The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review
Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. ‘Co’approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to und...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | BMC health services research Ročník 22; číslo 1; s. 877 - 26 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
London
BioMed Central
07.07.2022
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 1472-6963, 1472-6963 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | Background
Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. ‘Co’approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished.
Methods
Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong’s seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis.
Results
Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of ‘co’approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that ‘co’approaches improved the management of health conditions.
Conclusion
Those using ‘co’approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of ‘co’approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether ‘co’approaches produce improved health outcomes.
Trial Registration
PROSPERO
CRD42020187463
. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished.BACKGROUNDKnowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished.Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong's seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis.METHODSStudies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong's seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis.Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of 'co'approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that 'co'approaches improved the management of health conditions.RESULTSTwenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of 'co'approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that 'co'approaches improved the management of health conditions.Those using 'co'approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of 'co'approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether 'co'approaches produce improved health outcomes.CONCLUSIONThose using 'co'approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of 'co'approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether 'co'approaches produce improved health outcomes.PROSPERO CRD42020187463 .TRIAL REGISTRATIONPROSPERO CRD42020187463 . Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. ‘Co’approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished. Methods Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong’s seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Results Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of ‘co’approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that ‘co’approaches improved the management of health conditions. Conclusion Those using ‘co’approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of ‘co’approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether ‘co’approaches produce improved health outcomes. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020187463 . Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished. Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong's seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of 'co'approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that 'co'approaches improved the management of health conditions. Those using 'co'approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of 'co'approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether 'co'approaches produce improved health outcomes. Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished. Methods Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong's seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Results Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of 'co'approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that 'co'approaches improved the management of health conditions. Conclusion Those using 'co'approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of 'co'approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether 'co'approaches produce improved health outcomes. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020187463. Keywords: Co-production, Co-design, Co-creation, 'Co'approaches, Knowledge mobilisation, Health Abstract Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. ‘Co’approaches, such as co-production, co-design and co-creation, have been proposed as a way of overcoming the knowledge to practice gap. There is a need to understand why researchers choose to adopt these approaches, how they achieve knowledge mobilisation in the management of health conditions, and the extent to which knowledge mobilisation is accomplished. Methods Studies that explicitly used the terms co-production, co-design or co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions were included. Web of Science, EMBASE via OvidSP, MEDLINE via OvidSP and CINHAL via EBSCO databases were searched up to April 2021. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute qualitative quality assessment checklist. Pluye and Hong’s seven steps for mixed studies reviews were followed. Data were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Results Twenty four international studies were included. These were qualitative studies, case studies and study protocols. Key aspects of ‘co’approaches were bringing people together as active and equal partners, valuing all types of knowledge, using creative approaches to understand and solve problems, and using iterative prototyping techniques. Authors articulated mechanisms of action that included developing a shared understanding, identifying and meeting needs, giving everyone a voice and sense of ownership, and creating trust and confidence. They believed these mechanisms could produce interventions that were relevant and acceptable to stakeholders, more useable and more likely to be implemented in healthcare. Varied activities were used to promote these mechanisms such as interviews and creative workshops. There appeared to be a lack of robust evaluation of the interventions produced so little evidence in this review that ‘co’approaches improved the management of health conditions. Conclusion Those using ‘co’approaches believed that they could achieve knowledge mobilisation through a number of mechanisms, but there was no evidence that these led to improved health. The framework of key aspects and mechanisms of ‘co’approaches developed here may help researchers to meet the principles of these approaches. There is a need for robust evaluation to identify whether ‘co’approaches produce improved health outcomes. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42020187463 . |
| ArticleNumber | 877 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Coates, Elizabeth Croot, Liz Grindell, Cheryl O’Cathain, Alicia |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Cheryl surname: Grindell fullname: Grindell, Cheryl email: cheryl.grindell@sheffield.ac.uk organization: Health and Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield – sequence: 2 givenname: Elizabeth surname: Coates fullname: Coates, Elizabeth organization: Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield – sequence: 3 givenname: Liz surname: Croot fullname: Croot, Liz organization: Health and Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield – sequence: 4 givenname: Alicia surname: O’Cathain fullname: O’Cathain, Alicia organization: Health and Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield |
| BookMark | eNp9kstq3DAUhk1JaS7tC3Rl6KaLOpVk69ZFIYReAoFu0rWQpWOPprY0leyEeYC-d-VxCp1SgkC3838_RzrnvDjxwUNRvMboEmPB3idMJK4rREiFBOKy2j8rznDDScUkq0_-2p8W5yltEcJcEP6iOK0pl5JQfFb8uttAOScoQ1eaUO1isLOZXPDvlqOF5Hpfam-Xk4mgl1A5hXIMrRtc5n748DCA7aF0OZDNRu11DyP4afHcgB6mTaa9dQubPpS6TPs0wZi9TBnh3sHDy-J5p4cErx7Xi-L7509311-r229fbq6vbitDKZvybIRsaS04sg3roEGsM23HulbYxgKTtRFWNloTo4VtbSOQxJrqpq4lYRbqi-Jm9bVBb9UuulHHvQraqcNFiL3SMac1gLKcNhYzK6yGRhvbUiwlE5bgjneIiuz1cfXaze0I1uQHRz0cmR5HvNuoPtyrnEqT_z8bvH00iOHnDGlSo0sGhkF7CHNShAnOCSM1zdI3q7TXOTXnu5AdzSJXVxxJSrlAdVZd_keVh4XR5QpA5_L9ESBWwMSQUoROGTcdSpxBNyiM1NJoam00lRtNHRpN7TNK_kH_PPxJqF6hlMW-h6i2YY4-V_wp6jd44ul3 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1513_AnnalsATS_202307_599OC crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare13030254 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10896_024_00724_w crossref_primary_10_1111_nbu_12596 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2025_104073 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_025_01328_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70303 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13991 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_025_00765_2 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmj_2024_081720 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41599_024_03278_w crossref_primary_10_1071_IB24128 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0323870 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2024_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdaf111 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2023_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajs4_320 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70144 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_23795_w crossref_primary_10_1080_11038128_2023_2244563 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2025_104494 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70382 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2023_12_080 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70437 crossref_primary_10_1177_15394492251367259 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70436 crossref_primary_10_12688_wellcomeopenres_23534_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_15248399251363152 crossref_primary_10_1080_13632752_2025_2489914 crossref_primary_10_1177_23779608251362293 crossref_primary_10_1080_24735132_2024_2317966 crossref_primary_10_1108_JHOM_03_2024_0123 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_025_09785_z crossref_primary_10_1111_1440_1630_70037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_invent_2025_100835 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_083534 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2023_103642 crossref_primary_10_2196_57062 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13144178 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13774 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2024_2390049 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_025_02514_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_023_00495_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2024_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_024_01394_4 