Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prediction model based on a patient data meta-analysis

Abstract Aims Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in pa...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:European heart journal Ročník 44; číslo 32; s. 3073 - 3081
Hlavní autoři: van Es, Nick, Takada, Toshihiko, Kraaijpoel, Noémie, Klok, Frederikus A, Stals, Milou A M, Büller, Harry R, Courtney, D Mark, Freund, Yonathan, Galipienzo, Javier, Le Gal, Grégoire, Ghanima, Waleed, Huisman, Menno V, Kline, Jeffrey A, Moons, Karel G M, Parpia, Sameer, Perrier, Arnaud, Righini, Marc, Robert-Ebadi, Helia, Roy, Pierre-Marie, Wells, Phil S, de Wit, Kerstin, van Smeden, Maarten, Geersing, Geert-Jan
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: US Oxford University Press 22.08.2023
Témata:
ISSN:0195-668X, 1522-9645, 1522-9645
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Abstract Aims Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in patients with suspected disease based on readily available clinical items and D-dimer concentrations. Methods and results An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed based on sixteen cross-sectional or prospective studies with data from 28 305 adult patients with clinically suspected PE from various clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients. A multilevel logistic regression model was built and validated including ten a priori defined objective candidate predictors to predict objectively confirmed PE at baseline or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up of 30 to 90 days. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Backward elimination was performed with a P-value <0.10. Discrimination (c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals [CI] and prediction intervals [PI]) and calibration (outcome:expected [O:E] ratio and calibration plot) were evaluated based on internal-external cross-validation. The accuracy of the model was subsequently compared with algorithms based on the Wells score and D-dimer testing. The final model included age (in years), sex, previous VTE, recent surgery or immobilization, haemoptysis, cancer, clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, inpatient status, D-dimer (in µg/L), and an interaction term between age and D-dimer. The pooled c-statistic was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85–0.89; 95% PI, 0.77–0.93) and overall calibration was very good (pooled O:E ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87–1.14; 95% PI, 0.55–1.79). The model slightly overestimated VTE probability in the lower range of estimated probabilities. Discrimination of the current model in the validation data sets was better than that of the Wells score combined with a D-dimer threshold based on age (c-statistic 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.75) or structured clinical pretest probability (c-statistic 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76–0.81). Conclusion The present model provides an absolute, individualized probability of PE presence in a broad population of patients with suspected PE, with very good discrimination and calibration. Its clinical utility needs to be evaluated in a prospective management or impact study. Registration PROSPERO ID 89366. Structured Graphical Abstract Structured Graphical Abstract A clinical prediction model for the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism was developed and validated using data from 28 305 patients across 16 studies. Eight clinical variables and quantitative D-dimer levels were included in the final model, which showed good discrimination and calibration. Overall performance was comparable to that of current diagnostic strategies, but, unlike traditional decision rules, the model can be used to calculate absolute probabilities of pulmonary embolism.
AbstractList Abstract Aims Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in patients with suspected disease based on readily available clinical items and D-dimer concentrations. Methods and results An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed based on sixteen cross-sectional or prospective studies with data from 28 305 adult patients with clinically suspected PE from various clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients. A multilevel logistic regression model was built and validated including ten a priori defined objective candidate predictors to predict objectively confirmed PE at baseline or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up of 30 to 90 days. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Backward elimination was performed with a P-value <0.10. Discrimination (c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals [CI] and prediction intervals [PI]) and calibration (outcome:expected [O:E] ratio and calibration plot) were evaluated based on internal-external cross-validation. The accuracy of the model was subsequently compared with algorithms based on the Wells score and D-dimer testing. The final model included age (in years), sex, previous VTE, recent surgery or immobilization, haemoptysis, cancer, clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, inpatient status, D-dimer (in µg/L), and an interaction term between age and D-dimer. The pooled c-statistic was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85–0.89; 95% PI, 0.77–0.93) and overall calibration was very good (pooled O:E ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87–1.14; 95% PI, 0.55–1.79). The model slightly overestimated VTE probability in the lower range of estimated probabilities. Discrimination of the current model in the validation data sets was better than that of the Wells score combined with a D-dimer threshold based on age (c-statistic 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70–0.75) or structured clinical pretest probability (c-statistic 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76–0.81). Conclusion The present model provides an absolute, individualized probability of PE presence in a broad population of patients with suspected PE, with very good discrimination and calibration. Its clinical utility needs to be evaluated in a prospective management or impact study. Registration PROSPERO ID 89366. Structured Graphical Abstract Structured Graphical Abstract A clinical prediction model for the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism was developed and validated using data from 28 305 patients across 16 studies. Eight clinical variables and quantitative D-dimer levels were included in the final model, which showed good discrimination and calibration. Overall performance was comparable to that of current diagnostic strategies, but, unlike traditional decision rules, the model can be used to calculate absolute probabilities of pulmonary embolism.
Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in patients with suspected disease based on readily available clinical items and D-dimer concentrations.AIMSRisk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in patients with suspected disease based on readily available clinical items and D-dimer concentrations.An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed based on sixteen cross-sectional or prospective studies with data from 28 305 adult patients with clinically suspected PE from various clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients. A multilevel logistic regression model was built and validated including ten a priori defined objective candidate predictors to predict objectively confirmed PE at baseline or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up of 30 to 90 days. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Backward elimination was performed with a P-value <0.10. Discrimination (c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals [CI] and prediction intervals [PI]) and calibration (outcome:expected [O:E] ratio and calibration plot) were evaluated based on internal-external cross-validation. The accuracy of the model was subsequently compared with algorithms based on the Wells score and D-dimer testing. The final model included age (in years), sex, previous VTE, recent surgery or immobilization, haemoptysis, cancer, clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, inpatient status, D-dimer (in µg/L), and an interaction term between age and D-dimer. The pooled c-statistic was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89; 95% PI, 0.77-0.93) and overall calibration was very good (pooled O:E ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14; 95% PI, 0.55-1.79). The model slightly overestimated VTE probability in the lower range of estimated probabilities. Discrimination of the current model in the validation data sets was better than that of the Wells score combined with a D-dimer threshold based on age (c-statistic 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.75) or structured clinical pretest probability (c-statistic 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81).METHODS AND RESULTSAn individual patient data meta-analysis was performed based on sixteen cross-sectional or prospective studies with data from 28 305 adult patients with clinically suspected PE from various clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients. A multilevel logistic regression model was built and validated including ten a priori defined objective candidate predictors to predict objectively confirmed PE at baseline or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up of 30 to 90 days. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Backward elimination was performed with a P-value <0.10. Discrimination (c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals [CI] and prediction intervals [PI]) and calibration (outcome:expected [O:E] ratio and calibration plot) were evaluated based on internal-external cross-validation. The accuracy of the model was subsequently compared with algorithms based on the Wells score and D-dimer testing. The final model included age (in years), sex, previous VTE, recent surgery or immobilization, haemoptysis, cancer, clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, inpatient status, D-dimer (in µg/L), and an interaction term between age and D-dimer. The pooled c-statistic was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89; 95% PI, 0.77-0.93) and overall calibration was very good (pooled O:E ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14; 95% PI, 0.55-1.79). The model slightly overestimated VTE probability in the lower range of estimated probabilities. Discrimination of the current model in the validation data sets was better than that of the Wells score combined with a D-dimer threshold based on age (c-statistic 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.75) or structured clinical pretest probability (c-statistic 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81).The present model provides an absolute, individualized probability of PE presence in a broad population of patients with suspected PE, with very good discrimination and calibration. Its clinical utility needs to be evaluated in a prospective management or impact study.CONCLUSIONThe present model provides an absolute, individualized probability of PE presence in a broad population of patients with suspected PE, with very good discrimination and calibration. Its clinical utility needs to be evaluated in a prospective management or impact study.PROSPERO ID 89366.REGISTRATIONPROSPERO ID 89366.
Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to develop a clinical prediction model that provides an individualized, accurate probability estimate for the presence of acute PE in patients with suspected disease based on readily available clinical items and D-dimer concentrations. An individual patient data meta-analysis was performed based on sixteen cross-sectional or prospective studies with data from 28 305 adult patients with clinically suspected PE from various clinical settings, including primary care, emergency care, hospitalized and nursing home patients. A multilevel logistic regression model was built and validated including ten a priori defined objective candidate predictors to predict objectively confirmed PE at baseline or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during follow-up of 30 to 90 days. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. Backward elimination was performed with a P-value <0.10. Discrimination (c-statistic with 95% confidence intervals [CI] and prediction intervals [PI]) and calibration (outcome:expected [O:E] ratio and calibration plot) were evaluated based on internal-external cross-validation. The accuracy of the model was subsequently compared with algorithms based on the Wells score and D-dimer testing. The final model included age (in years), sex, previous VTE, recent surgery or immobilization, haemoptysis, cancer, clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis, inpatient status, D-dimer (in µg/L), and an interaction term between age and D-dimer. The pooled c-statistic was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.85-0.89; 95% PI, 0.77-0.93) and overall calibration was very good (pooled O:E ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.87-1.14; 95% PI, 0.55-1.79). The model slightly overestimated VTE probability in the lower range of estimated probabilities. Discrimination of the current model in the validation data sets was better than that of the Wells score combined with a D-dimer threshold based on age (c-statistic 0.73; 95% CI, 0.70-0.75) or structured clinical pretest probability (c-statistic 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81). The present model provides an absolute, individualized probability of PE presence in a broad population of patients with suspected PE, with very good discrimination and calibration. Its clinical utility needs to be evaluated in a prospective management or impact study. PROSPERO ID 89366.
Author Büller, Harry R
Freund, Yonathan
van Es, Nick
Stals, Milou A M
Takada, Toshihiko
Robert-Ebadi, Helia
Roy, Pierre-Marie
Huisman, Menno V
Righini, Marc
Le Gal, Grégoire
Ghanima, Waleed
Galipienzo, Javier
Perrier, Arnaud
van Smeden, Maarten
Klok, Frederikus A
Moons, Karel G M
Kraaijpoel, Noémie
Kline, Jeffrey A
Wells, Phil S
de Wit, Kerstin
Courtney, D Mark
Parpia, Sameer
Geersing, Geert-Jan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nick
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5256-6346
  surname: van Es
  fullname: van Es, Nick
  email: n.vanes@amsterdamumc.nl
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Toshihiko
  surname: Takada
  fullname: Takada, Toshihiko
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Noémie
  surname: Kraaijpoel
  fullname: Kraaijpoel, Noémie
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Frederikus A
  surname: Klok
  fullname: Klok, Frederikus A
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Milou A M
  surname: Stals
  fullname: Stals, Milou A M
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Harry R
  surname: Büller
  fullname: Büller, Harry R
– sequence: 7
  givenname: D Mark
  surname: Courtney
  fullname: Courtney, D Mark
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Yonathan
  surname: Freund
  fullname: Freund, Yonathan
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Javier
  surname: Galipienzo
  fullname: Galipienzo, Javier
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Grégoire
  surname: Le Gal
  fullname: Le Gal, Grégoire
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Waleed
  surname: Ghanima
  fullname: Ghanima, Waleed
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Menno V
  surname: Huisman
  fullname: Huisman, Menno V
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Jeffrey A
  surname: Kline
  fullname: Kline, Jeffrey A
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Karel G M
  surname: Moons
  fullname: Moons, Karel G M
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Sameer
  surname: Parpia
  fullname: Parpia, Sameer
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Arnaud
  surname: Perrier
  fullname: Perrier, Arnaud
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Marc
  surname: Righini
  fullname: Righini, Marc
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Helia
  surname: Robert-Ebadi
  fullname: Robert-Ebadi, Helia
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Pierre-Marie
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4811-6793
  surname: Roy
  fullname: Roy, Pierre-Marie
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Phil S
  surname: Wells
  fullname: Wells, Phil S
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Kerstin
  surname: de Wit
  fullname: de Wit, Kerstin
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Maarten
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5529-1541
  surname: van Smeden
  fullname: van Smeden, Maarten
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Geert-Jan
  surname: Geersing
  fullname: Geersing, Geert-Jan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9kMtKxTAURYMoen18gBPJ0IHVvJqmzsQ3CE4UnJXT5FSjTVObdODfW_Hq6LDZiw1n7ZLNIQ5IyCFnp5zV8gzn6Q1hyu9n-AZO8WqDrHgpRFFrVW6SFeN1WWhtXnbIbkrvjDGjud4mO7JSpaikWJGPKw-vQ0zZWxpggFcMOGQaOwp2zkjHuQ9xgOmLYmhj71M4p0DHCZ232ceBhuiwpy0kdHSJSwfZ_0w4yEADZiiW2f4r-bRPtjroEx6s7x55vrl-urwrHh5v7y8vHgpbSpELx5hrbVdZYZTlzpmKcd1qDa1yVknokJuu1JbLyljJQDNlVW2FbbvOVqWRe-T4d3ec4ueMKTfBJ4t9DwPGOTXCSCNUbXS9oEdrdG4DumacfFiebf4ELcDJLxDn8b_lrPnx3_z7b9b-5TfGXX2a
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12916_024_03841_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_MEJ_0000000000001136
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_opresp_2024_100371
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_archger_2025_106019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repc_2024_02_006
crossref_primary_10_1136_heartjnl_2024_324747
crossref_primary_10_38124_ijisrt_25aug1557
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_024_02975_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amepre_2025_108088
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_025_06802_x
crossref_primary_10_18087_cardio_2025_7_n2885
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2418_3960
crossref_primary_10_4178_epih_e2024046
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad521
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12890_024_03377_z
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad392
crossref_primary_10_2196_48595
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2023_131694
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinepi_2025_111690
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repc_2024_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12959_024_00584_w
crossref_primary_10_15829_1560_4071_2024_5679
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_74926
crossref_primary_10_1080_13814788_2025_2511645
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_024_03528_8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023
The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. 2023
– notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
DBID TOX
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad417
DatabaseName Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: TOX
  name: Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
  url: https://academic.oup.com/journals/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Focus Issue on Thrombosis and Antithrombotic Treatment
EISSN 1522-9645
EndPage 3081
ExternalDocumentID 37452732
10.1093/eurheartj/ehad417
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-E4
.2P
.GJ
.I3
.XZ
.ZR
08P
0R~
18M
1B1
1TH
29G
2WC
4.4
482
48X
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
5WA
5WD
6.Y
70D
AABZA
AACZT
AAJKP
AAJQQ
AAMVS
AAOGV
AAPGJ
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AASNB
AAUAY
AAUQX
AAVAP
AAWDT
ABEUO
ABIXL
ABKDP
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABOCM
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABQNK
ABQTQ
ABSAR
ABSMQ
ABWST
ABXVV
ABZBJ
ACFRR
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACMRT
ACPQN
ACPRK
ACUFI
ACUTJ
ACUTO
ACYHN
ACZBC
ADBBV
ADEYI
ADEZT
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADJQC
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADRIX
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEGXH
AEJOX
AEKPW
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFFNX
AFFZL
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFSHK
AFXAL
AFXEN
AFYAG
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGKRT
AGMDO
AGQXC
AGSYK
AGUTN
AHMBA
AHXPO
AI.
AIAGR
AIJHB
AJEEA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
APIBT
APJGH
APWMN
AQDSO
AQKUS
ASPBG
ATGXG
ATTQO
AVNTJ
AVWKF
AXUDD
AZFZN
BAWUL
BAYMD
BCGUY
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BTRTY
BVRKM
BZKNY
C1A
C45
CAG
CDBKE
COF
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DIK
DILTD
D~K
E3Z
EBS
EE~
EIHJH
EJD
EMOBN
ENERS
F5P
F9B
FECEO
FEDTE
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
GAUVT
GJXCC
GX1
H13
H5~
HAR
HVGLF
HW0
HZ~
IHE
IOX
J21
KAQDR
KBUDW
KC5
KOP
KQ8
KSI
KSN
L7B
M-Z
M41
M49
MBLQV
MHKGH
ML0
N4W
N9A
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
NQ-
NTWIH
NU-
NVLIB
O0~
O9-
OAUYM
OAWHX
OB3
OCZFY
ODMLO
OGROG
OJQWA
OJZSN
OK1
OPAEJ
OVD
OWPYF
O~Y
P2P
PAFKI
PB-
PEELM
PQQKQ
Q1.
Q5Y
QBD
R44
RD5
RIG
RNI
ROL
ROX
ROZ
RPZ
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
RZF
SEL
TCURE
TEORI
TJX
TMA
TOX
UHS
VH1
W8F
WOQ
X7H
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
ZGI
ZKX
~91
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABGNP
ABJNI
ABPQP
ABVGC
ADNBA
AEMQT
AHMMS
AJNCP
ALXQX
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
JXSIZ
NPM
7X8
AAFWJ
AHGBF
AJBYB
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-d00dbcf7c284c1dd87016b66ab4dc43afe18f56c1378c30a604c49c2cbffc7583
IEDL.DBID TOX
ISICitedReferencesCount 23
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001028931900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0195-668X
1522-9645
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 14:06:02 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:57:43 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 28 03:18:26 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 32
Keywords Pulmonary embolism
D-dimer
diagnosis
prediction model
venous thromboembolism
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c532t-d00dbcf7c284c1dd87016b66ab4dc43afe18f56c1378c30a604c49c2cbffc7583
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5529-1541
0000-0003-4811-6793
0000-0001-5256-6346
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad417
PMID 37452732
PQID 2838249869
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2838249869
pubmed_primary_37452732
oup_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehad417
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-08-22
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-08-22
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-08-22
  day: 22
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace US
PublicationPlace_xml – name: US
– name: England
PublicationTitle European heart journal
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Heart J
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References 37475706 - Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21
References_xml – reference: 37475706 - Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21;:
SSID ssj0008616
Score 2.5450683
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Abstract Aims Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim...
Risk stratification is used for decisions regarding need for imaging in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
oup
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 3073
SubjectTerms Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products - analysis
Humans
Models, Statistical
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis
Pulmonary Embolism - epidemiology
Venous Thromboembolism - diagnosis
Venous Thromboembolism - epidemiology
Title Diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prediction model based on a patient data meta-analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37452732
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2838249869
Volume 44
WOSCitedRecordID wos001028931900001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LS8QwEB5URLz4fqyPJYLeLDZNNw9voi4edPWg0lvJq7jqPui2gv_epO3uQT3oJVAC0zIz6Uw7M98HcKw8JpowLAiJNYGL0GEgFOsE1ojIxB4bsyLte75lvR5PEvEwB6fTWZjvJXxBzmyZe3Ln4vXMvkgTYz86jjvc0xU83iez1y6nFc9pRT5IKU-mJczfJHybZvuRVFbBpbv6v8dag5UmiUQXtdXXYc4ON2DprimTb8LbVd1A57bRYNbfgkYZkrosLBqX7877ZP6J7ECN3vuTwTmSaJx7Ad5QqOLHQT7CGeQu3V4Nv4p8Qyka2EIGskEz2YKn7vXj5U3QsCoEukOiIjBhaJTOmHaBSWNj3IHFVFEqVWx0TGRmMc86VGPCuCahpGGsY6EjrbJMu68Lsg0Lw9HQ7gLCLFMWK5fR8CimoRRGc6WIZW5VEssWnDg1p-MaNyOt690knWkubTTXgqOpIVLn3b5kIYd2VE5Sl_w40YJT0YKd2kIzcYTFHj0u2vvjXfZh2XPF-x_CUXQAC0Ve2kNY1B9Ff5K3YZ4l3K29h7t25VhfTiDO3A
linkProvider Oxford University Press
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+management+of+acute+pulmonary+embolism%3A+a+prediction+model+based+on+a+patient+data+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European+heart+journal&rft.au=van+Es%2C+Nick&rft.au=Takada%2C+Toshihiko&rft.au=Kraaijpoel%2C+No%C3%A9mie&rft.au=Klok%2C+Frederikus+A&rft.date=2023-08-22&rft.pub=Oxford+University+Press&rft.issn=0195-668X&rft.eissn=1522-9645&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=3073&rft.epage=3081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Feurheartj%2Fehad417&rft.externalDocID=10.1093%2Feurheartj%2Fehad417
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0195-668X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0195-668X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0195-668X&client=summon