Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile

•A new Statistical Representations of Homology Profile (SRHP) and its statistical representation was presented to capture the topological arrangement of nuclei with respect to the gland lumen.•SRHP approach could potentially serve as a decision support aid for discriminating G3 from G4 prostate canc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer methods and programs in biomedicine Vol. 194; p. 105528
Main Authors: Yan, Chaoyang, Nakane, Kazuaki, Wang, Xiangxue, Fu, Yao, Lu, Haoda, Fan, Xiangshan, Feldman, Michael D., Madabhushi, Anant, Xu, Jun
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.10.2020
Subjects:
ISSN:0169-2607, 1872-7565, 1872-7565
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract •A new Statistical Representations of Homology Profile (SRHP) and its statistical representation was presented to capture the topological arrangement of nuclei with respect to the gland lumen.•SRHP approach could potentially serve as a decision support aid for discriminating G3 from G4 prostate cancer grade.•SRHP are not just discriminating but also interpretable and intuitive. Background and Objective:Gleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups. Methods:To capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4. Results:On the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images. Conclusions:We presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.
AbstractList Gleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups. To capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4. On the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images. We presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.
•A new Statistical Representations of Homology Profile (SRHP) and its statistical representation was presented to capture the topological arrangement of nuclei with respect to the gland lumen.•SRHP approach could potentially serve as a decision support aid for discriminating G3 from G4 prostate cancer grade.•SRHP are not just discriminating but also interpretable and intuitive. Background and Objective:Gleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups. Methods:To capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4. Results:On the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images. Conclusions:We presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.
Gleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEGleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups.To capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4.METHODSTo capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4.On the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images.RESULTSOn the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images.We presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.CONCLUSIONSWe presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.
ArticleNumber 105528
Author Madabhushi, Anant
Wang, Xiangxue
Fu, Yao
Fan, Xiangshan
Xu, Jun
Lu, Haoda
Feldman, Michael D.
Yan, Chaoyang
Nakane, Kazuaki
AuthorAffiliation a School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
d Dept. of Pathology, the affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, China
e Division of Surgical Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
b Department of Molecular Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Science, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
c Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106-7207, USA
f Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106
g Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Analysis Technique and CICAEET, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: a School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
– name: f Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106
– name: c Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106-7207, USA
– name: b Department of Molecular Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Science, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
– name: d Dept. of Pathology, the affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, China
– name: e Division of Surgical Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
– name: g Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Big Data Analysis Technique and CICAEET, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Chaoyang
  surname: Yan
  fullname: Yan, Chaoyang
  organization: School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kazuaki
  surname: Nakane
  fullname: Nakane, Kazuaki
  organization: Department of Molecular Pathology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Division of Health Science, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xiangxue
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Xiangxue
  organization: Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106-7207, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yao
  surname: Fu
  fullname: Fu, Yao
  organization: Dept. of Pathology, the affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Haoda
  surname: Lu
  fullname: Lu, Haoda
  organization: School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xiangshan
  surname: Fan
  fullname: Fan, Xiangshan
  organization: Dept. of Pathology, the affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University Medical School, 210008, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Michael D.
  surname: Feldman
  fullname: Feldman, Michael D.
