Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review

A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Safety and health at work Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 127 - 135
Main Authors:	Ranasinghe, Udara, Jefferies, Marcus, Davis, Peter, Pillay, Manikam
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Korea (South) Elsevier B.V 01.06.2020 Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute Elsevier 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원
Subjects:	RE indicators resilience engineering Review safety safety management 예방의학 RE indicators safety management safety resilience engineering
ISSN:	2093-7911, 2093-7997
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co–occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators.
AbstractList	A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co–occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators. A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co–occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators. KCI Citation Count: 0 A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co-occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators.A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co-occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators.
Author	Ranasinghe, Udara Jefferies, Marcus Davis, Peter Pillay, Manikam
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Udara surname: Ranasinghe fullname: Ranasinghe, Udara email: udara.ranasingheranawalage@uon.edu.au organization: School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Australia – sequence: 2 givenname: Marcus surname: Jefferies fullname: Jefferies, Marcus organization: School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Australia – sequence: 3 givenname: Peter surname: Davis fullname: Davis, Peter organization: School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Manikam surname: Pillay fullname: Pillay, Manikam organization: School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia
BackLink	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002596677$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark	eNp9Uk1PGzEQXVVUhVL-QA_VHttDUn_t2q6qShECGilVpUDP1qw9Gxw2XrA3oPz7Ogmg0gO-jD_eezOeee-Lg9AHLIqPlIwpofXX5Thdw8OYEUbGhI8J0W-KI0Y0H0mt5cHzntLD4iSlJclL5BPj74pDzipdE1IfFbM5Jt95DBbLs7DwATH6sCinwXkLQx9TCcGVl9DisCl_QYAFrjAM38pJeblJA65g8Lac473Hhw_F2xa6hCeP8bj4c352dfpzNPt9MT2dzEa2qqph5BwhvFW85hxqaARzIAFVRQVwaAVH2oKgpCGVrGztZKvB0lYK4ZRqqKT8uPiy1w2xNTfWmx78Li56cxPNZH41NVoowiuVsdM91vWwNLfRryBudoTdRR8XBmL-QoemaqSjTEit2krYymlwTNkaa9VobTXPWj_2WrfrZoXO5j5E6F6IvnwJ_jrXdG8kz7VwnQU-PwrE_m6NaTArnyx2HQTs18kwQZVkWqkt9NO_uZ6TPI0uA9QeYGOfUsTWWD_kYfTb1L4zlJitUczSbI1itkYxhJtslExl_1Gf1F8lfd-TME82TzuaZHe-cT6iHXI7_Wv0v50f1jk
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2023_106071 crossref_primary_10_52547_jhehp_8_1_35 crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_5973_12419 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJBPA_05_2024_0090 crossref_primary_10_1177_10519815251353458 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e38240 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psep_2022_10_030 crossref_primary_10_3390_su152416947 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_autcon_2024_105800 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2024_104671 crossref_primary_10_1061_JCEMD4_COENG_13283 crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2025_2473223 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10111_024_00770_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jlp_2024_105460 crossref_primary_10_3390_app15116291 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings11030089 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings14124056 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings14092643 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2025_111512 crossref_primary_10_1515_dx_2024_0008 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11091470 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1174875 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph181910231 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings15060921 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_shaw_2025_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2024_106621 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2022_103037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2022_106045 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15064811 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16167090 crossref_primary_10_3390_math8091635 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmsy_2025_02_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrst_2025_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2021_105255 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jlp_2020_104366 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2020_105047 crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2022_2089468 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssci_2022_105768 crossref_primary_10_1177_21695067231192526 crossref_primary_10_3390_safety6030037 crossref_primary_10_1080_10803548_2024_2357938 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10669_022_09893_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_13675567_2022_2056584 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings13092205 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17176167 crossref_primary_10_3390_buildings14092790
