Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Carabid Beetles: Experimental Evidence
1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent con...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | The Journal of animal ecology Ročník 67; číslo 3; s. 460 - 471 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Oxford, UK
British Ecological Society
01.05.1998
Blackwell Science Ltd Blackwell Blackwell Scientific Publications |
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0021-8790, 1365-2656 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent continuous-forest controls. Remnants were of three sizes (0.25, 0.875, 3.062 ha.). Monitoring commenced 2 years prior to habitat fragmentation. Here we present results for 6 years after habitat fragmentation (4 years for species richness). 2. We tested four hypotheses. Hypothesis one: habitat fragmentation reduces species richness in the remaining remnants. Carabid species richness was not different in habitat remnants compared to continuous forest, neither was carabid richness different for remnants of different sizes, or at monitoring sites close to remnant edges compared to sites in remnant interiors. 3. Hypothesis two: populations decline as a result of habitat fragmentation. Two species of eight were completely isolated on remnants and both declined in abundance on remnants compared to control plots in continuous forest. The other six species responded in various ways, which included relative increases and decreases in abundance and no change, but as they were not completely isolated on remnants, their responses could not be explained by isolation. 4. Hypothesis three: remaining subpopulations decline further on smaller habitat remnants than on larger remnants. Three species responded to remnant size; one was most abundant in small remnants, the second was most abundant in large remnants, and the third was equally abundant in small and large remnants and less abundant in medium-sized remnants. 5. Hypothesis four: populations near to remnant edges decline further than populations in remnant interiors. Two species were more likely to occur in remnant interiors than at edges, whereas three species were equally likely to occur in remnant interiors and at edges. 6. The effects of habitat fragmentation may be the consequence of: (i) isolation; and (ii) habitat modification. In this study, we were able to consider effects of isolation for two carabid species. We tested only one aspect of the habitat modification hypothesis, edge effects. We discuss the possibility that other aspects of habitat modification in remnants may explain some of our results and suggest that this is where future research be directed. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south‐eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent continuous‐forest controls. Remnants were of three sizes (0·25, 0·875, 3·062 ha.). Monitoring commenced 2 years prior to habitat fragmentation. Here we present results for 6 years after habitat fragmentation (4 years for species richness).
2. We tested four hypotheses. Hypothesis one: habitat fragmentation reduces species richness in the remaining remnants. Carabid species richness was not different in habitat remnants compared to continuous forest, neither was carabid richness different for remnants of different sizes, or at monitoring sites close to remnant edges compared to sites in remnant interiors.
3. Hypothesis two: populations decline as a result of habitat fragmentation. Two species of eight were completely isolated on remnants and both declined in abundance on remnants compared to control plots in continuous forest. The other six species responded in various ways, which included relative increases and decreases in abundance and no change, but as they were not completely isolated on remnants, their responses could not be explained by isolation.
4. Hypothesis three: remaining subpopulations decline further on smaller habitat remnants than on larger remnants. Three species responded to remnant size; one was most abundant in small remnants, the second was most abundant in large remnants, and the third was equally abundant in small and large remnants and less abundant in medium‐sized remnants.
5. Hypothesis four: populations near to remnant edges decline further than populations in remnant interiors. Two species were more likely to occur in remnant interiors than at edges, whereas three species were equally likely to occur in remnant interiors and at edges.
