Estimating pathogen spread using structured coalescent and birth–death models: A quantitative comparison

Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epidemics Vol. 49; p. 100795
Main Authors: Seidel, Sophie, Stadler, Tanja, Vaughan, Timothy G.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2024
Elsevier
Subjects:
ISSN:1755-4365, 1878-0067, 1878-0067
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies – based on the coalescent and the birth–death model – are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth–death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth–death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth–death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models. •Comparison of structured phylodynamic models for estimating viral spread between populations.•Multi-type birth–death models excel in migration rate accuracy during epidemic outbreaks.•Both birth–death and coalescent models show comparable accuracy for endemic diseases; coalescent is more precise.•Estimating disease source location is more robust than migration rates.
AbstractList AbstractElucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies – based on the coalescent and the birth–death model – are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth–death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth–death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth–death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models.
Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies - based on the coalescent and the birth-death model - are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth-death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth-death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth-death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models.Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies - based on the coalescent and the birth-death model - are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth-death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth-death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth-death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models.
Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies - based on the coalescent and the birth-death model - are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth-death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth-death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth-death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models.
Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged as key principles to estimate such spread from pathogen phylogenies derived from molecular data. Two well-established structured phylodynamic methodologies – based on the coalescent and the birth–death model – are frequently employed to estimate viral spread between populations. Nonetheless, these methodologies operate under distinct assumptions whose impact on the accuracy of migration rate inference is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this manuscript, we present a simulation study, contrasting the inferential outcomes of the structured coalescent model with constant population size and the multitype birth–death model with a constant rate. We explore this comparison across a range of migration rates in endemic diseases and epidemic outbreaks. The results of the epidemic outbreak analysis revealed that the birth–death model exhibits a superior ability to retrieve accurate migration rates compared to the coalescent model, regardless of the actual migration rate. Thus, to estimate accurate migration rates, the population dynamics have to be accounted for. On the other hand, for the endemic disease scenario, our investigation demonstrates that both models produce comparable coverage and accuracy of the migration rates, with the coalescent model generating more precise estimates. Regardless of the specific scenario, both models similarly estimated the source location of the disease. This research offers tangible modelling advice for infectious disease analysts, suggesting the use of either model for endemic diseases. For epidemic outbreaks, or scenarios with varying population size, structured phylodynamic models relying on the Kingman coalescent with constant population size should be avoided as they can lead to inaccurate estimates of the migration rate. Instead, coalescent models accounting for varying population size or birth–death models should be favoured. Importantly, our study emphasises the value of directly capturing exponential growth dynamics which could be a useful enhancement for structured coalescent models. •Comparison of structured phylodynamic models for estimating viral spread between populations.•Multi-type birth–death models excel in migration rate accuracy during epidemic outbreaks.•Both birth–death and coalescent models show comparable accuracy for endemic diseases; coalescent is more precise.•Estimating disease source location is more robust than migration rates.
ArticleNumber 100795
Author Vaughan, Timothy G.
Stadler, Tanja
Seidel, Sophie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sophie
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4484-9888
  surname: Seidel
  fullname: Seidel, Sophie
  email: sophie.seidel@bsse.ethz.ch
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tanja
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6431-535X
  surname: Stadler
  fullname: Stadler, Tanja
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Timothy G.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6220-2239
  surname: Vaughan
  fullname: Vaughan, Timothy G.