Cites_doi	10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.008 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.07.007 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.003 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.014 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7 10.1002/hfm.20690 10.1080/02678379808256868 10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.003 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.028 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.003 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.017 10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_1 10.1002/prs.10286 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.016 10.4236/ojsst.2017.74012 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000114 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.006 10.1002/hfm.20766 10.1007/s10111-015-0343-1 10.3390/w10020164 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.005 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.003 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.006 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.015 10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.030 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.001 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.007 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.017 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 10.1016/j.psep.2013.03.002 10.1007/s13198-019-00774-0 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.004 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2020 The Authors 2020 The Authors. 2020 The Authors 2020
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2020 The Authors – notice: 2020 The Authors. – notice: 2020 The Authors 2020
DBID	6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR
DOI	10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009
DatabaseName	ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList	PubMed MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Economics
EISSN	2093-7997
EndPage	135
ExternalDocumentID	oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9480358 oai_doaj_org_article_5b7d124798f54c5d9ad28c6e68b99c93 PMC7303539 32596006 10_1016_j_shaw_2020_03_009 S2093791120302663
Genre	Journal Article Review
GroupedDBID	.UV .~1 0SF 1~. 4.4 457 4G. 5-W 53G 6I. 7-5 8JR AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAIKJ AAKDD AALRI AAXUO ABFRF ABMAC ACGFS ADBBV ADEZE ADRAZ AEFWE AEKER AEXQZ AFTJW AGHFR AITUG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ AOIJS BCNDV EBS EF. EJD FDB FEDTE FNPLU FRP GBLVA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HVGLF HYE IPNFZ KQ8 KVFHK M41 M48 MO0 M~E NCXOZ OK1 P-8 P-9 PC. RIG ROL RPM SSZ UNMZH W2D 9ZL AAYWO AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AFPUW AIGII AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP CITATION PGMZT NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c555t-dd003f83633a6ab42da7ae8514a3af43e1fa410b0575c6d7f9ac1f744d88b1713
IEDL.DBID	DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount	47
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000541503500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	2093-7911
IngestDate	Tue Nov 21 21:47:57 EST 2023 Mon Nov 10 04:33:01 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:59:45 EST 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:44:54 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:33:01 EDT 2025 Wed Nov 05 20:47:04 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:41:56 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:49:59 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess	true
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	2
Keywords	RE indicators safety management safety resilience engineering
Language	English
License	This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. 2020 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
LinkModel	DirectLink
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c555t-dd003f83633a6ab42da7ae8514a3af43e1fa410b0575c6d7f9ac1f744d88b1713
Notes	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791120302663
OpenAccessLink	https://doaj.org/article/5b7d124798f54c5d9ad28c6e68b99c93
PMID	32596006
PQID	2418729889
PQPubID	23479
PageCount	9
ParticipantIDs	nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9480358 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5b7d124798f54c5d9ad28c6e68b99c93 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7303539 proquest_miscellaneous_2418729889 pubmed_primary_32596006 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_shaw_2020_03_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_shaw_2020_03_009 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_shaw_2020_03_009
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2020-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2020-06-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 06 year: 2020 text: 2020-06-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2020
PublicationPlace	Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle	Safety and health at work
PublicationTitleAlternate	Saf Health Work
PublicationYear	2020
Publisher	Elsevier B.V Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute Elsevier 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier B.V – name: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute – name: Elsevier – name: 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원