  organization: Division of Surgical Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Anant
  surname: Madabhushi
  fullname: Madabhushi, Anant
  organization: Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, OH 44106-7207, USA
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Jun
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Jun
  email: jxx108@case.edu
  organization: School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUcFu1TAQtKpW7WvhBzggH7nk4dhx4iCEVFXQIlXiAmfLdjapH44d7LxK7-_rKKWCHtqT17szs6uZc3TsgweE3pVkW5Ky_rjbmnHSW0ro0uCciiO0KUVDi4bX_BhtMqgtaE2aM3Se0o4QQjmvT9EZo1VDWsI2qL_cz2FUM3R4cKBS8HiIqrN-wLmcYkhzHmJtw5QOODnbQcI6V7lt02yNcjjCFCGBX1rBJxx6fBfG4MJwWBR66-ANOumVS_D28b1Av759_Xl1U9z-uP5-dXlbGN7QuRC8rTTXbV8BGMG0MB0XUPeaiZIz1uvKkBoUVKBYa8pKl8C00pqWxjCaPxfoy6o77fUInclHReXkFO2o4kEGZeX_E2_v5BDu5aJPmioLfHgUiOHPHtIsR5sMOKc8hH2StCKCEp6tzND3_-56WvLX3AygK8BkG1OE_glSErkkKHdySVAuCco1wUwSz0jGrsbme617mfp5pUJ2-N5ClMlY8AY6G8HMsgv2ZfqnZ3TjrF8S_g2H18gPy_nN5Q
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_ima_70092
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_labinv_2024_102060
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10916_024_02118_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_46213_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_INMD_20240037
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7966553
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13061192
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_3008868
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41374_021_00579_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42979_023_02546_x
crossref_primary_10_1159_000546578
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpi_2023_100357
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12051149
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.033
10.1016/j.media.2019.03.014
10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
10.4103/2153-3539.83746
10.1109/TMI.2018.2875868
10.1109/TBME.2010.2053540
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4
10.1371/journal.pone.0097954
10.1038/s41598-018-33026-5
10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y
10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7
10.1109/TMI.2015.2458702
10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9
10.1016/j.compmedimag.2011.02.006
10.1109/JBHI.2016.2565515
10.1109/RBME.2016.2515127
10.1038/s41598-018-30535-1
10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2
10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1
10.1016/j.media.2012.06.007
10.1038/modpathol.3800054
10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30793-4
10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.06.015
10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051
10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.11.001
10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820
10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5
10.1090/conm/453/08802
10.1186/s13000-015-0244-x
10.1109/RBME.2014.2340401
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020
– notice: Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1872-7565
EndPage 105528
ExternalDocumentID PMC8153074
32470903
10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105528
S0169260719316001
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NCI NIH HHS
  grantid: U01 CA248226
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-~X
.1-
.DC
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29F
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYFN
AAYWO
ABBOA
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACLOT
ACNNM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ACZNC
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADJOM
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AHZHX
AIALX
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
AOUOD
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
GBOLZ
HLZ
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LG9
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SBC
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPC
SPCBC
SSH
SSV
SSZ
T5K
UHS
WUQ
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZY4
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABTAH
ABYKQ