  email: timothy.vaughan@bsse.ethz.ch
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39461051$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqVUstu1TAQjVARbS_8AUJZsrkXv32DEFJVFahUiQWwthx7cuuQ2KntVOqu_8Af8iU4pHSHECuPjs85o5kzp9WRDx6q6iVGO4yweNPvYHIWxh1BhBUIyYY_qU7wXu63CAl5VGrJ-ZZRwY-r05T6gjKM6bPqmDZMYMTxSdVfpOxGnZ0_1JPO1-EAvk5TBG3rOS1oynE2eY5gaxP0AMmAz7X2tm5dzNc_739YKMJ6DBaG9LY-q29m7bPLxfQWimacdHQp-OfV004PCV48vJvq24eLr-eftlefP16en11tDac4by1jhmrDpW6oJUK3HKQ0LeeWE97RBiPRgWGNMdw0YIG02iJBLZIG7XmpNtXl6muD7tUUy3jxTgXt1G8gxIPSMTszgNKsRR21lBIumMam3WOy11JYYjqhy9emer16TTHczJCyGl1ZwDBoD2FOimKCiZSMoUJ99UCd2xHsY-M_uy4EthJMDClF6B4pGKklUtWrNVK1RKrWSIvs_Sor24VbB1El48AbsC6CyWUo978GZnDeGT18hztIfZijL3korBJRSH1ZrmY5GsIQQlyQYvDu7wb_7v8LLHDWaw
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002947
10.2307/3213548
10.1073/pnas.2012008118
10.1073/pnas.081068098
10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.09.010
10.1126/science.1090727
10.1093/bioinformatics/bty406
10.1534/genetics.111.134627
10.1098/rsif.2014.0945
10.1093/ve/veac073
10.3390/v14081648
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002136
10.1093/ve/vez030
10.1098/rstb.2012.0198
10.1371/journal.pgen.1005421
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913
10.1093/molbev/msaa016
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003570
10.1093/molbev/msr217
10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110115
10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110400
10.1534/genetics.108.092460
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537
10.1073/pnas.2211217119
10.1007/BF00173909
10.1093/molbev/mst057
10.1093/molbev/msw064
10.1016/j.epidem.2014.09.001
10.1093/molbev/msx186
10.1093/bioinformatics/btu201
10.1038/s41576-022-00483-8
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004789
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520
10.1002/advs.202100707
10.1111/2041-210X.13620
10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.018
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Authors
The Authors
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Authors
– notice: The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1878-0067
EndPage 100795
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a4b0f3d332564a1cb8128a76d2cf6a0f
39461051
10_1016_j_epidem_2024_100795
S1755436524000562
1_s2_0_S1755436524000562
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~.
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AALRI
AAQFI
AARKO
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABGSF
ABMAC
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACGFS
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADQTV
ADUVX
ADVLN
AEKER
AENEX
AEQOU
AEUPX
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGEKW
AGHFR
AGYEJ
AIGII
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
BCNDV
EBS
EJD
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HVGLF
HZ~
IPNFZ
IXB
J1W
KQ8
LUGTX
M41
M48
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OD-
OK1
OO.
OZT
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
SDF
SES
SSZ
Z5R
~HD
0SF
AACTN
AFCTW
AJOXV
NCXOZ
6I.
AAFTH
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-d44c3ac57a93d26ab5e77cb55d525f39106fec49cc5c9ede2bad063d07c085063
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001347061500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1755-4365
1878-0067
IngestDate Fri Oct 03 12:48:26 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 28 05:01:00 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:39:38 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 01:54:22 EST 2025
Sat Feb 08 15:52:27 EST 2025
Mon Feb 24 20:33:34 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:30:56 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Phylogenetics
Coalescent
Phylodynamics
Pathogen spread
Birth–death
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c531t-d44c3ac57a93d26ab5e77cb55d525f39106fec49cc5c9ede2bad063d07c085063
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-4484-9888
0000-0001-6220-2239
0000-0001-6431-535X
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/a4b0f3d332564a1cb8128a76d2cf6a0f
PMID 39461051
PQID 3121277440
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a4b0f3d332564a1cb8128a76d2cf6a0f
proquest_miscellaneous_3121277440
pubmed_primary_39461051
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epidem_2024_100795
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_epidem_2024_100795
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1755436524000562
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_epidem_2024_100795
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Netherlands
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Netherlands
PublicationTitle Epidemics
PublicationTitleAlternate Epidemics
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier
References Lannelongue, Grealey, Inouye (b18) 2021; 8
Volz, Koelle, Bedford (b42) 2013; 9
Keeling, Rohani (b15) 2011
Müller, Rasmussen, Stadler (b25) 2018; 34
Notohara (b27) 1990; 29
Vaughan, Kühnert, Popinga, Welch, Drummond (b38) 2014; 30
Müller, Bouckaert, Wu, Bedford, Francisco (b22) 2024
Stadler (b34) 2010; 267
Mueller, N., 0000. Taming the beast: MASCOT tutorial.
