Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness

To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult...

Celý popis

Uložené v:
Podrobná bibliografia
Vydané v:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Ročník 127; číslo 3; s. 357
Hlavní autori: Li, Dian, Rauscher, Franziska G, Choi, Eun Young, Wang, Mengyu, Baniasadi, Neda, Wirkner, Kerstin, Kirsten, Toralf, Thiery, Joachim, Engel, Christoph, Loeffler, Markus, Elze, Tobias
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:English
Vydavateľské údaje: United States 01.03.2020
Predmet:
ISSN:1549-4713, 1549-4713
On-line prístup:Zistit podrobnosti o prístupe
Tagy: Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
Abstract To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from -9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.
AbstractList To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.PURPOSETo investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.Population-based cross-sectional study.DESIGNPopulation-based cross-sectional study.We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.PARTICIPANTSWe investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.METHODSAll participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESDifference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from -9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.RESULTSOur population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from -9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.CONCLUSIONSSubstantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.
To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from -9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.
Author Li, Dian
Elze, Tobias
Rauscher, Franziska G
Wirkner, Kerstin
Wang, Mengyu
Thiery, Joachim
Engel, Christoph
Kirsten, Toralf
Baniasadi, Neda
Choi, Eun Young
Loeffler, Markus
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dian
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Dian
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Franziska G
  surname: Rauscher
  fullname: Rauscher, Franziska G
  email: Franziska.Rauscher@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: Franziska.Rauscher@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Eun Young
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Eun Young
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Mengyu
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Mengyu
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Neda
  surname: Baniasadi
  fullname: Baniasadi, Neda
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kerstin
  surname: Wirkner
  fullname: Wirkner, Kerstin
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Toralf
  surname: Kirsten
  fullname: Kirsten, Toralf
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Applied Computer Science and Biosciences, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, Mittweida, Germany
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Joachim
  surname: Thiery
  fullname: Thiery, Joachim
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Christoph
  surname: Engel
  fullname: Engel, Christoph
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Markus
  surname: Loeffler
  fullname: Loeffler, Markus
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Tobias
  surname: Elze
  fullname: Elze, Tobias
  organization: Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany; Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31732228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpNUF1LwzAUDTJxH_oPRPLoS2s-mn48ynQqDAduPpckvWGZbVqTVty_t-AE4XLPgXs4nHPnaOJaBwhdUxJTQtO7Q9x2-34vY0ZoEZNxaHGGZlQkRZRklE_-8Smah3AghKQpTy7QlNOMM8byGdps4TvadqCtsRo_WGPAg9MQsHV4ab0emk52tq6lP-I36K2TNX4F_wV4ZRV4vJbHce_2Vn84COESnRtZB7g64QK9rx53y-dovXl6Wd6vIy142kdcEc24SjIDOakoqXKeZKkyhqVaFsCoUImQRZVJxpTJuWEw3pkUIudUiYwt0O2vb-fbzwFCXzY2aBhzOmiHUDJOBcmLhItRenOSDqqBquy8bcY25d8T2A9GrWGe
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_79424_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2024_02_017
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S372626
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12020500
crossref_primary_10_1136_gpsych_2024_101740
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1914_1985
crossref_primary_10_1093_ije_dyac114
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_021_02064_8
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_4068026
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes12091420
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftal_2023_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000001983
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10384_024_01049_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oftale_2023_06_017
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_cs_2621
crossref_primary_10_1177_10519815251335788
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_024_01988_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2021_680488
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00125_024_06093_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exer_2025_110286
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_024_01985_y
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_34794_5
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_68589_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_acn3_51830
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pnpbp_2021_110280
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_50934_3
crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_14364
crossref_primary_10_1002_INMD_20230056
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_86577_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_020_01142_1
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2023_1275308
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms24010402
crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2024_2410879
crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2021_318869
crossref_primary_10_1080_07420528_2024_2325017
crossref_primary_10_1167_iovs_64_4_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_15088
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2020_08_043
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNO_0000000000001717
crossref_primary_10_1111_aos_15046
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1549-4713
ExternalDocumentID 31732228
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 EY031725
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 EY030142
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: P30 EY003790
– fundername: NEI NIH HHS
  grantid: K99 EY028631
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~5
29N
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABWVN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIUM
ACNCT
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEFWE
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AGQPQ
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
BELOY
C5W
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBS
ECM
EFJIC
EFKBS
EIF
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
M27
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NPM
NQ-
O9-
OF-
OPF
OQ~
P2P
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDG
SEL
SES
SSZ
UHS
UNMZH
UV1
WH7
X7M
XH2
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-3b0c23b47fe80d10d83476bff26ca9e215b45a9d7a22bf83f2e4762a55831b572
IEDL.DBID 7X8
ISICitedReferencesCount 45
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000514829200014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1549-4713
IngestDate Sat Sep 27 17:00:26 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:36 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
License Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c536t-3b0c23b47fe80d10d83476bff26ca9e215b45a9d7a22bf83f2e4762a55831b572
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 31732228
PQID 2315089435
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2315089435
pubmed_primary_31732228
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Ophthalmology
PublicationYear 2020
SSID ssj0006634
Score 2.5134814
Snippet To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based...
To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.PURPOSETo investigate the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 357
SubjectTerms Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Nerve Fibers
Retina - anatomy & histology
Retinal Ganglion Cells
Sex Factors
Title Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31732228
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2315089435
Volume 127
WOSCitedRecordID wos000514829200014&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bS8MwFA7qRHzxfpk3IvhaXJImbZ9EpsMHV4dO2FtJ0oQVoa3bFP33nmQdexPBl1IoCSU5OedLzpfzIXRliRCWuUK3wvAgFBLeqNGw4o3Oc-sqrsRebCJK03g0SgbNgdu0oVUufKJ31Hml3Rn5NeAQwBIJRPeb-j1wqlEuu9pIaKyiFgMo4yhd0WhZLRyiqc8qwx4oACfMFlfnPL-rqsezsas8RBJf6ZT8AjJ9sOlt__c3d9BWAzPx7dwudtGKKffQRr9JpO-jpxfzFXjteVtofNeopIDPwEWJu8VEwyzL2ikSTb7xs7sWDb2ljh2Je45jgh8lYHU8HBf6zTnLA_Taux92H4JGWyHQnIlZwFRHU6bCyJq4k5NOHrMwEspaKrRMDAABFXKZ5JGkVNmYWWrgO5Wcx4woHtFDtFZWpTlGWNFcKgW4hUgREmjRsUSpXBKYaq45b6PLxVBlYLsuISFLU31Ms-VgtdHRfLyzel5kIwNc45JA8ckfWp-iTeq2wZ4adoZaFlauOUfr-nNWTCcX3ijgmQ76P8I-wSc
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex-Specific+Differences+in+Circumpapillary+Retinal+Nerve+Fiber+Layer+Thickness&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology+%28Rochester%2C+Minn.%29&rft.au=Li%2C+Dian&rft.au=Rauscher%2C+Franziska+G&rft.au=Choi%2C+Eun+Young&rft.au=Wang%2C+Mengyu&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=357&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ophtha.2019.09.019&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31732228&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31732228&rft.externalDocID=31732228
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1549-4713&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1549-4713&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1549-4713&client=summon