The efficacy of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background/Purpose Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 1156 - 1165
Main Authors: Watanabe, Jun, Rifu, Kazuma, Sasanuma, Hideki, Kotani, Kazuhiko, Sata, Naohiro
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Japan Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects:
ISSN:1868-6974, 1868-6982, 1868-6982
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background/Purpose Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left‐sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach. Methods Electronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random‐effect meta‐analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n). Results Thirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42‐0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79‐1.09) and recurrence‐free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37‐1.38) with low certainty of evidence. Conclusion The meta‐analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.
AbstractList Background/Purpose Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left‐sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach. Methods Electronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random‐effect meta‐analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n). Results Thirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42‐0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79‐1.09) and recurrence‐free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37‐1.38) with low certainty of evidence. Conclusion The meta‐analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.
Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach. Electronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random-effect meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n). Thirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79-1.09) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37-1.38) with low certainty of evidence. The meta-analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.
Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach.BACKGROUND/PURPOSEPrevious systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left-sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach.Electronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random-effect meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n).METHODSElectronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random-effect meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n).Thirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79-1.09) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37-1.38) with low certainty of evidence.RESULTSThirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79-1.09) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37-1.38) with low certainty of evidence.The meta-analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.CONCLUSIONThe meta-analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.
Background/PurposePrevious systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent large studies have shown opposite results, thus necessitating clarification of RAMPS efficacy. We aimed to update existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of RAMPS for left‐sided pancreatic cancer by comparing them to those of the conventional approach.MethodsElectronic databases and registries were searched until August 2021 to perform random‐effect meta‐analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The protocol was registered at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxhfpj3n).ResultsThirteen cohort studies (1641 patients) and four ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. RAMPS increased disease‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42‐0.91), but it had little effect on overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79‐1.09) and recurrence‐free survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37‐1.38) with low certainty of evidence.ConclusionThe meta‐analysis of recent studies suggests that RAMPS may have little effect on clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the necessity of further studies, including RCTs to determine the efficacy and subsequent indication of RAMPS in clinical cases.
Author Sasanuma, Hideki
Sata, Naohiro
Rifu, Kazuma
Watanabe, Jun
Kotani, Kazuhiko
AuthorAffiliation 1 12838 Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke‐City Japan
2 12838 Division of Community and Family Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke‐City Japan
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 12838 Division of Community and Family Medicine Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke‐City Japan
– name: 1 12838 Division of Gastroenterological, General and Transplant Surgery Department of Surgery Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke‐City Japan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jun
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4477-4238
  surname: Watanabe
  fullname: Watanabe, Jun
  email: m06105jw@jichi.ac.jp
  organization: Jichi Medical University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kazuma
  surname: Rifu
  fullname: Rifu, Kazuma
  organization: Jichi Medical University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hideki
  surname: Sasanuma
  fullname: Sasanuma, Hideki
  organization: Jichi Medical University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Kazuhiko
  surname: Kotani
  fullname: Kotani, Kazuhiko
  organization: Jichi Medical University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Naohiro
  surname: Sata
  fullname: Sata, Naohiro
