“It’s a reasonable gamble”—rural residents’ experience participating in cancer clinical trials at a single rural trial unit

Background We conducted a qualitative study to examine what factors influence rural-residing people with cancer to participate in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and what factors influence their retention in CCT. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from a regional cancer centre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 67 - 10
Main Authors: McPhee, Narelle J., Hughes, Diane, Ristevski, Eli
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London BioMed Central 25.02.2025
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Subjects:
Access
Aged
Altruism
Biomedicine
Cancer
Cancer clinical trials
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic - psychology
Consent
Equity
Evidence-based medicine
Female
Females
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Sciences
Humans
Informed Consent
Interviews
Interviews as Topic
Male
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Melanoma
Metastasis
Methods
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
Participation
Patient education
Patient Participation
Patient satisfaction
Patient Selection
Qualitative Research
Recruiting
Research ethics
Research Subjects - psychology
Rural areas
Rural health
Rural Health Services
Rural Population
Software
Statistics for Life Sciences
Trust
Victoria
Victoria
Australia
Rural health
Equity
Access
Cancer clinical trials
ISSN:1745-6215, 1745-6215
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background We conducted a qualitative study to examine what factors influence rural-residing people with cancer to participate in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and what factors influence their retention in CCT. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from a regional cancer centre in Victoria, Australia, to participate in a semi-structured interview. Eligible participants were ≥ 18 years of age at the time of cancer diagnosis, newly consented to a clinical trial (< 1 year) or have been a trial participant for ≥ 1 year, lived in a non-metropolitan area classified within the Monash Modified (MM) Model 2–7 and able to provide informed consent. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data. Results Seventeen participants were interviewed; 10 identified as female and seven as male. Participant’s ages ranged from 52 to 77 years, with a median age of 62 years. Eight participants had been on a CCT for ≤ 1 and 10 for ≥ 1 year. Factors that influenced their decision to participate in a CCT included trust and confidence in clinical trial staff, exposure to and trust in the experiences of cancer peers, altruism, low-risk trials and local access to trials. The factors influencing their decision to remain in a CCT included balancing the benefits and burdens of the trial, having no doubts about participating despite knowing the risks and seeing the personal benefits of participating in a CCT. Conclusion Our study shows that trust-based relationships, peer support, and altruism encourage rural residents to participate in CCT. To improve access to CCT for rural residents, a multi-faceted approach involving clinicians, health services, trial sponsors and policymakers is needed. These approaches must promote and facilitate the inclusion of diverse populations, prioritise CCT participation, and inform patients of CCT opportunities. We must recognise the knowledge and expertise of rural patients and caregivers and ensure they are involved as co-designers of future CCTs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1745-6215
1745-6215
DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08731-y