On the Practice of Lagging Variables to Avoid Simultaneity

A common practice in applied economics research consists of replacing a suspected simultaneously determined explanatory variable with its lagged value. This note demonstrates that this practice does not enable one to avoid simultaneity bias. The associated estimates are still inconsistent, and hypot...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics Ročník 77; číslo 6; s. 897 - 905
Hlavný autor: Reed, William Robert
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
Wiley-Blackwell
Predmet:
Applied economics
Economic research
Economic theory
Economics
Effectiveness studies
Endogenous
Estimating techniques
Estimation
Estimation bias
Hypothesis testing
Internet
Lagged variables
Research methodology
Reverse causality
Simultaneity
Valuation methods
ISSN:0305-9049, 1468-0084
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:A common practice in applied economics research consists of replacing a suspected simultaneously determined explanatory variable with its lagged value. This note demonstrates that this practice does not enable one to avoid simultaneity bias. The associated estimates are still inconsistent, and hypothesis testing is invalid. An alternative is to use lagged values of the endogenous variable in instrumental variable estimation. However, this is only an effective estimation strategy if the lagged values do not themselves belong in the respective estimating equation, and if they are sufficiently correlated with the simultaneously determined explanatory variable.
Bibliografia:ark:/67375/WNG-MBJJ92XW-2
ArticleID:OBES12088
istex:ED0DA7B86AAD0EBE03A19F2A8AAAF0ACC129A6E5
I acknowledge helpful comments from Kuntal Das, Chris Hajzler, Steven Stillman, Jeffrey Wooldridge, James Ziliak, Arthur Grimes and seminar participants at the University of Otago and the 2014 New Zealand Association of Economists conference. I am also grateful for the comments from anonymous reviewers which substantially improved the analysis. Remaining errors are my own.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0305-9049
1468-0084
DOI:10.1111/obes.12088