Metacognition in Argumentative Writing Based on Multiple Sources in Geography Education

This paper addresses questions about the use of metacognitive strategies in argumentative writing based on multiple sources and the influence of this use on the quality of student texts. For this purpose, think-aloud protocols and texts from a research project on material-supported argumentative wri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education (EJIHPE) Vol. 12; no. 8; pp. 948 - 974
Main Authors: Gebele, Diana, Zepter, Alexandra L., Königs, Pia, Budke, Alexandra
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2022
MDPI
Subjects:
ISSN:2254-9625, 2174-8144, 2254-9625
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper addresses questions about the use of metacognitive strategies in argumentative writing based on multiple sources and the influence of this use on the quality of student texts. For this purpose, think-aloud protocols and texts from a research project on material-supported argumentative writing in 8th grade geography lessons are analyzed and discussed. The analysis is based on a model of metacognition in argumentative writing using multiple sources, which we also propose in this paper. The results show that the use of metacognitive strategies is a challenge for the investigated target group but that their use, in particular the deployment of goal-setting strategies and planning strategies, enables students to write better texts.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2254-9625
2174-8144
2254-9625
DOI:10.3390/ejihpe12080069