Individual differences make a difference: On the use and the psychometric properties of difference scores in social psychology

Much social psychological research is concerned with the question whether and how behavior changes because of a “treatment” (e.g., a situation that triggers a psychological reaction). One easy way to investigate such changes would be to analyze intraindividual differences before (Time 1) and after t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of social psychology Vol. 44; no. 7; pp. 673 - 682
Main Authors: Gollwitzer, Mario, Christ, Oliver, Lemmer, Gunnar
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bognor Regis Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Behavior
Behavior change
Behavior Modification
Behavioural psychology
Changes
Difference scores
Individual Differences
Measurement
Mental health care
Property
Psychological factors
Psychological research
Psychologists
Psychology
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Reliability
Reputation
Responsiveness
Social psychologists
Social Psychology
Social theory
Treatment methods
ISSN:0046-2772, 1099-0992
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Much social psychological research is concerned with the question whether and how behavior changes because of a “treatment” (e.g., a situation that triggers a psychological reaction). One easy way to investigate such changes would be to analyze intraindividual differences before (Time 1) and after the treatment (Time 2). Interestingly, many scholars refrain from using difference scores because they think they are inherently unreliable. However, the bad reputation of difference scores is, in many cases, unwarranted: difference scores can be sufficiently reliable when standard deviations differ between measurement occasions, and standard deviations are likely to differ between measurement occasions because of differential treatment effects (i.e., interindividual differences in responsiveness to a treatment) and/or “strong situation” treatments. In the present article, we will (1) summarize classic and current arguments regarding the reliability of difference scores, (2) discuss the use of residual change scores as an alternative to difference scores, and (3) argue that latent difference score models are a particularly useful tool that social psychologists should consider using more frequently. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:Supporting info item
ark:/67375/WNG-BHCKWSL1-S
istex:712C789A179E82D3B12567E89FE8E9A93AF59D87
ArticleID:EJSP2042
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-2772
1099-0992
DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2042