Comparison of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology Ročník 59; číslo 5; s. 691 - 697
Hlavní autoři: Jeng, Cherng-Jye, Long, Cheng-Yu, Chuang, Linus T.
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: China (Republic : 1949- ) Elsevier B.V 01.09.2020
Elsevier
Témata:
ISSN:1028-4559, 1875-6263, 1875-6263
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma. Four studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another. Published evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.
AbstractList This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma. Four studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another. Published evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.
AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma. Materials and methodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma. ResultsFour studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another. ConclusionPublished evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma. Results: Four studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another. Conclusion: Published evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma.OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for the treatment of uterine myoma.A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma.MATERIALS AND METHODSA systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted using database searches of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Articles were searched through March 25, 2020. Outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Score (SSS), Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), re-intervention rate, and rate of adverse reactions in patients with uterine myoma.Four studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another.RESULTSFour studies were included with a total of 207 patients with uterine myomas who received MR-g HIFU and 201 who received UAE. UAE was associated with a greater reduction in SSS, improved HRQoL, and a significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with MR-g HIFU in 3 of 4 included studies. No significant differences were found in the incidence and severity of adverse events between treatment arms in one study, but differences were observed in the percentage of adverse reactions in another.Published evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.CONCLUSIONPublished evidence suggests that the efficacy of MR-g HIFU may not be superior to that of UAE in the treatment of uterine myoma.
Author Chuang, Linus T.
Jeng, Cherng-Jye
Long, Cheng-Yu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Cherng-Jye
  surname: Jeng
  fullname: Jeng, Cherng-Jye
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Cheng-Yu
  surname: Long
  fullname: Long, Cheng-Yu
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Linus T.
  surname: Chuang
  fullname: Chuang, Linus T.
  email: ltchuang@foxmailvip.com
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917320$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUk1v1DAQjVAR_YA_wAH5yCWL7WTzUSGkasVHpUocgLM1cSa7Dom92A5V-HP8NSbdLodKlJNH43lvZt688-TEOotJ8lLwleCieNOvYu-2K8klX_FyxYV8kpyJqlynhSyyE4q5rNJ8va5Pk_MQes7zknP-LDnNZC3KTPKz5PfGjXvwJjjLXMdG2FqMRjOPlAGrMd1OpsWW7cx2lxob0QYTZ9Y5PQVKT0P0ENxkW3Zr4o5NEb2xyMBTMDMcGzeYXxAN8XfOs7hDFj1CHNHGpeMRMM5uhEt2xcIcIo6wDDEY-oQ4eaR5fhq8ZUB9RoyQgoVhDiY8T552MAR8cf9eJN8-vP-6-ZTefP54vbm6SfW6lDHV-bopRa6xJOEEtByaqsszUYAu8lx2UjSIkNU6w6arIa_XTVYUspaVhLITkF0k1wfe1kGv9t6M4GflwKi7hPNbRSsbPaCSHKBrW67rpshbqCFrUQok9dtKZ1VDXK8PXHvvfkwYohpN0DgMYNFNQUmaSMpC5hmVvrovnZoR27-NjwekgupQoL0LwWOntIl3ctNdzKAEV4tXVK8Wr6jFK4qXirxCUPkAemR_FPT2AEISm07iVdAGySet8agjqWEeh797ANeDsUbD8B1nDL2bPB02KKGCVFx9WRy8GJg2JcZiIbj8N8H_uv8BsXcGfA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_11_031
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tvir_2021_100725
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60060868
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43032_024_01745_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_02656736_2024_2440545
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2021_01_026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mric_2024_02_005
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_124879_1
crossref_primary_10_4103_gmit_gmit_102_22
crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_124879_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11030839
Cites_doi 10.1177/1933719113497289
10.1007/s00330-014-3295-6
10.1067/mob.2003.99
10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009
10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.031
10.12659/PJR.890606
10.1038/nrdp.2016.43
10.1002/uog.7455
10.1016/j.ogc.2016.04.001
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.045
10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
10.1007/s00270-013-0582-6
10.2147/IJWH.S15710
10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.009
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.177
10.1093/humupd/dmw023
10.6061/clinics/2017(10)08
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020
– notice: Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

PubMed


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1875-6263
EndPage 697
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_20aafdd0c9b64da9a3de21e004d8c38b
32917320
10_1016_j_tjog_2020_07_012
S1028455920301662
1_s2_0_S1028455920301662
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
188
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
2UF
2WC
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
8RM
AABNK
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABMAC
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACGFS
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGHFR
AGYEJ
AIGII
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
CEFSP
CNMHZ
CS3
DIK
DU5
EBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IPNFZ
J1W
KQ8
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OK1
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
TUXDW
UZ5
Z5R
~HD
0SF
6I.
AACTN
AAFTH
AFCTW
AINHJ
NCXOZ
LCYCR
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-c45b714ce70161ad0ab8f4316ac6442f21beea39c3ebf9a495b36629282a7f1a3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 10
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000570259800012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1028-4559
1875-6263
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:52:18 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:03:21 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:57:04 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:37:08 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:07:57 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:49:58 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:12 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:28:18 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Uterine myoma
Fibroid
Ablation
High-intensity focused ultrasound
Quality of life
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c572t-c45b714ce70161ad0ab8f4316ac6442f21beea39c3ebf9a495b36629282a7f1a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/20aafdd0c9b64da9a3de21e004d8c38b
PMID 32917320
PQID 2442226243
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_20aafdd0c9b64da9a3de21e004d8c38b
proquest_miscellaneous_2442226243
pubmed_primary_32917320
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_07_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_07_012
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_07_012
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1028455920301662
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_tjog_2020_07_012
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace China (Republic : 1949- )
PublicationPlace_xml – name: China (Republic : 1949- )
PublicationTitle Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier
References Fischer, McDannold, Tempany, Jolesz, Fennessy (bib1) 2015; 7
Hayden, van der Windt, Cartwright, Cote, Bombardier (bib12) 2013; 158
Stewart, Laughlin-Tommaso, Catherino, Lalitkumar, Gupta, Vollenhoven (bib6) 2016; 2
Donnez, Dolmans (bib7) 2016; 22
Chen, Chen, Zhang, Li, Peng, He (bib18) 2015; 27
Ikink, Nijenhuis, Verkooijen, Voogt, Reuwer, Smeets (bib15) 2014; 24
Liberati, Altman, Tetzlaff, Mulrow, Gøtzsche, Ioannidis (bib11) 2009; 151
Keltz, Levie, Chudnoff (bib9) May-Jun 2017; 24
Barnard, AbdElmagied, Vaughan, Weaver, Laughlin-Tommaso, Hesley (bib14) 2017; 216
Peregrino, de Lorenzo Messina, Dos Santos Simões, Soares-Júnior, Baracat (bib20) 2017; 72
Froeling, Meckelburg, Scheurig-Muenkler, Schreiter, Kamp, Maurer (bib17) 2013; 36
Funaki, Fukunishi, Sawada (bib19) 2009; 34
Laughlin-Tommaso (bib5) 2016; 43
Baird, Dunson, Hill, Cousins, Schectman (bib3) 2003; 188
Gizzo, Saccardi, Patrelli, Ancona, Noventa, Fagherazzi (bib21) 2014; 1
Duhan (bib8) 2011; 3
Filipowska, Loziński (bib10) 2014; 79
Sparic, Mirkovic, Malvasi, Tinelli (bib2) 2016; 9
Stewart, Laughlin-Tommaso, Catherino, Lalitkumar, Gupta, Vollenhoven (bib4) 2016; 2
Froeling, Meckelburg, Schreiter, Scheurig-Muenkler, Kamp, Maurer (bib16) 2013; 82
Pron (bib22) 2015; 15
Wan, Wang, Liu, Tong (bib13) 2014; 14
Liberati (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib11) 2009; 151
Filipowska (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib10) 2014; 79
Fischer (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib1) 2015; 7
Wan (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib13) 2014; 14
Gizzo (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib21) 2014; 1
Ikink (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib15) 2014; 24
Keltz (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib9) 2017; 24
Hayden (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib12) 2013; 158
Stewart (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib4) 2016; 2
Froeling (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib17) 2013; 36
Peregrino (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib20) 2017; 72
Baird (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib3) 2003; 188
Barnard (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib14) 2017; 216
Chen (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib18) 2015; 27
Duhan (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib8) 2011; 3
Donnez (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib7) 2016; 22
Pron (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib22) 2015; 15
Funaki (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib19) 2009; 34
Laughlin-Tommaso (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib5) 2016; 43
Froeling (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib16) 2013; 82
Sparic (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib2) 2016; 9
Stewart (10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib6) 2016; 2
33678353 - Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;60(2):384
33495001 - Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;60(1):185-186
References_xml – volume: 1
  start-page: 465
  year: 2014
  end-page: 476
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound myomectomy: safety, efficacy, subsequent fertility and quality-of-life improvements, a systematic review
  publication-title: Reprod Sci
– volume: 2
  start-page: 16043
  year: 2016
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers
– volume: 43
  start-page: 397
  year: 2016
  end-page: 413
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Alternatives to hysterectomy: management of uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am
– volume: 216
  start-page: 500e1
  year: 2017
  end-page: 500e11
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 3
  start-page: 231
  year: 2011
  end-page: 241
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Current and emerging treatments for uterine myoma - an update
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
– volume: 72
  start-page: 637
  year: 2017
  end-page: 641
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Review of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Clinics
– volume: 24
  start-page: 538
  year: May-Jun 2017
  end-page: 545
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Pregnancy outcomes after direct uterine myoma thermal ablation: review of the literature
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
– volume: 79
  start-page: 439
  year: 2014
  end-page: 443
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) in treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas
  publication-title: Pol J Radiol
– volume: 82
  start-page: 2265
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2269
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Outcome of uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids: long-term results
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
– volume: 9
  start-page: 424
  year: 2016
  end-page: 435
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review
  publication-title: Int J Fertil
– volume: 151
  start-page: W65
  year: 2009
  end-page: W94
  ident: bib11
  article-title: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 27
  start-page: 671
  year: 2015
  end-page: 676
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases
  publication-title: Ultrason Sonochem
– volume: 2
  start-page: 16043
  year: 2016
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers
– volume: 188
  start-page: 100
  year: 2003
  end-page: 107
  ident: bib3
  article-title: High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 158
  start-page: 280
  year: 2013
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 86
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: an evidence-based analysis
  publication-title: Ont Health Technol Assess Ser
– volume: 14
  start-page: 135
  year: 2014
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 665
  year: 2016
  end-page: 686
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
– volume: 24
  start-page: 2649
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2657
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound versus uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: comparison of symptom improvement and reintervention rates
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
– volume: 34
  start-page: 584
  year: 2009
  end-page: 589
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1508
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1513
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Midterm results after uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
– volume: 7
  start-page: 901
  year: 2015
  end-page: 912
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Potential of minimally invasive procedures in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a focus on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound therapy
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
– volume: 1
  start-page: 465
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib21
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound myomectomy: safety, efficacy, subsequent fertility and quality-of-life improvements, a systematic review
  publication-title: Reprod Sci
  doi: 10.1177/1933719113497289
– volume: 24
  start-page: 2649
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib15
  article-title: Volumetric MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound versus uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: comparison of symptom improvement and reintervention rates
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3295-6
– volume: 188
  start-page: 100
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib3
  article-title: High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.99
– volume: 158
  start-page: 280
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib12
  article-title: Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00009
– volume: 27
  start-page: 671
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib18
  article-title: Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases
  publication-title: Ultrason Sonochem
  doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.05.031
– volume: 79
  start-page: 439
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib10
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) in treatment of symptomatic uterine myomas
  publication-title: Pol J Radiol
  doi: 10.12659/PJR.890606
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib22
  article-title: Magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: an evidence-based analysis
  publication-title: Ont Health Technol Assess Ser
– volume: 2
  start-page: 16043
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib6
  article-title: Uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers
  doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.43
– volume: 34
  start-page: 584
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib19
  article-title: Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.7455
– volume: 43
  start-page: 397
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib5
  article-title: Alternatives to hysterectomy: management of uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.04.001
– volume: 82
  start-page: 2265
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib16
  article-title: Outcome of uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids: long-term results
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.045
– volume: 151
  start-page: W65
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib11
  article-title: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1508
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib17
  article-title: Midterm results after uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0582-6
– volume: 9
  start-page: 424
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib2
  article-title: Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review
  publication-title: Int J Fertil
– volume: 3
  start-page: 231
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib8
  article-title: Current and emerging treatments for uterine myoma - an update
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
  doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S15710
– volume: 14
  start-page: 135
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib13
  article-title: Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
– volume: 7
  start-page: 901
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib1
  article-title: Potential of minimally invasive procedures in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a focus on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound therapy
  publication-title: Int J Womens Health
– volume: 2
  start-page: 16043
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib4
  article-title: Uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Nat Rev Dis Primers
  doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.43
– volume: 24
  start-page: 538
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib9
  article-title: Pregnancy outcomes after direct uterine myoma thermal ablation: review of the literature
  publication-title: J Minim Invasive Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.009
– volume: 216
  start-page: 500e1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib14
  article-title: Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.177
– volume: 22
  start-page: 665
  issue: 6
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib7
  article-title: Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future
  publication-title: Hum Reprod Update
  doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw023
– volume: 72
  start-page: 637
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012_bib20
  article-title: Review of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of uterine fibroids
  publication-title: Clinics
  doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(10)08
– reference: 33495001 - Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;60(1):185-186
– reference: 33678353 - Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;60(2):384
SSID ssj0047000
ssib060475427
Score 2.24597
Snippet This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery embolization (UAE)...
AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery...
Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided (MR-g) high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) with uterine artery...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 691
SubjectTerms Ablation
Fibroid
High-intensity focused ultrasound
Internal Medicine
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Quality of life
Uterine myoma
Title Comparison of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound with uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myoma: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1028455920301662
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1028455920301662
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.012
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917320
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2442226243
https://doaj.org/article/20aafdd0c9b64da9a3de21e004d8c38b
Volume 59
WOSCitedRecordID wos000570259800012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1875-6263
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0047000
  issn: 1028-4559
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20040101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Li9RAEG50EfEivh0fSwveJNDpZNIdb-vi4sEdFlSYW9PdqR5mmUlkkhHm1_nXrEon0QXdvXjJIaTSoapS_VVS9RVjbwUUuc4DJNaHMslDkSY6lD7BVES7yhVgi75R-LNaLPRyWV78MeqLasIiPXBUHCbn1oaqEr50RV7Z0mYVyBTQtpX2mXYUfYUqx2QqxuBcCRF5COjbEYLmoV0mVnZ1l80KM0MpetrOVF7Zknrm_is707-QZ78DnT1g9wfoyE_iIz9kt6B-xO6eDz_HH7Ofp9NMQd4EvrWrmjoUOSbUDdFqQLLaryuoOFEUJ-tYu94deGj8vsXT-023sy2NWeL0dZbTsAe8Me-rPg8ctq7ZDF2bKLPjCB35VKdOK44C20Ozte_5Cf9NE803E30zj90y3OI6W-hsYgdelCfs29nHr6efkmE-Q-LnSnaJz-dOpbkHRbjRVsI6Hai13npEWTLI1AHYrPQZuFBaTMVcVhSyxCzPqpDa7Ck7qpsanjOu5qCt1xpkwJRFFSWiOIBcuLxwKodsxtLRRMYP5OU0Q2Njxiq1S0NmNWRWI5RBs87Yu0nme6TuuPbqD2T56Uqi3e5PoDOawRnNTc44Y9noN2bsbMVYjDdaX7u0-psUtEM4aU1qWmmE-UL-TO4sKZFFVc7YfJIcEFNEQjeu-GZ0aoPhhP4R2RqafWsQ7SFiLGSOKn8WvX1SSSYxt8-kePE_VPWS3aMHiuV6r9hRt9vDa3bH_-jW7e6Y3VZLfdy_03hcXJz_AjrqVfk
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+magnetic+resonance-guided+high-intensity+focused+ultrasound+with+uterine+artery+embolization+for+the+treatment+of+uterine+myoma%3A+A+systematic+literature+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Taiwanese+journal+of+obstetrics+%26+gynecology&rft.au=Jeng%2C+Cherng-Jye&rft.au=Long%2C+Cheng-Yu&rft.au=Chuang%2C+Linus+T&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.issn=1028-4559&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.tjog.2020.07.012&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S1028455920301662&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S1028455920301662
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10284559%2FS1028455920X00052%2Fcov150h.gif