Volz, Frost (b40) 2014; 11
Anderson, May (b1) 1992
Müller, Dudas, Stadler (b23) 2019; 5
Attwood, Hill, Aanensen, Connor, Pybus (b2) 2022; 23
Featherstone, Di Giallonardo, Holmes, Vaughan, Duchêne (b8) 2021; 12
Boskova, Bonhoeffer, Stadler (b4) 2014; 10
Dudas, Carvalho, Rambaut, Bedford (b7) 2018; 7
Müller, Rasmussen, Stadler (b24) 2017; 34
Manceau, Gupta, Vaughan, Stadler (b20) 2021; 509
Stadler, Bonhoeffer (b35) 2013; 368
Grenfell, Pybus, Gog, Wood, Daly, Mumford, Holmes (b10) 2004; 303
Gupta, Manceau, Vaughan, Khammash, Stadler (b12) 2020; 488
Rasmussen, Ratmann, Koelle (b30) 2011; 7
Rasmussen, Volz, Koelle (b31) 2014; 10
Frost, Pybus, Gog, Viboud, Bonhoeffer, Bedford (b9) 2015; 10
Bouckaert, Heled, Kühnert, Vaughan, Wu, Xie, Suchard, Rambaut, Drummond (b5) 2014; 10
Kühnert, Stadler, Vaughan, Drummond (b17) 2016; 33
Beerli, Felsenstein (b3) 2001; 98
Nadeau, Vaughan, Scire, Huisman, Stadler (b26) 2021; 118
Notohara (b28) 1990; 29
Stadler (b33) 2009; 261
Hudson (b13) 1990; 7
Vaughan, Drummond (b37) 2013; 30
Parag, du Plessis, Pybus (b29) 2020; 37
De Maio, Wu, O’Reilly, Wilson (b6) 2015; 11
Stadler, Kouyos, VonWy, Yerly, Böni, Bürgisser, Klimkait, Joos, Rieder, Xie, Günthard, Drummond, Bonhoeffer (b36) 2012; 29
Scire, Barido-Sottani, Kühnert, Vaughan, Stadler (b32) 2022; 14
Volz, Frost (b41) 2014; 11
Wakeley, Sargsyan (b43) 2009; 181
Guinat, Agüí, Vaughan, Scire, Pohlmann, Staubach, King, Świȩton, Dán, Černíková, Ducatez, Stadler (b11) 2022; 8
Lemey, Rambaut, Drummond, Suchard (b19) 2009; 5
Karcher, Palacios, Bedford, Suchard, Minin (b14) 2016; 12
Yebra, Harling-Lee, Lycett, Aarestrup, Larsen, Cavaco, Seo, Abraham, Norris, Schmidt, Ehlers, Sordelli, Buzzola, Gebreyes, Gonçalves, dos Santos, Zakaria, Rall, Keane, Niedziela, Paterson, Holmes, Freeman, Fitzgerald (b44) 2022; 119
Kingman (b16) 1982; 19
Volz (b39) 2012; 190
Attwood (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b2) 2022; 23
Lannelongue (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b18) 2021; 8
Müller (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b25) 2018; 34
Guinat (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b11) 2022; 8
Rasmussen (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b31) 2014; 10
Kingman (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b16) 1982; 19
Notohara (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b27) 1990; 29
Grenfell (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b10) 2004; 303
Beerli (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b3) 2001; 98
Wakeley (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b43) 2009; 181
Gupta (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b12) 2020; 488
Müller (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b22) 2024
Stadler (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b34) 2010; 267
Lemey (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b19) 2009; 5
Volz (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b39) 2012; 190
Frost (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b9) 2015; 10
Müller (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b23) 2019; 5
Volz (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b40) 2014; 11
Dudas (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b7) 2018; 7
Vaughan (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b38) 2014; 30
Hudson (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b13) 1990; 7
Stadler (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b33) 2009; 261
Volz (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b42) 2013; 9
Kühnert (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b17) 2016; 33
Featherstone (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b8) 2021; 12
Boskova (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b4) 2014; 10
Rasmussen (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b30) 2011; 7
Stadler (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b35) 2013; 368
De Maio (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b6) 2015; 11
Vaughan (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b37) 2013; 30
Anderson (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b1) 1992
Manceau (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b20) 2021; 509
Nadeau (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b26) 2021; 118
Müller (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b24) 2017; 34
Bouckaert (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b5) 2014; 10
Keeling (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b15) 2011
Volz (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b41) 2014; 11
Notohara (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b28) 1990; 29
10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b21
Karcher (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b14) 2016; 12