crossref_primary_10_2196_54977 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44159_025_00491_5 crossref_primary_10_3917_sdd_021_0054 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70125 crossref_primary_10_1111_inm_13479 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_13120_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hjdsi_2025_100761 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2025_109339 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70361 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_024_01704_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_healthplace_2024_103253 crossref_primary_10_1177_16094069251356665 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13661 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_072238 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2024_084620 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjqs_2023_016196 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_025_00738_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12966_024_01610_w crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_024_00568_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s12888_025_06703_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11128_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2025_104547 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106974 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_025_01319_7 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_134193_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40814_025_01616_6 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0311564 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_023_00528_0 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_134193_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph192114284 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_024_00550_w crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20095698 crossref_primary_10_1108_MRJIAM_03_2025_1705 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_072567 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00640_25 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_083467 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mhp_2023_200308 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1425641 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_024_02518_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10641_024_01591_6 crossref_primary_10_2196_50463 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17010052 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_copsyc_2025_102001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psychsport_2025_102918 crossref_primary_10_2196_63707 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_024_00667_y crossref_primary_10_1038_s41540_025_00528_8 crossref_primary_10_1123_japa_2024_0257 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_beth_2024_11_002 crossref_primary_10_46292_sci23_00042 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40337_024_01040_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijnurstu_2024_104891 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16213769 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_025_00775_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_024_01256_9 crossref_primary_10_1071_IB23068 crossref_primary_10_1071_IB23101 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgc4_70089 crossref_primary_10_1017_dsj_2023_35 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_081151 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13844 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2025_1511973 crossref_primary_10_2196_53339 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16111730 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radi_2024_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2025_2486459 crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmacy12050138 crossref_primary_10_2196_45684 crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2024_1325143 crossref_primary_10_1093_ckj_sfad172 crossref_primary_10_1080_16549716_2024_2426348 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70196 crossref_primary_10_1155_hsc_3898705 crossref_primary_10_1200_EDBK_25_100050 crossref_primary_10_1111_jch_14918 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_12032_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2024_1379139 crossref_primary_10_1177_08901171251333564 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_outlook_2025_102542 crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2024_1386746 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dsx_2025_103220 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2025_105783 crossref_primary_10_2196_46590 crossref_primary_10_1177_21501319251332723 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_024_00578_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_025_02577_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_13201_x crossref_primary_10_1080_10401334_2025_2536526 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2023_1204980 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2025_105937 crossref_primary_10_1080_21645515_2025_2509484 