GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence

To provide guidance on how systematic review authors, guideline developers, and health technology assessment practitioners should approach the use of the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool as a part of GRADE's certainty rating process. The study design and se...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:

Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:	Journal of clinical epidemiology Ročník 111; s. 105 - 114
Hlavní autoři:	Schünemann, Holger J., Cuello, Carlos, Akl, Elie A., Mustafa, Reem A., Meerpohl, Jörg J., Thayer, Kris, Morgan, Rebecca L., Gartlehner, Gerald, Kunz, Regina, Katikireddi, S Vittal, Sterne, Jonathan, Higgins, Julian PT, Guyatt, Gordon
Médium:	Journal Article
Jazyk:	angličtina
Vydáno:	United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2019 Elsevier Limited
Témata:	Bias Certainty of the evidence Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic - standards Decision making Design Domains Dose-response effects Epidemiology Evidence-Based Medicine - methods Evidence-Based Medicine - standards GRADE Humans Internal Medicine Nonrandomized studies Observational Studies as Topic - standards Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards Quality Quality of evidence Risk Assessment Risk Factors Risk of bias ROBINS Studies Systematic Reviews as Topic Technology assessment Uncertainty Working groups GRADE Risk of bias ROBINS Quality of evidence Nonrandomized studies Certainty of the evidence
ISSN:	0895-4356, 1878-5921, 1878-5921
On-line přístup:	Získat plný text
Tagy:	Přidat tag Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!

Buďte první, kdo okomentuje tento záznam!