Understanding How the Design and Implementation of Online Consultations Affect Primary Care Quality: Systematic Review of Evidence With Recommendations for Designers, Providers, and Researchers
Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. We aimed to synth...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical Internet research Jg. 24; H. 10; S. e37436 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Canada
Journal of Medical Internet Research
24.10.2022
Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor JMIR Publications |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 1438-8871, 1439-4456, 1438-8871 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality.
We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation.
We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach.
We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients' queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats.
This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses).
PROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation. We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients’ queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats. This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses). Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation. We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients' queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats. This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses). PROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy. Background: Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. Objective: We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation. Methods: We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach. Results: We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients’ queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats. Conclusions: This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses). Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy BackgroundOnline consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. ObjectiveWe aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation. MethodsWe searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach. ResultsWe synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients’ queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats. ConclusionsThis is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses). Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy Background Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality. Objective We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation. Methods We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach. Results We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients’ queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats. Conclusions This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses). Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020191802; Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality.BACKGROUNDOnline consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to policy initiatives and COVID-19. There is a lack of evidence regarding how OC design and implementation influence care quality.We aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation.OBJECTIVEWe aimed to synthesize research on the impacts of OCs on primary care quality, and how these are influenced by system design and implementation.We searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach.METHODSWe searched databases from January 2010 to February 2022. We included quantitative and qualitative studies of real-world OC use in primary care. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative themes. We used thematic synthesis informed by the Institute of Medicine domains of health care quality, and framework analysis informed by the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework. Strength of evidence was judged using the GRADE-CERQual approach.We synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients' queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats.RESULTSWe synthesized 63 studies from 9 countries covering 31 OC systems, 14 (22%) of which used artificial intelligence; 41% (26/63) of studies were published from 2020 onward, and 17% (11/63) were published after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no quantitative evidence for negative impacts of OCs on patient safety, and qualitative studies suggested varied perceptions of their safety. Some participants believed OCs improved safety, particularly when patients could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload decreased when sufficient resources were allocated to implement OCs and patients used them for simple problems or could describe their queries using free text. Staff workload increased when OCs were not integrated with