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_025_22633_3 crossref_primary_10_1177_20556683241266780 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_025_00765_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_024_01127_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_70146 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12369_025_01275_w crossref_primary_10_1177_18333583251350437 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_025_12423_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11192615 crossref_primary_10_1080_02703181_2024_2340512 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_17736_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40900_025_00676_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cdnut_2024_104395 crossref_primary_10_1080_13814788_2023_2243037 crossref_primary_10_31389_jltc_362 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_70330 crossref_primary_10_2196_74082 crossref_primary_10_1080_13561820_2025_2453606 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1332/174426416X14534671325644 10.1177/0261018317747444 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x 10.1002/9781119536604 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039152 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036520 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6 10.1177/1744987120914353 10.2196/15914 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.042 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z 10.2196/11278 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035686 10.2196/19108 10.1108/MD-10-2019-1444 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00175.1 10.1111/padm.12365 10.1111/hex.12648 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76 10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3_2 10.1332/174426419X15552999451313 10.1332/174426416X14634763278725 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092 10.1186/s12913-016-1726-6 10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y 10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9 10.2196/19195 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2 10.1111/1468-0009.12197 10.1136/bmj.n160 10.1186/s12874-019-0701-4 10.1111/hex.13209 10.1007/s40271-016-0169-9 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440 10.1055/s-0041-1726273 10.2196/19532 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650 10.2196/14127 10.1186/s12911-020-01200-3 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00048 10.1080/15710882.2014.888183 10.2196/jmir.9716 10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9 10.1002/msc.1452 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022 COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. 2022. The Author(s). |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2022. The Author(s). |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y |
| DatabaseName | SpringerLink Open Access Journals CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
| EISSN | 1472-6963 |
| EndPage | 26 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_d754d16d8dae4acdb519968d21f7f058 PMC9264579 A709557803 10_1186_s12913_022_08079_y |
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 44B 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7RV 7WY 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FL AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BEZIV BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FRNLG FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK IAO IHR INH INR ITC K60 K6~ KQ8 M0C M0T M1P M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX AFFHD CITATION 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-c5c89b53870d46fe406fcbf6fb8d4de693c8d94aa2ca8dbd48091a5a433926de3 |
| IEDL.DBID | RSV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 176 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000825426000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1472-6963 |
| IngestDate | Tue Oct 14 19:05:05 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:44:28 EST 2025 Thu Sep 04 16:00:11 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:38:11 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:05:32 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 05:23:51 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:17:20 EST 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:27:04 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | ‘Co’approaches Co-design Co-production Co-creation Health Knowledge mobilisation |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c556t-c5c89b53870d46fe406fcbf6fb8d4de693c8d94aa2ca8dbd48091a5a433926de3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y |
| PMID | 35799251 |
| PQID | 2687726235 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 26 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d754d16d8dae4acdb519968d21f7f058 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9264579 proquest_miscellaneous_2687726235 gale_infotracmisc_A709557803 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A709557803 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12913_022_08079_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_022_08079_y springer_journals_10_1186_s12913_022_08079_y |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-07-07 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-07-07 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2022 text: 2022-07-07 day: 07 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC health services research |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Health Serv Res |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | R Jungk (8079_CR68) 1987 J Reeve (8079_CR33) 2016; 16 D Wolstenholme (8079_CR35) 2020; 25 AP Thompson (8079_CR47) 2020; 9 8079_CR34 8079_CR32 TM Fonseka (8079_CR43) 2019; 26 J Langley (8079_CR70) 2018; 18 8079_CR38 F Cowdell (8079_CR27) 2020; 10 A O’Cathain (8079_CR14) 2019; 5 T Mills (8079_CR71) 2019; 19 S Brand (8079_CR9) 2021; 24 M Gallagher (8079_CR56) 1993; 10 Å Revenäs (8079_CR48) 2018; 7 T Greenhalgh (8079_CR8) 2016; 94 MJ Page (8079_CR19) 2021; 372 8079_CR44 8079_CR45 T Pearce (8079_CR15) 2020; 17 8079_CR42 EBN Sanders (8079_CR58) 2014; 10 M Farr (8079_CR10) 2018; 38 F Cowdell (8079_CR11) 2020; 00 L Ospina-Pinillos (8079_CR39) 2019; 21 LA Maggio (8079_CR53) 2016; 8 8079_CR49 L Ospina-Pinillos (8079_CR41) 2018; 20 JL Miller (8079_CR46) 2016; 9 R Livings (8079_CR37) 2020; 10 RJ Law (8079_CR31) 2020; 10 S Knowles (8079_CR30) 2018; 21 GL Hundt (8079_CR65) 2011; 14 E Dent (8079_CR36) 2016; 16 8079_CR50 J Waggoner (8079_CR55) 2016; 91 P Liamputtong (8079_CR52) 2019 J Jones (8079_CR54) 1995; 311 D Moher (8079_CR22) 2009; 62 P Pluye (8079_CR18) 2014; 35 8079_CR6 (8079_CR64) 2010 L Locock (8079_CR7) 2019; 15 J Heaton (8079_CR29) 2016; 11 8079_CR17 A Kothari (8079_CR57) 2017; 6 O Williams (8079_CR13) 2020; 18 8079_CR59 8079_CR16 A Bryman (8079_CR51) 2008 E Ferlie (8079_CR4) 2012; 74 A Powell (8079_CR2) 2017; 13 L Ospina-Pinillos (8079_CR40) 2020; 7 8079_CR61 A Powell (8079_CR5) 2018; 96 NIHR INVOLVE (8079_CR12) 2019 V Ward (8079_CR3) 2017; 13 8079_CR24 8079_CR25 8079_CR69 L Melville-Richards (8079_CR1) 2019; 2 A Booth (8079_CR21) 2012 8079_CR66 8079_CR23 8079_CR67 8079_CR20 8079_CR62 8079_CR63 Y Wengel (8079_CR60) 2019; 23 8079_CR28 8079_CR26 |
| References_xml | – volume: 13 start-page: 201 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 8079_CR2 publication-title: Evidence and Policy doi: 10.1332/174426416X14534671325644 – volume: 38 start-page: 623 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR10 publication-title: Critical Soc ialPolicy doi: 10.1177/0261018317747444 – volume: 14 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 8079_CR65 publication-title: Health Expect doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00597.x – ident: 8079_CR20 doi: 10.1002/9781119536604 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR37 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039152 – volume: 62 start-page: 1006 issue: 10 year: 2009 ident: 8079_CR22 publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 – volume: 10 start-page: 36520 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR27 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036520 – volume: 5 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR14 publication-title: Pilot Feasibility Studies doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6 – volume: 25 start-page: 211 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR35 publication-title: J Res Nurs doi: 10.1177/1744987120914353 – volume: 7 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR40 publication-title: JMIR Mental Health doi: 10.2196/15914 – ident: 8079_CR45 – volume: 74 start-page: 1297 year: 2012 ident: 8079_CR4 publication-title: Soc Sci Med doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.042 – ident: 8079_CR25 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 – ident: 8079_CR67 doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0133-z – volume: 7 issue: 10 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR48 publication-title: JMIR Research Protocols doi: 10.2196/11278 – volume: 10 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR31 publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035686 – volume: 9 issue: 8 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR47 publication-title: JMIR Research Protocols doi: 10.2196/19108 – ident: 8079_CR50 doi: 10.1108/MD-10-2019-1444 – volume: 8 start-page: 297 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR53 publication-title: J Grad Med Educ doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00175.1 – volume: 96 start-page: 36 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR5 publication-title: Public Adm doi: 10.1111/padm.12365 – volume: 21 start-page: 539 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR30 publication-title: Health Expect doi: 10.1111/hex.12648 – volume-title: Qualitative Inquiry. In: Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR52 doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4 – volume: 10 start-page: 76 issue: 1 year: 1993 ident: 8079_CR56 publication-title: Fam Pract doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.1.76 – ident: 8079_CR62 doi: 10.1007/978-94-6091-596-3_2 – volume: 15 start-page: 409 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR7 publication-title: Evidence and Policy doi: 10.1332/174426419X15552999451313 – volume: 13 start-page: 477 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 8079_CR3 publication-title: Evidence and Policy doi: 10.1332/174426416X14634763278725 – ident: 8079_CR63 – start-page: 126 volume-title: Future workshops : how to create desirable futures year: 