References	Penaloza, Formoso, Saurin (bib32) 2017 Hosseini, Barker, Ramirez-Marquez (bib15) 2016; 145 (bib6) 2016 International Labour Organization (bib1) 2018 Hon, Chan (bib7) 2013; 30 Rabbani, Yazdanparast, Mobini (bib54) 2019; 10 Woods, Wreathall (bib36) 2003 Azadeh, Salehi, Mirzayi, Roudi (bib48) 2017; 27 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, PRISMA (bib57) 2009; 89 Schafer, Abdelhamid, Mitropoulos, Mrozowski (bib20) 2009 (bib9) 2008 Saurin, Rooke, Koskela, Kemmer (bib14) 2013; 1 Woods (bib27) 2015; 141 Kitchenham (bib39) 2004; vol. 33 Saurin, Junior (bib51) 2011; 49 Pillay, Borys, Else, Tuck (bib38) 2010 Shin, Lee, Judi, Parvania, Goharian, McPherson, Burian (bib16) 2018; 10 Hosseini, Martek, Zavadskas, Aibinu, Arashpour, Chileshe (bib44) 2018; 87 Bellamy, Chambon, Guldener (bib21) 2018; 172 Van Eck, Waltman (bib45) 2014 Chen, McCabe, Hyatt (bib58) 2017 Patriarca, Bergström, Di Gravio, Costantino (bib18) 2018; 102 Azadeh, Asadzadeh, Tanhaeean (bib59) 2017; 47 Patterson, Deutsch (bib11) 2015; 45 Cooper (bib64) 2000; 36 Woods (bib26) 2009; 47 Shirali, Mohammadfam, Ebrahimipour (bib2) 2013; 119 Rubio-Romero, Pardo-Ferreira, Varga-Salto, Galindo-Reyes (bib33) 2018; 108 Dekker, Hollnagel, Woods, Cook (bib4) 2008 Azadeh, Salehi, Ashjari, Saberi (bib47) 2014; 92 (bib8) 2015 Azadeh, Salehi, Arvan, Dolatkhah (bib17) 2014; 68 Shirali, Shekari, Angali (bib46) 2018; 9 Wehbe, Hattab, Hamzeh (bib29) 2016; 82 Tranfield, Denyer, Smart (bib43) 2003; 14 Hollnagel (bib12) 2017 Chen, McCabe, Hyatt (bib13) 2018; 109 Wiegmann, Zhang, Von Thaden, Sharma, Gibbons (bib63) 2004; 14 Hollnagel, Woods, Leveson (bib3) 2007 Bergström, van Winsen, Henriqson (bib19) 2015; 141 Azadeh, Zarrin (bib50) 2016; 89 Lehtiranta (bib56) 2011; 11 Adolph, Lafrenz, Grauel (bib31) 2012 Hollnagel (bib25) 2013 Righi, Saurin, Wachs (bib5) 2015; 141 Hollnagel (bib10) 2014; 67 (bib28) 2014 Saurin, Formoso, Cambraia (bib55) 2008; 46 Shirali, Motamedzade, Mohammadfam, Ebrahimipour, Moghimbeigi (bib22) 2016; 18 Okoli, Schabram (bib42) 2010 Hollnagel, Woods (bib53) 2005 Choudhry, Fang, Mohamed (bib65) 2007; 45 Niskanen (bib30) 2018; 101 Steen, Aven (bib23) 2011; 49 Pęciłło (bib35) 2016; 82 Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, Group (bib41) 2010 Reason (bib52) 1998; 12 Azadian, Shirali (bib60) 2014; 6 Shirali, Shekari, Angali (bib49) 2016; 40 Martinez-Aires, Lopez-Alonso, Martinez-Rojas (bib40) 2018; 101 Hollnagel (bib24) 2011 Huber, Wijgerden, Witt, Dekker (bib61) 2009; 28 Costella, Saurin, Guimaraes (bib37) 2009; 47 Zarrin, Azadeh (bib62) 2019; 29 Pillay (bib34) 2018; 7 Shirali (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib49) 2016; 40 Pillay (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib34) 2018; 7 Azadeh (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib48) 2017; 27 (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib8) 2015 Huber (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib61) 2009; 28 Patterson (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib11) 2015; 45 Woods (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib27) 2015; 141 Zarrin (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib62) 2019; 29 Patriarca (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib18) 2018; 102 Hosseini (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib44) 2018; 87 Steen (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib23) 2011; 49 Adolph (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib31) 2012 Bellamy (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib21) 2018; 172 (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib28) 2014 Tranfield (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib43) 2003; 14 Azadeh (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib50) 2016; 89 Lehtiranta (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib56) 2011; 11 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib24) 2011 Azadeh (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib47) 2014; 92 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib53) 2005 Azadian (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib60) 2014; 6 Bergström (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib19) 2015; 141 Dekker (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib4) 2008 Chen (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib58) 2017 Cooper (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib64) 2000; 36 Rubio-Romero (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib33) 2018; 108 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib10) 2014; 67 Martinez-Aires (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib40) 2018; 101 Chen (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib13) 2018; 109 Shirali (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib2) 2013; 119 Woods (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib26) 2009; 47 Okoli (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib42) 2010 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib3) 2007 Van Eck (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib45) 2014 Schafer (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib20) 2009 (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib6) 2016 Azadeh (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib59) 2017; 47 Reason (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib52) 1998; 12 Shirali (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib46) 2018; 9 (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib9) 2008 Niskanen (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib30) 2018; 101 Kitchenham (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib39) 2004; vol. 33 Shin (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib16) 2018; 10 Azadeh (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib17) 2014; 68 Costella (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib37) 2009; 47 Saurin (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib14) 2013; 1 Penaloza (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib32) 2017 Rabbani (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib54) 2019; 10 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib12) 