The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review

Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation ma...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Implementation science : IS Ročník 12; číslo 1; s. 53 - 12
Hlavní autoři: Kneale, Dylan, Rojas-García, Antonio, Raine, Rosalind, Thomas, James
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: London BioMed Central 20.04.2017
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Témata:
ISSN:1748-5908, 1748-5908
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers’ evidence needs is essential. Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data. Results From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability. Conclusions There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
AbstractList Abstract Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers’ evidence needs is essential. Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data. Results From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability. Conclusions There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers’ evidence needs is essential. Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data. Results From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability. Conclusions There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the "health" boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers' evidence needs is essential.BACKGROUNDPublic health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the "health" boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers' evidence needs is essential.We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data.METHODSWe conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data.From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability.RESULTSFrom a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability.There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.CONCLUSIONSThere is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the “health” boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers’ evidence needs is essential. Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data. Results From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability. Conclusions There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health services and planning having shifted from the "health" boundary to local authority (LA; local government) control. This transformation may have interrupted flows of research evidence use in decision-making and introduced a new political element to public health decision-making. For generators of research evidence, understanding and responding to this new landscape and decision-makers' evidence needs is essential. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature, drawing upon four databases and undertaking manual searching and citation tracking. Included studies were English-based, published in 2010 onwards, and were focused on public health decision-making, including the utilisation or underutilisation of research evidence use, in local (regional or sub-regional) areas. All studies presented empirical findings collected through primary research methods or through the reanalysis of existing primary data. From a total of 903 records, 23 papers from 21 studies were deemed to be eligible and were included for further data extraction. Three clear trends in evidence use were identified: (i) the primacy of local evidence, (ii) the important role of local experts in providing evidence and knowledge, and (iii) the high value placed on local evaluation evidence despite the varying methodological rigour. Barriers to the use of research evidence included issues around access and availability of applicable research evidence, and indications that the use of evidence could be perceived as a bureaucratic process. Two new factors resulting from reforms to public health structures were identified that potentially changed existing patterns of research evidence use and decision-making requirements: (i) greater emphasis among public health practitioners on the perceived uniqueness of LA areas and structures following devolution of public health into LAs and (ii) challenges introduced in responding to higher levels of local political accountability. There is a need to better understand and respond to the evidence needs of decision-makers working in public health and to work more collaboratively in developing solutions to the underutilisation of research evidence in decision-making.
