Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 – Brazilian version

Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality an...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:BMC health services research Ročník 23; číslo 1; s. 32 - 12
Hlavní autoři: Reis, Claudia Tartaglia, Laguardia, Josué, Bruno de Araújo Andreoli, Paola, Nogueira Júnior, Cassimiro, Martins, Mônica
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 14.01.2023
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:1472-6963, 1472-6963
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Methods Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. Results ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p -value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041—0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ( α = 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ( α = 0.41). Conclusion The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
AbstractList Abstract Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Methods Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. Results ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041—0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ( $$\alpha$$ α = 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ( $$\alpha$$ α = 0.41). Conclusion The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Methods Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. Results ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: [chl]2 = 634.425 df = 221 [chl]2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041--0.050) and probability RMSEA < = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ([formula omitted]= 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ([formula omitted] = 0.41). Conclusion The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity. Keywords: Organizational culture, Safety culture measurement, Patient safety, Health care quality, Cross-cultural adaptation, Validity and reliability, Questionnaire, HSOPSC 2.0
Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Methods Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. Results ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p -value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041—0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ( α = 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ( α = 0.41). Conclusion The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil.BACKGROUNDPatient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil.Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients.METHODSOf the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients.ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041-0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ([Formula: see text]= 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ([Formula: see text] = 0.41).RESULTSESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041-0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ([Formula: see text]= 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ([Formula: see text] = 0.41).The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.CONCLUSIONThe psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: [chl]2 = 634.425 df = 221 [chl]2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041--0.050) and probability RMSEA < = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ([formula omitted]= 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ([formula omitted] = 0.41). The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care provision actions and conduct. Several countries have made a priority of strengthening patient safety culture to improve the quality and safety of health care. In this direction, measuring the patient safety culture through validated instruments is a strategy applied worldwide. The purpose of this study was to adapt transculturally and validate the HSOPSC 2.0 to Brazilian Portuguese and the hospital context in Brazil. Of the various validated scales for measuring safety culture, the instrument most used internationally is the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC) developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2004 and revised in 2019, when version 2.0 was released. Adaptation was conducted on a universalist approach and the adapted instrument was then applied to a sample of 2,702 respondents (56% response rate) comprising staff of a large general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Construct validity was investigated by Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling-within-Confirmatory Factor Analysis (ESEM-within-CFA) and reliability was measured in each dimension by means of Cronbach alpha coefficients. ESEM fit indexes showed good data fit with the proposed model: χ2 = 634.425 df = 221 χ2/df ratio = 2.9 p-value < 0.0000; RMSEA = 0.045 (90% C.I. = 0.041-0.050) and probability RMSEA <  = .05 = 0.963; CFI = 0.986; TLI = 0.968. However, ten items had loads lower than 0.4. Cronbach alpha values were 0.6 or more for all dimensions, except Handoffs and information exchange ([Formula: see text]= 0.50) and Staffing and work pace ([Formula: see text] = 0.41). The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version were found to be satisfactory, demonstrating good internal consistency and construct validity as expressed by estimates of reliability and indexes of model fit. However, given factor loadings smaller than 0.4 observed in ten items and considering that the scale translated and adapted to Portuguese was tested on a single sample during the Covid-19 pandemic, the authors recognize the need for it to be tested on other samples in Brazil to investigate its validity.