2017 Hosseini (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib15) 2016; 145 Saurin (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib55) 2008; 46 Righi (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib5) 2015; 141 Woods (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib36) 2003 Pęciłło (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib35) 2016; 82 Saurin (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib51) 2011; 49 Hon (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib7) 2013; 30 International Labour Organization (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib1) 2018 Choudhry (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib65) 2007; 45 Moher (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib41) 2010 Wiegmann (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib63) 2004; 14 Hollnagel (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib25) 2013 Pillay (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib38) 2010 Wehbe (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib29) 2016; 82 Shirali (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib22) 2016; 18 Moher (10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib57) 2009; 89
References_xml	– year: 2010 ident: bib42 article-title: A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research – year: 2015 ident: bib8 article-title: An approach to sustainable refurbishment of existing building publication-title: Procs 31st Annual ARCOM Conference – year: 2017 ident: bib12 article-title: FRAM: the functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems – year: 2008 ident: bib4 article-title: Resilience engineering: new directions for measuring and maintaining safety in complex systems – volume: 10 start-page: 228 year: 2019 end-page: 241 ident: bib54 article-title: An algorithm for performance evaluation of resilience engineering culture based on graph theory and matrix approach publication-title: Int J Sys Assurance Eng Manag – volume: 141 start-page: 5 year: 2015 end-page: 9 ident: bib27 article-title: Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 47 start-page: 151 year: 2017 end-page: 160 ident: bib59 article-title: A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations publication-title: J Loss Prevent Process Ind – year: 2017 ident: bib32 article-title: Safety performance measurement systems based on resilience engineering: A – volume: 68 start-page: 99 year: 2014 end-page: 107 ident: bib17 article-title: Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps: a petrochemical plant publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2014 ident: bib28 article-title: The stress–strain model of resilience operationalizes the four cornerstones of resilience engineering publication-title: 5th Resilience Engineering Symposium – volume: 141 start-page: 131 year: 2015 end-page: 141 ident: bib19 article-title: On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: a literature review publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 119 start-page: 88 year: 2013 end-page: 94 ident: bib2 article-title: A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: a case study in a process industry publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 108 start-page: 161 year: 2018 end-page: 172 ident: bib33 article-title: Composite leading indicator to assess the resilience engineering in occupational health & safety in municipal solid waste management companies publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 46 start-page: 1169 year: 2008 end-page: 1183 ident: bib55 article-title: An analysis of construction safety best practices from a cognitive systems engineering perspective publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2011 ident: bib24 article-title: Prologue: the scope of resilience engineering publication-title: Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook – year: 2013 ident: bib25 article-title: Resilience engineering in practice: a guidebook – volume: 67 start-page: 21 year: 2014 end-page: 24 ident: bib10 article-title: Is safety a subject for science? publication-title: Safety Science – year: 2010 ident: bib41 article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement – volume: 1 start-page: 13 year: 2013 end-page: 22 ident: bib14 article-title: Guidelines for the management of complex socio-technical systems: an exploratory study of a refurbishment project publication-title: 21st Annual Summit of the International Group for Lean Construction – volume: 145 start-page: 47 year: 2016 end-page: 61 ident: bib15 article-title: A review of definitions and measures of system resilience publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 45 start-page: 993 year: 2007 end-page: 1012 ident: bib65 article-title: The nature of safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 28 start-page: 90 year: 2009 end-page: 95 ident: bib61 article-title: Learning from organizational incidents: resilience engineering for high-risk process environments publication-title: Process Safety Progress – year: 2007 ident: bib3 article-title: Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts – year: 2009 ident: bib20 article-title: Resilience engineering: a new approach for safety management – volume: 89 start-page: 873 year: 2009 end-page: 880 ident: bib57 article-title: Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: Phys Ther – volume: 82 start-page: 338 year: 2016 end-page: 351 ident: bib29 article-title: Exploring associations between resilience and construction safety performance in safety networks publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 27 start-page: 53 year: 2017 end-page: 65 ident: bib48 article-title: Combinatorial optimization of resilience engineering and organizational factors in a gas refinery by a unique mathematical programming approach publication-title: Human Fact Ergono Manufact Serv Ind – volume: 14 start-page: 207 year: 2003 end-page: 222 ident: bib43 article-title: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review publication-title: Br J Manag – volume: 6 year: 2014 ident: bib60 article-title: Designing a questionnaire to assess crisis management based on a resilience engineering approach publication-title: Jundishapur J Health Sci – year: 2008 ident: bib9 publication-title: Project_Complexity_in_Construction.pdf – volume: 36 start-page: 111 year: 2000 end-page: 136 ident: bib64 article-title: Towards a model of safety culture publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2017 ident: bib58 article-title: A belief network to predict safety performance of construction workers-from the perspectives of resilience – volume: 101 start-page: 11 year: 2018 end-page: 18 ident: bib40 article-title: Building information modeling and safety management: a systematic review publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2018 ident: bib1 article-title: The enormous burden of poor working conditions – year: 2016 ident: bib6 publication-title: Conflict, complexity, and uncertainty in building refurbishment projects – volume: 92 start-page: 231 year: 2014 end-page: 241 ident: bib47 article-title: Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis: the case of a petrochemical plant publication-title: Process Safety Environ Protect – volume: 29 start-page: 141 year: 2019 end-page: 153 ident: bib62 article-title: Mapping the influences of resilience engineering on health, safety, and environment and ergonomics management system by using Z-number cognitive map publication-title: Human Fact Ergon Manufact Service Ind – volume: 47 start-page: 498 year: 2009 end-page: 501 ident: bib26 article-title: Escaping failures of foresight publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 101 start-page: 108 year: 2018 end-page: 120 ident: bib30 article-title: A resilience engineering-related approach applying a taxonomy analysis to a survey examining the prevention of risks publication-title: Safety Sci – start-page: 21 year: 2010 end-page: 22 ident: bib38 article-title: Safety culture and resilience engineering–exploring theory and application in improving gold mining safety publication-title: Gravity Gold – volume: 30 year: 2013 ident: bib7 article-title: Safety management in repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition works: knowledge management perspective publication-title: J Manage Eng – volume: 40 start-page: 277 year: 2016 end-page: 284 ident: bib49 article-title: Quantitative assessment of resilience safety culture using principal components analysis and numerical taxonomy: a case study in a petrochemical plant publication-title: J Loss Prevent Process Ind – volume: 49 start-page: 355 year: 2011 end-page: 368 ident: bib51 article-title: Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2003 ident: bib36 article-title: Managing risk proactively: the emergence of resilience engineering – volume: 11 start-page: 141 year: 2011 end-page: 154 ident: bib56 article-title: Relational risk management in construction projects: modeling the complexity publication-title: Leadership Manag Eng – volume: 9 start-page: 296 year: 2018 end-page: 307 ident: bib46 article-title: Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems publication-title: Safety Health Work – volume: 102 start-page: 79 year: 2018 end-page: 100 ident: bib18 article-title: Resilience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 14 start-page: 117 year: 2004 end-page: 134 ident: bib63 article-title: Safety culture: an integrative review publication-title: Int J Aviation Psychol – volume: 141 start-page: 142 year: 2015 end-page: 152 ident: bib5 article-title: A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: research areas and a research agenda proposal publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 82 start-page: 190 year: 2016 end-page: 198 ident: bib35 article-title: The resilience engineering concept in enterprises with and without occupational safety and health management systems publication-title: Safety Sci – start-page: 285 year: 2014 end-page: 320 ident: bib45 article-title: Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring scholarly impact – volume: 49 start-page: 292 year: 2011 end-page: 297 ident: bib23 article-title: A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering publication-title: Safety Sci – year: 2012 ident: bib31 article-title: Safety management systems, safety culture and resilience engineering: comparison of concepts publication-title: Proceedings of the Human Factors and ergonomics society europe – volume: 172 start-page: 171 year: 2018 end-page: 184 ident: bib21 article-title: Getting resilience into safety programs using simple tools - a research background and practical implementation publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety – volume: 89 start-page: 55 year: 2016 end-page: 71 ident: bib50 article-title: An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 18 start-page: 19 year: 2016 end-page: 31 ident: bib22 article-title: Assessment of resilience engineering factors based on system properties in a process industry publication-title: Cognition Technol Work – volume: 87 start-page: 235 year: 2018 end-page: 247 ident: bib44 article-title: Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a scientometric analysis publication-title: Auto Constr – volume: 10 start-page: 164 year: 2018 ident: bib16 article-title: A systematic review of quantitative resilience