Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy

This paper examines how the governance in AI policy documents have been framed as way to resolve public controversies surrounding AI. It draws on the studies of governance of emerging technologies, the concept of policy framing, and analysis of 49 recent policy documents dedicated to AI which have b...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Policy & society Ročník 40; číslo 2; s. 158 - 177
Hlavní autori: Ulnicane, Inga, Knight, William, Leach, Tonii, Stahl, Bernd Carsten, Wanjiku, Winter-Gladys
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: Singapore Routledge 03.04.2021
Oxford University Press
Predmet:
Algorithms
Analysis
Artificial Intelligence
Assignment
Civil society
Disputes
emerging technology
Equality
Ethics
Frame analysis
Governance
Laws, regulations and rules
Mitigation
Oligopoly
policy
Political science
Prescription drugs
Rhetoric
Risk assessment
Robotics
Software
State role
Technological innovations
Technology
Technology and state
United Kingdom
ISSN:1449-4035, 1839-3373, 1839-3373
On-line prístup:Získať plný text
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Popis
Shrnutí:This paper examines how the governance in AI policy documents have been framed as way to resolve public controversies surrounding AI. It draws on the studies of governance of emerging technologies, the concept of policy framing, and analysis of 49 recent policy documents dedicated to AI which have been prepared in the context of technological hype expecting fast advances of AI that will fundamentally change economy and society. The hype about AI is accompanied by major public controversy about positive and negative effects of AI. Against the backdrop of this policy controversy, governance emerges as one of the frames that diagnoses the problems and offers prescriptions. Accordingly, the current governance characterized by oligopoly of a small number of large companies is indicated as one of the reasons for problems such as lack of consideration of societal needs and concerns. To address these problems, governance frame in AI policy documents assigns more active and collaborative roles to the state and society. Amid public controversies, the state is assigned the roles of promoting and facilitating AI development while at the same time being a guarantor of risk mitigation and enabler of societal engagement. High expectations are assigned to public engagement with multiple publics as a way to increase diversity, representation and equality in AI development and use. While this governance frame might have a normative appeal, it is not specific about addressing some well-known challenges of the proposed governance mode such as risks of capture by vested interests or difficulties to achieve consensus.
Bibliografia:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1449-4035
1839-3373
1839-3373
DOI:10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800