Biologic monitoring and causes of failure in cycles of sterilization in dental care offices in Mexico

Biologic indicator tests (BIs) are considered the most meaningful way to verify sterilization. To monitor the cycles of sterilization using BIs in dry heat sterilizers and steam autoclaves and to identify the causes of failures in the cycles of sterilization in dental offices in San Luis Potosí, Méx...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of infection control Vol. 43; no. 10; pp. 1092 - 1095
Main Authors: Patiño-Marín, Nuria, Martínez-Castañón, Gabriel A., Zavala-Alonso, Norma V., Medina-Solís, Carlo E., Torres-Méndez, Fernando, Cepeda-Argüelles, Oscar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2015
Mosby-Year Book, Inc
Subjects:
Autoclave
Biologic indicators
Dental care
Dental Offices
Disease control
Dry heat
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental Monitoring - standards
Humans
Indicator organisms
Indicators and Reagents
Infection
Infectious Disease
Mexico
Quality control
Sterilization
Sterilization - methods
Sterilization - standards
Temperature
Training
Mexico
Infection
Dry heat
Autoclave
Biologic indicators
ISSN:0196-6553, 1527-3296, 1527-3296
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Biologic indicator tests (BIs) are considered the most meaningful way to verify sterilization. To monitor the cycles of sterilization using BIs in dry heat sterilizers and steam autoclaves and to identify the causes of failures in the cycles of sterilization in dental offices in San Luis Potosí, México. An invitation to participate was sent to 400 dental offices, and 206 practitioners of 200 dental offices were included. A questionnaire was given to each of the participants, asking for the following information: sterilizer type, operational parameters used (eg, temperature, pressure, and length of exposure), frequency of sterilization cycles per day, use of BIs, and maintenance procedures of the sterilizer. Two hundred thirty sterilizers were monitored using BIs. The sterilizers with positive results were monitored a second and third time to identify the cause of the failure. Twenty-two percent of practitioners (n = 46) used BIs, and 17% (n = 39) of the sterilizers reported positive results (bacterial growth). The detected failures were a mistake in the procedure (eg, temperature, time, or pressure), an absence of supervision of the procedure performed by the assistant, and improper maintenance. There are opportunities to increase information on infection control, to improve the adoption of standard quality control methods for sterilization as a routine process, to improve training on proper testing, and standardize processes. •The 50% of the practitioners accepted the invitation of participate in the study.•Twenty-two percent of the practitioners (n = 46) had used BIs.•17% (n = 39) reported bacterial grown in the sterilizers of dry heat and autoclaves.•The detected failures were a mistake in the procedure, the absence of the supervision of the procedure and improper maintenance.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-6553
1527-3296
1527-3296
DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.034