ArticleNumber 53
Author Kneale, Dylan
Rojas-García, Antonio
Raine, Rosalind
Thomas, James
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dylan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7016-978X
  surname: Kneale
  fullname: Kneale, Dylan
  email: d.kneale@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Antonio
  surname: Rojas-García
  fullname: Rojas-García, Antonio
  organization: NIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rosalind
  surname: Raine
  fullname: Raine, Rosalind
  organization: NIHR CLAHRC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London
– sequence: 4
  givenname: James
  surname: Thomas
  fullname: Thomas, James
  organization: Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre, UCL Institute of Education, University College London
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9UstuFDEQHKEg8oAP4IIsceEyMO3H2OaAFEUBIkXiEs6Wx9Oz68VrL_ZsUP4eLxuiTSQ42WpXVVe767Q5iili07yG7j2A6j8UYB3QtgPZdkLKVj9rTkBy1QrdqaOD-3FzWsqq67jgPXvRHFPFqeS9OGnMzRLJtiBJE8FbP2J0SHwkl3ERfFmSkJwNZLMdgndkiTbMSzKi88Wn2K7tDx8XH4kl5a7MuLZzBRWXNrVKcpXDXy-b55MNBV_dn2fN98-XNxdf2-tvX64uzq9bJ1g_t1paqjkFOVbLjEmteC-lAmoVjpo7yejYDXREBmyaYBSOTwCD5sIKNg2UnTVXe90x2ZXZZL-2-c4k682fQsoLY3O1F9AIh8MAvXPgNJdUKd1TyWpnO_VyoH3V-rTXqmOvcXQY52zDI9HHL9EvzSLdGsF0HWIn8O5eIKefWyyzWfviMAQbMW2LAaUBmKrzVejbJ9BV2uZYv2qHEkA7CbKi3hw6erDyd48VAHuAy6mUjNMDBDqzy4rZZ8XUrJhdVoyuHPmE4_xcV5h2Q_nwXybdM0vtEheYD0z_k_QbGLfRmA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_020_00003_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_022_00385_0
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0282080
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_017_0669_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcop_22531
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13063_020_4178_6
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_055504
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_025_01320_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdac146
crossref_primary_10_1332_174426421X16917571241005
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_019_0446_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_024_02287_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_024_01162_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_020_00671_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhip_2024_100516
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2025_1628203
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_023_02949_w
crossref_primary_10_1186_s43058_022_00314_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_PHH_0000000000000821
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_1016076
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12961_023_01009_2
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_025_01691_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0328996
crossref_primary_10_1177_0017896918784072
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_09455_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_020_0905_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph22091343
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socscimed_2023_116407
crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdaa016
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_13396_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_jrsm_1320
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_publhealth_040617_014746
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_022_13758_w
crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdaa130
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_017_0606_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40258_019_00538_8
crossref_primary_10_2147_JHL_S288966
crossref_primary_10_1111_1753_6405_12949
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_023_10087_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10389_024_02369_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_jppi_12398
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43477_025_00179_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_020_09223_1
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_019_0859_5
crossref_primary_10_1093_pubmed_fdx152
Cites_doi 10.1057/9781137026583
10.1136/bmj.i272
10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.001
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.028