  organization: Jichi Medical University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kcFu1DAQhi1UREvpgRdAlrjAYVs7ThybQ6VSAQVVgkM5W44z2fXKiYPttMqNR-AZeRIcuq2gAl88o_n-X2P_T9He4AdA6Dklx5SQ4mS7acZjSgvyCB1QwcWKS1Hs3dd1uY-OYtySfBhlkpEnaJ9VRBa0rg_Q-moDGLrOGm1m7DscdJtrh_WQYJ0bwL1vJ6cDHvVgAujk4-hgAJN8P7_BZzjOMUGvkzU4wLWFm6xtcQ9J__z-Qw_azdHGZ-hxp12Eo919iL6-f3d1frG6_Pzh4_nZ5cpUjJEVbxuomk4aVgKHqmSylKY2DZVQSw68rnIjQDSVbmvIo1a0WjbcaM06ahg7RKe3vuPU9NAaGFLQTo3B9jrMymur_p4MdqPW_lrJWhJOF4NXO4Pgv00Qk-ptNOCcHsBPURW8YEIITsuMvnyAbv0U8oMzVVes4KIii-GLPze6X-Uugwyc3AIm-BgDdMrYlL_TLwtapyhRS9BqCVotQWfF6weKO9N_sTv3G-tg_j-oPl28_fJb8QvTabtv
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10353_023_00812_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_wjs_12630
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2022_101858
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_15414_6
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_024_15939_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers15082322
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00423_024_03417_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2025_04_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2025_1510342
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.pan.2015.05.390
10.1001/jama.2013.279201
10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.653
10.1007/s00268-013-2254-8
10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.014
10.6004/jnccn.2019.5007
10.1007/s11605-017-3607-7
10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.012
10.1245/s10434‐016‐5675‐4
10.1007/s00595‐021‐02280‐y
10.21037/cco‐20‐6
10.1136/bmj.g7647
10.21037/jgo.2018.12.08
10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29
10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
10.12659/MSM.914540
10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06651-X
10.1007/s00595-016-1317-5
10.3322/caac.21492
10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
10.1177/000313481408000326
10.1348/000711007X255327
10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.1854
10.1056/NEJMra1404198
10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x
10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016
10.1016/j.pan.2017.05.245
10.1186/s12893‐019‐0476‐x
10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3
10.1177/000313481307901117
10.1056/NEJMoa032295
10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513
10.14309/00000434-201510001-00023
10.1067/msy.2003.146
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
2022 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
– notice: 2022 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
– notice: 2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1002/jhbp.1120
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate WATANABE et al
EISSN 1868-6982
EndPage 1165
ExternalDocumentID PMC9790613
35092177
10_1002_jhbp_1120
JHBP1120
Genre reviewArticle
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: JSPS KAKENHI
  funderid: Grant Number JP21K21121
– fundername: JSPS KAKENHI
  grantid: Grant Number JP21K21121
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-Y2
0R~
0VY
1OC
24P
2JY
2~H
30V
33P
3SF
4.4
52U
52V
53G
5VS
8-1
8TC
8UJ
95.
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIAL
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AANXM
AAONW
AARHV
AARTL
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAYZH
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABQSL
ABQWH
ABTEG
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACBXY
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACOMO
ACPOU
ACREN
ACRPL
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADINQ
ADIZJ
ADKPE
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGNC
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBBN
AFBPY
AFEXP
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFLOW
AFPWT
AFWTZ
AFWVQ
AGJBK
AHBTC
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BGNMA
BHBCM
BMXJE
BRXPI
C45
CSCUP
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
GODZA
GQ6
GQ8
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HMJXF
HVGLF
HZ~
IZIGR
JBSCW
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M4Y
MA-
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
N2Q
NF~
NU0
O66
O9-
O93
O9I
OVD
P2W
P9S
PQQKQ
Q.N
QB0
QOS
R89
ROL
RSV
S37
S3B
SDE
SMD
SOJ
SUPJJ
SV3
SZN
TEORI
TSV
TUC
VC2
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WK8
WOHZO
WVDHM
WXSBR
Z45
Z7U
Z82
Z87
Z8V
~EX
AAMMB
AAYXX
ABFSG
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AEZWR
AFHIU
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHWEU
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIXLP
CITATION
KOV
LH4
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5330-6dbe5bf9c34e6e543949c7cb19e796e6757cb8e8b5ad7e9c7d8da9b6caa3f1c33
IEDL.DBID 24P
ISICitedReferencesCount 10
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000755149000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1868-6974
1868-6982
IngestDate Tue Nov 04 02:07:10 EST 2025
Fri Sep 05 08:16:42 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 07 07:10:54 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:06:26 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:31:36 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 04:43:45 EST 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:26:56 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Keywords meta-analysis
mortality
systematic review
pancreatic neoplasms
prognosis
Language English
License Attribution-NonCommercial
2022 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5330-6dbe5bf9c34e6e543949c7cb19e796e6757cb8e8b5ad7e9c7d8da9b6caa3f1c33
Notes Funding information
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K21121.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0003-4477-4238
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.1120
PMID 35092177
PQID 2753268503
PQPubID 2034613
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9790613
proquest_miscellaneous_2623888614
proquest_journals_2753268503
pubmed_primary_35092177
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_jhbp_1120
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1120
wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1120_JHBP1120
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2022
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2022
  text: November 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
– name: Tokyo
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
References 2010; 12
2015; 15
2009; 62
2011
2017; 47
2019; 10
2019; 17
2017; 17.3
2019; 19
2020; 58
2014; 371
2016; 91
2001; 66
2017; 112
2018; 22
2021; 51
2016; 15
2003; 133
2018; 25
1998; 25
2014; 156
2018; 68
2015; 350
2018; 18
2014; 80
2013; 79
2019; 21
2004; 350
2019; 25
2020; 9
2015; 110
2011; 64
2014; 38
2013; 310
2020; 49
2017; 161
2016; 40
2017; 19
2011; 46
2001; 358
e_1_2_8_28_1
e_1_2_8_29_1
You D (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2010; 12
Uesaka K (e_1_2_8_22_1) 1998; 25
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_9_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
e_1_2_8_43_1
e_1_2_8_21_1
e_1_2_8_42_1
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_44_1
e_1_2_8_40_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
Xu D (e_1_2_8_26_1) 2016; 15
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_39_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
e_1_2_8_38_1
e_1_2_8_16_1
e_1_2_8_37_1
Yin J (e_1_2_8_35_1) 2020; 58
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
Food & Drug Administration, HHS (e_1_2_8_41_1) 2001; 66
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_12_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – year: 2011
– volume: 21
  start-page: S313
  year: 2019
  article-title: The role of radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy compared to conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy in patients with left‐sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective multicenter propensity score matching analysis
  publication-title: HPB
– volume: 10
  start-page: 259
  year: 2019
  end-page: 69
  article-title: Outcome of head compared to body and tail pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 93 studies
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1131
  year: 1998
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Differences in strategies for carcinoma of the pancreas between Japan and Western countries]
  publication-title: Gan to Kagaku Ryoho
– volume: 47
  start-page: 8
  year: 2017
  end-page: 13
  article-title: No‐touch isolation techniques for pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: Surg Today
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1175
  year: 2021
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left‐sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study
  publication-title: Surg Today
– volume: 358
  start-page: 1576
  year: 2001
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 68
  start-page: 394
  year: 2018
  end-page: 424
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 80
  start-page: 295
  year: 2014
  end-page: 300
  article-title: Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy
  publication-title: Am Surg
– volume: 110
  start-page: S10
  year: 2015
  article-title: Value of ramps radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left‐sided invasive intraductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 17.3
  start-page: S78
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2017
  article-title: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) increases survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body and tail
  publication-title: Pancreatology
– volume: 350
  start-page: g7647
  year: 2015
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis protocols (PRISMA‐P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 91
  start-page: 29
  year: 2016
  end-page: 36
  article-title: Initial experience with radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy in a single institution
  publication-title: Ann Surg Treat Res
– volume: 62
  start-page: 97
  year: 2009
  end-page: 128
  article-title: Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results
  publication-title: Br J Math Stat Psychol
– volume: 371
  start-page: 1039
  year: 2014
  end-page: 49
  article-title: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 38
  start-page: 186
  year: 2014
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 58
  start-page: 505
  year: 2020
  end-page: 11
  article-title: Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail
  publication-title: Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi
– volume: 25
  start-page: 4590
  year: 2019
  end-page: 601
  article-title: Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy with standard retrograde pancreatectomy for left‐sided pancreatic cancer: a meta‐analysis and experience of a single center
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
– volume: 112
  start-page: 653
  year: 2017
  end-page: 63
  article-title: Is radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy the solution? A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Chirurgia (Bucur)
– volume: 22
  start-page: 295
  year: 2018
  end-page: 302
  article-title: Comprehensive assessment of accurate lymph node staging and preoperative detection in resected pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– volume: 15
  start-page: S109
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Prognostic factors for survival in body and tail pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: Pancreatology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 962