measures for water infrastructure systems publication-title: Water – volume: 45 start-page: 382 year: 2015 end-page: 389 ident: bib11 article-title: Safety-I, Safety-II and resilience engineering publication-title: Curr Prob Pediatr Adolescent Health Care – volume: 109 start-page: 434 year: 2018 end-page: 445 ident: bib13 article-title: A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: 12 start-page: 293 year: 1998 end-page: 306 ident: bib52 article-title: Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice publication-title: Work Stress – year: 2005 ident: bib53 article-title: Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering – volume: 47 start-page: 1056 year: 2009 end-page: 1067 ident: bib37 article-title: A method for assessing health and safety management systems from the resilience engineering perspective publication-title: Safety Sci – volume: vol. 33 start-page: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 26 ident: bib39 publication-title: Procedures for performing systematic reviews – volume: 7 start-page: 129 year: 2018 ident: bib34 article-title: Resilience engineering: an integrative review of fundamental concepts and directions for future research in safety management publication-title: Open J Safety Sci Technol – volume: 141 start-page: 131 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib19 article-title: On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: a literature review publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.008 – volume: 46 start-page: 1169 issue: 8 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib55 article-title: An analysis of construction safety best practices from a cognitive systems engineering perspective publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.07.007 – volume: 67 start-page: 21 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib10 article-title: Is safety a subject for science? publication-title: Safety Science doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025 – year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib20 – volume: 49 start-page: 292 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib23 article-title: A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.003 – volume: 108 start-page: 161 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib33 article-title: Composite leading indicator to assess the resilience engineering in occupational health & safety in municipal solid waste management companies publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.014 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib4 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib42 – volume: 36 start-page: 111 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib64 article-title: Towards a model of safety culture publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7 – start-page: 21 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib38 article-title: Safety culture and resilience engineering–exploring theory and application in improving gold mining safety publication-title: Gravity Gold – volume: 27 start-page: 53 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib48 article-title: Combinatorial optimization of resilience engineering and organizational factors in a gas refinery by a unique mathematical programming approach publication-title: Human Fact Ergono Manufact Serv Ind doi: 10.1002/hfm.20690 – year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib8 article-title: An approach to sustainable refurbishment of existing building – volume: 12 start-page: 293 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib52 article-title: Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice publication-title: Work Stress doi: 10.1080/02678379808256868 – volume: 119 start-page: 88 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib2 article-title: A new method for quantitative assessment of resilience engineering by PCA and NT approach: a case study in a process industry publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.003 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib6 – volume: 30 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib7 article-title: Safety management in repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition works: knowledge management perspective publication-title: J Manage Eng – volume: 45 start-page: 382 issue: 12 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib11 article-title: Safety-I, Safety-II and resilience engineering publication-title: Curr Prob Pediatr Adolescent Health Care – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib53 – volume: 87 start-page: 235 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib44 article-title: Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: a scientometric analysis publication-title: Auto Constr doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002 – volume: 14 start-page: 207 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib43 article-title: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review publication-title: Br J Manag doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 – year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib12 – volume: vol. 33 start-page: 1 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib39 – year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib25 – volume: 47 start-page: 151 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib59 article-title: A consensus-based AHP for improved assessment of resilience engineering in maintenance organizations publication-title: J Loss Prevent Process Ind doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.02.028 – volume: 109 start-page: 434 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib13 article-title: A resilience safety climate model predicting construction safety performance publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.003 – volume: 82 start-page: 190 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib35 article-title: The resilience engineering concept in enterprises with and without occupational safety and health management systems publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.017 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib9 – volume: 14 start-page: 117 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib63 article-title: Safety culture: an integrative review publication-title: Int J Aviation Psychol doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap1402_1 – volume: 28 start-page: 90 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib61 article-title: Learning from organizational incidents: resilience engineering for high-risk process environments publication-title: Process Safety Progress doi: 10.1002/prs.10286 – volume: 101 start-page: 108 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib30 article-title: A resilience engineering-related approach applying a taxonomy analysis to a survey examining the prevention of risks publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.016 – volume: 7 start-page: 129 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib34 article-title: Resilience engineering: an integrative review of fundamental concepts and directions for future research in safety management publication-title: Open J Safety Sci Technol doi: 10.4236/ojsst.2017.74012 – volume: 11 start-page: 141 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib56 article-title: Relational risk management in construction projects: modeling the complexity publication-title: Leadership Manag Eng doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000114 – volume: 141 start-page: 142 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib5 article-title: A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: research areas and a research agenda proposal publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007 – volume: 6 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib60 article-title: Designing a questionnaire to assess crisis management based on a resilience engineering approach publication-title: Jundishapur J Health Sci – volume: 82 start-page: 338 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib29 article-title: Exploring associations between resilience and construction safety performance in safety networks publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.006 – volume: 29 start-page: 141 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib62 article-title: Mapping the influences of resilience engineering on health, safety, and environment and ergonomics management system by using Z-number cognitive map publication-title: Human Fact Ergon Manufact Service Ind doi: 10.1002/hfm.20766 – volume: 18 start-page: 19 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib22 article-title: Assessment of resilience engineering factors based on system properties in a process industry publication-title: Cognition Technol Work doi: 10.1007/s10111-015-0343-1 – year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib31 article-title: Safety management systems, safety culture and resilience engineering: comparison of concepts – year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib3 – volume: 10 start-page: 164 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib16 article-title: A systematic review of quantitative resilience measures for water infrastructure systems publication-title: Water doi: 10.3390/w10020164 – volume: 141 start-page: 5 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib27 article-title: Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 – volume: 172 start-page: 171 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib21 article-title: Getting resilience into safety programs using simple tools - a research background and practical implementation publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.005 – year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib58 – volume: 1 start-page: 13 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib14 article-title: Guidelines for the management of complex socio-technical systems: an exploratory study of a refurbishment project – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib41 – volume: 45 start-page: 993 issue: 10 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib65 article-title: The nature of safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.003 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib24 article-title: Prologue: the scope of resilience engineering – volume: 47 start-page: 1056 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib37 article-title: A method for assessing health and safety management systems from the resilience engineering perspective publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.11.006 – volume: 101 start-page: 11 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib40 article-title: Building information modeling and safety management: a systematic review publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.015 – start-page: 285 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib45 – year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib1 – volume: 89 start-page: 873 issue: 9 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib57 article-title: Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement publication-title: Phys Ther doi: 10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 – volume: 47 start-page: 498 issue: 4 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib26 article-title: Escaping failures of foresight publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.030 – volume: 89 start-page: 55 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib50 article-title: An intelligent framework for productivity assessment and analysis of human resource from resilience engineering, motivational factors, HSE and ergonomics perspectives publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.001 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib36 – volume: 40 start-page: 277 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib49 article-title: Quantitative assessment of resilience safety culture using principal components analysis and numerical taxonomy: a case study in a petrochemical plant publication-title: J Loss Prevent Process Ind doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.007 – volume: 49 start-page: 355 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib51 article-title: Evaluation and improvement of a method for assessing HSMS from the resilience engineering perspective: a case study of an electricity distributor publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.017 – volume: 145 start-page: 47 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib15 article-title: A review of definitions and measures of system resilience publication-title: Reliab Eng Sys Safety doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 – volume: 92 start-page: 231 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib47 article-title: Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis: the case of a petrochemical plant publication-title: Process Safety Environ Protect doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2013.03.002 – volume: 10 start-page: 228 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib54 article-title: An algorithm for performance evaluation of resilience engineering culture based on graph theory and matrix approach publication-title: Int J Sys Assurance Eng Manag doi: 10.1007/s13198-019-00774-0 – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib28 article-title: The stress–strain model of resilience operationalizes the four cornerstones of resilience engineering – year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib32 – volume: 9 start-page: 296 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib46 article-title: Assessing reliability and validity of an instrument for measuring resilience safety culture in sociotechnical systems publication-title: Safety Health Work doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.07.010 – volume: 68 start-page: 99 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib17 article-title: Assessment of resilience engineering factors in high-risk environments by fuzzy cognitive maps: a petrochemical plant publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.004 – volume: 102 start-page: 79 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009_bib18 article-title: Resilience engineering: current status of the research and future challenges publication-title: Safety Sci doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005
SSID	ssj0000491123
Score	2.420754
SecondaryResourceType	review_article
Snippet	A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in...
SourceID	nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref elsevier
SourceType	Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	127
SubjectTerms	RE indicators resilience engineering Review safety safety management 예방의학
Title	Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596006 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2418729889 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7303539 https://doaj.org/article/5b7d124798f54c5d9ad28c6e68b99c93 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002596677
Volume	11
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000541503500002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX	Safety and Health at Work, 2020, 11(2), , pp.127-135
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2093-7997 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000491123 issn: 2093-7911 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20100101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9VAEB5sEfRFvDdeyiq-STDJ7ia7vlWxWJAiVuG8LXu1aUuOnJwq_ntns8nxRKS--JSQTbLMZCbzDTv7DcALDJHMMaNzHyzPGXpTLmWFZywIYwtLTQhDs4nm-FgsFvLjVquvWBOW6IGT4l5x0ziMQY0UgTPLndSuErb2tTBSWjnwfCLq2UqmzhLuRSARl5crTNkjJ2M57phJxV39qf6ByWFVJIZTOYtKA3n_LDjtdKvwNwj6ZyXlVmg6vA23RkxJDpIsd-Ca7-7CjWnLcX8PPnzyfXsxODHZIiAkR11cpYn9dojuHDnRwa9_kt8VMa_JATnZUD2TtI5wH74cvvv89n0-tlHILed8nTuHnhsErSnVtTascrrRHpEW01QHRn0ZNCsLE5GbrV0TpLZlaBhzQpgSk9gHsNstO78HhJZe19zUvLHo_MbhuNXS4RUccLrIoJzUqOzIMR5bXVyoqZjsTEXVq6h6VVCFqs_g5eaZb4lh48q738Svs7kzsmMPF9Bm1Ggz6l82kwGfvq0agUYCEPiq9srJn6MhqHPbDvPG49elOl8pzD2OlGSioFxk8GyyE4WuGtdfdOeXl71CsCQwlxECX_Qw2c1GDoppKGLPOoNmZlEzQecjXXs60IHjP5pyKh_9D808hptR3lQL9wR216tL_xSu2-_rtl_tw06zEPuDp_0CEbsqxQ
linkProvider	Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resilience+Engineering+Indicators+and+Safety+Management%3A+A+Systematic+Review&rft.jtitle=Safety+and+health+at+work&rft.au=Udara+Ranasinghe&rft.au=Marcus+Jefferies&rft.au=Peter+Davis&rft.au=Manikam+Pillay&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier&rft.issn=2093-7911&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=135&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.shaw.2020.03.009&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_5b7d124798f54c5d9ad28c6e68b99c93
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2093-7911&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2093-7911&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2093-7911&client=summon