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002714
10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
10.1371/journal.pone.0021704
10.1093/pubmed/fdv035
10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010137
10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01362.x
10.1093/pubmed/fdv139
10.1111/1467-9566.12214
10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
10.1136/jech-2014-204671
10.1136/jech-2014-204608
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.003
10.1186/1748-5908-8-17
10.1108/14769011311316015
10.1080/19439342.2012.710641
10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05631.x
10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008132
10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1
10.1136/tc.2005.013649
10.1093/pubmed/fdu073
10.1371/journal.pone.0077404
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007053
10.1093/eurpub/cku038
10.1093/pubmed/fdt039
10.1136/jech.2003.011585
10.1136/bmj.d7310
10.1093/pubmed/fds099
10.1093/eurpub/ckt206
10.1080/03003930.2013.841578
10.1080/09581596.2016.1164299
10.1503/cmaj.081229
10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.009
10.1136/jech.56.2.119
10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010132
10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.009
10.1108/IJPSM-04-2013-0052
10.1093/pubmed/fdt131
10.1186/1471-2458-11-821
10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.012
10.1177/1524500413483454
10.1080/13648470.2012.747593
10.1093/eurpub/ckv082
10.1093/pubmed/fdv195
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2017
Copyright BioMed Central 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2017
– notice: Copyright BioMed Central 2017
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: PIMPY
  name: ProQuest Publicly Available Content
  url: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1748-5908
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_5cebb16cc1c947288962737d7af67b26
PMC5399426
28427465
10_1186_s13012_017_0577_9
Genre Journal Article
Scoping Review
GeographicLocations United Kingdom--UK
England
GeographicLocations_xml – name: England
– name: United Kingdom--UK
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institute for Health Research
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
– fundername: Department of Health
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29I
2WC
44B
53G
5GY
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
MK0
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
AFFHD
CITATION
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-97a294217d748337984677812a8ed94c732d0b2de313ff1d5c4f11b945a53fb23
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISICitedReferencesCount 54
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000399781900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1748-5908
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:51:52 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 04 01:57:28 EST 2025
Wed Oct 01 12:38:25 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 15 14:06:38 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:26:28 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:56:31 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:34:08 EST 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:24:47 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords National Health Service
Local Public Health
Evaluation Evidence
Research Evidence
Public Health Service
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c536t-97a294217d748337984677812a8ed94c732d0b2de313ff1d5c4f11b945a53fb23
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ORCID 0000-0002-7016-978X
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/1895120717?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 28427465
PQID 1895120717
PQPubID 54980
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_5cebb16cc1c947288962737d7af67b26
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5399426
proquest_miscellaneous_1891138781
proquest_journals_1895120717
pubmed_primary_28427465
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_017_0577_9
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13012_017_0577_9
springer_journals_10_1186_s13012_017_0577_9
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-04-20
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-04-20
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-04-20
  day: 20
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Implementation science : IS
PublicationTitleAbbrev Implementation Sci
PublicationTitleAlternate Implement Sci
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher BioMed Central
Springer Nature B.V
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: BMC
References D Buck (577_CR13) 2013
577_CR5
K Oliver (577_CR51) 2012; 106
577_CR7
J Skinner (577_CR67) 2013; 21
D Gough (577_CR36) 2012; 1
L Rychetnik (577_CR8) 2004; 58
G Lister (577_CR58) 2013; 19
M Gorsky (577_CR21) 2014; 36
577_CR46
577_CR47
G Martin (577_CR52) 2011; 16
Office of Tobacco Control (577_CR3) 2004
SV Katikireddi (577_CR32) 2011; 343
DL Sackett (577_CR1) 1996; 312
SE Straus (577_CR57) 2009; 181
M Liverani (577_CR60) 2013; 8
P Nilsen (577_CR35) 2015; 10
T Lorenc (577_CR24) 2014; 24
SV Katikireddi (577_CR30) 2014; 24
D Pentland (577_CR10) 2011; 67
L Marks (577_CR14) 2015; 129
K Qureshi (577_CR63) 2013; 20
L Orton (577_CR31) 2011; 6
N King (577_CR48) 2014; 27
577_CR53
RK Rushmer (577_CR54) 2014; 128
C Salisbury (577_CR45) 2011; 16
L Wye (577_CR41) 2015
577_CR18
S Peckham (577_CR44) 2015
K Oliver (577_CR50) 2013; 35
M Willmott (577_CR49) 2015
577_CR22
577_CR66
House of Commons (577_CR17) 2009
577_CR23
577_CR26
T Blackman (577_CR59) 2011; 72
577_CR25
577_CR28
577_CR27
S Milton (577_CR56) 2014; 128
K Marsh (577_CR55) 2013; 35
C Bonell (577_CR6) 2014; 69
577_CR20
L Deas (577_CR61) 2013; 96
A Coleman (577_CR65) 2014; 40
R Grol (577_CR11) 2003; 362
Public Health England (577_CR15) 2013
J Thomas (577_CR33) 2010
E Barnett-Page (577_CR38) 2009; 9
B Snilstveit (577_CR37) 2012; 4
G Phillips (577_CR40) 2015; 37
RC Brownson (577_CR2) 2009; 30
577_CR34
L Rychetnik (577_CR9) 2002; 56
NHS (577_CR64) 2012
Department of Health (577_CR12) 2011
577_CR39
T Blackman (577_CR43) 2012; 34
Royal Society for Public Health (577_CR16) 2014
GT Fong (577_CR4) 2006; 15
K Oliver (577_CR29) 2014; 14
BA Evans (577_CR62) 2013; 8
K Oliver (577_CR42) 2015
The King's Fund (577_CR19) 2015
References_xml – ident: 577_CR28
  doi: 10.1057/9781137026583
– ident: 577_CR22
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i272
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR61
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.001
– volume: 30
  start-page: 175
  year: 2009
  ident: 577_CR2
  publication-title: Annu Rev Public Health
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
– volume-title: EPPI-Reviewer 4.0: software for research synthesis
  year: 2010
  ident: 577_CR33
– volume: 129
  start-page: 1194
  issue: 9
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR14
  publication-title: Public Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.028
– ident: 577_CR46
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002714
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR35
  publication-title: Implement Sci
  doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0
– volume: 6
  start-page: e21704
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR31
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021704
– year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR49
  publication-title: J Public Health (Oxf)
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv035
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 577_CR38
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
– volume: 16
  start-page: 218
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR45
  publication-title: J Health Serv Res Policy
  doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010137
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 577_CR36
  publication-title: Syst Rev
  doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
– volume: 34
  start-page: 49
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 577_CR43
  publication-title: Sociol Health Illn
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01362.x
– ident: 577_CR66
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv139
– volume: 37
  start-page: 491
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR40
  publication-title: Sociol Health Illn
  doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12214
– volume: 312
  start-page: 71
  issue: 7023
  year: 1996
  ident: 577_CR1
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
– volume: 69
  start-page: 95
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR6
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
  doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204671
– volume-title: Improving the public’s health: A resource for local authorities
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR13
– volume-title: Public Health in Local Government: Commissioning Responsibilities
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR12
– ident: 577_CR27
  doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204608
– ident: 577_CR25
– volume: 72
  start-page: 1965
  issue: 12
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR59
  publication-title: Soc Sci Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.003
– volume: 8
  start-page: 17
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR62
  publication-title: Implement Sci
  doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-17
– volume-title: Guidance for Employers and Managers: Public Health (Tobacco) Acts 2002 and 2004 Section 47 - Smoking Prohibitions
  year: 2004
  ident: 577_CR3
– volume: 21
  start-page: 77
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR67
  publication-title: J Integrated Care
  doi: 10.1108/14769011311316015
– volume-title: House of Commons Health Committee inquiry on public health post-2013: structures, organisation, funding and delivery
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR19
– volume: 4
  start-page: 409
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 577_CR37
  publication-title: J Dev Effect
  doi: 10.1080/19439342.2012.710641
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1408
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR10
  publication-title: J Adv Nurs
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05631.x
– ident: 577_CR23
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.i272
– ident: 577_CR5
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR29
  publication-title: BMC Health Serv Res
  doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008132
– volume: 362
  start-page: 1225
  issue: 9391
  year: 2003
  ident: 577_CR11
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1
– volume: 15
  start-page: iii51
  issue: suppl 3
  year: 2006
  ident: 577_CR4
  publication-title: Tob Control
  doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.013649
– ident: 577_CR18
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu073
– volume: 8
  start-page: e77404
  issue: 10
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR60
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077404
– ident: 577_CR34
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007053
– ident: 577_CR26
– ident: 577_CR39
– volume-title: Commissioning fact sheet for clinical commissioning groups
  year: 2012
  ident: 577_CR64
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1041
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR24
  publication-title: Eur J Public Health
  doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku038
– volume: 35
  start-page: 453
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR50
  publication-title: J Public Health (United Kingdom)
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt039
– volume: 58
  start-page: 538
  issue: 7
  year: 2004
  ident: 577_CR8
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
  doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.011585
– volume-title: PHOENIX: Public Health and Obesity in England–the New Infrastructure examined
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR44
– volume: 343
  start-page: d7310
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR32
  publication-title: Br Med J
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7310
– volume-title: Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning. Knowledge exchange in health-care commissioning: case studies of the use of commercial, not-for-profit and public sector agencies, 2011-14
  year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR41
– volume: 35
  start-page: 460
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR55
  publication-title: J Public Health (Oxf)
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds099
– volume: 24
  start-page: 490
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR30
  publication-title: Eur J Public Health
  doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt206
– volume-title: Immunisation & Screening National Delivery Framework & Local Operating Model
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR15
– ident: 577_CR7
– volume: 40
  start-page: 560
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR65
  publication-title: Local Government Studies
  doi: 10.1080/03003930.2013.841578
– ident: 577_CR47
  doi: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1164299
– volume-title: The Balance of Power: Central and Local Government
  year: 2009
  ident: 577_CR17
– volume: 181
  start-page: 165
  issue: 3-4
  year: 2009
  ident: 577_CR57
  publication-title: Can Med Assoc J
  doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081229
– volume: 106
  start-page: 97
  year: 2012
  ident: 577_CR51
  publication-title: Health Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.009
– volume: 56
  start-page: 119
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: 577_CR9
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
  doi: 10.1136/jech.56.2.119
– volume: 16
  start-page: 211
  year: 2011
  ident: 577_CR52
  publication-title: J Health Serv Res Policy
  doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010132
– volume: 128
  start-page: 1112
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR56
  publication-title: Public Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.009
– volume: 27
  start-page: 152
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR48
  publication-title: Int J Public Sector Management
  doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-04-2013-0052
– volume: 36
  start-page: 546
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR21
  publication-title: J Public Health
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt131
– volume-title: The Views of Public Health Teams Working in Local Authorities Year 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR16
– ident: 577_CR53
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-821
– volume: 128
  start-page: 552
  year: 2014
  ident: 577_CR54
  publication-title: Public Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.012
– volume: 19
  start-page: 76
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR58
  publication-title: Soc Mark Q
  doi: 10.1177/1524500413483454
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 577_CR63
  publication-title: Anthropol Med
  doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.747593
– year: 2015
  ident: 577_CR42
  publication-title: Eur J Public Health
  doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv082
– ident: 577_CR20
  doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv195
SSID ssj0045463
Score 2.3813276
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public...
Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public health...
Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for public...
Abstract Background Public health decision-making structures in England have transformed since the implementation of reforms in 2013, with responsibility for...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 53
SubjectTerms Alcohol
Decision Making
England
Evaluation Evidence
Evidence-Based Medicine - methods
Health Administration
Health disparities
Health Informatics
Health Policy
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Health services
Health Services Research
Humans
Initiatives
Local Public Health
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental health
National Health Service
Objectives
Primary care
Public Health
Public Health - methods
Public Health Service
Research Evidence
Studies
Systematic Review
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LixQxEC5k8SCI-LbdVSJ4UsJ2Xp3Em4qLB1k8qOwt5NU4oD2yM-Pv30rSM-74vHjtpJuiHqmqrtRXAE_7fuQqMkWz95nKkD3FNEhREcdBc2m8qRXdT-_06ak5O7PvL436KnfCGjxwY9yxijkENsTIopWaG1OmxQidtMePBV7Btnttt8lUO4NlAXmfa5jMDMcrPKnrFQRNMT7R1O55oQrW_7sI89eLkj9VS6sTOrkJN-bokbxsVN-CK3m6DdfbrzfSOorugEPRk80qk-VI8jw0lCwmMnfskuq-SMO3Jq0PkqR51A79WqdTvSCe_MB4JqV1BZ-S1udyFz6evPnw-i2d5yjQqMSwplZ7biXmHklLI4S2JebQ6Nm9ycnKqAVPfeApCybGkSUV5chYsFJ5JcbAxT04mJZTfgBEYHQXNEowjFF63YecRI7o81XCyMCkDvotX12cQcbLrIsvriYbZnBNFA5F4YoonO3g2e6Vbw1h42-bXxVh7TYWcOz6AFXGzSrj_qUyHRxtRe1mi105ZjDW5CW77eDJbhltrRRQ_JSXm7qHMWGQdR3cb5qxowTdPCb4g-pA7-nMHqn7K9Pic8XzLuDAspD1fKtdl8j6Eyce_g9OHMI1Xo1C4ml5BAfr801-BFfj9_Vidf64mtQF0rgivg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access
  dbid: RSV
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9UwEB50FRHEy-pqdZUIPilhm1uT-qbi4oMu4mXZt5CkqR5we-Rc_P1O0vTo0VXQ11xgOplJvnQy3wA8quueq8AUjc5FKn10FK9BiorQN5pL40yO6B6_1kdH5uSkfVvyuJfTa_cpJJl36uzWpjlY4m6bnxFoihhD0_Y8XMDTzqR6De_eH0_br0z87iV8eea0rQMo8_SfBS5_fyP5S6A0nz-H1_5L8utwtcBN8my0jxtwLg67cOlNCajvwpXxtx0Zs5FugkWzIetlJPOexFJwlMwGUrJ9ST76yMiNTcYcStKVMj30NFe2ekoc-cEPTVLaC7aSMUfmFnw8fPnhxStaajDQoESzoq12vJV4b-m0NELoNuEVjajAmdi1MmjBu9rzLgom-p51KsieMd9K5ZToPRd7sDPMh3gHiEBk6DWuvu-DdLr2sRMxIF5QHaIK01VQTwtjQyEoT3Uyvth8UTGNHRVpUZE2KdK2FTzeTPk6snP8bfDztNqbgYlYOzfMF59s8VOrQvSeNSGw0ErNjUnFiQR-vUPb9bypYH-yFVu8fWmZQZzK0824goebbvTTFHxxQ5yv8xjGhEHVVXB7NK2NJAgRuJaNqkBvGd2WqNs9w-xz5gJPxMIyifVkMr2fxPqTJu7-0-h7cJln25W4pe7DzmqxjvfhYvi2mi0XD7LzfQcjhSmq
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-017-0577-9
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427465
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1895120717
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1891138781
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5399426
https://doaj.org/article/5cebb16cc1c947288962737d7af67b26
Volume 12
WOSCitedRecordID wos000399781900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVADU
  databaseName: BioMed Central_OA刊
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: RBZ
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.biomedcentral.com/search/
  providerName: BioMedCentral
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 20060101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Publicly Available Content
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: PIMPY
  dateStart: 20090101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1748-5908
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0045463
  issn: 1748-5908
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 20061201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELag5YCEeBcCZWUkTiCr8SOxwwVR1AokWK0KVMvJsh0HVoKkbHb5_Ywdb8ry6IVLpCSOZGdm7G88nm8QepLnDSscLYg3xhNhvSHgBhWEu6aUTCijYkT39K2cTtV8Xs3ShlufjlVu5sQ4UdedC3vkB1QBFmDB-3hx9p2EqlEhuppKaFxGu6FsdtBzOR8dLhGo3lMkk6ryoIf5Oh5EkARQiiTV1loUKfv_hjP_PC75W8w0LkXHN_53EDfR9QRC8ctBa26hS769ja4NO3h4SEy6gzRoEF73HncN9qn2KF60OCX-4rgK4oEmGw_plLhOFXvIt1jk6jk2-JwqGocMGHiKh3SZu-jj8dGHV69JKsdAXMHLFamkYZUAF6aWQnEuqwBdJAAEo3xdCSc5q3PLas8pbxpaF040lNpKFKbgjWV8D-20XevvI8wBJFoJimAbJ4zMra-5dwAdihoAhqozlG8Eo13iKg8lM77q6LOoUg-y1CBLHWSpqww9HT85G4g6Lmp8GKQ9Ngwc2_FBt_ysk8nqwnlraekcdZWQTKlQp4jD6A2osWVlhvY3QtbJ8Ht9LuEMPR5fg8mGOIxpfbeObSjlCn5dhu4NqjX2BNACk6IsMiS3lG6rq9tv2sWXSAseOIZF6NazjXr-0q1__YkHFw_iIbrKor0ImE730c5qufaP0BX3Y7Xol5NobfGqJmj38Gg6O5nETQ24m715N_sEdyfvT38CIQc3Iw
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9QwEB5VBQkkxH0EChgJXkBW10diBwkhrqpVlxUPBe2bcRwHVoKk7AHiT_EbGTtHWY6-9YHX2JFs55uZbzKeGYD7o1HFU8dS6q31VBbeUnSDUipclSkutdUxovturCYTPZ3mbzbgR58LE65V9joxKuqyceEf-TbTyAV48D6eHn6hoWtUiK72LTRaWOz779_QZVs82XuJ3_cB5zuvDl7s0q6rAHWpyJY0V5bnEpl4qaQWQuXBAiu0c1b7MpdOCV6OCl56wURVsTJ1smKsyGVqU1EVodABqvxTqMdVcPbUdHDwZCgt30VOmc62F2gf4sUHRZEVKZqv2b7YIuBvvPbP65m_xWij6du58L8d2kU435Fs8qyVikuw4evLcK79Q0naxKsrYFBCyGrhSVMR3_VWJbOadInNJFp50pYBJ226KCm7jkT0c2zi9ZhYclQKm4QMH3xK2nSgq_D2RPZ4DTbrpvY3gAgkwYVCoBeVk1aNCl8K75AapSUSKF0mMOqBYFxXiz20BPlkok-mM9NixyB2TMCOyRN4OLxy2BYiOW7y84CuYWKoIR4fNPMPplNJJnW-KFjmHHO5VFzr0IdJ4O4timnBswS2elCZTrEtzBGiErg3DKNKCnEmW_tmFecwJjQeXQLXWygPK0E2xJXM0gTUGsjXlro-Us8-xrLnoYayDMt61IvDL8v610ncPH4Td-HM7sHrsRnvTfZvwVkeZVWi6diCzeV85W_Dafd1OVvM70RJJ_D-pKXkJ4F3iuM
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bi9QwFD7oKsuCeFl3tbpqBJ-UsG0uTeqbt0FxHRbUZd9CkqY6oJ1lOuPvN7eOjq6C-NqkkJx-Sb7Tk_MdgEdl2RFuK46d1g4z4zT2bhDH1Ha1IExqGSO6J0diOpWnp81xrnM6jLfdx5BkymkIKk398vCs7dISl_Xh4HfeeKVAYM83BG4uwiUW7tEHd_39ybgVs6D1nkOZ5762cRhFzf7ziObv9yV_CZrGs2hy7b9ncR2uZhqKniXc3IALrt-F7Xc50L4LV9LvPJSylG6C8nBCq8GheYdcLkSKZj3KWcAoHokoaWajlFuJ2ly-B3-NFa-eIo1-6EajkA7jn6KUO7MHHyevPrx4jXNtBmw5rZe4EZo0zPszrWCSUtEEHiM8W9DStQ2zgpK2NKR1tKJdV7Xcsq6qTMO45rQzhO7DVj_v3W1A1DNGIzwqTGeZFqVxLXXW8wjeerYh2wLK8SMpm4XLQ_2MLyo6MLJWyZDKG1IFQ6qmgMfrV86SasffOj8PX37dMQhuxwfzxSeV16_i1hlT1dZWtmGCSBmKFlE_e-0xbUhdwMGIG5V3gUFV0vNXEjzmAh6um_36DUEZ3bv5KvapKiq96Qq4lWC2HomnDkSwmhcgNgC4MdTNln72OWqEB8FhFob1ZIThT8P6kyXu_FPvB7B9_HKijt5M396FHRJhzPyuewBby8XK3YPL9ttyNizuxzX5HWC2NXI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+use+of+evidence+in+English+local+public+health+decision-making%3A+a+systematic+scoping+review&rft.jtitle=Implementation+science+%3A+IS&rft.au=Kneale%2C+Dylan&rft.au=Rojas-Garcia%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Raine%2C+Rosalind&rft.au=Thomas%2C+James&rft.date=2017-04-20&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.eissn=1748-5908&rft.volume=12&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13012-017-0577-9
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-5908&client=summon