ArticleNumber 32
Audience Academic
Author Nogueira Júnior, Cassimiro
Martins, Mônica
Laguardia, Josué
Bruno de Araújo Andreoli, Paola
Reis, Claudia Tartaglia
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Claudia Tartaglia
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5392-9281
  surname: Reis
  fullname: Reis, Claudia Tartaglia
  email: clautartaglia@gmail.com
  organization: Ministério da Saúde, Planejamento e Gestão SMS Cataguases (MG)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Josué
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1456-5590
  surname: Laguardia
  fullname: Laguardia, Josué
  organization: Instituto de Comunicação e Informação Científica e Tecnológica em Saúde, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Paola
  orcidid: 0000-0001-9085-7582
  surname: Bruno de Araújo Andreoli
  fullname: Bruno de Araújo Andreoli, Paola
  organization: Quality, Patient Safety and Clinical Outcomes Manager – Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Cassimiro
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9924-3664
  surname: Nogueira Júnior
  fullname: Nogueira Júnior, Cassimiro
  organization: Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Mônica
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9962-0618
  surname: Martins
  fullname: Martins, Mônica
  organization: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1DAUhiNURC_wAiyQJTZsMvgWXzZIZVRopUogFdaW48vUo0w82MlIw4p36BvyJHgmpeogVHkR55zv_3NO9J9WR33sXVW9RnCGkGDvM8ISkRpiXEMhJKz5s-oEUY5rJhk5enQ_rk5zXkKIuMD8RXVMGKOlSU-qPE8x59qM3TAm3QFt9XrQQ4g90L0FG90FO71GD4ZbBy5jXoehkDdj2rgtKJ2vBXD9AG60d8MWzPdeDuAZBL9_3YGPSf8MXdA92LiUi9XL6rnXXXav7p9n1fdPF9_ml_X1l89X8_Pr2jRcDjU2tJVNY6XGTHJsCaa67OKJxbIVpJXGSUeQ1Ey0SFjeUC-g8Z7AxhsDKTmrriZfG_VSrVNY6bRVUQe1L8S0UDoNwXROIWIRExpzii21uGkb1BhKmcDIt0TC4vVh8lqP7cpZU_Ytv-vA9LDTh1u1iBslBYWINcXg3b1Bij9Glwe1Ctm4rtO9i2NWmLOGc0EFKejbCV3oMlrofSyOZoerc04IoZSS3USz_1DlWLcKpiTFh1I_ELx5vMLD7H_DUAA8AWaXieT8A4Kg2iVOTYlTJXFqnzjFi0j8IzJhClAZJ3RPS8kkzeU7_cIltYxj6ksknlL9AbWj6iM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2023_002362
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_024_02409_7
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0326320
crossref_primary_10_1155_jonm_6817853
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11802_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_nursrep14020108
crossref_primary_10_1177_08903344241271360
crossref_primary_10_3389_ijph_2024_1607392
crossref_primary_10_1177_09514848241275783
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14188496
crossref_primary_10_1097_NCQ_0000000000000847
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_12960_x
Cites_doi 10.1037/1082-989X2.3.292
10.1590/0102-311X00115614
10.1023/a:1024985930536
10.6018/eglobal.16.1.238811
10.1590/0102-311X00143613
10.5020/18061230.2016.p334
10.1186/s12913-016-1502-7
10.3390/ijerph19042237
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896
10.1787/95ae65a3-en
10.7322/jhgd.152192
10.1097/PTS.0000000000000644
10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00001
10.1093/intqhc/mzy080
10.5123/S1679-49742017000300004
10.33546/bnj.1928
10.1097/pq9.0000000000000323
10.1590/0102-311X00246018
10.1186/s12912-020-00523-w
10.1590/0104-07072016001610015
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
2023. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12913-022-08890-7
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList


MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1472-6963
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_13d168a2742d4d25b515c446821fb390
PMC9840165
A733344430
36641474
10_1186_s12913_022_08890_7
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Brazil
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Brazil
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
44B
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7RV
7WY
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FL
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BEZIV
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FRNLG
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
K60
K6~
KQ8
M0C
M0T
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-2c4b955d9a26972d324a963f3d29b83b9ce9e319a68b18d754f80cff305fcc043
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 15
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000915838500004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1472-6963
IngestDate Mon Nov 10 04:27:18 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 02:06:31 EST 2025
Thu Oct 02 06:04:48 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 11 10:23:54 EST 2025
Tue Nov 04 17:39:35 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:05 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:23:56 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:32:19 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:30:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Validity and reliability
Questionnaire
Organizational culture
Safety culture measurement
Patient safety
Health care quality
HSOPSC 2.0
Cross-cultural adaptation
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c579t-2c4b955d9a26972d324a963f3d29b83b9ce9e319a68b18d754f80cff305fcc043
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5392-9281
0000-0002-9962-0618
0000-0003-1456-5590
0000-0001-9085-7582
0000-0002-9924-3664
OpenAccessLink https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12913-022-08890-7
PMID 36641474
PQID 2765778483
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_13d168a2742d4d25b515c446821fb390
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9840165
proquest_miscellaneous_2765778483
gale_infotracmisc_A733344430
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A733344430
pubmed_primary_36641474
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_022_08890_7
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12913_022_08890_7
springer_journals_10_1186_s12913_022_08890_7
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-01-14
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-01-14
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-01-14
  day: 14
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle BMC health services research
PublicationTitleAbbrev BMC Health Serv Res
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Health Serv Res
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References LEL Andrade (8890_CR29) 2017; 26
CT Reis (8890_CR30) 2019; 35
GM Silva (8890_CR15) 2018; 28
LE Van Zyl (8890_CR23) 2022; 12
FCB Netto (8890_CR12) 2016; 29
8890_CR2
S-H Lee (8890_CR31) 2016; 16
EK Kelloay (8890_CR25) 2015
J Sorra (8890_CR16) 2019
8890_CR4
PG Shekelle (8890_CR1) 2013; 158
LT DeCarlo (8890_CR20) 1997; 2
8890_CR22
World Health Organization (8890_CR3) 2021
CT Reis (8890_CR11) 2016; 32
CT Reis (8890_CR9) 2018; 30
J Sorra (8890_CR28) 2019
ME Reichenheim (8890_CR19) 2014; 30
LJ Blazin (8890_CR32) 2020; 5
P Waterson (8890_CR6) 2019; 9
L Suryani (8890_CR21) 2022; 8
AP Minuzz (8890_CR13) 2016; 25
HW Marsh (8890_CR24) 2014; 10
MP Pinheiro (8890_CR14) 2017; 16
JA Calvache (8890_CR27) 2021; 17
8890_CR8
M Herdman (8890_CR18) 1998; 7
TA Brown (8890_CR26) 2015
World Health Organization (8890_CR7) 2020