AFKWA
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
LCYCR
RIG
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
AFCTW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-8594b5b9f4eec83b8cd58e6fb381533fb4c06eae4ea39c14b1e3babb21cc321e3
ISICitedReferencesCount 12
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000557906500013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0169-2607
1872-7565
IngestDate Tue Sep 30 15:34:54 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 28 06:21:22 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:29:44 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:23:56 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 20:27:39 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:46:43 EST 2024
Tue Oct 14 19:32:55 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Homology Profile
Gleason grading
Prostate cancer
Digitized needle biopsy samples
Statistical representation
Language English
License Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c572t-8594b5b9f4eec83b8cd58e6fb381533fb4c06eae4ea39c14b1e3babb21cc321e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0169260719316001?via%3Dihub
PMID 32470903
PQID 2408205000
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8153074
proquest_miscellaneous_2408205000
pubmed_primary_32470903
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105528
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105528
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105528
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_cmpb_2020_105528
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Ireland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Ireland
PublicationTitle Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Comput Methods Programs Biomed
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
References Macenko, Niethammer, Marron, Borland, Woosley, Guan, Schmitt, Thomas (bib0033) 2009
Arvaniti, Fricker, Moret, Rupp, Hermanns, Fankhauser, Wey, Wild, Rueschoff, Claassen (bib0012) 2018; 8
Mosquera-Lopez, Agaian, Velez-Hoyos, Thompson (bib0009) 2014; 8
Li, Li, Sarma, Ho, Shen, Knudsen, Gertych, Arnold (bib0011) 2018; 38
Otsu (bib0039) 1979; 9
Pantanowitz, Valenstein, Evans, Kaplan, Pfeifer, Wilbur, Collins, Colgan (bib0004) 2011; 2
Ali, Veltri, Epstein, Christudass, Madabhushi (bib0022) 2015; 41
Epstein (bib0034) 2015; 107
Poojitha, Sharma (bib0015) 2019
Nakane, Takiyama, Mori, Matsuura (bib0042) 2015; 10
Nakane, Tsuchihashi, Matsuura (bib0043) 2013; volume 8
Bera, Schalper, Rimm, Velcheti, Madabhushi (bib0008) 2019; 16
Madabhushi, Feldman, Leo (bib0021) 2020; 21
Fuchs, Buhmann (bib0020) 2011; 35
Xing, Yang (bib0006) 2016; 9
Wonnacott, Wonnacott (bib0036) 1990; 5
van Leenders, Kweldam, Hollemans, Kümmerlin, Nieboer, Verhoef, Remmers, Incrocci, Bangma, van der Kwast (bib0041) 2020; 77
Ström, Kartasalo, Olsson, Solorzano, Delahunt, Berney, Bostwick, Evans, Grignon, Humphrey (bib0018) 2020
Bulten, Pinckaers, van Boven, Vink, de Bel, van Ginneken, van der Laak, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Litjens (bib0019) 2020
Qaiser, Sirinukunwattana, Nakane, Tsang, Epstein, Rajpoot (bib0029) 2016; 90
Monaco, Madabhushi (bib0017) 2012; 16
Doyle, Feldman, Tomaszewski, Madabhushi (bib0016) 2010; 59
Humphrey (bib0026) 2004; 17
Ruifrok, Johnston (bib0032) 2001; 23
Farooq, Shaukat, Akram, Waqas, Ahmad (bib0010) 2017
Krizhevsky, Sutskever, Hinton (bib0040) 2012
Edelsbrunner, Harer (bib0028) 2008; 453
A.G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang, T. Weyand, M. Andreetto, H. Adam, Mobilenets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications
Qaiser, Tsang, Epstein, Rajpoot (bib0030) 2017
Xu, Xiang, Liu, Gilmore, Wu, Tang, Madabhushi (bib0037) 2016; 35
Hamilton, Bankhead, Wang, Hutchinson, Kieran, McArt, James, Salto-Tellez (bib0005) 2014; 70
Gleason, Mellinger (bib0002) 1974; 111
Nagpal, Foote, Liu, Chen, Wulczyn, Tan, Olson, Smith, Mohtashamian, Wren (bib0013) 2019; 2
Lee, Sparks, Ali, Shih, Feldman, Spangler, Rebbeck, Tomaszewski, Madabhushi (bib0024) 2014; 9
Leo, Elliott, Shih, Gupta, Feldman, Madabhushi (bib0023) 2018; 8
Bankhead, Loughrey, Fernández, Dombrowski, McArt, Dunne, McQuaid, Gray, Murray, Coleman (bib0007) 2017; 7
Chen, Zhou (bib0027) 2016; 28
(2017).
