Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system
Objective: Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Traffic injury prevention Vol. 17; no. sup1; pp. 59 - 65 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Taylor & Francis
12.09.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1538-9588, 1538-957X |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Objective: Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in the event of an imminent crash, can either alert the driver or take autonomous evasive action. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a predictive model for detecting whether a stop sign violation was imminent.
Methods: Passenger vehicle intersection approaches were extracted from a data set of typical driver behavior (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study) and violations (event data recorders downloaded from real-world crashes) and were assigned weighting factors based on real-world frequency. A k-fold cross-validation procedure was then used to develop and evaluate 3 hypothetical stop sign warning algorithms (i.e., early, intermediate, and delayed) for detecting an impending violation during the intersection approach. Violation detection models were developed using logistic regression models that evaluate likelihood of a violation at various locations along the intersection approach. Two potential indicators of driver intent to stop-that is, required deceleration parameter (RDP) and brake application-were used to develop the predictive models. The earliest violation detection opportunity was then evaluated for each detection algorithm in order to (1) evaluate the violation detection accuracy and (2) compare braking demand versus maximum braking capabilities.
Results: A total of 38 violating and 658 nonviolating approaches were used in the analysis. All 3 algorithms were able to detect a violation at some point during the intersection approach. The early detection algorithm, as designed, was able to detect violations earlier than all other algorithms during the intersection approach but gave false alarms for 22.3% of approaches. In contrast, the delayed detection algorithm sacrificed some time for detecting violations but was able to substantially reduce false alarms to only 3.3% of all nonviolating approaches. Given good surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.8 g) and maximum effort, most drivers (55.3-71.1%) would be able to stop the vehicle regardless of the detection algorithm. However, given poor surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.4 g), few drivers (10.5-26.3%) would be able to stop the vehicle. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) would allow for early braking prior to driver reaction. If equipped with an AEB system, the results suggest that, even for the poor surface conditions scenario, over one half (55.3-65.8%) of the vehicles could have been stopped.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of I-ADAS to incorporate a stop sign violation detection algorithm. Repeating the analysis on a larger, more extensive data set will allow for the development of a more comprehensive algorithm to further validate the findings. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Objective: Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in the event of an imminent crash, can either alert the driver or take autonomous evasive action. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a predictive model for detecting whether a stop sign violation was imminent. Methods: Passenger vehicle intersection approaches were extracted from a data set of typical driver behavior (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study) and violations (event data recorders downloaded from real-world crashes) and were assigned weighting factors based on real-world frequency. A k-fold cross-validation procedure was then used to develop and evaluate 3 hypothetical stop sign warning algorithms (i.e., early, intermediate, and delayed) for detecting an impending violation during the intersection approach. Violation detection models were developed using logistic regression models that evaluate likelihood of a violation at various locations along the intersection approach. Two potential indicators of driver intent to stop -- that is, required deceleration parameter (RDP) and brake application -- were used to develop the predictive models. The earliest violation detection opportunity was then evaluated for each detection algorithm in order to (1) evaluate the violation detection accuracy and (2) compare braking demand versus maximum braking capabilities. Results: A total of 38 violating and 658 nonviolating approaches were used in the analysis. All 3 algorithms were able to detect a violation at some point during the intersection approach. The early detection algorithm, as designed, was able to detect violations earlier than all other algorithms during the intersection approach but gave false alarms for 22.3% of approaches. In contrast, the delayed detection algorithm sacrificed some time for detecting violations but was able to substantially reduce false alarms to only 3.3% of all nonviolating approaches. Given good surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.8 g) and maximum effort, most drivers (55.3-71.1%) would be able to stop the vehicle regardless of the detection algorithm. However, given poor surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.4 g), few drivers (10.5-26.3%) would be able to stop the vehicle. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) would allow for early braking prior to driver reaction. If equipped with an AEB system, the results suggest that, even for the poor surface conditions scenario, over one half (55.3-65.8%) of the vehicles could have been stopped. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of I-ADAS to incorporate a stop sign violation detection algorithm. Repeating the analysis on a larger, more extensive data set will allow for the development of a more comprehensive algorithm to further validate the findings. Objective: Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in the event of an imminent crash, can either alert the driver or take autonomous evasive action. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a predictive model for detecting whether a stop sign violation was imminent. Methods: Passenger vehicle intersection approaches were extracted from a data set of typical driver behavior (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study) and violations (event data recorders downloaded from real-world crashes) and were assigned weighting factors based on real-world frequency. A k-fold cross-validation procedure was then used to develop and evaluate 3 hypothetical stop sign warning algorithms (i.e., early, intermediate, and delayed) for detecting an impending violation during the intersection approach. Violation detection models were developed using logistic regression models that evaluate likelihood of a violation at various locations along the intersection approach. Two potential indicators of driver intent to stop-that is, required deceleration parameter (RDP) and brake application-were used to develop the predictive models. The earliest violation detection opportunity was then evaluated for each detection algorithm in order to (1) evaluate the violation detection accuracy and (2) compare braking demand versus maximum braking capabilities. Results: A total of 38 violating and 658 nonviolating approaches were used in the analysis. All 3 algorithms were able to detect a violation at some point during the intersection approach. The early detection algorithm, as designed, was able to detect violations earlier than all other algorithms during the intersection approach but gave false alarms for 22.3% of approaches. In contrast, the delayed detection algorithm sacrificed some time for detecting violations but was able to substantially reduce false alarms to only 3.3% of all nonviolating approaches. Given good surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.8 g) and maximum effort, most drivers (55.3-71.1%) would be able to stop the vehicle regardless of the detection algorithm. However, given poor surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.4 g), few drivers (10.5-26.3%) would be able to stop the vehicle. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) would allow for early braking prior to driver reaction. If equipped with an AEB system, the results suggest that, even for the poor surface conditions scenario, over one half (55.3-65.8%) of the vehicles could have been stopped. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of I-ADAS to incorporate a stop sign violation detection algorithm. Repeating the analysis on a larger, more extensive data set will allow for the development of a more comprehensive algorithm to further validate the findings. Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in the event of an imminent crash, can either alert the driver or take autonomous evasive action. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a predictive model for detecting whether a stop sign violation was imminent. Passenger vehicle intersection approaches were extracted from a data set of typical driver behavior (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study) and violations (event data recorders downloaded from real-world crashes) and were assigned weighting factors based on real-world frequency. A k-fold cross-validation procedure was then used to develop and evaluate 3 hypothetical stop sign warning algorithms (i.e., early, intermediate, and delayed) for detecting an impending violation during the intersection approach. Violation detection models were developed using logistic regression models that evaluate likelihood of a violation at various locations along the intersection approach. Two potential indicators of driver intent to stop-that is, required deceleration parameter (RDP) and brake application-were used to develop the predictive models. The earliest violation detection opportunity was then evaluated for each detection algorithm in order to (1) evaluate the violation detection accuracy and (2) compare braking demand versus maximum braking capabilities. A total of 38 violating and 658 nonviolating approaches were used in the analysis. All 3 algorithms were able to detect a violation at some point during the intersection approach. The early detection algorithm, as designed, was able to detect violations earlier than all other algorithms during the intersection approach but gave false alarms for 22.3% of approaches. In contrast, the delayed detection algorithm sacrificed some time for detecting violations but was able to substantially reduce false alarms to only 3.3% of all nonviolating approaches. Given good surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.8 g) and maximum effort, most drivers (55.3-71.1%) would be able to stop the vehicle regardless of the detection algorithm. However, given poor surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.4 g), few drivers (10.5-26.3%) would be able to stop the vehicle. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) would allow for early braking prior to driver reaction. If equipped with an AEB system, the results suggest that, even for the poor surface conditions scenario, over one half (55.3-65.8%) of the vehicles could have been stopped. This study demonstrates the potential of I-ADAS to incorporate a stop sign violation detection algorithm. Repeating the analysis on a larger, more extensive data set will allow for the development of a more comprehensive algorithm to further validate the findings. OBJECTIVEIntersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety systems that seek to help drivers safely traverse intersections. I-ADAS uses onboard sensors to detect oncoming vehicles and, in the event of an imminent crash, can either alert the driver or take autonomous evasive action. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a predictive model for detecting whether a stop sign violation was imminent.METHODSPassenger vehicle intersection approaches were extracted from a data set of typical driver behavior (100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study) and violations (event data recorders downloaded from real-world crashes) and were assigned weighting factors based on real-world frequency. A k-fold cross-validation procedure was then used to develop and evaluate 3 hypothetical stop sign warning algorithms (i.e., early, intermediate, and delayed) for detecting an impending violation during the intersection approach. Violation detection models were developed using logistic regression models that evaluate likelihood of a violation at various locations along the intersection approach. Two potential indicators of driver intent to stop-that is, required deceleration parameter (RDP) and brake application-were used to develop the predictive models. The earliest violation detection opportunity was then evaluated for each detection algorithm in order to (1) evaluate the violation detection accuracy and (2) compare braking demand versus maximum braking capabilities.RESULTSA total of 38 violating and 658 nonviolating approaches were used in the analysis. All 3 algorithms were able to detect a violation at some point during the intersection approach. The early detection algorithm, as designed, was able to detect violations earlier than all other algorithms during the intersection approach but gave false alarms for 22.3% of approaches. In contrast, the delayed detection algorithm sacrificed some time for detecting violations but was able to substantially reduce false alarms to only 3.3% of all nonviolating approaches. Given good surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.8 g) and maximum effort, most drivers (55.3-71.1%) would be able to stop the vehicle regardless of the detection algorithm. However, given poor surface conditions (maximum braking capabilities = 0.4 g), few drivers (10.5-26.3%) would be able to stop the vehicle. Automatic emergency braking (AEB) would allow for early braking prior to driver reaction. If equipped with an AEB system, the results suggest that, even for the poor surface conditions scenario, over one half (55.3-65.8%) of the vehicles could have been stopped.CONCLUSIONSThis study demonstrates the potential of I-ADAS to incorporate a stop sign violation detection algorithm. Repeating the analysis on a larger, more extensive data set will allow for the development of a more comprehensive algorithm to further validate the findings. |
| Author | Scanlon, John M. Sherony, Rini Gabler, Hampton C. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: John M. surname: Scanlon fullname: Scanlon, John M. email: john91@vt.edu organization: Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics Department, Virginia Tech – sequence: 2 givenname: Rini surname: Sherony fullname: Sherony, Rini organization: Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America – sequence: 3 givenname: Hampton C. surname: Gabler fullname: Gabler, Hampton C. organization: Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics Department, Virginia Tech |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqN0k1vFCEYB3BiauyLfgQNiRcvs8IwMBAvNo1vSRM9aOKNsPBMS8PACuya_Qp-all328QerKchk9__SeD_nKKjmCIg9JySBSWSvKacScWlXPSEigWliijBHqGT3f9O8fH70d1ZymN0WsoNIT2VhD9Bx_3IpaBkOEG_vmRw3lYfr7DNplx3GQJsTKx441Mw1adYsKm41LTCxV_FzqZYcwoBHPaxQi5g92pKGddrwA42ENJqhjYkTdjEvxx22W8gY1OKL9VEC7hsS4X5KXo8mVDg2eF7hr69f_f14mN3-fnDp4vzy85yxmvnlHUEBLVSCSGWg3BsUgwGy4WZYOmMNZQAbWYwywEMF_2SWjdxM3LbD8DO0Kv93FVOP9ZQqp59sRCCiZDWRbenHKhSQo4PU6moHCWl_X9QKgQTbOCNvrxHb9I6x3bnpnrGFBVUNPXioNbLGZxeZT-bvNW33TXA98DmVEqG6Y5Qonc7om93RO92RB92pOXe3MtZX_8UXbPx4cH0233ax9b3bH6mHJyuZhtSnnKr0xfN_j3iN7_p1-s |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_fi15070238 crossref_primary_10_1109_MITS_2020_3014115 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIV_2017_2708611 crossref_primary_10_1109_TITS_2019_2955721 crossref_primary_10_3390_s24123859 crossref_primary_10_1080_15389588_2017_1300257 crossref_primary_10_1109_TITS_2017_2699079 crossref_primary_10_1145_3403952 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1201/9781420054101 10.1037/e624282011-001 10.1080/15389588.2015.1066500 10.4271/2010-01-1000 10.1201/9781420089011 10.1109/41.649946 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619 10.1049/iet-its.2009.0015 10.1109/MCOM.2009.5307471 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.001 10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542 10.1038/nphoton.2006.5 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.001 10.4271/2006-01-1397 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.07.003 10.1080/15389588.2013.871003 10.4271/870239 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2016 Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2016 – notice: Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QF 7QQ 7SC 7SE 7SP 7SR 7T2 7TA 7TB 7U5 8BQ 8FD C1K F28 FR3 H8D H8G JG9 JQ2 KR7 L7M L~C L~D 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1080/15389588.2016.1190963 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Aluminium Industry Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Corrosion Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts Engineered Materials Abstracts Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive) Materials Business File Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts METADEX Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database Copper Technical Reference Library Materials Research Database ProQuest Computer Science Collection Civil Engineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Materials Research Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Aluminium Industry Abstracts Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Electronics & Communications Abstracts ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Ceramic Abstracts Materials Business File METADEX Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Aerospace Database Copper Technical Reference Library Engineered Materials Abstracts Health & Safety Science Abstracts Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts Engineering Research Database Corrosion Abstracts Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Materials Research Database Technology Research Database Health & Safety Science Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Economics |
| EISSN | 1538-957X |
| EndPage | 65 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 4195178621 27586104 10_1080_15389588_2016_1190963 1190963 |
| Genre | Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | United States--US USA |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US – name: USA |
| GroupedDBID | --- ..I .7F .QJ 0BK 0R~ 123 29Q 30N 36B 4.4 53G 5VS 6PF AAENE AAGDL AAHIA AAJMT AALDU AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR AAWTL ABCCY ABFIM ABHAV ABJNI ABLIJ ABPAQ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ACGFS ACHQT ACIWK ACPRK ACTIO ADCVX ADGTB ADLRE ADXPE AEISY AENEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AFKVX AFRAH AFRVT AGDLA AGMYJ AHDZW AIJEM AIYEW AJWEG AKBVH AKOOK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQRUH AQTUD AVBZW AWYRJ BLEHA CCCUG CE4 CS3 DGEBU DKSSO DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN EV9 E~A E~B F5P GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ H~P IPNFZ J.P KYCEM M4Z NA5 O9- PQQKQ RIG RNANH ROSJB RTWRZ S-T SNACF SV3 TASJS TBQAZ TDBHL TEN TFL TFT TFW TNC TTHFI TUROJ TWF UT5 UU3 ZGOLN ~S~ AAYXX CITATION 1TA ACTTO ADUMR ADYSH AFBWG AFION AGVKY AGWUF ALRRR BWMZZ CAG CGR COF CUY CVF CYRSC DAOYK ECM EIF LJTGL NPM OPCYK 7QF 7QQ 7SC 7SE 7SP 7SR 7T2 7TA 7TB 7U5 8BQ 8FD C1K F28 FR3 H8D H8G JG9 JQ2 KR7 L7M L~C L~D 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-d9cd0e61c89666b46d3f93e4c56afebdaca10e1d0e4ab4ea562b1cdf5a75c24e3 |
| IEDL.DBID | TFW |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 11 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000383897600012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1538-9588 |
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 01 14:52:53 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:24:41 EDT 2025 Sun Nov 09 12:31:25 EST 2025 Thu Nov 20 01:17:42 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:59:48 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:19:15 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:40:43 EST 2025 Mon Oct 20 23:47:21 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | sup1 |
| Keywords | Intersection I-ADAS driver assistance systems violations |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c535t-d9cd0e61c89666b46d3f93e4c56afebdaca10e1d0e4ab4ea562b1cdf5a75c24e3 |
| Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Predicting_crash-relevant_violations_at_stop_sign_controlled_intersections_for_the_development_of_an_intersection_driver_assistance_system/3803280 |
| PMID | 27586104 |
| PQID | 1823391616 |
| PQPubID | 186141 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1891878112 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_15389588_2016_1190963 proquest_miscellaneous_1904199687 pubmed_primary_27586104 proquest_miscellaneous_1816636345 crossref_primary_10_1080_15389588_2016_1190963 proquest_journals_1823391616 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_15389588_2016_1190963 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2016-09-12 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-09-12 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2016 text: 2016-09-12 day: 12 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Philadelphia |
| PublicationTitle | Traffic injury prevention |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Traffic Inj Prev |
| PublicationYear | 2016 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
| References | cit0033 Doerzaph Z (cit0013) 2010 cit0034 cit0031 cit0010 Doerzaph Z (cit0011) 2007 Doerzaph Z (cit0012) 2008 Gabler HC (cit0016) 2008 Garcia-Garrido MA (cit0017) 2006 Baker JS (cit0004) 1975 Bahlmann C (cit0003) 2005 Dingus TA (cit0009) 1998 Volvo Car Corporation (cit0039) 2015 Jansson J (cit0018) 2002 Scanlon JM (cit0036) 2016 cit0019 cit0038 cit0014 Neale V (cit0027) 2008 cit0022 cit0001 cit0023 Mardirossian A (cit0024) 1999 cit0020 cit0021 Sudweeks J (cit0037) 2007 cit0040 Neale V (cit0026) 2006 Franke U (cit0015) 1997 Mercedes-Benz USA (cit0025) 2015 Pierowicz JA (cit0029) 2000 Yamaki T (cit0041) 2004 cit0006 cit0028 cit0007 R Core Team (cit0030) 2015 cit0005 cit0002 Scanlon JM (cit0035) 2015 |
| References_xml | – ident: cit0005 doi: 10.1201/9781420054101 – ident: cit0010 doi: 10.1037/e624282011-001 – ident: cit0038 – volume-title: Traffic Violation Warning and Traffic Violation Storage Apparatus year: 2004 ident: cit0041 – ident: cit0034 doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1066500 – volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing year: 2015 ident: cit0030 – volume-title: Paper presented at: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium year: 2005 ident: cit0003 – ident: cit0033 doi: 10.4271/2010-01-1000 – ident: cit0014 doi: 10.1201/9781420089011 – volume-title: Development of a Threat Assessment Algorithm for Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems year: 2007 ident: cit0011 – ident: cit0007 doi: 10.1109/41.649946 – start-page: 55 year: 1998 ident: cit0009 publication-title: Human Factors in Intelligent Transportation Systems – year: 2015 ident: cit0025 publication-title: 2016 S-Class Operator's Manual – ident: cit0022 doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1063619 – volume-title: Paper presented at: Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting year: 2010 ident: cit0013 – volume-title: Intersection Collision Avoidance Using ITS Countermeasures year: 2000 ident: cit0029 – ident: cit0023 doi: 10.1049/iet-its.2009.0015 – volume-title: Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance System Limited to Stop Sign and Traffic Signal Violations (CICAS-V) Subtask 3.3 Interim Report: Test of Alternative Driver–Vehicle Interfaces on the Smart Road year: 2008 ident: cit0027 – ident: cit0028 doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2009.5307471 – volume-title: Traffic Accident Investigation Manual year: 1975 ident: cit0004 – volume-title: Decision Making for Collision Avoidance Systems. Society of Automotive Engineering year: 2002 ident: cit0018 – volume-title: 2016 Volvo XC90 Owner's Manual year: 2015 ident: cit0039 – volume-title: Paper presented at: Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference year: 2006 ident: cit0017 – volume-title: Paper presented at: IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems year: 1997 ident: cit0015 – ident: cit0001 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.001 – ident: cit0020 doi: 10.1109/TITS.2012.2191542 – volume-title: Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance System Limited to Stop Sign and Traffic Signal Violations (CICAS-V) Subtask 3.2 Interim Report: Naturalistic Infrastructure-Based Driving Data Collection and Intersection Collision Avoidance Algorithm Development year: 2008 ident: cit0012 – ident: cit0019 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2006.5 – volume-title: For Monitoring and Detecting Traffic Violations year: 1999 ident: cit0024 – year: 2008 ident: cit0016 publication-title: Event Data Recorders. A Decade of Innovation – ident: cit0031 doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.001 – volume-title: Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Limited to Stop Sign and Traffic Signal Violations (CICAS-V) Subtask 3.1 Report: Mining of the 100-Car Naturalistic Database to Determine Factors Related to Intersection Violations and Near Violations. year: 2007 ident: cit0037 – ident: cit0040 doi: 10.4271/2006-01-1397 – ident: cit0006 doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.07.003 – ident: cit0021 doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.871003 – start-page: 687 year: 2006 ident: cit0026 publication-title: Handbook of Warnings – volume-title: Using Event Data Recorders from Real-world Crashes to Evaluate the Vehicle Detection Capability of an Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance System year: 2016 ident: cit0036 – ident: cit0002 doi: 10.4271/870239 – volume-title: Paper presented at: 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium year: 2015 ident: cit0035 |
| SSID | ssj0021805 |
| Score | 2.1423464 |
| Snippet | Objective: Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are... Intersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are active safety... OBJECTIVEIntersection crashes resulted in over 5,000 fatalities in the United States in 2014. Intersection Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (I-ADAS) are... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref informaworld |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 59 |
| SubjectTerms | Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control Alarms Algorithms Automobile Driving - psychology Braking Crashes Data Deceleration Delayed driver assistance systems Driver behavior Drivers Environment Design - statistics & numerical data False alarms Humans I-ADAS Impending Intersection Intersections Mathematical models Models, Theoretical Plugs Prediction models Protective Devices Regression analysis Reproducibility of Results Safety systems Traffic accidents & safety United States Vehicles Violations Weighting |
| Title | Predicting crash-relevant violations at stop sign-controlled intersections for the development of an intersection driver assistance system |
| URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15389588.2016.1190963 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586104 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823391616 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1816636345 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1891878112 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1904199687 |
| Volume | 17 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000383897600012&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAWR databaseName: Taylor & Francis Online Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1538-957X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0021805 issn: 1538-9588 databaseCode: TFW dateStart: 20020301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.tandfonline.com providerName: Taylor & Francis |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWgQiqXAi3QhVIZqVdDnNhOfESoqx6qqocCe4v8KZCqLEpSfgS_mhnHWdhD20M5RhlHGmfGeRM_vyHkhMcoDQ810zbWTEQRmYmFZQ0vnCxcwX3qn_L1vL64aFYrfZnZhEOmVWINHSehiLRWY3IbO8yMuI-YpFo2iZilIOc1wHDU-wRkj6S-q-W3TcnFm0RinNIahsxneG57ytbXaUu79HYEmr5Ey2f_wYfnZC_DUPppipsX5FHo9snufEp5OCC_L3vcwkFSNHW9Gb4z7K4CsHukuJc__eejZqSoTECRBcIy6_06eIoiFP2QWF5gBe5RwJnU_yUo0XWkptuyo75HjggFNI-YFoKRTjLTL8mX5enV5zOW-zYwJys5Mq-dL4LiroFaSlmhfBV1FYSTysRgvXGGF4GDjTBWBAMQzHLnIWhq6UoRqldkp1t34ZBQqZy22gEIVFI4bq0XZeQRcGYJ0DKoBRHz-2pdFjXH3hrXLc_ap_NEtzjRbZ7oBfmwGfZzUvW4b4D-NxjaMf1OiVPvk7a6Z-zRHDltXiCGFsq6Cs88c3Dh_eY2pDbu15gurG_QhgMeVJWQd9lo3uBp4fIOG10IJJs39YK8niJ343UJ9SIgaPHmAQ6-JU_xkqXGGkdkZ-xvwjvyxP0afwz9MXlcr5rjlJZ_AEHwNWo |
| linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagILUXypuFAkbiaogT24mPCHVVxLLisEBvluOHilRlUZL2R_CrmXGSpXtoe2jPHkcaZ8b-xv5mhpD3PEZpeSiZrmPJRBSR2ZjVrOKZk5nLuE_9U34uyuWyOj7WF3NhkFaJMXQcCkWkvRqdGy-jJ0rcR_RSLavEzFLg9BpweHGX3MPudBiArea_NkEXrxKNcXBsmDNl8Vz2ma3zaat66eUYNJ1F8_3b0OIheTAiUfppMJ1H5E5oHpPdKVG5e0L-fm_xFQd50dS1tjth2GAFkHdP8Tl_uOqjtqdYnIAiEYSNxPfT4CnWoWi7RPQCKdCPAtSk_j9Hia4jtc2WHPUt0kQoAHqEtWCPdKg0_ZT8mB-uPh-xsXUDc7KQPfPa-Swo7ioIp1QtlC-iLoJwUtkYam-d5VngICNsLYIFFFZz58FuSulyEYpnZKdZN-EFoVI5XWsHOFBJ4Xhde5FHHgFq5oAug5oRMf0w48a65the49TwsfzptNAGF9qMCz0jHzbT_gyFPa6boC9ag-nTjUoc2p-Y4pq5B5PpmHGP6AxEdgWmPXNQ4d1mGLwbn2xsE9ZnKMMBEqpCyKtkNK8wYTi_QkZnAvnmVTkjzwfT3WidQ8gIIFq8vIGCb8nu0erbwiy-LL--Ins4xFKfjQOy07dn4TW578773137JnnnP1MrOKU |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagIODC-7FQwEhcTePEduIjAlYgqtUeCvRmOX4IpCpbJSk_gl_NjOMs7KHtAc4eRxpnxv7G_maGkNc8Rml5qJluY81EFJHZWLSs4YWThSu4T_1Tvh7Wq1VzfKzXmU04ZFolxtBxKhSR9mp07lMfZ0bcATqplk0iZinweQ0wvLpKrgF0lmjYR8tv25iLN4nFOPk1zJmTeM77zM7xtFO89HwImo6i5Z3_oMRdcjvjUPp2Mpx75Ero7pObc5ry8ID8Wvf4hoOsaOp6O3xn2F4FcPdI8TF_uuijdqRYmoAiDYRl2vtJ8BSrUPRDonmBFKhHAWhS_4ehRDeR2m5HjvoeSSIU4DyCWrBGOtWZfki-LD8cvfvIcuMG5mQlR-a180VQ3DUQTKlWKF9FXQXhpLIxtN46y4vAQUbYVgQLGKzlzoPV1NKVIlSPyF636cITQqVyutUOUKCSwvG29aKMPALQLAFbBrUgYv5fxuWq5thc48TwXPx0XmiDC23yQi_Im-2006msx2UT9N_GYMZ0nxKn5iemumTu_mw5Ju8Qg4G4rsKkZw4qvNoOg2_jg43twuYMZTgAQlUJeZGM5g2mC5cXyOhCINu8qRfk8WS5W61LCBgBQoun_6DgS3Jj_X5pDj-tPj8jt3CEpSYb-2Rv7M_Cc3Ld_Rx_DP2L5Ju_AXl9N1c |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting+crash-relevant+violations+at+stop+sign-controlled+intersections+for+the+development+of+an+intersection+driver+assistance+system&rft.jtitle=Traffic+injury+prevention&rft.au=Scanlon%2C+John+M&rft.au=Sherony%2C+Rini&rft.au=Gabler%2C+Hampton+C&rft.date=2016-09-12&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=1538-9588&rft.eissn=1538-957X&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=59&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F15389588.2016.1190963&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT&rft.externalDocID=4195178621 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1538-9588&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1538-9588&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1538-9588&client=summon |