Bridging the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening

Kieser and Leiner (2009) maintain that the rigour–relevance gap in management research is fundamentally unbridgeable because researchers and the researched inhabit separate social systems. They argue that it is impossible to assess the relevance of research outputs within the system of science and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of management studies Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 534 - 546
Main Authors: Hodgkinson, Gerard P., Rousseau, Denise M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2009
Wiley Blackwell
Series:Journal of Management Studies
Subjects:
ISSN:0022-2380, 1467-6486
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Kieser and Leiner (2009) maintain that the rigour–relevance gap in management research is fundamentally unbridgeable because researchers and the researched inhabit separate social systems. They argue that it is impossible to assess the relevance of research outputs within the system of science and that neither action research nor related approaches to collaborative research can succeed in producing research that is rigorous as well as relevant. In reply, we show how their analysis is inconsistent with available evidence. Drawing on a diversity of management research domains, we provide counter‐illustrations of work where researchers, in a number of cases in collaboration with practitioners, have generated knowledge that is both socially useful and academically rigorous.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-NQH3SBQB-Z
ArticleID:JOMS832
istex:EF9227A89E54838E257F0C196D65CB27678BB43C
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-2380
1467-6486
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00832.x