On the Practice of Lagging Variables to Avoid Simultaneity

A common practice in applied economics research consists of replacing a suspected simultaneously determined explanatory variable with its lagged value. This note demonstrates that this practice does not enable one to avoid simultaneity bias. The associated estimates are still inconsistent, and hypot...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics Ročník 77; číslo 6; s. 897 - 905
Hlavní autor: Reed, William Robert
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2015
Wiley-Blackwell
Témata:
Applied economics
Economic research
Economic theory
Economics
Effectiveness studies
Endogenous
Estimating techniques
Estimation
Estimation bias
Hypothesis testing
Internet
Lagged variables
Research methodology
Reverse causality
Simultaneity
Valuation methods
ISSN:0305-9049, 1468-0084
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:A common practice in applied economics research consists of replacing a suspected simultaneously determined explanatory variable with its lagged value. This note demonstrates that this practice does not enable one to avoid simultaneity bias. The associated estimates are still inconsistent, and hypothesis testing is invalid. An alternative is to use lagged values of the endogenous variable in instrumental variable estimation. However, this is only an effective estimation strategy if the lagged values do not themselves belong in the respective estimating equation, and if they are sufficiently correlated with the simultaneously determined explanatory variable.
Bibliografie:ark:/67375/WNG-MBJJ92XW-2
ArticleID:OBES12088
istex:ED0DA7B86AAD0EBE03A19F2A8AAAF0ACC129A6E5
I acknowledge helpful comments from Kuntal Das, Chris Hajzler, Steven Stillman, Jeffrey Wooldridge, James Ziliak, Arthur Grimes and seminar participants at the University of Otago and the 2014 New Zealand Association of Economists conference. I am also grateful for the comments from anonymous reviewers which substantially improved the analysis. Remaining errors are my own.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0305-9049
1468-0084
DOI:10.1111/obes.12088