1987 ident: 8079_CR68 – volume: 18 start-page: 43 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR13 publication-title: Health Research Policy and Systems doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0 – volume: 91 start-page: 663 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR55 publication-title: Academic Medcine doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092 – volume: 16 start-page: 470 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR33 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1726-6 – volume-title: Social Research Methods year: 2008 ident: 8079_CR51 – volume: 6 start-page: 299 issue: 5 year: 2017 ident: 8079_CR57 publication-title: International Journal of Health Policy Management – volume: 18 start-page: 585 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR70 publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y – volume: 17 start-page: 1 issue: 7 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR15 publication-title: International Jourmal of Environmental Research and Public Health – volume: 16 start-page: 62 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR36 publication-title: BMC Health Services Research doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1302-0 – ident: 8079_CR16 doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9 – ident: 8079_CR49 doi: 10.2196/19195 – volume: 26 start-page: 1 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR43 publication-title: J Eval Clin Pract – volume: 311 start-page: 376 issue: 7001 year: 1995 ident: 8079_CR54 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376 – ident: 8079_CR69 – volume: 23 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR60 publication-title: Tourism Geography – ident: 8079_CR26 doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2 – volume: 94 start-page: 392 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR8 publication-title: Milbank Q doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197 – ident: 8079_CR66 – volume: 372 start-page: n160 year: 2021 ident: 8079_CR19 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160 – ident: 8079_CR59 – volume-title: Guidance on co-producing a research project year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR12 – volume: 19 start-page: 55 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR71 publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0701-4 – volume: 24 start-page: 628 year: 2021 ident: 8079_CR9 publication-title: Health Expect doi: 10.1111/hex.13209 – volume-title: Systematic Approaches to a successful literaure review year: 2012 ident: 8079_CR21 – ident: 8079_CR6 – volume: 9 start-page: 457 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR46 publication-title: Patient doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0169-9 – volume: 35 start-page: 29 year: 2014 ident: 8079_CR18 publication-title: Annu Rev Public Heal doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440 – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR1 publication-title: Evidence and Policy – ident: 8079_CR34 – ident: 8079_CR42 doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726273 – ident: 8079_CR38 doi: 10.2196/19532 – ident: 8079_CR17 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650 – ident: 8079_CR61 – volume: 21 start-page: 1 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 8079_CR39 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/14127 – ident: 8079_CR28 doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01200-3 – ident: 8079_CR32 doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00048 – volume-title: This Is Service Design Thinking year: 2010 ident: 8079_CR64 – volume: 10 start-page: 5 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 8079_CR58 publication-title: CoDesign doi: 10.1080/15710882.2014.888183 – volume: 20 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 8079_CR41 publication-title: J Med Internet Res doi: 10.2196/jmir.9716 – ident: 8079_CR44 – volume: 00 start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: 8079_CR11 publication-title: Health Soc Care Community – volume: 11 start-page: 20 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 8079_CR29 publication-title: Implementation Science doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9 – ident: 8079_CR23 – ident: 8079_CR24 doi: 10.1002/msc.1452 |
| SSID | ssj0017827 |
| Score | 2.6680825 |
| Snippet | Background
Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. ‘Co’approaches, such... Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such... Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence. 'Co'approaches, such as... Abstract Background Knowledge mobilisation is a term used in healthcare research to describe the process of generating, sharing and using evidence.... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 877 |
| SubjectTerms | Co-creation Co-design Co-production Forecasts and trends Health Health Administration Health aspects Health Informatics Knowledge management Knowledge mobilisation Medical care Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nursing Research Public Health Social aspects United Kingdom ‘Co’approaches |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NaxUxEA9SPAgi9QtXq0QQPNil-3bz6a2KxVPxoNBbSDIJPrC7pfue0D_A_7uTZPfpWqgXLw_2JbNkZyaZSTLzG0LeNOhSeGC6hqjbmoXoaidkV2sLXUz1th0vxSbk6ak6O9Nf_ij1lWLCCjxwYdwRSM5gJUCBDcx6QFp00RW0qyhjw3OabyP1vJma7g_Q7sk5RUaJoxGtWqpigBsv9JCkrq8WZiij9d9ck2_GSf51WZpt0Mk-eTA5j_S4DPohuRP6R-R-OXmjJaHoMfmFkqfbMdAhUj_UFwXSFdl_mB4hR2xQ20N6ml1Guhno-ZDiZJFud8xG19iALzvfhcikd5bMSaROl91Jad9TS38DQtOSDPOEfDv59PXj53oqtlB7zsUGf73SDpc_2QATMaChj95FEZ0CBkHozivQzNrWWwUOmEJPw3LLOvSwBITuKdnrhz48I9RZqR36nR2SMR6Vc1604HH1iNy6CBVZzbw3fkIiTwUxfpi8I1HCFHkZlJfJ8jJXFXm3o7koOBy39v6QRLrrmTC08x-oWWbSLPMvzarI26QQJs10HJ63U8ICfmTCzDLHMsH3SdV0FTlY9MQZ6hfNr2eVMqkphbX1YdiOphUKdzfogfKKyIWuLYa-bOnX3zMMOLKdcakrcjhrpZnWn_EW1jz_H6x5Qe61eTKlY-4Dsre53IaX5K7_uVmPl6_yVLwGm3k7HA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Title | The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y https://www.proquest.com/docview/2687726235 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9264579 https://doaj.org/article/d754d16d8dae4acdb519968d21f7f058 |
| Volume | 22 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000825426000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVADU databaseName: BioMedCentral customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: RBZ dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/ providerName: BioMedCentral – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20010101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest) customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7WY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/abicomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ABI/INFORM Global (OCUL) customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M0C dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/abiglobal providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health Management Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: M0T dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthmanagement providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Nursing & Allied Health Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: 7RV dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/nahs providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20090101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1472-6963 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017827 issn: 1472-6963 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 20011201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwED-xDSEkxMcAERiVkZB4YNHaxLEd3rZpEzy0qsoY5cnyRwyVWDI1LdL-AP5vzk5SFIYmwctJ6dmR6_x8Pvu-AF4PUaUwluaxdXkS08LpWDOexrmyqfP1tnXWFJvgk4mYz_NpGxRWd97unUkySOqwrAU7qHFn8pUI8PCEWg7P46st2MHtTviCDbOP5xvbAe55vAuP-Wu_3hYUMvVfl8fXfST_MJSG_ef0wf-N_CHcb_VNctgA5BHcKspduDNuLeq7cK-5tyNNONJj-Im4Ieu6IJUjpoovm4Sw-PH2_aMN_h5EldY_dQonWVXkovJetthvc0lHFsjAl11sHGz8O5u4S-ztTeUe8u-IIr_TSZMmlOYJfDo9OTt-H7elGmKTZWyF1Ihco_DkQ0uZK1BNcEY75rSw1BYsT42wOVUqMUpYbalAPUVliqaonzFbpE9hu6zK4hkQrXiuUWtNsRvNnNDasMQalD0uU9rZCEbd15OmzWPuy2l8l-E8I5hs5lvifMsw3_IqgrebPpdNFo8bWx95UGxa-gzc4Ydq-VW2C1panlE7YlZYVVBlLGIaj47CJiPH3TATEbzxkJJeTuDwjGrDHfBP-oxb8pD75H9cDNMI9notcX2bHvtVB0rpWd4priyqdS0TJvBshPprFgHvobU39D6nXHwLScRx2mnG8wj2O8zKVnrVN0zN839r_gLuJgH2_jp8D7ZXy3XxEm6bH6tFvRzAFp-de_r5i6dzHqgYwM7RyWQ6G4T7EaTj4XGgZ8iZfhhPfWtc8L8A96NMqg |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3batRA9KBVVBAvVTFadQTBBxvcTeYW36pYKraLaJW-DXPVBZuUza7QD_C_PTNJVmKloC-BZOaEycm5zZwbwLMJmhTW0Sp3oSpy6oPJDRdlXmlXhthv27Cu2YSYzeTRUfWhTwprh2j3wSWZJHVia8lftqiZYicC3DyhlSOq_PQiXKKosWLF_I-fvqx9B6jzxJAe81e4kQpKlfrPyuOzMZJ_OEqT_tm9-X8rvwU3enuT7HQEchsu-HoTrhz0HvVNuN6d25EuHekO_ES6IavWkyYQ2-QnXUFY_Hnb8daleA-iaxfvBoOTLBty3MQoW4RbH9KROQ7gy47XATbxnV3eJUJHV3kk-VdEk9_lpEmXSnMXPu--PXyzl_etGnLLGF_i1crKoPAUE0d58GgmBGsCD0Y66jyvSitdRbUurJbOOCrRTtFM0xLtM-58eQ826qb294EYLSqDVmuJYJQFaYzlhbMoewLTJrgMpsPfU7avYx7baXxXaT8juerwrRDfKuFbnWbwYg1z0lXxOHf260gU65mxAnd60Cy-qp6hlROMuil30mlPtXVI07h1lK6YBhEmTGbwPJKUinICl2d1n-6AHxkrbqkdEYv_CTkpM9gazUT-tqPhpwNRqjgUg-Jq36xaVXCJeyO0X1kGYkSto6WPR-r5t1REHNFOmagy2B5oVvXSqz0HNQ_-bfoTuLp3eLCv9t_N3j-Ea0VigXg0vgUby8XKP4LL9sdy3i4eJxb-BexDRaM |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3ri9QwEB_0lEMQH-eJ1VMjCH7wyu22aZL67Xwsiroc-OC-hSTT6ILXLvsQ7g_w_3bStKv15ED8stBNprTTmclMMvMbgMcjcikc8jJFX2Ypr7xNrZB5WhrMfei3bYvYbEJOp-r4uDz6rYq_zXbvjyRjTUNAaapXB3P0UcWVOFjSKhW6ElAgRR6PLNPTi3CJh0T6EK9_-Lw5R6D1T_alMn-lGyxHLWr_Wdt8Nl_yj0PTdi2aXP__t7gB1zo_lB1GwbkJF6p6B7bfdyftO3A17uexWKZ0C36QPLH1smKNZ65J5xEolj7qfrjENg-EmRrDVe-IslXDTpqQfUt0m807NqMButnJJvEm3DPWYxJ1OEIPqvCMGfYLZprFEptd-DR59fHF67Rr4ZC6ohAr-nWqtGRU5Qi58BW5D95ZL7xVyLESZe4UltyYzBmFFrki_8UUhufktwms8tuwVTd1dQeYNbK05M3mRMYLr6x1IkNHNskXxnpMYNx_Se06fPPQZuObbuMcJXTktyZ-65bf-jSBpxuaeUT3OHf28yAgm5kBmbv9o1l80Z2ia5QFx7FAhabixiHJOoWUCrOxl35UqASeBPHSwX7Q4znTlUHQSwYkLn0oAyigVKM8gb3BTNJ7Nxh-1AuoDkMhWa6umvVSZ0JRzER-bZGAHEju4NGHI_XsawsuTmznhSwT2O_lV3dWbXkOa-7-2_SHsH30cqLfvZm-vQdXslYDwo75HmytFuvqPlx231ez5eJBq80_AT3VToc |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+use+of+co-production%2C+co-design+and+co-creation+to+mobilise+knowledge+in+the+management+of+health+conditions%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=BMC+health+services+research&rft.au=Grindell%2C+Cheryl&rft.au=Coates%2C+Elizabeth&rft.au=Croot%2C+Liz&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Cathain%2C+Alicia&rft.date=2022-07-07&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12913-022-08079-y&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12913_022_08079_y |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6963&client=summon |