SE Lee (8890_CR10) 2021; 20
O Brborovic (8890_CR5) 2022; 19
8890_CR17
References_xml – volume: 2
  start-page: 292
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  ident: 8890_CR20
  publication-title: Psychol Methods
  doi: 10.1037/1082-989X2.3.292
– volume: 32
  start-page: e00115614
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 8890_CR11
  publication-title: Cad Saúde Pública [online]
  doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00115614
– volume: 7
  start-page: 323
  year: 1998
  ident: 8890_CR18
  publication-title: Qual Life Res
  doi: 10.1023/a:1024985930536
– volume: 16
  start-page: 309
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 8890_CR14
  publication-title: Enfermería Global
  doi: 10.6018/eglobal.16.1.238811
– volume: 30
  start-page: 927
  year: 2014
  ident: 8890_CR19
  publication-title: Cad Saúde Pública
  doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00143613
– volume: 29
  start-page: 334
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 8890_CR12
  publication-title: Rev Bras Promoç Saúde
  doi: 10.5020/18061230.2016.p334
– volume: 16
  start-page: 254
  year: 2016
  ident: 8890_CR31
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1502-7
– volume-title: Global patient safety action plan 2021–2030: towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care
  year: 2021
  ident: 8890_CR3
– start-page: 248p
  volume-title: Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: a researcher’s guide
  year: 2015
  ident: 8890_CR25
– volume: 19
  start-page: 2237
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 8890_CR5
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042237
– volume: 10
  start-page: 85
  year: 2014
  ident: 8890_CR24
  publication-title: Annu Rev Clin Psychol
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
– volume-title: Pilot test results from the 2019 AHRQ surveys on patient safety cultureTM (SOPSTM) hospital survey version 2.0 – part 1: overall results
  year: 2019
  ident: 8890_CR28
– ident: 8890_CR22
– volume: 9
  start-page: e026896
  year: 2019
  ident: 8890_CR6
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896
– ident: 8890_CR4
  doi: 10.1787/95ae65a3-en
– volume-title: ransitioning SOPSTM Hospital Survey Version 2.0: What’s Different and What to Expect, Part I: Main Report
  year: 2019
  ident: 8890_CR16
– volume: 28
  start-page: 307
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 8890_CR15
  publication-title: J Hum Growth Dev
  doi: 10.7322/jhgd.152192
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1806
  issue: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 8890_CR27
  publication-title: J Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000644
– volume: 158
  start-page: 365
  issue: 5_Part_2
  year: 2013
  ident: 8890_CR1
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00001
– volume: 30
  start-page: 660
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 8890_CR9
  publication-title: Int J Qual Heal Care
  doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy080
– volume: 26
  start-page: 455
  year: 2017
  ident: 8890_CR29
  publication-title: Epidemiol Serv Saúde
  doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300004
– ident: 8890_CR2
– volume: 8
  start-page: 2169
  year: 2022
  ident: 8890_CR21
  publication-title: BNJ
  doi: 10.33546/bnj.1928
– volume: 5
  start-page: e323
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 8890_CR32
  publication-title: Pediatr Qual Saf
  doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000323
– volume: 35
  start-page: e00246018
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 8890_CR30
  publication-title: Cad Saúde Pública
  doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00246018
– volume: 20
  start-page: 12
  year: 2021
  ident: 8890_CR10
  publication-title: BMC Nurs
  doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00523-w
– start-page: 462p
  volume-title: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research
  year: 2015
  ident: 8890_CR26
– volume: 25
  start-page: e1610015
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 8890_CR13
  publication-title: Texto Contexto Enf
  doi: 10.1590/0104-07072016001610015
– ident: 8890_CR8
– ident: 8890_CR17
– volume: 12
  start-page: 795672
  year: 2022
  ident: 8890_CR23
  publication-title: Front Psychiatry
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672
– volume-title: World Patient Safety Day Goals 2020–2021. Health Worker Safety: A Priority for Patient Safety
  year: 2020
  ident: 8890_CR7
SSID ssj0017827
Score 2.450328
Snippet Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which influence their...
Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their care...
Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation's health staff and other personnel which influence their...
Abstract Background Patient safety culture concerns the values, beliefs and standards shared by an organisation’s health staff and other personnel which...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 32
SubjectTerms Brazil
Care and treatment
COVID-19
Cross-cultural adaptation
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Evaluation
Health Administration
Health aspects
Health care quality
Health Informatics
Hospitals, General
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Multiculturalism
Nursing Research
Organizational culture
Pandemics
Patient Safety
Patients
Psychometrics
Public Health
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Safety culture measurement
Safety Management
Surveys and Questionnaires
Validity and reliability
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LaxUxFA5SXAgivh1tSwTBhcbOJJk8lm2xdCGlUJXuQiYPvFDmljv3Xqgr_4P_0F_iyWTm0qnQbtxOMiQ5-U7OOXl8B6F31LoGAotIIi094VJZ0lQsElHamNIsaN3nT_n-RZ6cqPNzfXot1Ve6E5bpgbPg9irmK6FsOlH03NO6AQPsIIZR0EADAXtafcHrGYOp4fwA7J4cn8gosdeBVUtZDCDwStd6SiInZqhn6_93Tb5mlG5emLxxatobo6PH6NHgReL93Psn6F5on6KHeQsO55dFz1B3mJomI7cGtt5e5oN3bFuPAWKznFAJzyMGPxCPOUTw2WqxDlcYSk4z7So-szEsr3Am4AyYfirxn1-_8cHC_pyljRK8zvtuz9G3o89fD4_JkGOBuFrqJaGON7quvbZUaEk9-FcWdDIyT3WjWKNd0AHU1ArVVMrLmkdVuhhhmYjOlZy9QFvtvA2vEFallbKqfQCnkEenrfPg7VgH5lBY6XyBqlHkxg0E5CkPxoXpAxElTJ4mA9Nk-mkyskAfNv9cZvqNW2sfpJnc1EzU2f0HAJQZAGXuAlSB3iccmKTg0D1nh3cKMMhElWX2JWOMc86g5vakJiimmxS_HZFkUlG6zdaG-aozVIpaSsUVK9DLjKxNn5kQvOKSF0hOMDcZ1LSknf3oecE1BOuVqAv0cUSnGRak7hahvf4fQnuDHlDw_tLeVMW30dZysQo76L5bL2fdYrfXzb_WgDms
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 – Brazilian version
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-022-08890-7
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36641474
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2765778483
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9840165
https://doaj.org/article/13d168a2742d4d25b515c446821fb390
Volume 23
WOSCitedRecordID wos000915838500004&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central Open Access Free
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20010101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ABI/INFORM Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: 7WY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/abicomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ABI/INFORM Global
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: M0C
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/abiglobal
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Healthcare Administration Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: M0T
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: 7RV
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1472-6963
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0017827
  issn: 1472-6963
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20011201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1db9Mw0GIbQkiIj_EVGJWRkHiAjCR2YvtxrTaBRKuqHWU8WY4dQyWUTk1baTzxH_iH_BLOTlKRgSbByz30LpLt3vfZdwi9SJTOIbCwoU0iE1LGVZjHxIZZpKwbsyCEn58ye89GI352JsbNo7Cqve3eliS9pvZizbM3FVgmN4kAgid3NScK2Q7aA3PHnThOprNt7QBsHmufx_z1u44J8p36_9THvxmky5clL1VMvSE6ufN_W7iLbjeOJz6qOeUeulaU--jGsCmt76NbdQIP1--S7qNq4BYftp05sDLqvC7bY1UaDAw6r8cx4YXF4EXidgIJnq6Xm-ICA2ZcN23FU2WL1QWu23cWODmM8M_vP3B_qb7NXZoFb-qs3QP04eT4dPA2bCY0hDplYhUmmuYiTY1QSSZYYsA7UyDRlphE5JzkQheiACFXGc9jblhKLY-0taBkrNYRJQ_Rbrkoi8cI80gxFqemAJeSWi2UNuArKQ3GNFNMmwDF7Z8mddO-3E3R-Cp9GMMzWZ-uhNOV_nQlC9Cr7TfndfOOK6n7jhe2lK7xtv9hsfwsGzmWMTFxxpUrcBtqkjQHf1BDSM2B33MiogC9dJwknXqA5WnVvHKATbpGW_KIEUIopQQoDzqUINa6g37e8qJ0KHcXriwW60omLEsZ45STAD2qeXO7ZpJlNKaMBoh1uLazqS6mnH_xXcUFhPpxlgbodcu7slFn1RWH9uTfyJ-imwl4iS6HFdMDtLtarotn6LrerObVsod22GTm4MdPDp4xD3kP7fWPR-NJzydMAA6jgYengBm_G44dNWiAX4GJTJI
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagIIqEeJRXoICRkDiUQBI7fhzbiqqI7apiS9Wb5dhxWQllq2R3pXLiP_AP-SWM42RFCqoE13gs2c43L894BqFXmTYFOBYudlliY8qFjouUuJgl2vk2C1K2_VOOR3w8Ficn8rB7FNb02e59SLKV1C1bC_auAc3kOxGA8-RTc5KYX0XXKGgsn8j3aXK8ih2AzuP985i_zhuooLZS_5_y-DeFdDFZ8kLEtFVEe3f-bwt30e3O8MTbASn30JWy2kA3DrrQ-ga6FS7wcHiXdB81u37xcV-ZA2urz0LYHuvKYgDoNLRjwjOHwYrEfQcSPFnUy_Icw8hhKNqKJ9qV83McyneWOHub4J_ff-CdWn-b-msWvAy3dg_Q5733R7v7cdehITY5l_M4M7SQeW6lzpjkmQXrTANHO2IzWQhSSFPKEphcM1GkwvKcOpEY50DIOGMSSh6itWpWlY8RFonmPM1tCSYldUZqY8FW0gaUKdPc2Ail_U9Tpitf7rtofFWtGyOYCqer4HRVe7qKR2hrNecsFO-4lHrHY2FF6Qtvtx9m9anq-FilxKZMaB_gttRmeQH2oAGXWgDeCyKTCL32SFJePMDyjO5eOcAmfaEttc0JIZRSApSbA0pgazMYftljUfkhnwtXlbNFozLOcs4FFSRCjwI2V2smjNGUchohPkDtYFPDkWr6pa0qLsHVT1keoTc9dlUnzppLDu3Jv5G_QOv7RwcjNfow_vgU3czAYvT3WSndRGvzelE-Q9fNcj5t6uctT_8CemdFiw
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3di9QwEB_0lEMQP86v6qkRBB-0XtukTfJ4d7oonsvC6nFvIU0aXZDusl9wPvk_-B_6lzhp2uV6yoH42kwgSWcyM5mZ3wA8z7Qp0bFwscsSGzMudFym1MVFop1vsyBl0z_l-IgPh-LkRI7OVPE32e5dSDLUNHiUpnq5N7MuiLgo9haopXxXAnSkfJpOEvPLcIX5pkHeXx8fb-IIqP94Vyrz13k9ddSg9v95N59RTucTJ89FTxulNLj5_9u5BTdag5TsBw66DZeqege2P7Yh9x24Hh72SKhXugOLQ7-RuEPsINrqWQjnE11bgow7CW2ayNQRtC5J15mEjFfzdXVKcGQUwFzJWLtqeUoCrGdFstcJ-fXjJzmY6-8T__xC1uE17y58Hrz9dPgubjs3xCbnchlnhpUyz63UWSF5ZtFq0yjpjtpMloKW0lSyQuHXhShTYXnOnEiMc3j5OGMSRu_BVj2tqwdARKI5T3NboanJnJHaWLShtEElW2hubARp9wOVaWHNfXeNb6pxb0ShwukqPF3VnK7iEbzczJkFUI8LqQ88X2woPSB382E6_6Ja-VYptWkhtA98W2azvEQ70aCrLVAOSiqTCF54rlL-2sDlGd1WP-AmPQCX2ueUUsYYRcrdHiWKu-kNP-v4UvkhnyNXV9PVQmW8yDkXTNAI7gc-3ayZFgVLGWcR8B4H9zbVH6knXxu0cSmYL3mL4FXHx6q95hYXHNrDfyN_CtujNwN19H744RFcy9CQ9M9cKduFreV8VT2Gq2a9nCzmTxrx_g1SH05v
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-cultural+adaptation+and+validation+of+the+Hospital+Survey+on+Patient+Safety+Culture+2.0+%E2%80%93+Brazilian+version&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Reis%2C+Claudia+Tartaglia&rft.au=Laguardia%2C+Josu%C3%A9&rft.au=Bruno+de+Ara%C3%BAjo+Andreoli%2C+Paola&rft.au=Nogueira+J%C3%BAnior%2C+Cassimiro&rft.date=2023-01-14&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-022-08890-7&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12913_022_08890_7
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon