Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – Current status and potential improvements
► GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. ► System-boundary settings often vary largely in reviewed studies. ► Existing LCA guidelines give varying recommendations in relation to several key issues. Twenty-five compara...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) Jg. 32; H. 12; S. 2439 - 2455 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Kidlington
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2012
Elsevier |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0956-053X, 1879-2456, 1879-2456 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | ► GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. ► System-boundary settings often vary largely in reviewed studies. ► Existing LCA guidelines give varying recommendations in relation to several key issues.
Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons.Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons. Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons. Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer System-boundary settings often vary largely in reviewed studies. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Existing LCA guidelines give varying recommendations in relation to several key issues. - Abstract: Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons. ► GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. ► System-boundary settings often vary largely in reviewed studies. ► Existing LCA guidelines give varying recommendations in relation to several key issues. Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal treatment, compost (small and large scale) and anaerobic digestion. The global warming potential related to these treatment alternatives varies largely amongst the studies. Large differences in relation to setting of system boundaries, methodological choices and variations in used input data were seen between the studies. Also, a number of internal contradictions were identified, many times resulting in biased comparisons between alternatives. Thus, noticed differences in global warming potential are not found to be a result of actual differences in the environmental impacts from studied systems, but rather to differences in the performance of the study. A number of key issues with high impact on the overall global warming potential from different treatment alternatives for food waste were identified through the use of one-way sensitivity analyses in relation to a previously performed LCA of food waste management. Assumptions related to characteristics in treated waste, losses and emissions of carbon, nutrients and other compounds during the collection, storage and pretreatment, potential energy recovery through combustion, emissions from composting, emissions from storage and land use of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers and eco-profiles of substituted goods were all identified as highly relevant for the outcomes of this type of comparisons. As the use of LCA in this area is likely to increase in coming years, it is highly relevant to establish more detailed guidelines within this field in order to increase both the general quality in assessments as well as the potentials for cross-study comparisons. |
| Author | Bernstad, A. la Cour Jansen, J. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. surname: Bernstad fullname: Bernstad, A. email: anna.bernstad@chemeng.lth.se – sequence: 2 givenname: J. surname: la Cour Jansen fullname: la Cour Jansen, J. |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27042413$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22922048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22089905$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
| BookMark | eNqFUsuKFDEUDTLi9LT-gUiBCG66zbMeLgaGxhc0CKLgLtxK3XLSVFXaJNXD7PwH_9AvMdXVjuDCWQUu55F77rkgZ4MbkJCnjK4ZZfmr3foGQg_DmlPG17RYUy4ekAUri2rFpcrPyIJWKl9RJb6ek4sQdpQyWTL6iJxzXnFOZbkg9hMeLN5krs2M6_fgIdoDZtvNVZhmrXNNlnwiZskKvmGPQ8zCbRr0Ifv142e2Gb0_ziLEMWQwNNnexTSx0GW233t3OJLCY_KwhS7gk9O7JF_evvm8eb_afnz3YXO1XRklRVwxI-pW0ZxyRKhZyfNCoTQKhESTFzRHg8BZhaJRkCtRGSMabhomBIhGKrEkMOuGG9yPtd5724O_1Q6s3jsfodMeA4I317obdUCdUJ01aXE3BG2YkEBpqzHlqqXIG50sal2o2lRt01IDJnk8nz1ciFYHYyOaa-OGAU3UKdmyquj0k5czKoXwfcQQdW-Dwa6DAd0YNCtYuhktVXU_NImKvJTVpPrsBB3rHpu7_f7cNAFenAAQDHSth8HY8BdXUMllimtJ5Iwz3oXgsb2DMKqniumdniump4ppWuj03UR7_Q8trX8ML3qw3X3ky5mMqQGpeH4KDweDjfVTdo2z_xf4DUSS8X4 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_02772248_2015_1074235 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2019_109512 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2024_132593 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2023_129771 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2024_142625 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1001_0742_13_60596_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2014_02_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_085 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10163_016_0531_y crossref_primary_10_1051_e3sconf_201911204005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_138622 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_020_01732_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s13399_020_00883_y crossref_primary_10_3390_su14148509 crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8120680 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104908 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods11223645 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_05_049 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X19879222 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_135580 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_12_087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_105209 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_016_7159_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_019_00687_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_egypro_2017_10_253 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2023_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_02_298 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clwas_2023_100092 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2019_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trd_2017_03_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2025_117884 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2016_07_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2015_06_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_023_02168_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_128057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2021_04_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_017_8441_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_su9050827 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2013_08_038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2020_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_117999 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2015_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10669_024_09978_7 crossref_primary_10_1515_opag_2017_0020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_015_9399_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_renene_2020_04_083 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2016_02_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2019_02_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2018_08_061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_09_035 crossref_primary_10_3390_en10020210 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wmb_2023_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_04_017 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods9121765 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2017_08_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_165372 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11236790 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2018_05_003 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2013_821593 crossref_primary_10_3390_en15176268 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12199400 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_105119 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_130552 crossref_primary_10_3390_land14081622 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_132613 crossref_primary_10_3390_en13092291 crossref_primary_10_1139_er_2023_0005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2023_120481 crossref_primary_10_3390_environments2040471 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2024_131305 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10020230 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_015_0851_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14137533 crossref_primary_10_3390_app9173608 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eiar_2023_107279 crossref_primary_10_1088_2515_7620_adc22f crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_142510 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_138708 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_06_154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2020_111417 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cie_2020_106510 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2015_04_058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2015_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_136762 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_07_100 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10784_021_09549_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_10_164 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_021_13983_7 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X16675683 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2013_06_003 crossref_primary_10_22630_MIBE_2019_20_4_25 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_105898 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_124195 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2017_09_082 crossref_primary_10_22630_MIBE_2019_20_1_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_05_329 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_125813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apenergy_2023_121044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2015_06_021 crossref_primary_10_3390_app8101804 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40093_018_0208_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_04_169 crossref_primary_10_3390_en14061790 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13063377 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2014_11_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_01_135 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2014_05_123 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_023_02092_w crossref_primary_10_1002_ese3_503 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cogsc_2018_06_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_02_104 crossref_primary_10_3390_foods14071159 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_04_111 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_133068 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_021_01448_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2017_09_105 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2014_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_122865 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_10_233 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2023_03_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biosystemseng_2013_10_014 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15021137 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tifs_2023_104288 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2021_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2017_10_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11082282 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11123456 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_04_106 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10103515 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2018_04_061 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jer_2024_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2016_10_044 crossref_primary_10_3390_su11061556 crossref_primary_10_3390_en12040767 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_016_9484_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2024_115040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scs_2017_03_028 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1EE00850A crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2017_03_094 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2020_117462 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2015_11_085 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593330_2017_1297851 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2022_106271 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2021_127913 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2017_06_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psep_2014_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_018_0214_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_150409 crossref_primary_10_1080_10962247_2015_1083913 crossref_primary_10_1002_jaa2_59 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2017_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170853 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_756_1_012005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2018_07_240 crossref_primary_10_3390_resources11100080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eti_2023_103256 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2016_09_042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2015_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fuel_2022_123585 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2016_12_030 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10098_019_01686_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123076 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envsci_2021_09_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_desal_2024_117447 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2023_136254 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2020_115616 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_023_02248_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_04_034 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13373 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_149960 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodchem_2015_11_035 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10098_020_02016_5 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X18786388 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12393_015_9125_z crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph18105379 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2022_101151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_131490 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lwt_2025_118182 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734242X16652965 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2022_106730 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10311_021_01220_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2013_10_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_126889 crossref_primary_10_3390_su16083359 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11157_016_9405_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2016_01_079 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envdev_2021_100617 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12051916 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2021_110974 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_egypro_2018_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_energy_2021_121397 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_11_241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_138567 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2019_01_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2022_133200 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_022_01914_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2021_125080 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2014_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_186_3_012039 crossref_primary_10_3390_resources11120117 crossref_primary_10_1080_10962247_2024_2378102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cej_2024_150242 crossref_primary_10_1002_bab_2385 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoenv_2023_115913 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2020_104778 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2017_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2019_07_322 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_119848 crossref_primary_10_1002_ghg_2231 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2020_109876 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.010 10.1177/0734242X09345275 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464463 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.026 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.023 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.009 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016 10.1021/es100529f 10.1021/es802677t 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004 10.1177/0734242X06062598 10.1016/S0921-3449(97)00020-7 10.1016/0167-9473(95)92843-M 10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00093-1 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.005 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.072 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.08.002 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.02.014 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00029-4 10.1007/BF02978849 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.019 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.011 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.002 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.049 10.1007/s10666-005-9028-0 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.005 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.023 10.1007/s11367-009-0123-3 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.037 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009 10.1177/0734242X0302100603 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00314-9 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.008 10.1177/0734242X08096304 10.1177/0734242X09344876 10.1007/s10098-007-0125-4 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.009 10.1097/00010694-197101000-00007 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2012 Elsevier Ltd 2014 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 Elsevier Ltd – notice: 2014 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| CorporateAuthor | Institutioner vid LTH Institutionen för processteknik och tillämpad biovetenskap Avdelningen för kemiteknik Departments at LTH Division of Chemical Engineering Department of Process and Life Science Engineering Lunds universitet Faculty of Engineering, LTH Lunds Tekniska Högskola Lund University |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Faculty of Engineering, LTH – name: Lund University – name: Avdelningen för kemiteknik – name: Department of Process and Life Science Engineering – name: Division of Chemical Engineering – name: Institutionen för processteknik och tillämpad biovetenskap – name: Institutioner vid LTH – name: Lunds Tekniska Högskola – name: Departments at LTH – name: Lunds universitet |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 OTOTI ADTPV AOWAS D95 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic OSTI.GOV SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Lunds universitet |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Engineering Chemistry Applied Sciences Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 1879-2456 |
| EndPage | 2455 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_c134a00f_e201_436d_9ccb_75bc9fdf0cac 22089905 22922048 27042413 10_1016_j_wasman_2012_07_023 S0956053X12003455 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -~X .DC .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29R 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JN AABNK AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAXUO ABEFU ABFNM ABFYP ABJNI ABLST ABMAC ABQEM ABQYD ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACLVX ACRLP ACSBN ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG ATOGT AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CS3 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HMC HVGLF HZ~ IHE IMUCA J1W KCYFY KOM LY9 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SDF SDG SEN SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSE SSJ SSZ T5K TAE WUQ Y6R ~02 ~G- 9DU AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACLOT ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEGFY AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGQPQ AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION EFKBS ~HD AGCQF AGRNS BNPGV IQODW SSH CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7S9 L.6 AALMO AAPBV ABPIF ABPTK OTOTI ADTPV AOWAS D95 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-1c3bf50602eeab182675e4c5a34ec6706ecea219e3d5a6539cc3d2cd133a3d453 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 228 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000312675400028&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
| IngestDate | Wed Dec 10 15:01:29 EST 2025 Thu May 18 18:39:33 EDT 2023 Sun Sep 28 09:37:39 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 22:37:53 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:56 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:47:44 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:12:54 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:24:43 EST 2024 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | Food waste System-boundaries Key issues Life-cycle assessment Compost Waste dumping Global warming potential Heat treatment Sensitivity analysis Life cycle (environment) Fertilization Waste treatment Ecobalance Energy recovery Combustion Pollutant emission Anaerobic digestion Fertilizers Waste management Composting Environment impact |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c543t-1c3bf50602eeab182675e4c5a34ec6706ecea219e3d5a6539cc3d2cd133a3d453 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 22922048 |
| PQID | 1220368495 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 17 |
| ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_c134a00f_e201_436d_9ccb_75bc9fdf0cac osti_scitechconnect_22089905 proquest_miscellaneous_1710230859 proquest_miscellaneous_1220368495 pubmed_primary_22922048 pascalfrancis_primary_27042413 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2012_07_023 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_wasman_2012_07_023 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_wasman_2012_07_023 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-12-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2012 text: 2012-12-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Kidlington |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Kidlington – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Waste management (Elmsford) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Waste Manag |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier |
| References | Gentil, E.C., Damgaard, A., Hauschild, M., Finnveden, G., 2010. Models for waste life cycle assessment: Review of technical assumptions. In: Eriksson, O., Thorneloe, S., Kaplan, P.O., Barlaz, M., Muller, O., Matsui, Y., Ii, R., Christensen, T.H. (Eds.), Waste Management 30 (12), 2636–2648. European Parliament, 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and the of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Güereca, Gassó, Baldasano, Jiménez-Guerrero (b0160) 2006; 49 Diggelman, Ham (b0120) 2003; 21 Chaya, Gheewala (b0085) 2007; 15 ILCD, 2011a. Support JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Waste Management – A Technical Guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Waste Experts and LCA Practitioners. ISO, 2006a. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, second ed., ISO 14040:2006. <http://www.iso.org.> (accessed 15.10.11). Packman (b0330) 2011 Hansen, la Cour Jansen, Davidsson, Christensen (b0165) 2007; 27 Smith, A., Brown, K., Ogilvie, S., Rushton, K., Bates, J., 2001. Waste Management Options and Climate Change. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Guinée (b0440) 2002 Nielsen, O.-K., Lyck, E., Mikkelsen, M.H., Hoffmann, L., Gyldenkærne, S., Winther, M., Nielsen, M., Fauser, P., Thomsen, M., Plejdrup, M.S., Illerup, J.B., Sørensen, P.B., Vesterdal, L., 2008. Denmark’s National Inventory Report 2008 - Emission Inventories 1990–2006. Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. NERI Technical Report No. 667. National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark. <http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR667.pdf>. Banar, Cokaygil, Ozkan (b0015) 2009; 29 Lantz, M., Ekman, A., Börjesson, P., 2009. Systemoptimerad produktion av fordonsgas – En miljö- och energioptimerad studie av Söderåsens biogasanläggnin/Systems optimized production of vehicle gas – an environmental and energy assessment of the Söderåsen biogas production plant. Report 69. Envionmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Lund Sweden (in Swedish). Eriksson, Baky (b0135) 2010; 4 Clift, Doig, Finnveden (b0110) 2000; 78 Kim, Kim (b0245) 2010; 408 Linzner, Mostbauer (b0285) 2005 Whitehead, Raistrick (b0425) 1990; 41 Bruun, Lund Hansen, Christensen, Magid, Jensen (b0070) 2006; 11 Khoo, Lim, Tan (b0240) 2010; 408 Boldrin, Andersen, Møller, Christensen, Favoino (b0050) 2009; 27 Saltelli, Andres, Homma (b0360) 1995; 20 Morris (b0320) 2011 Bouwman, Boumans, Batjes (b0060) 2002; 16 Lee, Choi, Osako, Dong (b0275) 2007; 387 Stangel, P., 1988. Technological options affecting emissions. Paper Presented at US Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Agriculture and Climate Change, February 28–March 1, 1988, Washington DC. Morris (b0315) 2010; 44 Swedish Waste Management Association, 2007. Frivilligt åtagande – inventering av utsläpp från biogas- och uppgraderingsanläggningar/Mapping of methane emissions from Swedish biogas plants (in Swedish). Report U2007:02. Malmö, Sweden. Blengini (b0045) 2008; 53 EPA, 2010. Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the nitric acid production industry. Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, US. Mathiesen, Münster, Fruergaard (b0300) 2009; 17 Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 5 Waste. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. Sørensen, P., Birkmose, T., 2002. Kvaelstofudvaskning efter gødskning med afgasset gylle /Nitrogen leachate after fertilizing with digestate from cow manure. Grøn Viden, Markbruk nr 266, Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri, Danmarks Jordbruksforskning, Copenahgen, Denmark (in Danish). Aye, Widjaya (b0005) 2005; 26 ISO, 2000. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment - Life cycle impact assessment. ISO 14042:2000. <http://www.iso.org> (accessed 15.10.11). ISO, 2006b. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, first ed., ISO 14044:2006. <http://www.iso.org.> (accessed 15.10.11). Tyskeng, S., Finnveden, G., 2007. Energy and environmental differences between material recycling and energy utilization of waste – a literature review. TRITA-INFRA-FMS 2007:11, KTH, Stockholm (in Swedish). Cabaraban, Khire, Alocilja (b0080) 2008; 10 Winkler, Bilitewski (b0430) 2007; 27 Finnveden, G., 1992. Landfilling - a forgotten part of Life Cycle Assessments. Product Life Cycle Assessments - Principles and Methodology, vol. 9. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 263–280. Hirai, Y., Murata. M., Sakai, S., Takatsuki, H., 2000. Life Cycle Assessment for Food Waste Recycling and Management. In: Proceedings from the 4th International Conference on EcoBalance Methodologies for decision Making in a Sustainable 21st Century. October 31st–November 2nd, 2000, Tsukuba, Japan. Peters, Rowley (b0340) 2009; 43 Baky, A., Eriksson, O., 2003. Systems analysis of organic waste management in Denmark. Environmental Project No. 822. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. Bernstad, la Cour Jansen (b0025) 2011; 31 ILCD, 2010. ILCD handbook. International Reference Life Cycle Data System. General guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed guidance. EUR 24708 EN – 2010. JRC, European Commission. Clemens, Trimborn, Weiland, Amon (b0105) 2006; 112 Nanh, C., Warren, J., Sistani, K., 2008. Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Land Application of Swine Slurry: A Comparison of Three Application Methods. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan. <http://www.asabe.org>. Kirkeby, Birgisdottir, Lund Hansen, Christensen, Bhander, Hauschild (b0250) 2006; 24 IFA, 2011. International Fertlizer Industry Association. Climate Change. <http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/HomePage/SUSTAINABILITY/Climate-change/Emissions-from-production.html> (Downloaded 20110925). PCR, 2008. Product Category Rules (PCR) for preparing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Solid Waste Disposal Services. PCR 2008:02. <http://www.environdec.com>. Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, A.J., 2004. A review of approaches to treat uncertainties in LCA. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of iEMSs, Complexity and integrated resources management, Osnabrück, Germany, 14–17 June, 2004, pp. 332–339. Björklund (b0035) 2002; 7 Dalemo, Sonesson, Bjorklund, Mingarini, Frostell, Jonsson, Nybrant, Sundqvist, Thyselius (b0115) 1997; 21 Møller, Boldrin, Christensen (b0310) 2009; 27 Finnveden, Hauschild, Ekvall, Guinee, Heijungs, Hellweg, Koehler, Pennington, Suh (b0145) 2009; 91 Pertl, Mostbauer, Obersteiner (b0450) 2010; 30 Cherubini, Bargigli, Ulgiati (b0090) 2009; 34 Sonesson, Björklund, Carlsson, Dalemo (b0370) 2000; 28 Swedish Waste Management Association, 2010. Viktreducering, energiförlust och gasemissioner vid olika insamlingssystem av matavfall från hushåll/Weight reduction, energy losses and gas emissions in different systems for collection of household food waste (in Swedish). Report U2010:10. ISSN 1103–4092. Malmö, Sweden. Martin, Haider (b0290) 1971; 111 Rodhe, L., Ascue, J., Tersmeden, M., Ringmar, A., Nordberg, Å., 2009. Växthusgaser från lager med nötflytgödsel – Förhållanden i gårdsbehållare, metodikutveckling av gasmätning samt bestämning av emissioner från nötflytgödsel, /Greenhouse gas emissions from storage of mannure – Conditions in farm storage, method development of gas emission detection and determination of emissions from liquid mannure. Report No. 370JTI, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish). ILCD, 2011b. Support JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Food Waste Management – A Technical Guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Waste Experts and LCA practitioners. Tan, Khoo (b0400) 2006; 56 Hayashi, K., Gaillard, G., Nemecek, T., 2005. Life cycle assessment of agricultural production systems: current issues and future perspectives. In: International Seminar on Technology Development for Good Agriculture Practice in Asia and Oceania, 25–26th of October, 2005, Tsukuba, Japan. USEPA (b0415) 1995 Kirchmann, H., 1985. Household Composts, Waste-Water Treatment Sludge and Byproducts from Industry in Agriculture; Problems, Demand and Research. ISBN 91-576-3283–9. SLU Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish). Kärrman, E., Baky, A., Edström, M., Magnusson, Y., Malmqvist, P.-A., Palm, O., Rogstrant, G., 2005. Systemstudie rörande insamling och behandling av lättnedbrytbart organiskt avfall i Malmö/Systems study on collection and treatment of easily degradable orgnaic wast in Malmö. Report 2005004, Ecoloop, 2005, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish). la Cour Jansen, J., Christensen, T., Davidsson, Å., Lund Hansen, T., Jönsson, H., Kirkeby, J., 2007. Biowaste – Decision Support Tool for Collection and Treatment of Source-Sorted Organic Municipal Solid Waste. TemaNord 2007:602. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. Villanueva, Wenzel (b0420) 2007; 27 Bovea, Powell (b0065) 2006; 2 Christensen, Emmanuel, Boldrin, Larsen (b0095) 2009; 27 Börjesson, Berglund (b0055) 2007; 31 Martínez-Blanco, Colón, Gabarrell, Font, Sánchez, Artola, Rieradevall (b0295) 2010; 30 Truedsson, C., 2010. Positiva och negative miljöaspekter genom optimering av förbehandling av matavfall från hushåll/Positive and Negative Environmental Aspects through Optimization of Food Waste Pretreatment at Sysav Biotec. Master Thesis. Department for Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Sweden (in Swedish). Benjaminsson, J., 2006. Nya uppgraderingstekniker för biogas/ Koning (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0255) 2010; 15 Boldrin (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0050) 2009; 27 Tan (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0400) 2006; 56 Peters (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0340) 2009; 43 Villanueva (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0420) 2007; 27 Mathiesen (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0300) 2009; 17 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0235 Cabaraban (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0080) 2008; 10 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0355 Møller (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0310) 2009; 27 Whitehead (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0425) 1990; 41 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0155 Saltelli (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0360) 1995; 20 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0435 Blengini (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0040) 2008; 19 Aye (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0005) 2005; 26 Liang (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0280) 2000; 80 Martínez-Blanco (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0295) 2010; 30 Bovea (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0065) 2006; 2 Finnveden (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0145) 2009; 91 Bernstad (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0025) 2011; 31 Morris (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0320) 2011 Bruun (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0070) 2006; 11 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0170 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0010 Clemens (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0105) 2006; 112 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0175 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0130 Kim (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0245) 2010; 408 Rigamonti (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0350) 2009; 29 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0125 Pertl (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0450) 2010; 30 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0200 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0365 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0205 Güereca (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0160) 2006; 49 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0325 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0445 Hansen (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0165) 2007; 27 Kirkeby (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0250) 2006; 24 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0405 Busca (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0075) 2003; 16 Morris (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0315) 2010; 44 Diggelman (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0120) 2003; 21 Björklund (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0035) 2002; 7 Christensen (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0095) 2009; 27 Clift (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0110) 2000; 78 Martin (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0290) 1971; 111 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0260 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0380 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0180 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0220 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0385 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0020 Börjesson (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0055) 2007; 31 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0140 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0410 Fruergaard (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0150) 2011; 31 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0210 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0375 USEPA (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0415) 1995 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0215 Blengini (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0045) 2008; 53 Lee (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0275) 2007; 387 Cherubini (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0090) 2009; 34 Sonesson (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0370) 2000; 28 Chaya (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0085) 2007; 15 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0190 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0270 Linzner (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0285) 2005 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0390 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0230 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0395 Packman (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0330) 2011 Banar (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0015) 2009; 29 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0030 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0195 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0345 Bouwman (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0060) 2002; 16 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0100 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0265 Khoo (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0240) 2010; 408 Eriksson (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0135) 2010; 4 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0225 Winkler (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0430) 2007; 27 Guinée (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0440) 2002 Dalemo (10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0115) 1997; 21 |
| References_xml | – reference: Hayashi, K., Gaillard, G., Nemecek, T., 2005. Life cycle assessment of agricultural production systems: current issues and future perspectives. In: International Seminar on Technology Development for Good Agriculture Practice in Asia and Oceania, 25–26th of October, 2005, Tsukuba, Japan. – reference: European Parliament, 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and the of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. – volume: 31 start-page: 572 year: 2011 end-page: 582 ident: b0150 article-title: Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective publication-title: Waste Management – volume: 408 start-page: 3998 year: 2010 end-page: 4006 ident: b0245 article-title: Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – volume: 26 start-page: 1180 year: 2005 end-page: 1191 ident: b0005 article-title: Environmental and economic analyses of waste disposal options for traditional markets in Indonesia publication-title: Waste Management – year: 2002 ident: b0440 publication-title: Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment - Operational Guide to the ISO Standards – volume: 30 start-page: 983 year: 2010 end-page: 994 ident: b0295 article-title: The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale publication-title: Waste Management – reference: Kirchmann, H., 1985. Household Composts, Waste-Water Treatment Sludge and Byproducts from Industry in Agriculture; Problems, Demand and Research. ISBN 91-576-3283–9. SLU Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish). – volume: 17 start-page: 1331 year: 2009 end-page: 1338 ident: b0300 article-title: Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production – volume: 91 start-page: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 21 ident: b0145 article-title: Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management – volume: 44 start-page: 7944 year: 2010 end-page: 7949 ident: b0315 article-title: Bury or burn North America MSW? LCAs provide answers for climate impacts & carbon neutral power potential publication-title: Environmental Science and Technology – volume: 16 start-page: 157 year: 2003 end-page: 163 ident: b0075 article-title: Abatement of ammonia and amines from waste gases: a summary publication-title: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries – volume: 27 start-page: 707 year: 2009 end-page: 715 ident: b0095 article-title: C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems publication-title: Waste Management and Research – reference: ILCD, 2011a. Support JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Waste Management – A Technical Guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Waste Experts and LCA Practitioners. – reference: ILCD, 2011b. Support JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Food Waste Management – A Technical Guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Waste Experts and LCA practitioners. – reference: Sundqvist, J.-O., 1999. Life cycles assessments and solid waste – Guidelines for solid waste treatment and disposal in LCA. IVL, Swedish Environmental Research Institute. Report 279. AFN, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden. – volume: 34 start-page: 2116 year: 2009 end-page: 2123 ident: b0090 article-title: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration publication-title: Energy – volume: 80 start-page: 259 year: 2000 end-page: 269 ident: b0280 article-title: Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration publication-title: Journal of Hazardous Materials – volume: 16 start-page: 28 year: 2002 end-page: 31 ident: b0060 article-title: Modelling global annual N publication-title: Global Biogeochemical Cycles – volume: 112 start-page: 171 year: 2006 end-page: 177 ident: b0105 article-title: Mitigation of greenhouse emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry publication-title: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment – reference: Jensen, T.K., Kongshaug, G., 2003. Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in fertiliser production. In: Proceedings No. 509, Paper presented to The International Fertiliser Society at a Meeting in London, on 3rd of April 2003. The International Fertilizer Society, York, United Kingdom. ISBN 0 85310 145 0. – volume: 56 start-page: 244 year: 2006 end-page: 254 ident: b0400 article-title: Impact assessment of waste management options in Singapore publication-title: Journal of Air and Waste Management Association – year: 2011 ident: b0330 article-title: Risk Assessment of Cadmium in the Swedish Environment – reference: Baky, A., Eriksson, O., 2003. Systems analysis of organic waste management in Denmark. Environmental Project No. 822. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. – volume: 78 start-page: 279 year: 2000 end-page: 287 ident: b0110 article-title: The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management. Process safety and environmental protection publication-title: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers – reference: PCR, 2008. Product Category Rules (PCR) for preparing an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) for Solid Waste Disposal Services. PCR 2008:02. <http://www.environdec.com>. – volume: 15 start-page: 1463 year: 2007 end-page: 1468 ident: b0085 article-title: Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production – volume: 24 start-page: 16 year: 2006 end-page: 26 ident: b0250 article-title: Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) publication-title: Waste Management and Research – reference: Swedish Waste Management Association, 2010. Viktreducering, energiförlust och gasemissioner vid olika insamlingssystem av matavfall från hushåll/Weight reduction, energy losses and gas emissions in different systems for collection of household food waste (in Swedish). Report U2010:10. ISSN 1103–4092. Malmö, Sweden. – reference: Finnveden, G., 1992. Landfilling - a forgotten part of Life Cycle Assessments. Product Life Cycle Assessments - Principles and Methodology, vol. 9. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 263–280. – reference: ISO, 2000. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment - Life cycle impact assessment. ISO 14042:2000. <http://www.iso.org> (accessed 15.10.11). – volume: 21 start-page: 501 year: 2003 end-page: 514 ident: b0120 article-title: Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question publication-title: Waste Management and Research – volume: 20 start-page: 387 year: 1995 end-page: 407 ident: b0360 article-title: Sensitivity analysis of model output. Performance of the iterated fractional factorial design method publication-title: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis – reference: Kärrman, E., Baky, A., Edström, M., Magnusson, Y., Malmqvist, P.-A., Palm, O., Rogstrant, G., 2005. Systemstudie rörande insamling och behandling av lättnedbrytbart organiskt avfall i Malmö/Systems study on collection and treatment of easily degradable orgnaic wast in Malmö. Report 2005004, Ecoloop, 2005, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish). – reference: Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, A.J., 2004. A review of approaches to treat uncertainties in LCA. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Meeting of iEMSs, Complexity and integrated resources management, Osnabrück, Germany, 14–17 June, 2004, pp. 332–339. – reference: Hirai, Y., Murata. M., Sakai, S., Takatsuki, H., 2000. Life Cycle Assessment for Food Waste Recycling and Management. In: Proceedings from the 4th International Conference on EcoBalance Methodologies for decision Making in a Sustainable 21st Century. October 31st–November 2nd, 2000, Tsukuba, Japan. – reference: Bjarnadottir, H.J., Fridriksson, G.B., Johnsen, T., Sletnes, H., 2002. Guidelines for the Use of LCA in the Waste Management Sector. Nordtest Report TR 517. Nordtest, Espoo, Finland. – volume: 28 start-page: 29 year: 2000 end-page: 53 ident: b0370 article-title: Environmental and economic analysis of management systems for biodegradable waste publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling – reference: Eggleston, S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 5 Waste. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. – year: 2005 ident: b0285 article-title: Composting and its impact on climate change with regard to process engineering and compost application – a case study in Vienna. In: Proceedings of Sardinia 2005 – Tenth International landfill Symposium – volume: 29 start-page: 934 year: 2009 end-page: 944 ident: b0350 article-title: Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems publication-title: Waste Management. – reference: ISO, 2006a. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, second ed., ISO 14040:2006. <http://www.iso.org.> (accessed 15.10.11). – reference: ISO, 2006b. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, first ed., ISO 14044:2006. <http://www.iso.org.> (accessed 15.10.11). – volume: 31 start-page: 1879 year: 2011 end-page: 1896 ident: b0025 article-title: A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste – a Swedish full-scale case study publication-title: Waste Management – volume: 21 start-page: 17 year: 1997 end-page: 37 ident: b0115 article-title: ORWARE – a simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Part 1: Model description publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling – reference: EPA, 2010. Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the nitric acid production industry. Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, US. – reference: Rodhe, L., Ascue, J., Tersmeden, M., Ringmar, A., Nordberg, Å., 2009. Växthusgaser från lager med nötflytgödsel – Förhållanden i gårdsbehållare, metodikutveckling av gasmätning samt bestämning av emissioner från nötflytgödsel, /Greenhouse gas emissions from storage of mannure – Conditions in farm storage, method development of gas emission detection and determination of emissions from liquid mannure. Report No. 370JTI, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish). – volume: 408 start-page: 1367 year: 2010 end-page: 1373 ident: b0240 article-title: Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – reference: Truedsson, C., 2010. Positiva och negative miljöaspekter genom optimering av förbehandling av matavfall från hushåll/Positive and Negative Environmental Aspects through Optimization of Food Waste Pretreatment at Sysav Biotec. Master Thesis. Department for Chemical Engineering, Lund University, Sweden (in Swedish). – volume: 27 start-page: 800 year: 2009 end-page: 812 ident: b0050 article-title: Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions publication-title: Waste Management and Research – volume: 27 start-page: 1021 year: 2007 end-page: 1031 ident: b0430 article-title: Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management publication-title: Waste management – volume: 7 start-page: 64 year: 2002 end-page: 72 ident: b0035 article-title: Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA publication-title: International Journal of LCA – year: 1995 ident: b0415 article-title: Guidelines for Assessing the Quality of Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis. Office of Solid Waste – reference: Stangel, P., 1988. Technological options affecting emissions. Paper Presented at US Environmental Protection Agency Workshop on Agriculture and Climate Change, February 28–March 1, 1988, Washington DC. – reference: IPCC, 2006. IPCC 2006 Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L. Miwa, K. Ngara, T. och Tanabe, K. (Eds), Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, vol. 4. Agricultural, Forestry and Other Land Use, IGES, Japan. – year: 2011 ident: b0320 article-title: Review of LCAs on Organics Management Methods and Development of an Environmental Hierarchy – volume: 29 start-page: 54 year: 2009 end-page: 62 ident: b0015 article-title: Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey publication-title: Waste Management – volume: 27 start-page: 398 year: 2007 end-page: 406 ident: b0165 article-title: Effects of pretreatment technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery publication-title: Waste Management – reference: Lantz, M., Ekman, A., Börjesson, P., 2009. Systemoptimerad produktion av fordonsgas – En miljö- och energioptimerad studie av Söderåsens biogasanläggnin/Systems optimized production of vehicle gas – an environmental and energy assessment of the Söderåsen biogas production plant. Report 69. Envionmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Lund Sweden (in Swedish). – reference: Swedish Waste Management Association, 2007. Frivilligt åtagande – inventering av utsläpp från biogas- och uppgraderingsanläggningar/Mapping of methane emissions from Swedish biogas plants (in Swedish). Report U2007:02. Malmö, Sweden. – volume: 30 start-page: 92 year: 2010 end-page: 99 ident: b0450 article-title: Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems publication-title: Waste Management – volume: 19 start-page: 533 year: 2008 end-page: 549 ident: b0040 article-title: Applying LCA to organic waste management in Piedmont, Italy publication-title: Organic waste management – volume: 27 start-page: 813 year: 2009 end-page: 824 ident: b0310 article-title: Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution publication-title: Waste Management and Research – volume: 387 start-page: 42 year: 2007 end-page: 53 ident: b0275 article-title: Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea publication-title: Science of the Total Environment – volume: 53 start-page: 1373 year: 2008 end-page: 1381 ident: b0045 article-title: Using LCA to evaluate impacts and resources conservation potential of composting: a case study of the Asti District in Italy publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. – reference: Clavreul, J., Christensen, T.H., 2011. Uncertainties in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. In: Proceedings from the Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 2011, Sardinia, Italy. – reference: ILCD, 2010. ILCD handbook. International Reference Life Cycle Data System. General guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed guidance. EUR 24708 EN – 2010. JRC, European Commission. – reference: Gentil, E.C., Damgaard, A., Hauschild, M., Finnveden, G., 2010. Models for waste life cycle assessment: Review of technical assumptions. In: Eriksson, O., Thorneloe, S., Kaplan, P.O., Barlaz, M., Muller, O., Matsui, Y., Ii, R., Christensen, T.H. (Eds.), Waste Management 30 (12), 2636–2648. – volume: 15 start-page: 79 year: 2010 end-page: 89 ident: b0255 article-title: Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result publication-title: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment – reference: Benjaminsson, J., 2006. Nya uppgraderingstekniker för biogas/New upgrading techniques for biogas. Master Thesis. LITH-IKP-EX-06/2370—SE. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lindköping University, Sweden (in Swedish). – volume: 2 start-page: 115 year: 2006 end-page: 132 ident: b0065 article-title: Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management – volume: 31 start-page: 326 year: 2007 end-page: 344 ident: b0055 article-title: Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems publication-title: Biomass and Bioenergy – reference: Sørensen, P., Birkmose, T., 2002. Kvaelstofudvaskning efter gødskning med afgasset gylle /Nitrogen leachate after fertilizing with digestate from cow manure. Grøn Viden, Markbruk nr 266, Ministeriet for Fødevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri, Danmarks Jordbruksforskning, Copenahgen, Denmark (in Danish). – volume: 4 start-page: 1095 year: 2010 end-page: 1099 ident: b0135 article-title: Identification and testing of potential key parameters in system analysis of Municipal solid waste management publication-title: Conservation and Recycling – reference: Nielsen, O.-K., Lyck, E., Mikkelsen, M.H., Hoffmann, L., Gyldenkærne, S., Winther, M., Nielsen, M., Fauser, P., Thomsen, M., Plejdrup, M.S., Illerup, J.B., Sørensen, P.B., Vesterdal, L., 2008. Denmark’s National Inventory Report 2008 - Emission Inventories 1990–2006. Submitted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. NERI Technical Report No. 667. National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark. <http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR667.pdf>. – reference: la Cour Jansen, J., Christensen, T., Davidsson, Å., Lund Hansen, T., Jönsson, H., Kirkeby, J., 2007. Biowaste – Decision Support Tool for Collection and Treatment of Source-Sorted Organic Municipal Solid Waste. TemaNord 2007:602. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen. – volume: 11 start-page: 251 year: 2006 end-page: 265 ident: b0070 article-title: Application of processed organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land – a scenario analysis publication-title: Environmental Modelling and Assessment – volume: 111 start-page: 54 year: 1971 end-page: 63 ident: b0290 article-title: Microbial activity in relationship to soil humus formation publication-title: Soil Science – reference: Smith, A., Brown, K., Ogilvie, S., Rushton, K., Bates, J., 2001. Waste Management Options and Climate Change. Final report to the European Commission, DG Environment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. – volume: 41 start-page: 380 year: 1990 end-page: 394 ident: b0425 article-title: Ammonia volatilization from five nitrogen compounds used as fertilizers following surface application to soils publication-title: European Journal of Soil Science – volume: 10 start-page: 39 year: 2008 end-page: 52 ident: b0080 article-title: Aerobic in-vessel composting versus bioreactor landfilling using life cycle inventory models publication-title: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy – reference: IFA, 2011. International Fertlizer Industry Association. Climate Change. <http://www.fertilizer.org/ifa/HomePage/SUSTAINABILITY/Climate-change/Emissions-from-production.html> (Downloaded 20110925). – reference: Tyskeng, S., Finnveden, G., 2007. Energy and environmental differences between material recycling and energy utilization of waste – a literature review. TRITA-INFRA-FMS 2007:11, KTH, Stockholm (in Swedish). – volume: 27 start-page: S29 year: 2007 end-page: S46 ident: b0420 article-title: Paper waste – recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments publication-title: Waste Management – reference: Nanh, C., Warren, J., Sistani, K., 2008. Ammonia and Greenhouse Gases Emission from Land Application of Swine Slurry: A Comparison of Three Application Methods. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan. <http://www.asabe.org>. – volume: 49 start-page: 32 year: 2006 end-page: 48 ident: b0160 article-title: Life cycle assessment of two biowaste management systems for Barcelona, Spain publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling – volume: 43 start-page: 2674 year: 2009 end-page: 2679 ident: b0340 article-title: Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment publication-title: Environmental Science and Technology – volume: 26 start-page: 1180 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0005 article-title: Environmental and economic analyses of waste disposal options for traditional markets in Indonesia publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.010 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0030 – volume: 27 start-page: 800 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0050 article-title: Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions publication-title: Waste Management and Research doi: 10.1177/0734242X09345275 – volume: 56 start-page: 244 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0400 article-title: Impact assessment of waste management options in Singapore publication-title: Journal of Air and Waste Management Association doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464463 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0355 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0380 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0265 – volume: 78 start-page: 279 issue: 4 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0110 article-title: The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management. Process safety and environmental protection publication-title: Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0195 – volume: 41 start-page: 380 issue: 3 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0425 article-title: Ammonia volatilization from five nitrogen compounds used as fertilizers following surface application to soils publication-title: European Journal of Soil Science – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0435 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0175 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0020 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0210 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0320 – volume: 34 start-page: 2116 issue: 12 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0090 article-title: Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration publication-title: Energy doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2008.08.023 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0365 – volume: 31 start-page: 1879 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0025 article-title: A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste – a Swedish full-scale case study publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.02.026 – volume: 27 start-page: 1021 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0430 article-title: Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management publication-title: Waste management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.023 – volume: 29 start-page: 54 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0015 article-title: Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006 – volume: 49 start-page: 32 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0160 article-title: Life cycle assessment of two biowaste management systems for Barcelona, Spain publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.03.009 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0200 – volume: 112 start-page: 171 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0105 article-title: Mitigation of greenhouse emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry publication-title: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016 – volume: 44 start-page: 7944 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0315 article-title: Bury or burn North America MSW? LCAs provide answers for climate impacts & carbon neutral power potential publication-title: Environmental Science and Technology doi: 10.1021/es100529f – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0445 – volume: 43 start-page: 2674 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0340 article-title: Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment publication-title: Environmental Science and Technology doi: 10.1021/es802677t – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0270 – year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0330 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0140 – volume: 31 start-page: 326 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0055 article-title: Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems publication-title: Biomass and Bioenergy doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.004 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0440 – year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0415 – volume: 24 start-page: 16 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0250 article-title: Evaluation of environmental impacts from municipal solid waste management in the municipality of Aarhus, Denmark (EASEWASTE) publication-title: Waste Management and Research doi: 10.1177/0734242X06062598 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0325 – volume: 21 start-page: 17 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0115 article-title: ORWARE – a simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Part 1: Model description publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(97)00020-7 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0155 – volume: 20 start-page: 387 issue: 4 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0360 article-title: Sensitivity analysis of model output. Performance of the iterated fractional factorial design method publication-title: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis doi: 10.1016/0167-9473(95)92843-M – volume: 16 start-page: 157 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0075 article-title: Abatement of ammonia and amines from waste gases: a summary publication-title: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00093-1 – volume: 19 start-page: 533 issue: 5 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0040 article-title: Applying LCA to organic waste management in Piedmont, Italy publication-title: Organic waste management – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0130 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0205 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0345 – volume: 2 start-page: 115 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0065 article-title: Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.06.005 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0260 – volume: 408 start-page: 1367 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0240 article-title: Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective publication-title: Science of the Total Environment doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.072 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0390 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0010 – volume: 53 start-page: 1373 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0045 article-title: Using LCA to evaluate impacts and resources conservation potential of composting: a case study of the Asti District in Italy publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.08.002 – volume: 27 start-page: 398 issue: 3 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0165 article-title: Effects of pretreatment technologies on quantity and quality of source-sorted municipal organic waste for biogas recovery publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.02.014 – volume: 28 start-page: 29 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0370 article-title: Environmental and economic analysis of management systems for biodegradable waste publication-title: Resources, Conservation and Recycling doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(99)00029-4 – volume: 7 start-page: 64 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0035 article-title: Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA publication-title: International Journal of LCA doi: 10.1007/BF02978849 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0225 – volume: 27 start-page: S29 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0420 article-title: Paper waste – recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.019 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0215 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0170 – volume: 30 start-page: 92 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0450 article-title: Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.011 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0395 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0410 – volume: 4 start-page: 1095 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0135 article-title: Identification and testing of potential key parameters in system analysis of Municipal solid waste management publication-title: Conservation and Recycling doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.002 – volume: 408 start-page: 3998 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0245 article-title: Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery publication-title: Science of the Total Environment doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.049 – volume: 11 start-page: 251 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0070 article-title: Application of processed organic municipal solid waste on agricultural land – a scenario analysis publication-title: Environmental Modelling and Assessment doi: 10.1007/s10666-005-9028-0 – volume: 29 start-page: 934 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0350 article-title: Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems publication-title: Waste Management. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.005 – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0285 – volume: 30 start-page: 983 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0295 article-title: The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.023 – volume: 15 start-page: 79 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0255 article-title: Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result publication-title: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment doi: 10.1007/s11367-009-0123-3 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0235 – volume: 387 start-page: 42 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0275 article-title: Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea publication-title: Science of the Total Environment doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.037 – volume: 17 start-page: 1331 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0300 article-title: Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessments publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.009 – volume: 21 start-page: 501 issue: 6 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0120 article-title: Household food waste to wastewater or to solid waste? That is the question publication-title: Waste Management and Research doi: 10.1177/0734242X0302100603 – volume: 91 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0145 article-title: Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment publication-title: Journal of Environmental Management doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 – volume: 80 start-page: 259 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0280 article-title: Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration publication-title: Journal of Hazardous Materials doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00314-9 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0405 – volume: 16 start-page: 28 issue: 4 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0060 article-title: Modelling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilised fields: summary of available measurement data publication-title: Global Biogeochemical Cycles – volume: 15 start-page: 1463 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0085 article-title: Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand publication-title: Journal of Cleaner Production doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.008 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0220 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0375 – volume: 27 start-page: 707 issue: 8 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0095 article-title: C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems publication-title: Waste Management and Research doi: 10.1177/0734242X08096304 – volume: 27 start-page: 813 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0310 article-title: Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution publication-title: Waste Management and Research doi: 10.1177/0734242X09344876 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0190 – volume: 10 start-page: 39 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0080 article-title: Aerobic in-vessel composting versus bioreactor landfilling using life cycle inventory models publication-title: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy doi: 10.1007/s10098-007-0125-4 – volume: 31 start-page: 572 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0150 article-title: Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective publication-title: Waste Management doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.09.009 – volume: 111 start-page: 54 year: 1971 ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0290 article-title: Microbial activity in relationship to soil humus formation publication-title: Soil Science doi: 10.1097/00010694-197101000-00007 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0125 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0230 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0100 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0385 – ident: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023_b0180 |
| SSID | ssj0014810 |
| Score | 2.4929323 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | ► GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste management. ► System-boundary settings often... Twenty-five comparative cycle assessments (LCAs) addressing food waste treatment were reviewed, including the treatment alternatives landfill, thermal... Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer GHG-emissions from different treatment alternatives vary largely in 25 reviewed comparative LCAs of bio-waste... |
| SourceID | swepub osti proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 2439 |
| SubjectTerms | ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Applied sciences biofertilizers CARBON Chemical Engineering COMBUSTION COMPOSTING composts emissions energy recovery Engineering and Technology environmental impact ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Exact sciences and technology FERTILIZERS FOOD Food waste General treatment and storage processes global warming GREENHOUSE EFFECT guidelines heat treatment HEAT TREATMENTS Kemiteknik Key issues LAND USE landfills Life-cycle assessment MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES management systems NUTRIENTS Pollution POTENTIAL ENERGY RECOMMENDATIONS SANITARY LANDFILLS SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Solid Waste System-boundaries Teknik Waste Management - methods WASTE STORAGE waste treatment Wastes |
| Title | Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – Current status and potential improvements |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22922048 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1220368495 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710230859 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22089905 |
| Volume | 32 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000312675400028&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1879-2456 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0014810 issn: 0956-053X databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3fb9MwELZYhwQ8IBgMCmMKEuIFBSX-USePY-oEVTUQ6qDixXIdRzCVtDQt7M_nLnbSdBtsPPASVW6cX_fFOd99_o6QFz0hWZJrGVrO8pAzycMki2zILKaBbCqzatX7p6E8Pk7G4_SDpwSVVTkBWRTJ2Vk6_6-mhjYwNi6d_QdzNweFBvgNRoctmB221zL8x2Yximkpew8PDyrSRo4qxr802NYTVysygNNzLsPQeLkmXGe0cvLN89kSGUUozlEFIKoeZdup_Xz-cOC19qffS8ebbyINb-wCfdFsI4I61VXZvFcDXfhY0KAdiIhpi9Thxs5EYrJGeGXrS9r8gLsOaK4aErUfPrlTNrowrrsQw-lreD5wN8jIo5XmqlurvCmjffxeHZ0Mh2rUH49ezn-EWGEMM_G-3MoW2aZSpDCIbx-8648HTc6JJ067or7keqFlxQa8eOI_OTKdGYzNSLHVJbxluSuPctn85Zw4beXQjO6Ru34mEhw4BN0nN2yxQ24d1gUAd8idllblA5I7XAWzPGjhKkBcYRviKqhwFayBEJzHVeBwFQCuggZXQRtXD8nJUX90-Db0RTpCIzhbhrFhkxxVKqm1eoKzVSksN0Izbk1PRj1rrIbPomWZ0KiDbAzLqMlixjTLuGC7pFPMCvuYBAa-PhOaJZHJBDdJLxXGmjzOYJLBYxrrLmH1E1fGK9hjIZWpqqmKp8rZSaGdVCQV2KlLwqbX3Cm4XLG_rI2pvBfqvEsFYLyi5x7aHnuhALNBphp0oxRT65Hokv0NTDRXQyXyD2Lo_7wGiQJTY-ZOF3a2KlVMkS-Q8FT8ZR-cKzDUK-ySRw5h6zPQlKJCd5d8cZBr_kF1eTfRV15d7KuarlRp1byVNlAmZlxHUa4s3K_irJcpMORESTExaZ7lkdHmyTUu_ym5vR469khnuVjZZ-Sm-bn8Vi72yZYcJ_v-vfwNC3MBcQ |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review+of+comparative+LCAs+of+food+waste+management+systems--current+status+and+potential+improvements&rft.jtitle=Waste+management+%28Elmsford%29&rft.au=Bernstad%2C+A&rft.au=la+Cour+Jansen%2C+J&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.issn=1879-2456&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2439&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.wasman.2012.07.023&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0956-053X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0956-053X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0956-053X&client=summon |