6. The effects of habitat fragmentation may be the consequence of: (i) isolation; and (ii) habitat modification. In this study, we were able to consider effects of isolation for two carabid species. We tested only one aspect of the habitat modification hypothesis, edge effects. We discuss the possibility that other aspects of habitat modification in remnants may explain some of our results and suggest that this is where future research be directed. 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south‐eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent continuous‐forest controls. Remnants were of three sizes (0·25, 0·875, 3·062 ha.). Monitoring commenced 2 years prior to habitat fragmentation. Here we present results for 6 years after habitat fragmentation (4 years for species richness). 2. We tested four hypotheses. Hypothesis one: habitat fragmentation reduces species richness in the remaining remnants. Carabid species richness was not different in habitat remnants compared to continuous forest, neither was carabid richness different for remnants of different sizes, or at monitoring sites close to remnant edges compared to sites in remnant interiors. 3. Hypothesis two: populations decline as a result of habitat fragmentation. Two species of eight were completely isolated on remnants and both declined in abundance on remnants compared to control plots in continuous forest. The other six species responded in various ways, which included relative increases and decreases in abundance and no change, but as they were not completely isolated on remnants, their responses could not be explained by isolation. 4. Hypothesis three: remaining subpopulations decline further on smaller habitat remnants than on larger remnants. Three species responded to remnant size; one was most abundant in small remnants, the second was most abundant in large remnants, and the third was equally abundant in small and large remnants and less abundant in medium‐sized remnants. 5. Hypothesis four: populations near to remnant edges decline further than populations in remnant interiors. Two species were more likely to occur in remnant interiors than at edges, whereas three species were equally likely to occur in remnant interiors and at edges. 6. The effects of habitat fragmentation may be the consequence of: (i) isolation; and (ii) habitat modification. In this study, we were able to consider effects of isolation for two carabid species. We tested only one aspect of the habitat modification hypothesis, edge effects. We discuss the possibility that other aspects of habitat modification in remnants may explain some of our results and suggest that this is where future research be directed. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent continuous-forest controls. Remnants were of three sizes (0 times 25, 0 times 875, 3 times 062 ha.). Monitoring commenced 2 years prior to habitat fragmentation. Here we present results for 6 years after habitat fragmentation (4 years for species richness). We tested four hypotheses. Hypothesis one: habitat fragmentation reduces species richness in the remaining remnants. Carabid species richness was not different in habitat remnants compared to continuous forest, neither was carabid richness different for remnants of different sizes, or at monitoring sites close to remnant edges compared to sites in remnant interiors. Hypothesis two: populations decline as a result of habitat fragmentation. Two species of eight were completely isolated on remnants and both declined in abundance on remnants compared to control plots in continuous forest. The other six species responded in various ways, which included relative increases and decreases in abundance and no change, but as they were not completely isolated on remnants, their responses could not be explained by isolation. Hypothesis three: remaining subpopulations decline further on smaller habitat remnants than on larger remnants. Three species responded to remnant size; one was most abundant in small remnants, the second was most abundant in large remnants, and the third was equally abundant in small and large remnants and less abundant in medium-sized remnants. Hypothesis four: populations near to remnant edges decline further than populations in remnant interiors. Two species were more likely to occur in remnant interiors than at edges, whereas three species were equally likely to occur in remnant interiors and at edges. The effects of habitat fragmentation may be the consequence of: (i) isolation; and (ii) habitat modification. In this study, we were able to consider effects of isolation for two carabid species. We tested only one aspect of the habitat modification hypothesis, edge effects. We discuss the possibility that other aspects of habitat modification in remnants may explain some of our results and suggest that this is where future research be directed. 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight carabid beetle species, and the carabid assemblage (45 species). Monitoring was by pitfall trapping in forest remnants and in adjacent continuous-forest controls. Remnants were of three sizes (0.25, 0.875, 3.062 ha.). Monitoring commenced 2 years prior to habitat fragmentation. Here we present results for 6 years after habitat fragmentation (4 years for species richness). 2. We tested four hypotheses. Hypothesis one: habitat fragmentation reduces species richness in the remaining remnants. Carabid species richness was not different in habitat remnants compared to continuous forest, neither was carabid richness different for remnants of different sizes, or at monitoring sites close to remnant edges compared to sites in remnant interiors. 3. Hypothesis two: populations decline as a result of habitat fragmentation. Two species of eight were completely isolated on remnants and both declined in abundance on remnants compared to control plots in continuous forest. The other six species responded in various ways, which included relative increases and decreases in abundance and no change, but as they were not completely isolated on remnants, their responses could not be explained by isolation. 4. Hypothesis three: remaining subpopulations decline further on smaller habitat remnants than on larger remnants. Three species responded to remnant size; one was most abundant in small remnants, the second was most abundant in large remnants, and the third was equally abundant in small and large remnants and less abundant in medium-sized remnants. 5. Hypothesis four: populations near to remnant edges decline further than populations in remnant interiors. Two species were more likely to occur in remnant interiors than at edges, whereas three species were equally likely to occur in remnant interiors and at edges. 6. The effects of habitat fragmentation may be the consequence of: (i) isolation; and (ii) habitat modification. In this study, we were able to consider effects of isolation for two carabid species. We tested only one aspect of the habitat modification hypothesis, edge effects. We discuss the possibility that other aspects of habitat modification in remnants may explain some of our results and suggest that this is where future research be directed. |
| Author | Margules, Chris R. Davies, Kendi F. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kendi F. surname: Davies fullname: Davies, Kendi F. – sequence: 2 givenname: Chris R. surname: Margules fullname: Margules, Chris R. |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2318236$$DView record in Pascal Francis |
| BookMark | eNqNkV1LHDEUhkNR6Kr9B14MtHg323wnU1DQZbZWRG_qdchmT0qGcWZNZtv135txxIJXC4Ecznne83mEDrq-A4QKgucEc_m9mRMmRUmlkHNSVXqOMc2x3Sc0ew8coNnoLbWq8Gd0lFKDMVYUsxm6qb0HN6Si98W1XYXBDsUy2j-P0GUz9F2R38LGHFoXVwBDC-lHUe82EMMr0xb137CGzsEJOvS2TfDl7T9GD8v69-K6vL3_-WtxeVs6wSQuPdW5T1txhRVwaQlzTFRcCMbAuwrztSWUuUpqLhRVXnHgXEsuJGGwghU7RmdT3k3sn7aQBvMYkoO2tR3022SIFFRjgTP49QPY9NvY5d4yo1muUDGVqW9vlE3Otj7azoVkNnk-G58NZURTJjOmJ8zFPqUI_p0g2IyXMI0ZF27GhZvxEub1EmaXpRcfpC5Myx2iDe0-Cc6nBP9CC897FzY3l3d1trL-dNI3aejj_9EkV0xL9gIbharp |
| CODEN | JAECAP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109115 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2006_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2005_03_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_d12120479 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_004_0255_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0906_7590_2005_03991_x crossref_primary_10_1603_022_038_0412 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_35_6_1550 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9993_2009_01936_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_018_0117_3 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0051802 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2003_10_028 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12518 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_1704 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119201 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0169_2046_02_00147_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_1744_7917_12039 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2022_734448 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1016018702894 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_005_1128_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10310_012_0349_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_011_0059_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2005_03_014 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2001_082_1830_EOWABP_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12600_020_00838_z crossref_primary_10_51847_j0SlBXqp4p crossref_primary_10_1139_Z07_100 crossref_primary_10_1673_031_013_4001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_011_9656_5 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_379267 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1463_6409_2001_00068_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_007_9076_7 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0082792 crossref_primary_10_1890_03_0110 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2007_02_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00227_020_03772_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2006_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0006_3207_02_00347_6 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2699_2001_00534_x crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2699_2002_00722_x crossref_primary_10_14411_eje_2012_060 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_004_5537_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_007_9121_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_019_00853_4 crossref_primary_10_14411_eje_2004_079 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2014_05_049 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1464793105006949 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1526_100X_2008_00476_x crossref_primary_10_1890_1051_0761_2000_010_0580_TASMFP_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_00222933_2013_773098 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_01_00433_9 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2000_081_3048_DOPEAR_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2006_02849_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2699_2004_01113_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_006_9008_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_005_0349_0 crossref_primary_10_14411_eje_2001_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2008_07_022 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2001_082_3435_SEEOHF_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9993_2005_01438_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2008_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_016_0056_9 crossref_primary_10_1603_022_038_0107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2009_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_0030_1299_2006_13977_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_016_0364_z crossref_primary_10_1111_een_12498 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_008_9161_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2005_08_051 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_012_9474_3 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1023223532149 crossref_primary_10_1002_etc_2552 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2010_03_039 crossref_primary_10_1080_00049158_2013_844090 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2006_05_043 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1440_6055_2009_00694_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2006_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1744_7917_2006_00075_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_008_9146_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_018_1597_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_010_9359_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marenvres_2022_105798 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_4598_2007_00003_x crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2000_081_1450_WTOSPP_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2009_03_044 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9993_2009_02007_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0378_1127_99_00021_3 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_36_2_348 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_02543 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2005_02849_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2009_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2745_2009_01517_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_004_4248_1 crossref_primary_10_3897_zookeys_100_1523 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1141_2009_05545 crossref_primary_10_1603_0046_225X_32_4_797 crossref_primary_10_1603_EN11298 crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2001_082_1360_EOEHFO_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_3390_d15020130 crossref_primary_10_1034_j_1600_0706_2003_12220_x crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02704966 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2025_122885 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12094 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2004_02310_x crossref_primary_10_1051_forest_2009003 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1523_1739_2009_01295_x crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1009668817271 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1017594108769 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9993_2004_01378_x crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9615_2002_072_0001_EOFFOB_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1523_1739_2000_98533_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107780 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1440_6055_2005_00490_x crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12036 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12039 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_006_9014_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2006_05_029 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1442_9993_2001_01113_x crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1523_1739_2000_98081_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2311_2010_01175_x crossref_primary_10_3377_004_045_0105 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_005_3813_6 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0376892917000121 crossref_primary_10_1111_jbi_12827 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_3126 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2656_2008_01478_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2006_07_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landurbplan_2008_01_005 crossref_primary_10_13102_sociobiology_v59i4_513 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_005_0275_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_010_9971_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1749_8198_2009_00245_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0587_2012_07762_x crossref_primary_10_1890_0012_9658_2001_082_1371_MOFLHO_2_0_CO_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_006_9011_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_een_12330 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2005_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1022412617568 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0167_8809_01_00261_4 crossref_primary_10_1023_A_1025594022759 crossref_primary_10_1890_04_1716 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9993_2005_01429_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0006_3207_03_00105_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_09_065 crossref_primary_10_1093_ee_nvaa047 crossref_primary_10_3897_zookeys_100_1533 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2004_05_047 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_903898 crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_2003_11682751 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2699_2006_01476_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0006_3207_99_00110_X |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright 1998 British Ecological Society Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1998 INIST-CNRS |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 1998 British Ecological Society – notice: Blackwell Publishers Ltd – notice: 1998 INIST-CNRS |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW HFIND HZAIM K30 PAAUG PAWHS PAWZZ PAXOH PBHAV PBQSW PBYQZ PCIWU PCMID PCZJX PDGRG PDWWI PETMR PFVGT PGXDX PIHIL PISVA PJCTQ PJTMS PLCHJ PMHAD PNQDJ POUND PPLAD PQAPC PQCAN PQCMW PQEME PQHKH PQMID PQNCT PQNET PQSCT PQSET PSVJG PVMQY PZGFC 7SN 7SS C1K |
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00210.x |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Periodicals Index Online Segment 16 Periodicals Index Online Segment 26 Periodicals Index Online Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50 Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Periodicals Index Online Segment 26 Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50 Periodicals Index Online Segment 16 Periodicals Index Online Entomology Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Zoology Biology |
| EISSN | 1365-2656 |
| EndPage | 471 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 2318236 10_1046_j_1365_2656_1998_00210_x JANE210 2647386 |
| Genre | article |
| GeographicLocations | Australia Oceania South Australia |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 29J 2AX 2WC 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABAWQ ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPFR ABPLY ABPQH ABPVW ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHIC ACHJO ACKIV ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACUBG ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AQVQM AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 F5P FVMVE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HGD HGLYW HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NHB O66 O9- OIG OK1 P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TN5 UB1 UPT VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 YQT ZCG ZY4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~WT 24P AAHHS ABTAH ABYAD ACCFJ ACTWD ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE C45 DOOOF ESX HF~ JSODD OVD TEORI WHG WRC ~KM AAYXX ABUFD AGHNM CITATION O8X IQODW HFIND HZAIM K30 PAAUG PAWHS PAWZZ PAXOH PBHAV PBQSW PBYQZ PCIWU PCMID PCZJX PDGRG PDWWI PETMR PFVGT PGXDX PIHIL PISVA PJCTQ PJTMS PLCHJ PMHAD PNQDJ POUND PPLAD PQAPC PQCAN PQCMW PQEME PQHKH PQMID PQNCT PQNET PQSCT PQSET PSVJG PVMQY PZGFC 7SN 7SS C1K |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5360-f28199a94707e46a13c35945533efc904da123c96845727f74e448645613ebeb3 |
| IEDL.DBID | WIN |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 187 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000074031000012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0021-8790 |
| IngestDate | Mon Oct 06 17:47:40 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 03:30:40 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:17:29 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:40:02 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:36:33 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:23:17 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 21:18:18 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Forests Metapopulation Coleoptera Insecta Carabidae Experimental study Population decline Fragmentation Species diversity Edge effect Arthropoda Population dynamics Habitat Invertebrata Species richness Anthropogenic factor |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5360-f28199a94707e46a13c35945533efc904da123c96845727f74e448645613ebeb3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00210.x |
| PQID | 1683968937 |
| PQPubID | 1818631 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_16528050 proquest_journals_1683968937 pascalfrancis_primary_2318236 crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2656_1998_00210_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1046_j_1365_2656_1998_00210_x wiley_primary_10_1046_j_1365_2656_1998_00210_x_JANE210 jstor_primary_2647386 |
| PublicationCentury | 1900 |
| PublicationDate | May 1998 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1998-05-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 1998 text: May 1998 |
| PublicationDecade | 1990 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of animal ecology |
| PublicationYear | 1998 |
| Publisher | British Ecological Society Blackwell Science Ltd Blackwell Blackwell Scientific Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: British Ecological Society – name: Blackwell Science Ltd – name: Blackwell – name: Blackwell Scientific Publications |
| SSID | ssj0007203 |
| Score | 2.0059674 |
| Snippet | 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were... 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south‐eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were... 1. We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south‐eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were... We tested for effects of habitat fragmentation in a controlled, replicated, field experiment, in south-eastern Australia. Our experimental subjects were eight... |
| SourceID | proquest pascalfrancis crossref wiley jstor |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 460 |
| SubjectTerms | Animal and plant ecology Animal ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Beetles Biological and medical sciences Coniferous forests Edge effects equilibrium theory of island biogeography Forest ecology Forest habitats Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Habitat fragmentation Human ecology isolation metapopulation dynamics Metapopulation ecology remnant size Species Synecology Terrestrial ecosystems |
| Title | Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Carabid Beetles: Experimental Evidence |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/2647386 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2656.1998.00210.x https://www.proquest.com/docview/1683968937 https://www.proquest.com/docview/16528050 |
| Volume | 67 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000074031000012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2656 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0007203 issn: 0021-8790 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Free Content customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2656 dateEnd: 20231207 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0007203 issn: 0021-8790 databaseCode: WIN dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dSxwxEB-KreCLta3S9at58HVhP5LsxjdRjyrlKEWp9CXsZhMR7J7caqn_vTNJXD3og0jhHgJzOfYmk8kvOx8_gD1p0QHgzSGtC9elvBMqbVVRpXiS1HgXU1aUzpNNVNNpfXGhvsf8J6qFCf0hxhdutDO8v6YN3rSBhSTz3W3HDC0hqeTOp0SilPBkznMiM_h5Mh2dMkUbQ7ZHjg5AZTGpJwY4__lDCydVSFakzMlmQOW5wHqxAEufg1t_Ok3e_8__tQarEaOyg2BUH-CN7T_CcmCtvMfRr5kffYLT0Pt4YDPHqOE3AleGz3z5OxY09Qw_ppmjqGOttWiXwz57TirAbGQ1XYfzyfHZ4dc0kjOkRpQySx1F4FSjeJVVlssmL00pFBcIH60zKuNdg4eiUbLmAjGSq7jF5ZeE10o0nLbcgKV-1tvPwLpamKJFKKHwcoM3liY3onW1daorEB-5BKrHhdAmdi4nAo1r7SPonKrNSGeadKZJZ9rrTP9NIB9n3oTuHS-Ys-7XepyAkJGYURPYWVj7Jzm6xaJE-fajLejoBwadSwSgkjBhAl9GMe5gCss0vZ3d0XdEUWciS0B6u3jxk-rTg-kxjjZfO3ELVkKJJeVvbsPS7fzO7sA78-f2apjvwtujH5Pzb7t-Iz0AbGgVpA |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB5K0tJc0rRNiZuXDr2a-iHJVm8hJORV00NKQy_ClqVSSLxlnZT233dGUtws5BBCYA-CWS3e0czok2c0H8AHaTEA4MkhrQvXp7wXKu1UUaW4k9R4FlNWlM6TTVRNU19cqC-RDojuwoT-ENMLN_IMH6_JwemF9MeYlgxeHkq0hKQ7d74mEqUIKJc54g7icfh23ExhmfKNod4jxxCgsljWE1Oc9_7Swl4VyhWpdrIdUX0u8F4sANO78NbvT4evnvSfrcFqhKlsL9jVa3hmhzfwIhBX_sXR95kfvYWT0P54ZDPHqOc3YleGD_3jKt5pGhh-TDtHUc86a9E0x0_sLq8As5HYdB2-Hh6c7x-lkZ8hNaKUWeooCadaxaussly2eWlKobhABGmdURnvW9wXjZI1FwiTXMUtWoAkyFai7XTlO1gaZoPdANbXwhQdogmF5xs8tLS5EZ2rrVN9gRDJJVDdroQ2sXk5cWhcap9E53ThjHSmSWeadKa9zvSfBPJp5q_QwOMBc9b9Yk8TEDUSOWoC2wuL_1-OkbEoUb51aww6hoJR5xIxqCRYmMDuJEYnpsxMO9jZDX1HFHUmsgSkN4wHP6k-2WsOcPT-sRN34eXR-eczfXbcnG7CSrhxSeWcW7B0Pb-x2_Dc_L7-Oc53vDf9Ax-mGCI |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEB7CJi29pEmbUuepQ6-mfkiy1VtIsuTFEkoDoRdhy1IptN6wTkr77zsjKW4WegilsAfBrBbvaGb0yTOjD-CdtBgA8OSQ1oXrUt4JlbaqqFLcSWo8iykrSufJJqrZrL65UVeRDoh6YcL9EOMLN_IMH6_Jwe1t597HtGTw8lCiJST13PmaSJQioFzlxCkzgdXjj9PryzEwU8YxVHzkGARUFgt7YpLzr7-1tFuFgkWqnmwGVKALzBdL0PQxwPU71PTlf_1vG7AegSo7DJa1CSu2fwXPAnXlLxx9nvvRazgPFyAPbO4Y3fqN6JXhQ3_5HruaeoYf0yxQ1LHWWjTO4QN7zCzAbKQ23YLr6cmno9M0MjSkRpQySx2l4VSjeJVVlssmL00pFBeIIa0zKuNdgzujUbLmAoGSq7hFG5AE2kq0nrZ8A5N-3tu3wLpamKJFPKHwhIPHliY3onW1daorECS5BKqHldAmXl9OLBrftE-jc2o5I51p0pkmnWmvM_0zgXyceRuu8HjCnC2_2OMExI1Ej5rA3tLi_5FjbCxKlO8-GIOOwWDQuUQUKgkYJnAwitGNKTfT9HZ-T98RRZ2JLAHpDePJT6rPD2cnONr-14kH8PzqeKovz2YXO_AitFxSPecuTO4W93YP1syPu6_DYj-6028GuRjL |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+habitat+fragmentation+on+carabid+beetles%3A+experimental+evidence&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+animal+ecology&rft.au=Davies%2C+K+F&rft.au=Margules%2C+C+R&rft.date=1998-05-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Scientific+Publications&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2656.1998.00210.x&rft.externalDBID=PAO_PIO_ONLY |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |