GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as a part of GRADE's certainty rating process. The study design and se...

Celý popis

Uložené v:

Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:	Journal of clinical epidemiology Ročník 111; s. 105 - 114
Hlavní autori:	Schünemann, Holger J., Cuello, Carlos, Akl, Elie A., Mustafa, Reem A., Meerpohl, Jörg J., Thayer, Kris, Morgan, Rebecca L., Gartlehner, Gerald, Kunz, Regina, Katikireddi, S Vittal, Sterne, Jonathan, Higgins, Julian PT, Guyatt, Gordon
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	English
Vydavateľské údaje:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2019 Elsevier Limited
Predmet:	Bias Certainty of the evidence Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Decision making Design Domains Dose-response effects Epidemiology Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Evidence-Based Medicine - standards GRADE Humans Internal Medicine Nonrandomized studies Observational Studies as Topic - standards Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Quality Quality of evidence Risk Assessment Risk Factors Risk of bias ROBINS Studies Systematic Reviews as Topic Technology assessment Uncertainty Working groups GRADE Risk of bias ROBINS Quality of evidence Nonrandomized studies Certainty of the evidence
ISSN:	0895-4356, 1878-5921, 1878-5921
On-line prístup:	Získať plný text
Tagy:	Pridať tag Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!

Buďte prvý, kto okomentuje tento záznam!