  year: 2018
  end-page: 70
  article-title: Diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer in adults: a summary of guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
  publication-title: Pancreatology
– volume: 133
  start-page: 521
  year: 2003
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy
  publication-title: Surgery
– volume: 51
  start-page: 1126
  year: 2021
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left‐sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: Surg Today
– volume: 66
  start-page: 24390
  year: 2001
  end-page: 5152
  article-title: International on Harmonisation choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials availability
  publication-title: Fed Regist
– volume: 19
  start-page: 12
  year: 2019
  article-title: Assessement of postoperative long‐term survival quality and complications associated with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a meta‐analysis and systematic review
  publication-title: BMC Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 46
  year: 2018
  end-page: 50
  article-title: Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
– volume: 64
  start-page: 383
  year: 2011
  end-page: 94
  article-title: GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction‐GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 567
  year: 2016
  end-page: 73
  article-title: Clinical effect of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for carcinoma of pancreatic body and tail
  publication-title: Zhong Hua Xiao Hua Wai Ke Za Zhi
– volume: 156
  start-page: 591
  year: 2014
  end-page: 600
  article-title: Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)
  publication-title: Surgery
– volume: 40
  start-page: 2267
  year: 2016
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatectomy (SPRS) for left‐sided pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 12
  start-page: 209
  year: 2010
  article-title: Comparative analysis between ramps and conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer
  publication-title: HPB
– volume: 17
  start-page: 603
  year: 2019
  end-page: 5
  article-title: NCCN Guidelines updates: pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: J Natl Compr Canc Netw
– volume: 49
  start-page: 326
  issue: 3
  year: 2020
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Committee for Revision of Clinical Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer of the Japan Pancreas Society. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer 2019 from the Japan Pancreas Society: a synopsis
  publication-title: Pancreas
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1154
  year: 2013
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: Am Surg
– volume: 46
  start-page: 399
  year: 2011
  end-page: 424
  article-title: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies
  publication-title: Multivariate Behav Res
– volume: 19
  start-page: 10
  year: 2017
  end-page: 5
  article-title: A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas
  publication-title: HPB (Oxford)
– volume: 25
  start-page: 4590
  year: 2019
  end-page: 601
  article-title: Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy for left‐sided pancreatic cancer: a meta‐analysis and experience of a single center
  publication-title: Med Sci Monit
– volume: 310
  start-page: 1473
  year: 2013
  end-page: 81
  article-title: Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long‐term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO‐001 randomized trial
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 9
  start-page: 54
  year: 2020
  article-title: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer, a dual‐institutional analysis
  publication-title: Chin Clin Oncol
– volume: 350
  start-page: 1200
  year: 2004
  end-page: 10
  article-title: A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 161
  start-page: 584
  year: 2017
  end-page: 91
  article-title: International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after
  publication-title: Surgery
– volume: 66
  start-page: 24390
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_8_41_1
  article-title: International on Harmonisation choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials availability
  publication-title: Fed Regist
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.05.390
– volume: 12
  start-page: 209
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  article-title: Comparative analysis between ramps and conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body and tail cancer
  publication-title: HPB
– ident: e_1_2_8_40_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.279201
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.6.653
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2254-8
– volume: 58
  start-page: 505
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  article-title: Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail
  publication-title: Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.07.014
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.5007
– ident: e_1_2_8_44_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3607-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.012
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1245/s10434‐016‐5675‐4
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1131
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
  article-title: Differences in strategies for carcinoma of the pancreas between Japan and Western countries]
  publication-title: Gan to Kagaku Ryoho
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00595‐021‐02280‐y
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
  doi: 10.21037/cco‐20‐6
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.12.08
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.1.29
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
  doi: 10.12659/MSM.914540
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06651-X
– ident: e_1_2_8_42_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1317-5
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
– ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1177/000313481408000326
– ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
  doi: 10.1348/000711007X255327
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.1854
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1404198
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3526-x
– ident: e_1_2_8_43_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.05.245
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12893‐019‐0476‐x
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02203-3
– volume: 15
  start-page: 567
  year: 2016
  ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
  article-title: Clinical effect of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for carcinoma of pancreatic body and tail
  publication-title: Zhong Hua Xiao Hua Wai Ke Za Zhi
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1177/000313481307901117
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032295
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001513
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.14309/00000434-201510001-00023
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
  doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.146
SSID ssj0000313930
Score 2.403737
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background/Purpose Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including...
Previous systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including prognosis. However, recent...
Background/PurposePrevious systematic reviews have shown that radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) had favorable outcomes including...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1156
SubjectTerms Clinical outcomes
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Medical prognosis
Meta-analysis
mortality
Pancreatectomy - methods
Pancreatic cancer
pancreatic neoplasms
Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery
Prognosis
Splenectomy - methods
Systematic Review
Title The efficacy of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.1120
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35092177
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2753268503
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2623888614
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9790613
Volume 29
WOSCitedRecordID wos000755149000001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1868-6982
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0000313930
  issn: 1868-6974
  databaseCode: DRFUL
  dateStart: 20100101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1La9wwEB5CkkMvfZA-3KZBCT30YhLLth7tKX0sIYSwlAb2ZvRyk9L1LrubQm79Cf2N_SWdkb1OlyQQ6MXYaIRlzYz1jaT5BPAmK2oEIZqnorB1WmgnUyO5SwsvfC6cdT5Edv0TeXqqRiM9XIP3y1yYlh-in3Ajz4j_a3JwY-f716Sh38_tlBJgMF7fyLJc0bkNvBj2EyxESqjjWSPECJ8KBM5LZqEDvt_XXh2PboDMm3sl_8WwcRAaPPqv5j-Ghx32ZIetsTyBtdBswTc0FBaISMK4Kzap2czEpRtmWiIJH9h44mmzKsMfRxulz6c4VtF0__jqHTtk12zQrM2EwbqejcPC_Pn123SsJ0_hbPD568ejtDt9IXW04zQV3obS1trlRRChpAxa1KSzmQ5Si4CBBj6ooGxpvAxY5JU32gpnTF5nLs-fwXozacILYLqUqHRneRbQJAphVFl4V3IpHI6cziXwdqmDynXU5HRCxo-qJVXmFfVWRb2VwF4vOm35OG4T2l4qsupccl5xDMy4UOVBnsBuX4zORCskpgmTS5RBMKiUQsiSwPNW7_1bcoRWGL_JBOSKRfQCRNS9WtJcnEfCbi01wSb8zGgRdze8Oj76MKSbl_cXfQUPOKVkxPzIbVhfzC7Da9h0PxcX89lO9Am8ypHagY1PXwZnJ38BVf8W1w
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5VbSW4AFWBBgo1iAOXqF0n8QP1UqCrhS6rCrVSb5Ff6UNsdrW7ReqNn8Bv5Jd0JsmmXbVISNwSeazEnhn7G9vzGeBdJy0QhGgei9QWcaqdjI3kLk698Ilw1vlQsev35WCgTk704RLsznNhan6IdsGNPKMar8nBaUF6-4Y19OLMjikDBgP2lRTNCO175fP37nG_XWMhXkJdXTdCpPCxQOw8Jxfa4dtt_cUp6Q7OvHtc8jaMreah7uP_a8ETeNTgT7ZXG8waLIVyHU7RWFggMgnjrtioYBNTbd8wU5NJ-MCGI08HVhkOHnWkPh3jfEVL_sOrD2yP3TBCszobBut6Ngwz8-fXb9MwnzyF4-7-0ade3NzAEDs6dRoLb0NmC-2SNIiQURYtatPZjg5Si4DBBr6ooGxmvAxY5JU32gpnTFJ0XJI8g-VyVIYNYDqTqHhneSegWaTCqCz1LuNSOJw9nYvg_VwJuWvoyemWjB95TazMc-qtnHorgret6Ljm5LhPaHOuybxxy2nOMTjjQmU7SQRv2mJ0KNolMWUYXaIMAkKlFMKWCJ7Xim-_kiC8whhORiAXTKIVILLuxZLy_Kwi7dZSE3TCZlYm8fcfz7_2Ph7Sw4t_F92CB72jb_28_2Vw8BIeckrRqPIlN2F5NrkMr2DV_ZydTyevGxe5BpjiGdU
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5VW4S4QBGvQFsM4sAlatdJ_EC99MGqwGq1QlTqLfIrtFU3u9rdVuqtP4Hf2F_SmSSbsipISNwSeazEnhn7G9vzGeBDNy0QhGgei9QWcaqdjI3kLk698Ilw1vlQsev35WCgjo_1cAV2FrkwNT9Eu-BGnlGN1-TgYeKLrTvW0LMTO6EMGAzYV1O6RKYDqwffe0f9do2FeAl1dd0IkcLHArHzglxom2-19ZenpHs48_5xyd9hbDUP9Z78XwvW4HGDP9lubTBPYSWUz-AnGgsLRCZh3BUbF2xqqu0bZmoyCR_YaOzpwCrDwaOO1GcTnK9oyX909YntsjtGaFZnw2Bdz0Zhbm6uf5mG-eQ5HPU-_9g_jJsbGGJHp05j4W3IbKFdkgYRMsqiRW0629VBahEw2MAXFZTNjJcBi7zyRlvhjEmKrkuSF9Apx2V4BUxnEhXvLO8GNItUGJWl3mVcCoezp3MRfFwoIXcNPTndknGe18TKPKfeyqm3Injfik5qTo4_Ca0vNJk3bjnLOQZnXKhsO4ngXVuMDkW7JKYM4wuUQUColELYEsHLWvHtVxKEVxjDyQjkkkm0AkTWvVxSnp5UpN1aaoJO2MzKJP7-4_nXw70hPbz-d9G38HB40Mv7Xwbf3sAjThkaVbrkOnTm04uwAQ_c5fx0Nt1sPOQWAncZUA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+efficacy+of+radical+antegrade+modular+pancreatosplenectomy%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Watanabe%2C+Jun&rft.au=Rifu%2C+Kazuma&rft.au=Sasanuma%2C+Hideki&rft.au=Kotani%2C+Kazuhiko&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+and+Sons+Inc&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1156&rft.epage=1165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.1120&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35092177&rft.externalDocID=PMC9790613
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon