Fu (6429_CR17) 2010; 30 Z Shah (6429_CR29) 2017; 44 H Sillesen (6429_CR24) 2008; 39 PM Rothwell (6429_CR5) 1999; 353 6429_CR32 S Schnaudigel (6429_CR14) 2008; 39 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (6429_CR38) 1991; 22 N Cheung (6429_CR13) 2010; 133 M Canyigit (6429_CR15) 2007; 30 LH Bonati (6429_CR9) 2012; 9 SF Cheng (6429_CR33) 2017; 30 L Saba (6429_CR34) 2018; 39 ST Pendlebury (6429_CR41) 2010; 41 European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (6429_CR2) 1998; 351 L Saba (6429_CR49) 2019; 18 C Carotid Stenting Trialists (6429_CR10) 2010; 376 DW Kang (6429_CR43) 2006; 63 AR Naylor (6429_CR27) 2011; 9 MD Walker (6429_CR8) 1995; 273 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (6429_CR23) 2002; 360 PW Wilson (6429_CR45) 1998; 97 M Mott (6429_CR50) 2017; 48 G Howard (6429_CR11) 2016; 387 K Rerkasem (6429_CR30) 2009; 37 PM Rothwell (6429_CR19) 2003; 34 LH Bonati (6429_CR16) 2010; 9 |
| References_xml | – volume: 363 start-page: 1491 issue: 9420 year: 2004 ident: 6429_CR6 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16146-1 – volume: 37 start-page: 504 issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 6429_CR30 publication-title: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.01.011 – volume: 48 start-page: e130 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 6429_CR50 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016051 – volume: 378 start-page: 2182 issue: 23 year: 2018 ident: 6429_CR20 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802712 – volume: 376 start-page: 1062 issue: 9746 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR10 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61009-4 – volume: 9 start-page: 116 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 6429_CR27 publication-title: Nat Rev Cardiol doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.151 – volume: 13 start-page: 395 issue: 2 Pt 1 year: 2020 ident: 6429_CR18 publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.028 – volume: 41 start-page: 1290 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR41 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.579888 – volume: 376 start-page: 1074 issue: 9746 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR7 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X – volume: 39 start-page: E9 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 6429_CR34 publication-title: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5488 – volume: 34 start-page: 514 year: 2003 ident: 6429_CR19 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000054671.71777.C7 – volume: 62 start-page: 1081 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 6429_CR48 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015 – volume: 20 start-page: 169 issue: 708 year: 2017 ident: 6429_CR22 publication-title: Cardiovasc Med doi: 10.4414/cvm.2017.00499 – volume: 40 start-page: e573 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: 6429_CR28 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.556068 – volume: 120 start-page: 366 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 6429_CR21 publication-title: Circ Res doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309115 – volume: 30 start-page: 189 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 6429_CR15 publication-title: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0384-6 – volume: 363 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR44 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321 – volume: 9 start-page: CD000515 year: 2012 ident: 6429_CR9 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 133 start-page: 1987 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR13 publication-title: Brain doi: 10.1093/brain/awq127 – volume: 325 start-page: 445 year: 1991 ident: 6429_CR47 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 – volume: 30 start-page: 51 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR17 publication-title: Cerebrovasc Dis doi: 10.1159/000313614 – volume: 26 start-page: 1231 issue: 7 year: 1995 ident: 6429_CR35 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.26.7.1231 – volume: 339 start-page: 1415 issue: 20 year: 1998 ident: 6429_CR3 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJM199811123392002 – volume: 387 start-page: 1305 issue: 10025 year: 2016 ident: 6429_CR11 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01309-4 – volume: 22 start-page: 711 year: 1991 ident: 6429_CR38 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.22.6.711 – volume: 44 start-page: 150 issue: 3-4 year: 2017 ident: 6429_CR29 publication-title: Cerebrovasc Dis doi: 10.1159/000477501 – volume: 97 start-page: 1837 issue: 18 year: 1998 ident: 6429_CR45 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837 – volume: 357 start-page: 1821 issue: 18 year: 2007 ident: 6429_CR12 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070972 – ident: 6429_CR32 – volume: 63 start-page: 1730 issue: 12 year: 2006 ident: 6429_CR43 publication-title: Arch Neurol doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.12.1730 – volume: 9 start-page: 353 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR16 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0 – volume: 365 start-page: 256 issue: 9455 year: 2005 ident: 6429_CR4 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70156-2 – volume: 375 start-page: 985 issue: 9719 year: 2010 ident: 6429_CR46 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60239-5 – volume: 40 start-page: 3017 issue: 9 year: 2009 ident: 6429_CR36 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555052 – volume: 353 start-page: 2105 issue: 9170 year: 1999 ident: 6429_CR5 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11415-0 – volume: 30 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 6429_CR33 publication-title: Semin Vasc Surg doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2017.04.005 – volume: 15 start-page: 638 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 6429_CR51 publication-title: Int J Stroke doi: 10.1177/1747493019833017 – volume: 355 start-page: 549 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 6429_CR26 publication-title: New Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061894 – volume: 273 start-page: 1421 issue: 18 year: 1995 ident: 6429_CR8 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035 – volume: 65 start-page: 513 issue: 4 year: 2005 ident: 6429_CR42 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000169031.39264.ff – volume: 39 start-page: 3297 issue: 12 year: 2008 ident: 6429_CR24 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.516450 – volume: 36 start-page: 281 year: 2005 ident: 6429_CR39 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000152333.75932.fe – volume: 360 start-page: 7 issue: 9326 year: 2002 ident: 6429_CR23 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3 – volume: 12 start-page: e007870 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 6429_CR31 publication-title: Circ Cardiovasc Interv doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007870 – volume: 351 start-page: 1379 issue: 9113 year: 1998 ident: 6429_CR2 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 – volume: 35 start-page: 1095 issue: 11 year: 1997 ident: 6429_CR40 publication-title: Med Care doi: 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 – volume: 104 start-page: 2051 issue: 17 year: 2001 ident: 6429_CR37 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097839 – volume: 18 start-page: 559 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 6429_CR49 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30035-3 – ident: 6429_CR1 doi: 10.1002/bjs.11136 – volume: 39 start-page: 1911 issue: 6 year: 2008 ident: 6429_CR14 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.500603 – volume: 72 start-page: 1816 issue: 21 year: 2009 ident: 6429_CR25 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a711cb |
| SSID | ssj0043934 ssj0017864 |
| Score | 2.4474545 |
| Snippet | Background
Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted... Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50%, based on... Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis [greater than or equal to]50%, based on randomised... BackgroundCarotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30... Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials conducted 30 years... Abstract Background Carotid endarterectomy is currently recommended for patients with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥50%, based on randomised trials... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 606 |
| SubjectTerms | Asymptomatic Atherosclerosis Biomedicine Brain research Carotid arteries Carotid endarterectomy Carotid stenosis Carotid stenting Clinical trials Diagnosis Evaluation Health Sciences Hypotheses Ischaemic stroke Ischemia Magnetic resonance imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Patients Risk factors Risk prediction Statistics for Life Sciences Stenosis Stroke Stroke (Disease) Study Protocol Surgery |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database dbid: 7RV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwEDcwEOKFb0RgoENCAgTRqPNhhxc0pk08wIRYQXuLbMeGaG1ckhS0_fWcHaejTOyFvlSKz40v_eV85zv_TMhTQyuFHxErU-Vxmoki5hVL4iTNE0mFYVJ4yvwPbH-fHx4Wn8KCWxfKKkeb6A11ZZVbI9-i3HGxpyyhbxc_YndqlMuuhiM0LpHLEzd3I57Z56-rLALjeTpulOH5Vof22mctaezc7iI-WZuMPGf_Wct8tlryr5Spn4n2bvyvDjfJ9eCDwvYAmlvkom5uk6sfQ5b9zoUIsQO0qWBcqgdXFtLXFRwMm6hh6mALz3d3DqYxffEG2rCkqEFgN8f9YBFggA4xCGxsKotw0hWM-zDBHxYCQwE8Kgn13G9h6TW0eiyODYVG4ApHlh1YNG7Dr8yH5BIMe8eOQcxso6FuIJDEduBWl6E7ni966ylp_bDEnxdU0AhB3tiu7kD0MLO_oLfgGDTa1XDq7gisQbnWHum75Mve7nTnfRyOkIgVelZ9nJqKMlXgV5LJjJkkL6QRE8VzgaFxpqiRjgRtkhkpucFQTBsEzWvDaEUzibbrHtloUIf7BCTGXlkiNPpsFGeXRCrDRS4q5TLikpmITEYslSrwq7tjPmalj7N4Xg74KxF_pcdfeRKRl6s-i4Fd5Fzpdw6iK0nHDO4v2PZbGQxNKfIsqXTiWJpkmqSF5FzwVBccfRUjijQizxzAS2e_cHhKhG0YqKRjAiu32WTCXK6dRmRzTRL_YrXePIK8DHavK08RHpEnq2bX09XyNdouUSbHqBmfYoYybO3VWtNsvaWpv3vucww3MAbPIvJqfAlPb_7vJ_fg_LE-JNeotwospmyTbPTtUj8iV9TPvu7ax96m_AYxj4bH priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present dbid: RSV link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9QwDA8wEOKFb0RhICMhAWIVXPqRlLcxbeIBJsQNtLcoSROodtdObQ-0_fU4aXpQBkhwLyc1zl3S2I4d278Q8tjSUuNHxtqWeZxmsoh5yZI4SfNEUWmZkh4y_y3b3-eHh8X7UBTWjdnuY0jSa2ov1jx_0aG29TFHGjujuYhPL5CLuN1xJ44f5p9G_Ys7bJKO5TG_7TfZgjxS_1l9fDZH8pdAqd9_9q7938ivk6vB3oTtgUFukPOmvkkuvwsR9VvnIuQToHUJ47E8uBSQviphPhRMw4FjUXi6uzM_iOmzV9CG40MDErs5nIcGmQnQ-AWJjXXZIOuYEsaaS_AXg8CQ7I7Dhmrpy1V6A60ZE2FDUhG4JJFVBw0qsuFXlkMgCYY6sROQi6Y2UNUQAGE7cCfJ0J0sj_vGw8_6YcmfH-gwI2TouumqDmQPi-Yb9A04tIx2PZyqO4LGIl3bHJnb5OPe7sHOmzhcFxFrtKL6OLUlZbrAryRTGbNJXigrZ5rnEt3gTFOrHODZLLNKcYtul7GM5y8toyXNFOqpO2SjxjncJaDQz8oSadA-o7iTJEpbLnNZahf9VsxGZDZykNABS91d6bEQ3qfiuRjWXOCaC7_m4jQiz9d9jgckkb9Sv3aMuaZ0KOD-QdN-FkGpCJlnSWkSh8ik0iQtFOeSp6bgaJdYWaQReeLYWjhdhcPTMpRc4CQd6pfYZrMZc3F1GpHNCSUusZ42j4Ihgo7rBOXudoSUJdj8aN3serq8vdo0K6TJ0UPGt5ghDZsI1GRm05a6-uJxztG1QH87i8jWKFY__vzPb-7ev5HfJ1eol0wWU7ZJNvp2ZR6QS_prX3XtQ69ZvgPN2X1_ priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | The 2nd European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST-2): rationale and protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing immediate revascularisation versus optimised medical therapy alone in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis at low to intermediate risk of stroke |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-022-06429-z https://www.proquest.com/docview/2808574732 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2696006552 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9328625 https://doaj.org/article/a653de30776b4349b88a84e98303fa94 |
| Volume | 23 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000831214700008&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMed Central_OA刊 customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20060101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20000401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20000401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20000401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20000401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access customDbUrl: eissn: 1745-6215 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0043934 issn: 1745-6215 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20000401 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3db9MwEDcwEOIF8SkKozokJEAQjTofdnjbpk4gsapqy1SeItuxRbQ2mZIUtP31nJ2kLEzAC31Ilfjc2s7PZ5_v_DMhLw1NFX6Ep0waeUEoYo-nzPf8IPIlFYZJ4SjzP7PJhC-X8fTSUV82JqyhB24abk9EoZ9q37LOyMAPYsm54IGOOepeI2LHBIqzns6YanQwjrJ-0G2R4dFehZra-SupZyfcsXfRG4YcW_9VnXw1TvI3Z6kbg47ukbvt5BH2m0LfJ9d1_oDcPm7d4w-vDfClA81T6NbYwcZz1FkK82b3Myws3uD1-HC-8OibD1C2a4EaBGazpA0FIgNwJgsCE_O0QBzoFLoNlOBO-YAmch3LCNna7T2pNZS6i2ptI4TARnxsKihQKzW_sm68QtBs-joHsSpyDVkOLbtrBXZZGKrz9VldOC5ZVyxx-YFqa4TozIsqq0DUsCp-QF2Apb4ot8XJqlMoDMqVxal-RL4cjReHH7327AdP4ZSo9gKTUqZi_PJDGTLjR7E0YqR4JNCmDRU10rKXjUIjJTdoQ2nDePTeMJrSUKLSeUx2cqzDEwISjabQFxonWxSHBV8qw0UkUmVd2ZKZARl1UEhUS4xuz-dYJc5A4lHSwCdB-CQOPsnFgLzd5jlraEH-Kn1gEbaVtJTe7gECPWmBnvwL6APyyuIzsYoHi6dEu38CK2kpvJJ9Nhox6ySnA7Lbk8RXrPrJHcKTVmFVCeX2qIOA-Zj8Yptsc9ogvFwXG5SJ0NzFVgxRhvV6Rq9m_ZQ8--ZIy9FOQOM5HJB3XR_69ed_brmn_6PlnpE71HV95lG2S3bqcqOfk1vqe51V5ZDcYLMTe10yd-VDcvNgPJnOhk6l4N300_H0K97N5ic_AbUZfto |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9QwEDZVQcALNyJQYJBAgCAq6xx2kBAqpVWrHkLqVupbcBwborZJSVKq9kfxG5lxki1LRd_6wL6sFE92fc3lmfnM2HPLc40f5Wubx34YqcSXuQj8IIyDjCsrMuUg89fF5qbc2Um-zLBfQy0MpVUOMtEJ6rzSdEY-zyVhsYci4B8Pfvh0axRFV4crNLptsWaOj9Blaz6sfsb1fcH58tJ4ccXvbxXwNSrb1g9tzoVO8CuIskjYIE4yq0Zaxgq9pUhzmxEu1iiyWSYtWufGChm_s4LnPMoEgS-hyL-MclxQCpnYmTh4I6QLh8IcGc83qB9clJT7ZOYn_smU8nN3BJzVBGezM_8K0TrNt3zzf5uzW-xGb2PDQscUt9mMKe-wqxt9FsHdSx7yBvAyhyEUAZT20hY5bHVF4jAmtoRXS4tbY5-_fg91f2RqQOFrhG1RIQMBGvygsLHMK2QXk8NQZwruMhToEvxxUqHYdyU6rYHaDMm_fSIVUGLMYQMVCu_uV_a74Bl0tXHHoPaq0kBRQg-C2wCdnkNzvH_QVg5y13VL_flA9yNCJi6rpmhAtbBXHUFbASGE1JPuFM0uVBbp6mrX3GPbF7Iw99lsiWN4wCBD3zIKlEGblKP2DDJtpYpVrininwnrsdGwd1Pd48fTNSZ7qfMjZZx2-z3F_Z66_Z6eeOzN5J2DDj3lXOpPxBITSkI-dw-q-lvaC9JUxVGQm4BQqLIwCJNMSiVDk0i0xaxKQo-9JIZKST5j97Tqy0xwkIR0li6I0UhQLgH32NwUJS6xnm4emCrt5XqTnnKUx55NmulNylUsTXWINHESk2UfIY2YYuWpkU23lMV3h-2O7pSMeeSxtwPTn_75v2fu4fl9fcqurYw31tP11c21R-w6dxJJ-FzMsdm2PjSP2RX9sy2a-omTZ8C-XrQw-A3tiuOS |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bT9RAFB4JGuKLd2MV9Zho1GiDO73M1MQY5BIJSEiAZN_qdDqjDdBiWyTw0_x1njNtF1cibzy4L5t0Tnfndm4z53yHseeW5xo_ytc2j_0wUokvcxH4QRgHGVdWZMpB5m-IzU05HidbM-zXkAtDYZWDTHSCOq80nZEvcElY7KEI-ILtwyK2llc_Hv7wqYIU3bQO5TS6LbJuTo7RfWs-rC3jWr_gfHVlZ-mz31cY8DUq3tYPbc6FTvAriLJI2CBOMqtGWsYKPadIc5sRRtYoslkmLVrqxgoZv7OC5zzKBAExofi_KoJAUNkIMZ44eyOkC4ckHRkvNKgr3I0p98nkT_zTKUXo6gWc1wrnIzX_uq51WnD15v88f7fYjd72hsWOWW6zGVPeYXNf-uiCu1c85BngZQ7DFQVQOExb5LDdJY_DDrErvFpZ2t7x-ev3UPdHqQYUvkaYFxUyFqAjAAoby7xCNjI5DPmn4IqkQBf4jxMMxYFL3WkN1GYICu4DrIACZo4aqFCod79y0F2qQZczdwJqvyoNFCX04LgN0Kk6NCcHh23loHhdt9SfD3Q_ImTusmqKBlQL-9UxtBUQckg96U7R7EFlka6u9sw9tnspC3OfzZY4hgcMMvQ5o0AZtFU5atUg01aqWOWaIgEyYT02GvZxqntceSpvsp86_1LGabf3U9z7qdv76anH3kzeOexQVS6k_kTsMaEkRHT3oKq_pb2ATVUcBbkJCJ0qC4MwyaRUMjSJRBvNqiT02EtirpTkNnZPqz79BAdJCGjpohiNBMUYcI_NT1HiEuvp5oHB0l7eN-kZd3ns2aSZ3qQYxtJUR0gTJzFZ_BHSiCm2nhrZdEtZfHeY7-hmyZhHHns7CICzP__3zD28uK9P2RzKgHRjbXP9EbvOnXASPhfzbLatj8xjdk3_bIumfuJEG7Cvly0LfgPpyexG |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+2nd+European+Carotid+Surgery+Trial+%3A+rationale+and+protocol+for+a+randomised+clinical+trial+comparing+immediate+revascularisation+versus+optimised+medical+therapy+alone+in+patients+with+symptomatic+and+asymptomatic+carotid+stenosis+at+low+to+intermediate+risk+of+stroke&rft.jtitle=Trials&rft.au=Cheng%2C+Suk+Fun&rft.au=van+Velzen%2C+Twan+J&rft.au=Gregson%2C+John&rft.au=Richards%2C+Toby&rft.date=2022-07-27&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13063-022-06429-z&rft.externalDocID=A711765922 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1745-6215&client=summon |