other software or organizational workflows and patients used them for complex queries. OC systems that required patients to describe their queries using multiple-choice questionnaires increased workload for patients and staff. Health costs decreased when patients used OCs for simple queries and increased when patients used them for complex queries. Patients using OCs were more likely to be female, younger, and native speakers, with higher socioeconomic status. OCs increased primary care access for patients with mental health conditions, verbal communication difficulties, and barriers to attending in-person appointments. Access also increased by providing a timely response to patients' queries. Patient satisfaction increased when using OCs owing to better primary care access, although it decreased when using multiple-choice questionnaire formats.This is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses).CONCLUSIONSThis is the first theoretically informed synthesis of research on OCs in primary care and includes studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. It contributes new knowledge that, in addition to having positive impacts on care quality such as increased access, OCs also have negative impacts such as increased workload. Negative impacts can be mitigated through appropriate OC system design (eg, free text format), incorporation of advanced technologies (eg, artificial intelligence), and integration into technical infrastructure (eg, software) and organizational workflows (eg, timely responses).PROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONPROSPERO CRD42020191802; https://tinyurl.com/2p84ezjy. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Coulson, Tessa van der Veer, Sabine N Moschogianis, Susan Darley, Sarah Wong, David C Peek, Niels Brown, Benjamin C |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom 3 Centre for Health Informatics Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom 2 National Health Service Salford Clinical Commissioning Group Salford United Kingdom 4 National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom 5 National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester Manchester United Kingdom 6 Department of Computer Science The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 5 National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester Manchester United Kingdom – name: 1 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom – name: 6 Department of Computer Science The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom – name: 3 Centre for Health Informatics Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom – name: 2 National Health Service Salford Clinical Commissioning Group Salford United Kingdom – name: 4 National Institute for Health and Care Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre School of Health Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sarah orcidid: 0000-0001-5420-6774 surname: Darley fullname: Darley, Sarah – sequence: 2 givenname: Tessa orcidid: 0000-0002-2080-5653 surname: Coulson fullname: Coulson, Tessa – sequence: 3 givenname: Niels orcidid: 0000-0002-6393-9969 surname: Peek fullname: Peek, Niels – sequence: 4 givenname: Susan orcidid: 0000-0002-7002-7933 surname: Moschogianis fullname: Moschogianis, Susan – sequence: 5 givenname: Sabine N orcidid: 0000-0003-0929-436X surname: van der Veer fullname: van der Veer, Sabine N – sequence: 6 givenname: David C orcidid: 0000-0001-8117-9193 surname: Wong fullname: Wong, David C – sequence: 7 givenname: Benjamin C orcidid: 0000-0001-9975-4782 surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Benjamin C |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36279172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptk91u0zAUgCM0xH7YKyBLCAkEHY6dOskukKYyWKWJwcbEpeXax62nxC52srHH4804WTtYJ5SLWCefv_MTezfb8sFDlu3n9IDltXjPy4KLJ9lOXvBqVFVlvvVgvZ3tpnRFKaNFnT_LtrlgZZ2XbCf7fekNxNQpb5yfk5NwQ7oFkI-Q3NwTjJJpu2ygBd-pzgVPgiVnvnEeyCT41DercCJH1oLuyNfoWhVvyURFIN961bju9pBc3KYOWiQ1OYdrBzeD5vjaGfAayA_XLTCuQ4tpzNpnQ1xXgeW9Q28Y8GE5FHUOCVTUCww8z55a1STYX7_3sstPx98nJ6PTs8_TydHpSI_HVTeyulaKaVNorgo2NszWqoBCzcDODGjNuAVGDRI1o0rzcV3QmdXKcKYpWMH3sunKa4K6kstVnzIoJ-8CIc6lithhA1IInVM65oWtqkIpWglr8lyjnwlbzUp0fVi5lv2sBaNxulE1G9LNL94t5Dxcy1qwnNMaBa_Xghh-9pA62bqkoWmUh9AnyUpW4d9nVYXoy0foVeijx1EhxWnBC1aLf9RcYQPO24B59SCVR6XgQmDaoe6D_1D4GGidxgNpHcY3NrzZ2IBMB7-6uepTktOLL5vsi4dD-TuN-8OKwNsVoGNIKYKV2q2OH1bhGplTOVwFeXcVkH71iL4XbnJ_AKUICUI |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_023_01287_y crossref_primary_10_3399_BJGP_2024_0228 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_072944 crossref_primary_10_2196_63068 crossref_primary_10_2196_59620 crossref_primary_10_2196_56711 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11524_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2023_105296 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjoq_2024_002741 crossref_primary_10_2196_66672 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina61050826 crossref_primary_10_1002_hec_70014 crossref_primary_10_1089_tmj_2023_0274 crossref_primary_10_2196_44944 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_088169 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2024_1459684 crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics13152989 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13982 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjhci_2023_100861 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering11040337 crossref_primary_10_2196_51272 crossref_primary_10_3389_frhs_2024_1499847 crossref_primary_10_2196_55158 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_12044_2 crossref_primary_10_3399_BJGP_2024_0184 crossref_primary_10_2196_40690 crossref_primary_10_3399_BJGP_2024_0322 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1007/s41233-020-00038-x 10.2196/19149 10.3233/EFI-180221 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948 10.3399/bjgp20X710933 10.7326/M15-0498 10.1089/pop.2009.0018 10.2196/19375 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001310 10.3390/ijerph15050896 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.305 10.2196/16021 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104228 10.1089/tmj.2012.0221 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.011 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.016 10.1089/tmj.2017.0091 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169 10.2196/16484 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200241 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251 10.2196/jmir.4255 10.2196/jmir.8775 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036585 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895 10.2196/19264 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190081 10.2196/jmir.3171 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901 10.3399/bjgp19X701333 10.3389/fpubh.2021.588583 10.2196/23482 10.1089/tmj.2012.0095 10.2196/29868 10.3399/bjgp17X693509 10.2196/23851 10.2196/13042 10.1089/tmj.2019.0044 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1151 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.004 10.1177/2150132720909656 10.3310/hsdr06200 10.3399/bjgp14X677662 10.1093/jamia/ocaa051 10.3399/bjgp17X689929 10.3399/bjgp19X702197 10.1080/17571472.2016.1173946 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688 10.3399/bjgp18X694853 10.1136/bmj.n71 10.1089/tmj.2020.0047 10.1089/tmj.2010.0156 10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2900 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001208 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034773 10.1108/tg-06-2018-0041 10.2196/21698 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-376 10.2196/jmir.7374 10.14236/jhi.v23i2.141 10.4065/mcp.2010.0145 10.2196/14478 10.1136/bmj.k1195 10.1177/1357633X16675802 10.1136/bmj.n264 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0040 10.1177/2150132720910564 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6 10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9 10.1136/bmj.g1687 10.1186/s12916-019-1463-x 10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05122 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100114 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037064 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0426 10.1109/etelemed.2010.33 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 10.2196/18930 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019966 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20204-5 10.3399/bjgp17X693137 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32819-8 10.1089/tmj.2013.0097 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007 10.1093/ofid/ofz393 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Susan Moschogianis, Sabine N van der Veer, David C Wong, Benjamin C Brown. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2022. COPYRIGHT 2022 Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Susan Moschogianis, Sabine N van der Veer, David C Wong, Benjamin C Brown. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2022. 2022 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Susan Moschogianis, Sabine N van der Veer, David C Wong, Benjamin C Brown. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2022. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 Journal of Medical Internet Research – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Susan Moschogianis, Sabine N van der Veer, David C Wong, Benjamin C Brown. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2022. 2022 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISN 3V. 7QJ 7RV 7U3 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR BHHNA CCPQU CNYFK COVID DWQXO E3H F2A FYUFA GHDGH K9. KB0 M0S M1O NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PRQQA 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.2196/37436 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Canada ProQuest Central (Corporate) Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) Nursing & Allied Health Database Social Services Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials - QC ProQuest Central Sociological Abstracts ProQuest One Community College Library & Information Science Collection Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Library Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Proquest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Social Sciences MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Library Science ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Library & Information Science Collection Social Services Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Sociological Abstracts ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Library & Information Science |
| EISSN | 1438-8871 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_66c100534f884aa086fd11ce2026f8b7 PMC9621309 A763661307 36279172 10_2196_37436 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United States |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Wellcome Trust grantid: 209593/Z/17/Z |
| GroupedDBID | --- .4I .DC 29L 2WC 36B 53G 5GY 5VS 77I 77K 7RV 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAKPC AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABUWG ACGFO ADBBV AEGXH AENEX AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION CNYFK CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAP EBD EBS EJD ELW EMB EMOBN ESX F5P FRP FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO ICO IEA IHR INH ISN ITC KQ8 M1O M48 NAPCQ OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PPXIY PQQKQ PRQQA RNS RPM SJN SV3 TR2 UKHRP XSB ACUHS ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QJ 7U3 7XB 8FK AZQEC BHHNA COVID E3H F2A K9. PJZUB PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-fc9aa2cd4c3a425d2f9a4e4abefbdecc23fe20d2cd920ac35940bfcad32c0ef63 |
| IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 33 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000964685700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1438-8871 1439-4456 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:45:20 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:07:03 EST 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:37:50 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 08 16:12:10 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 11:15:43 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:38:59 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 16:23:11 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:20 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:08:10 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:22:41 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Keywords | telemedicine remote consultation primary health care pandemic patient care systematic review COVID-19 health outcome OC general practice health care professional primary care workforce triage care provider |
| Language | English |
| License | Sarah Darley, Tessa Coulson, Niels Peek, Susan Moschogianis, Sabine N van der Veer, David C Wong, Benjamin C Brown. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.10.2022. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c558t-fc9aa2cd4c3a425d2f9a4e4abefbdecc23fe20d2cd920ac35940bfcad32c0ef63 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Review-4 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0929-436X 0000-0001-5420-6774 0000-0002-6393-9969 0000-0002-7002-7933 0000-0001-8117-9193 0000-0002-2080-5653 0000-0001-9975-4782 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2730434296?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
| PMID | 36279172 |
| PQID | 2730434296 |
| PQPubID | 2033121 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_66c100534f884aa086fd11ce2026f8b7 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9621309 proquest_miscellaneous_2728143288 proquest_journals_2730434296 gale_infotracmisc_A763661307 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A763661307 gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A763661307 pubmed_primary_36279172 crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_37436 crossref_primary_10_2196_37436 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-10-24 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-10-24 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2022 text: 2022-10-24 day: 24 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Canada |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada – name: Toronto – name: Toronto, Canada |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of medical Internet research |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Med Internet Res |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | Journal of Medical Internet Research Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor JMIR Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Journal of Medical Internet Research – name: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor – name: JMIR Publications |
| References | ref57 ref56 (ref81) 2001 ref59 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref55 ref54 ref51 ref50 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref42 ref41 ref44 ref43 ref49 ref8 Wilson, G (ref63) 2021; 134 Ritchie, J (ref83) 1994 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref100 ref40 ref35 ref34 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 ref32 ref39 ref38 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref29 Rogers, EM (ref111) 1962 ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref97 ref96 ref11 ref99 ref10 ref98 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref93 ref92 ref95 ref91 ref90 Chen, L (ref82) 2019 ref89 ref86 ref85 ref88 ref87 ref84 Jung, C (ref101) 2011; 2011 ref80 ref79 ref108 ref78 ref109 ref106 ref107 ref75 ref104 ref74 ref105 ref77 ref102 ref76 ref103 ref2 Padman, R (ref94) 2010; 160 ref1 ref71 ref70 ref73 ref72 ref110 ref68 ref67 ref69 ref64 ref66 Pawson, R (ref65) 1997 ref60 ref62 ref61 |
| References_xml | – volume: 2011 start-page: 1070 year: 2011 ident: ref101 publication-title: AMIA Annu Symp Proc – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1007/s41233-020-00038-x – ident: ref56 doi: 10.2196/19149 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.3233/EFI-180221 – ident: ref85 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948 – ident: ref24 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710933 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.7326/M15-0498 – ident: ref100 doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0018 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.2196/19375 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001310 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050896 – ident: ref99 doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.305 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.2196/16021 – ident: ref13 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104228 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0221 – ident: ref103 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.011 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.016 – ident: ref50 – ident: ref102 – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0091 – ident: ref79 doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.2196/16484 – ident: ref33 – ident: ref62 doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200241 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028251 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.2196/jmir.4255 – ident: ref108 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775 – ident: ref32 – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036585 – ident: ref15 – ident: ref84 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001895 – year: 1962 ident: ref111 publication-title: Diffusion of Innovations – ident: ref48 doi: 10.2196/19264 – ident: ref104 doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190081 – year: 1997 ident: ref65 publication-title: Realistic Evaluation – ident: ref43 doi: 10.2196/jmir.3171 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016901 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701333 – volume: 134 start-page: 89 issue: 1538 year: 2021 ident: ref63 publication-title: N Z Med J – ident: ref7 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.588583 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.2196/23482 – ident: ref21 – ident: ref106 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0095 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.2196/29868 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693509 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.2196/23851 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.2196/13042 – ident: ref77 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0044 – ident: ref93 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1151 – ident: ref91 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.004 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1177/2150132720909656 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.3310/hsdr06200 – ident: ref109 doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677662 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa051 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X689929 – ident: ref90 doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702197 – ident: ref96 doi: 10.1080/17571472.2016.1173946 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018688 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X694853 – ident: ref69 – ident: ref68 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 – ident: ref60 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0047 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0156 – ident: ref49 doi: 10.1080/13814788.2021.1965120 – ident: ref98 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2900 – ident: ref88 doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001208 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034773 – ident: ref87 doi: 10.1108/tg-06-2018-0041 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.2196/21698 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-376 – ident: ref92 doi: 10.2196/jmir.7374 – ident: ref105 doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i2.141 – ident: ref95 doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0145 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.2196/14478 – ident: ref51 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1195 – ident: ref107 doi: 10.1177/1357633X16675802 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n264 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0040 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1177/2150132720910564 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00620-6 – start-page: 173 year: 1994 ident: ref83 publication-title: Analyzing Qualitative Data doi: 10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9 – ident: ref110 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687 – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1463-x – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07039-2 – ident: ref89 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05122 – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100114 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037064 – ident: ref64 doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0426 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1109/etelemed.2010.33 – ident: ref25 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 – ident: ref61 doi: 10.2196/18930 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019966 – year: 2001 ident: ref81 publication-title: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century – ident: ref78 – volume: 160 start-page: 262 issue: Pt 1 year: 2010 ident: ref94 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743 – ident: ref67 – start-page: 324 year: 2019 ident: ref82 publication-title: Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20204-5 – ident: ref86 doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693137 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32819-8 – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0097 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893 – ident: ref31 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007 – ident: ref97 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz393 |
| SSID | ssj0020491 |
| Score | 2.5135558 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly owing to... Background Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly... Background: Online consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly... BackgroundOnline consultations (OCs) allow patients to contact their care providers on the web. Worldwide, OCs have been rolled out in primary care rapidly... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e37436 |
| SubjectTerms | Access Artificial Intelligence Communication disorders COVID-19 Data Epidemics Female Health behavior Health care expenditures Health education Health information Health services Humans Implementation Infrastructure Literature reviews Male Medical care Medical care, Cost of Medical personnel Medical research Medicine Medicine, Experimental Mental disorders Mental health Mental health services Multimedia Multiple choice Objectives Pandemics Patient satisfaction Patients Primary care Qualitative research Quality management Quality of care Quality of Health Care Quantitative analysis Questionnaires Referral and Consultation Registration Resource allocation Responses Review Safety Satisfaction Socioeconomic status Software Synthesis Systematic review Technology adoption Telemedicine United States Verbal communication Web portals Web sites |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQhSokhKA8mtJWA6rgQtRd20lsbsujKhKsKpVCb5Hj2HSlNlt1d0H8PP4ZM7ETbeDAhdvKnmTH9mfPjDLzmbEDg1YDzXCe8spjgKKcSTWa3TQzGfdjXYm6LR_78rGYTtX5uT5Zu-qLcsICPXCYuMM8t2NCivRKSWPQA_f1eGwdBu25V1VbR45eTxdMxVAL_d7xJrtLic4IsUOBdjIfWJ6WoP_vY3jNDg1zJNeMztF9di96izAJWj5gt1yzxfZirQG8gFhMRJMLcZdusc1P8Xv5Q_brbL12BY7nPwAdPnjXpm0AtkLLDnwVC5AamHsI5KNAN3muLkPzAiZt2gecBG4KoKolCPQbP1_Dac8GDeFTA72mu64Uvs6WF0BR7hX-TR3fh2pHLVC9V_jeUA-IP0mpLh0QGx6xs6P3n98ep_HShtRmmVqm3mpjuK2lFQbPg5p7baSTpnK-qhEvXHhcuxolNB8ZKzItR5W3phbcjpzPxWO20cwbt81A5KrwIydEoTJZ81xl3GipvRXSYNTmEnbQLWhpI6M5XaxxWWJkQ-tetuuesP1e7DpM058CbwgNfScxbrcNiMMy4rD8Fw4T9pywVBKnRkNJO9_MarEoP5xOywme4TnFaSj0Mgr5OWpqTayBwPESDddAcncgiZveDrs7yJbx0FmU6ImOpEAHA0f0rO-mJymRrnHzFclwhXuTK5WwJwHh_bjRlykweucJKwbYH0zMsKeZXbSU5DrnqJbe-R8z-ZTd4VRjgg4Cl7tsY3mzcnvstv2-nC1u9tt9_htzmVwF priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Title | Understanding How the Design and Implementation of Online Consultations Affect Primary Care Quality: Systematic Review of Evidence With Recommendations for Designers, Providers, and Researchers |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36279172 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2730434296 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2728143288 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9621309 https://doaj.org/article/66c100534f884aa086fd11ce2026f8b7 |
| Volume | 24 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000964685700003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Library Science Database (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: M1O dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/libraryscience providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1438-8871 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0020491 issn: 1438-8871 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwELdYhyYkxMf4CmyVQRO8EC1xnMTmBXWwaZNoqTY2ylPkOPFWaUtG04L48_jPuEvc0IDECy9WZV_Tc3q-D_vuZ0J2FFgNMMORy1IDAYrIlSvB7LqhCpnxZRpkdfnY2Yd4NBKTiRzbDbfKplUudWKtqLNS4x75LphZjwegPaO3119dvDUKT1ftFRprZB2RyniPrO_tj8bHbcgF_q-_QW5jwjOI2m4A9jLqWKAaqP9vdbxij7q5kivG5-Du_7J9j9yxbicdNHJyn9zIi02ybYsW6Etqq5LwX6J2uW-SjaE9eH9Afp6uFsHQw_I7Bc-Rvq_zPyj00hpm-MpWMhW0NLRBMaV4Jejisumu6KDOH6HjBuSCYvkTbXA8fryhJy2sNG3OLPAxy3tP6efp_IJiuHwFP5PZ5wHblgtg7zU8tykshI_I1DKvEDoektOD_U_vDl17-4Orw1DMXaOlUkxnXAcKFEvGjFQ85yrNTZqB4LHA5MzLgEIyT-kglNxLjVZZwLSXmyh4RHpFWeRPCA0iERsvD4JYhDxjkQiZklwaHXAF4V_ukJ2lRCTaQqPjDR2XCYRIKDhJLTgO6bdk181r-pNgD8WpHUTo7rqjnJ0nVhMkUaR9VH3cCMGVgpDSZL6vYS4sMiKNHfIChTFBcI4Cs3_O1aKqkqOTUTIAYxBhwAdEryyRKYFTrWwxBcwX8bw6lFsdStAeuju8lNvEaq8q-S20DnneDuM3MSOvyMsF0jABi5wJ4ZDHzRJp5w1OUSzBM3ZI3Fk8nRfTHSmmFzW2uYwYsCWf_putZ-QWwzIU8CEY3yK9-WyRb5Ob-tt8Ws36ZC0-PsN2Etet6Fu10K93XKAd-h-hb3w0HH_5BeZHcoE |
| linkProvider | ProQuest |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9QwELZKQQUJcZQr0BaDCrwQNXFOIyG0UKpdtV1VvehbcBy7XalNymaXqn-K_8A_YyZxwgYk3vrA28qe9Y69429mkjkIWRWgNUANhzZLNTgosRI2B7VrByJg2uWpl1XpY4db0XAYHx3xnTnyo8mFwbDKBhMroM4Kic_I10DNOr4H6Bl-OP9mY9cofLvatNCoxWJTXV6Ay1a-H6zD__uKsY3P-5_6tukqYMsgiCe2llwIJjNfegIENmOaC1_5IlU6zWBDzNOKORlQcOYI6QXcd1ItReYx6SgderDuNXIdOHExhCzaPWwdPLC23QVyG8OrQbDXPNDOYUffVW0B_gb_Ge3XjcycUXUbd_-3Q7pH7hijmvbqW3CfzKl8kSyblAz6mpqcK5RBasBskSxsm7CCB-TnwWyKD-0XFxTsYrpeRbdQGKVVEeUzk6eV00LTukYrxYan09N6uKS9KjqG7tQlPCgmd9G6SsnlO7rXFs2m9RsZXKbp6kq_jCYnFB8GnMHPZGY9YNtwAey9hXXrtEn4iEw1UZMw8JAcXMkBPyLzeZGrJ4R6YRxpR3leFAd-xsI4YIL7XEvPF-DcKousNhKYSFP4HfuPnCbgAKKgJpWgWmSlJTuvj-lPgo8ovu0kFiavBorxcWJwLglD6SKw-zqOfSHAYdaZ60rYCwt1nEYWeYnCn2DpkRxjm47FtCyTwd4w6YGqC9GdBaI3hkgXwKkUJlUE9ovVyjqUSx1KwEbZnW7uSWKwuUx-XxKLvGin8ZsYb5irYoo0LAYIY3Fskcf1lWz3DSZfxMHut0jUuaydg-nO5KOTqnI7DxmwxZ_-m63n5GZ_f3sr2RoMN5-RWwwTbsBaYv4SmZ-Mp2qZ3JDfJ6NyvFLBDyVfr_oq_wLods3v |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1R3bbtMw1BobmpAQl3ELbMOgAS9ETR3nhoRQoVSrtlWVtsF4Co5jb5W2ZDQt036NN_6McxInNCDxtgfeIvvEOXbONTkXQrYEaA1Qw77NEg0OSqiEHYHatT3hMd2NEjct08c-7QajUXh0FI2XyI86FwbDKmuZWArqNJf4jbwDatbhLkhPv6NNWMS4P3h3_s3GDlL4p7Vup1GRyI66vAD3rXg77MO7fsHY4OPBh23bdBiwpeeFM1vLSAgmUy5dAcSbMh0JrrhIlE5S2BxztWJOChARc4R0vYg7iZYidZl0lPZdWPcaWQGTnAOPrYyHe-MvjbsHtnd3ldzEYGsg844LMH5L-5VNAv5WBQu6sB2nuaD4Brf_5yO7Q24Zc5v2Kv64S5ZUtkY2TLIGfUlNNhZSJzVibo2s7pmAg3vk5-Fi8g_dzi8oWMy0X8a9UBilZXnlM5PBldFc06p6K8VWqPPTarigvTJuho6r4h4U075oVb_k8g3db8pp0-pfDS5T93ulnyezE4qfCc7gMalZD9A2WAB6r2HdKqESLhGpOp4SBu6Twys54AdkOcsz9YhQ1w8D7SjXDUKPp8wPPSYiHmnpcgFur7LIVk2NsTQl4bEzyWkMriESbVwSrUU2G7Dz6pj-BHiPpNxMYsnyciCfHsdGAsa-L7so8rkOQy4EuNI67XYl7IX5OkwCizxHRoixKEmGtHos5kURD_dHcQ-UoI-OLgC9MkA6B0ylMEkksF-sY9aCXG9BgtSU7emaZ2IjtYv4N8NY5FkzjXdiJGKm8jnCsBCEGwtDizys2LPZNxiDQQQegUWCFuO2DqY9k01Oyprukc8Arejxv9F6SlaBg-Pd4WjnCbnBMBMHzCjG18nybDpXG-S6_D6bFNNNI4so-XrVvPwLHh_YEg |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding+How+the+Design+and+Implementation+of+Online+Consultations+Affect+Primary+Care+Quality%3A+Systematic+Review+of+Evidence+With+Recommendations+for+Designers%2C+Providers%2C+and+Researchers&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+medical+Internet+research&rft.au=Darley%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Coulson%2C+Tessa&rft.au=Peek%2C+Niels&rft.au=Moschogianis%2C+Susan&rft.date=2022-10-24&rft.pub=Journal+of+Medical+Internet+Research&rft.issn=1439-4456&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F37436&rft.externalDBID=ISN&rft.externalDocID=A763661307 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1438-8871&client=summon |