Campanella, Hanna, Geneslaw, Miraflor, Werneck Krauss Silva, Busam, Brogi, Reuter, Klimstra, Fuchs (bib0014) 2019; 25
DeGroot, Schervish (bib0035) 2012
Epstein, Humphrey, Amin, Reuter (bib0003) 2017
Bray, Ferlay, Soerjomataram, Siegel, Torre, Jemal (bib0001) 2018; 68
Niazi, Yao, Zynger, Clinton, Chen, Koyutürk, LaFramboise, Gurcan (bib0025) 2017; 21
Qaiser, Tsang, Taniyama, Sakamoto, Nakane, Epstein, Rajpoot (bib0031) 2019
Xu (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0037) 2016; 35
van Leenders (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0041) 2020; 77
Pantanowitz (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0004) 2011; 2
Lee (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0024) 2014; 9
Otsu (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0039) 1979; 9
Madabhushi (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0021) 2020; 21
Bulten (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0019) 2020
Humphrey (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0026) 2004; 17
Bray (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0001) 2018; 68
Monaco (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0017) 2012; 16
Nakane (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0042) 2015; 10
Mosquera-Lopez (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0009) 2014; 8
Nagpal (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0013) 2019; 2
Qaiser (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0030) 2017
Li (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0011) 2018; 38
Epstein (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0003) 2017
Edelsbrunner (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0028) 2008; 453
Niazi (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0025) 2017; 21
DeGroot (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0035) 2012
Campanella (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0014) 2019; 25
Nakane (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0043) 2013; volume 8
Xing (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0006) 2016; 9
Gleason (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0002) 1974; 111
Qaiser (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0029) 2016; 90
Poojitha (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0015) 2019
Ruifrok (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0032) 2001; 23
Arvaniti (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0012) 2018; 8
Fuchs (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_sbref0020) 2011; 35
Macenko (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0033) 2009
10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0038
Ström (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0018) 2020
Farooq (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0010) 2017
Qaiser (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0031) 2019
Krizhevsky (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0040) 2012
Chen (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0027) 2016; 28
Bankhead (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0007) 2017; 7
Leo (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0023) 2018; 8
Hamilton (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0005) 2014; 70
Ali (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0022) 2015; 41
Wonnacott (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0036) 1990; 5
Epstein (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0034) 2015; 107
Bera (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0008) 2019; 16
Doyle (10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0016) 2010; 59
References_xml – volume: 68
  start-page: 394
  year: 2018
  end-page: 424
  ident: bib0001
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
– volume: 38
  start-page: 945
  year: 2018
  end-page: 954
  ident: bib0011
  article-title: Path r-cnn for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleasongrading of histological images
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1205
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1218
  ident: bib0016
  article-title: A boosted bayesian multiresolution classifier for prostate cancer detection from digitized needle biopsies
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 292
  year: 2004
  ident: bib0026
  article-title: Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate
  publication-title: Mod. Pathol.
– volume: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: bib0012
  article-title: Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 703
  year: 2019
  end-page: 715
  ident: bib0008
  article-title: Artificial intelligence in digital pathology new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 16878
  year: 2017
  ident: bib0007
  article-title: Qupath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
– start-page: 642
  year: 2017
  end-page: 645
  ident: bib0010
  article-title: Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using gabor filter and local binary patterns
  publication-title: 2017 40th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)
– volume: 28
  start-page: 58
  year: 2016
  ident: bib0027
  article-title: The evolving Gleason grading system
  publication-title: Chin. J. Cancer Res.
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1477
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1489
  ident: bib0017
  article-title: Class-specific weighting for markov random field estimation: application to medical image segmentation
  publication-title: Med. Image Anal.
– volume: 77
  start-page: 191
  year: 2020
  end-page: 198
  ident: bib0041
  article-title: Improved prostate cancer biopsy grading by incorporation of invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma in the 2014 grade groups
  publication-title: Eur. Urol.
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1301
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1309
  ident: bib0014
  article-title: Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
  publication-title: Nat. Med.
– volume: 21
  start-page: 187
  year: 2020
  end-page: 189
  ident: bib0021
  article-title: Deep-learning approaches for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– year: 2012
  ident: bib0035
  article-title: Probability and Statistics
– volume: 5
  year: 1990
  ident: bib0036
  article-title: Introductory Statistics
– volume: 111
  start-page: 58
  year: 1974
  end-page: 64
  ident: bib0002
  article-title: Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging
  publication-title: J. Urol.
– volume: 107
  start-page: 205
  year: 2015
  end-page: 207
  ident: bib0034
  article-title: A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system: message to the italian pathologists
  publication-title: Pathologica
– volume: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: bib0004
  article-title: Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology
  publication-title: J. Pathol. Inform.
– volume: 70
  start-page: 59
  year: 2014
  end-page: 73
  ident: bib0005
  article-title: Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research
  publication-title: Methods
– year: 2017
  ident: bib0003
  article-title: Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 international society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma
  publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol.
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: bib0024
  article-title: Co-occurring gland angularity in localized subgraphs: predicting biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 90
  start-page: 119
  year: 2016
  end-page: 124
  ident: bib0029
  article-title: Persistent homology for fast tumor segmentation in whole slide histology images
  publication-title: Procedia Comput. Sci.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 119
  year: 2016
  end-page: 130
  ident: bib0037
  article-title: Stacked sparse autoencoder (ssae) for nuclei detection on breast cancer histopathology images
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 13
  ident: bib0022
  article-title: Selective invocation of shape priors for deformable segmentation and morphologic classification of prostate cancer tissue microarrays
  publication-title: Comput. Med. Imaging  Graph.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 48
  year: 2019
  ident: bib0013
  article-title: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
  publication-title: NPJ Digit. Med.
– volume: 8
  start-page: 14918
  year: 2018
  ident: bib0023
  article-title: Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
– volume: 453
  start-page: 257
  year: 2008
  end-page: 282
  ident: bib0028
  article-title: Persistent homology-a survey
  publication-title: Contemp. Math.
– start-page: 1107
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1110
  ident: bib0033
  article-title: A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis
  publication-title: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro
– volume: 8
  start-page: 98
  year: 2014
  end-page: 113
  ident: bib0009
  article-title: Computer-aided prostate cancer diagnosis from digitized histopathology: a review on texture-based systems
  publication-title: IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0018
  article-title: Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– start-page: 899
  year: 2019
  end-page: 903
  ident: bib0015
  article-title: Hybrid unified deep learning network for highly precise Gleason grading of prostate cancer
  publication-title: 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)
– start-page: 320
  year: 2017
  end-page: 329
  ident: bib0030
  article-title: Tumor segmentation in whole slide images using persistent homology and deep convolutional features
  publication-title: Annual Conference on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1027
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1038
  ident: bib0025
  article-title: Visually meaningful histopathological features for automatic grading of prostate cancer
  publication-title: IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 291
  year: 2001
  end-page: 299
  ident: bib0032
  article-title: Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution
  publication-title: Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol.
– year: 2020
  ident: bib0019
  article-title: Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
– start-page: 1097
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1105
  ident: bib0040
  article-title: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
  publication-title: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
– reference: A.G. Howard, M. Zhu, B. Chen, D. Kalenichenko, W. Wang, T. Weyand, M. Andreetto, H. Adam, Mobilenets: efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications,
– year: 2019
  ident: bib0031
  article-title: Fast and accurate tumor segmentation of histology images using persistent homology and deep convolutional features
  publication-title: Med. Image Anal.
– volume: 10
  start-page: 36
  year: 2015
  ident: bib0042
  article-title: Homology-based method for detecting regions of interest in colonic digital images
  publication-title: Diagnostic pathology
– volume: volume 8
  start-page: S27
  year: 2013
  ident: bib0043
  article-title: A simple mathematical model utilizing topological invariants for automatic detection of tumor areas in digital tissue images
  publication-title: Diagnostic pathology
– volume: 9
  start-page: 234
  year: 2016
  end-page: 263
  ident: bib0006
  article-title: Robust nucleus/cell detection and segmentation in digital pathology and microscopy images: a comprehensive review
  publication-title: IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 515
  year: 2011
  end-page: 530
  ident: bib0020
  article-title: Computational pathology: Challenges and promises for tissue analysis
  publication-title: Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
– reference: (2017).
– volume: 9
  start-page: 62
  year: 1979
  end-page: 66
  ident: bib0039
  article-title: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
– volume: 90
  start-page: 119
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0029
  article-title: Persistent homology for fast tumor segmentation in whole slide histology images
  publication-title: Procedia Comput. Sci.
  doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.033
– volume: 5
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0036
– year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0031
  article-title: Fast and accurate tumor segmentation of histology images using persistent homology and deep convolutional features
  publication-title: Med. Image Anal.
  doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.014
– volume: 9
  start-page: 62
  issue: 1
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0039
  article-title: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.
  doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
– volume: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0004
  article-title: Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology
  publication-title: J. Pathol. Inform.
  doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.83746
– volume: 38
  start-page: 945
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0011
  article-title: Path r-cnn for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleasongrading of histological images
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2875868
– start-page: 899
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0015
  article-title: Hybrid unified deep learning network for highly precise Gleason grading of prostate cancer
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1205
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0016
  article-title: A boosted bayesian multiresolution classifier for prostate cancer detection from digitized needle biopsies
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2053540
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0035
– volume: 111
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 1974
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0002
  article-title: Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging
  publication-title: J. Urol.
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4
– volume: 9
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0024
  article-title: Co-occurring gland angularity in localized subgraphs: predicting biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097954
– volume: 8
  start-page: 14918
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0023
  article-title: Stable and discriminating features are predictive of cancer presence and Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-site study
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33026-5
– volume: 16
  start-page: 703
  issue: 11
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0008
  article-title: Artificial intelligence in digital pathology new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology
  publication-title: Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.
  doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0018
  article-title: Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7
– volume: 35
  start-page: 119
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0037
  article-title: Stacked sparse autoencoder (ssae) for nuclei detection on breast cancer histopathology images
  publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2458702
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0019
  article-title: Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9
– volume: 35
  start-page: 515
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_sbref0020
  article-title: Computational pathology: Challenges and promises for tissue analysis
  publication-title: Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
  doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2011.02.006
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1027
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0025
  article-title: Visually meaningful histopathological features for automatic grading of prostate cancer
  publication-title: IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.
  doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2565515
– volume: volume 8
  start-page: S27
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0043
  article-title: A simple mathematical model utilizing topological invariants for automatic detection of tumor areas in digital tissue images
– start-page: 1107
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0033
  article-title: A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis
– volume: 9
  start-page: 234
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0006
  article-title: Robust nucleus/cell detection and segmentation in digital pathology and microscopy images: a comprehensive review
  publication-title: IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.
  doi: 10.1109/RBME.2016.2515127
– volume: 8
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0012
  article-title: Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30535-1
– start-page: 1097
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0040
  article-title: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
– volume: 2
  start-page: 48
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0013
  article-title: Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
  publication-title: NPJ Digit. Med.
  doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1301
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0014
  article-title: Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images
  publication-title: Nat. Med.
  doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1477
  issue: 8
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0017
  article-title: Class-specific weighting for markov random field estimation: application to medical image segmentation
  publication-title: Med. Image Anal.
  doi: 10.1016/j.media.2012.06.007
– ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0038
– volume: 23
  start-page: 291
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0032
  article-title: Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution
  publication-title: Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol.
– volume: 17
  start-page: 292
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0026
  article-title: Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate
  publication-title: Mod. Pathol.
  doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800054
– volume: 21
  start-page: 187
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0021
  article-title: Deep-learning approaches for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30793-4
– volume: 28
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0027
  article-title: The evolving Gleason grading system
  publication-title: Chin. J. Cancer Res.
– volume: 70
  start-page: 59
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0005
  article-title: Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research
  publication-title: Methods
  doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.06.015
– volume: 77
  start-page: 191
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0041
  article-title: Improved prostate cancer biopsy grading by incorporation of invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma in the 2014 grade groups
  publication-title: Eur. Urol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051
– start-page: 642
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0010
  article-title: Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using gabor filter and local binary patterns
– volume: 41
  start-page: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0022
  article-title: Selective invocation of shape priors for deformable segmentation and morphologic classification of prostate cancer tissue microarrays
  publication-title: Comput. Med. Imaging  Graph.
  doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.11.001
– start-page: 320
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0030
  article-title: Tumor segmentation in whole slide images using persistent homology and deep convolutional features
– year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0003
  article-title: Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 international society of urological pathology (isup) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma
  publication-title: Am. J. Surg. Pathol.
  doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820
– volume: 7
  start-page: 16878
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0007
  article-title: Qupath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis
  publication-title: Sci. Rep.
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5
– volume: 453
  start-page: 257
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0028
  article-title: Persistent homology-a survey
  publication-title: Contemp. Math.
  doi: 10.1090/conm/453/08802
– volume: 10
  start-page: 36
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0042
  article-title: Homology-based method for detecting regions of interest in colonic digital images
  publication-title: Diagnostic pathology
  doi: 10.1186/s13000-015-0244-x
– volume: 68
  start-page: 394
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0001
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin.
– volume: 107
  start-page: 205
  issue: 3–4
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0034
  article-title: A new contemporary prostate cancer grading system: message to the italian pathologists
  publication-title: Pathologica
– volume: 8
  start-page: 98
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528_bib0009
  article-title: Computer-aided prostate cancer diagnosis from digitized histopathology: a review on texture-based systems
  publication-title: IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng.
  doi: 10.1109/RBME.2014.2340401
SSID ssj0002556
Score 2.3800664
Snippet •A new Statistical Representations of Homology Profile (SRHP) and its statistical representation was presented to capture the topological arrangement of nuclei...
Gleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 105528
SubjectTerms Biopsy
Digitized needle biopsy samples
Gleason grading
Homology Profile
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Male
Neoplasm Grading
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Statistical representation
Title Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0169260719316001
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32470903
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2408205000
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8153074
Volume 194
WOSCitedRecordID wos000557906500013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1872-7565
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002556
  issn: 0169-2607
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ba9swFBZpO8Zexu7LLkWDvQWXxLZs-TGMll3LYN3Inowky2m71DZJXNL9hf3pnWNJzo11F9iLcWTLEjmfdC46F0JeworhmsWJJxMZeWGuQ0_kuu9lmVAi0ooFjWngy_v4-JiPRsnHTueHi4W5nMRFwReLpPqvpIY2IDaGzv4FuduPQgPcA9HhCmSH6x8RfljPSxBDQZAcT7TAAoPjaeMoj-cCFQZ5wMOePCur2VUPpMxMz1AGxeYmaXOT6b9aRiUZP7nT8sJka7JFvleFWlcZwpajntnkA43jV-Nua2L8187wvwp32l9eCcs90SYtvlnn23fiew3S7dLgbzalEcB5vKjb7xzVDRMR5ar5AnRV5whnbWpbcTXGzBklHmhahhVrszXzGHQBZipLtHu3qZC8xQeMSeL8QF1U8gCHxXrGzIahr-fX_oSD4Vggyg5Q_Nshe37MEtgi94ZvDkdvW8aO2dpMqngzORuDZdwFN0f6lZyzrcdsuuOuyDcnd8htq5jQoQHUXdLRxT1y84Ml232St7iiFlfU4orCrcMVNbiiBldUwt0SV3QDV7TMqcMVtbh6QD4fHZ68eu3ZIh2eYrE_9zhLQslkkodaKx5IrjLGdZRLEAVBlchlqPqRFjrUIkjUIJQDHUghpT9QKvDhx0OyW5SFfkxoDsq6zINAY8kA5fscuGmkw8gXGY-Y5F0ycH9pqmwGeyykMkmdq-J5imRIkQypIUOX9No-lcnfcu3bgaNU6iKTgZemAKtre7G2l5VbjTz6234vHBhS2NTxpA6WWFnPUsw76PexVkmXPDLgaGcPGlCMxtUuiddg076ACePXnxRnp03ieKQIqAxP_nG-T8mt5Qp-Rnbn01o_JzfUJcBouk924hHft2vmJ4qc7N8
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated+gleason+grading+on+prostate+biopsy+slides+by+statistical+representations+of+homology+profile&rft.jtitle=Computer+methods+and+programs+in+biomedicine&rft.au=Yan%2C+Chaoyang&rft.au=Nakane%2C+Kazuaki&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiangxue&rft.au=Fu%2C+Yao&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=0169-2607&rft.eissn=1872-7565&rft.volume=194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cmpb.2020.105528&rft.externalDocID=S0169260719316001
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0169-2607&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0169-2607&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0169-2607&client=summon