Stadler (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b36) 2012; 29
Yebra (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b44) 2022; 119
Parag (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b29) 2020; 37
Scire (10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b32) 2022; 14
References_xml – volume: 118
  year: 2021
  ident: b26
  article-title: The origin and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2414
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2429
  ident: b29
  article-title: Jointly inferring the dynamics of population size and sampling intensity from molecular sequences
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
– volume: 190
  start-page: 187
  year: 2012
  end-page: 201
  ident: b39
  article-title: Complex population dynamics and the coalescent under neutrality
  publication-title: Genetics
– volume: 8
  year: 2022
  ident: b11
  article-title: Disentangling the role of poultry farms and wild birds in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in Europe
  publication-title: Virus Evol.
– year: 2024
  ident: b22
  article-title: MASCOT-Skyline integrates population and migration dynamics to enhance phylogeographic reconstructions
– volume: 10
  start-page: 88
  year: 2015
  end-page: 92
  ident: b9
  article-title: Eight challenges in phylodynamic inference
  publication-title: Epidemics
– volume: 267
  start-page: 396
  year: 2010
  end-page: 404
  ident: b34
  article-title: Sampling-through-time in birth–death trees
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
– volume: 181
  start-page: 341
  year: 2009
  end-page: 345
  ident: b43
  article-title: Extensions of the coalescent effective population size
  publication-title: Genetics
– volume: 98
  start-page: 4563
  year: 2001
  end-page: 4568
  ident: b3
  article-title: Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 1990
  end-page: 44
  ident: b13
  article-title: Gene genealogies and the coalescent process
  publication-title: Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol.
– volume: 12
  year: 2016
  ident: b14
  article-title: Quantifying and mitigating the effect of preferential sampling on phylodynamic inference
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 368
  year: 2013
  ident: b35
  article-title: Uncovering epidemiological dynamics in heterogeneous host populations using phylogenetic methods
  publication-title: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
– volume: 509
  year: 2021
  ident: b20
  article-title: The probability distribution of the ancestral population size conditioned on the reconstructed phylogenetic tree with occurrence data
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
– year: 1992
  ident: b1
  article-title: Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control (Oxford Science Publications)
– volume: 10
  year: 2014
  ident: b5
  article-title: BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 22
  ident: b6
  article-title: New routes to phylogeography: A Bayesian structured coalescent approximation
  publication-title: PLoS Genet.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 59
  year: 1990
  end-page: 75
  ident: b28
  article-title: The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population
  publication-title: J. Math. Biol.
– volume: 488
  year: 2020
  ident: b12
  article-title: The probability distribution of the reconstructed phylogenetic tree with occurrence data
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1480
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1493
  ident: b37
  article-title: A stochastic simulator of birth-death master equations with application to phylodynamics
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
– volume: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: b40
  article-title: Sampling through time and phylodynamic inference with coalescent and birth-death models
  publication-title: J. Royal Soc. Interface
– year: 2011
  ident: b15
  article-title: Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: b7
  article-title: MERS-CoV spillover at the camel-human interface
  publication-title: eLife
– volume: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: b30
  article-title: Inference for nonlinear epidemiological models using genealogies and time series
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 27
  year: 1982
  end-page: 43
  ident: b16
  article-title: On the genealogy of large populations
  publication-title: J. Appl. Probab.
– volume: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: b23
  article-title: Inferring time-dependent migration and coalescence patterns from genetic sequence and predictor data in structured populations
  publication-title: Virus Evol.
– volume: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: b18
  article-title: Green algorithms: Quantifying the carbon footprint of computation
  publication-title: Adv. Sci.
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2272
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2279
  ident: b38
  article-title: Efficient Bayesian inference under the structured coalescent
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
– volume: 303
  start-page: 327
  year: 2004
  end-page: 332
  ident: b10
  article-title: Unifying the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of pathogens
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 14
  year: 2022
  ident: b32
  article-title: Robust phylodynamic analysis of genetic sequencing data from structured populations
  publication-title: Viruses
– volume: 119
  year: 2022
  ident: b44
  article-title: Multiclonal human origin and global expansion of an endemic bacterial pathogen of livestock
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
– volume: 34
  start-page: 3843
  year: 2018
  end-page: 3848
  ident: b25
  article-title: MASCOT: parameter and state inference under the marginal structured coalescent approximation
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
– volume: 10
  year: 2014
  ident: b4
  article-title: Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2102
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2116
  ident: b17
  article-title: Phylodynamics with migration: A computational framework to quantify population structure from genomic data
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1498
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1507
  ident: b8
  article-title: Infectious disease phylodynamics with occurrence data
  publication-title: Methods Ecol. Evol.
– volume: 5
  year: 2009
  ident: b19
  article-title: Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 261
  start-page: 58
  year: 2009
  end-page: 66
  ident: b33
  article-title: On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
– reference: Mueller, N., 0000. Taming the beast: MASCOT tutorial.
– volume: 9
  year: 2013
  ident: b42
  article-title: Viral Phylodynamics
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2970
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2981
  ident: b24
  article-title: The structured coalescent and its approximations
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 59
  year: 1990
  end-page: 75
  ident: b27
  article-title: The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population
  publication-title: J. Math. Biol.
– volume: 23
  start-page: 547
  year: 2022
  end-page: 562
  ident: b2
  article-title: Phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches to understanding and combating the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  publication-title: Nature Rev. Genet.
– volume: 10
  year: 2014
  ident: b31
  article-title: Phylodynamic inference for structured epidemiological models
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
– volume: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: b41
  article-title: Sampling through time and phylodynamic inference with coalescent and birth-death models
  publication-title: J. R. Soc. Interface
– volume: 29
  start-page: 347
  year: 2012
  end-page: 357
  ident: b36
  article-title: Estimating the basic reproductive number from viral sequence data
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b15
– volume: 9
  issue: 3
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b42
  article-title: Viral Phylodynamics
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002947
– volume: 19
  start-page: 27
  issue: A
  year: 1982
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b16
  article-title: On the genealogy of large populations
  publication-title: J. Appl. Probab.
  doi: 10.2307/3213548
– volume: 118
  issue: 9
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b26
  article-title: The origin and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012008118
– volume: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b7
  article-title: MERS-CoV spillover at the camel-human interface
  publication-title: eLife
– volume: 98
  start-page: 4563
  issue: 8
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b3
  article-title: Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.081068098
– volume: 267
  start-page: 396
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b34
  article-title: Sampling-through-time in birth–death trees
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.09.010
– volume: 303
  start-page: 327
  issue: 5656
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b10
  article-title: Unifying the epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of pathogens
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1090727
– volume: 34
  start-page: 3843
  issue: 22
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b25
  article-title: MASCOT: parameter and state inference under the marginal structured coalescent approximation
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty406
– volume: 190
  start-page: 187
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b39
  article-title: Complex population dynamics and the coalescent under neutrality
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.134627
– volume: 11
  issue: 101
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b41
  article-title: Sampling through time and phylodynamic inference with coalescent and birth-death models
  publication-title: J. R. Soc. Interface
  doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0945
– volume: 8
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b11
  article-title: Disentangling the role of poultry farms and wild birds in the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in Europe
  publication-title: Virus Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/ve/veac073
– volume: 14
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b32
  article-title: Robust phylodynamic analysis of genetic sequencing data from structured populations
  publication-title: Viruses
  doi: 10.3390/v14081648
– volume: 11
  issue: 101
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b40
  article-title: Sampling through time and phylodynamic inference with coalescent and birth-death models
  publication-title: J. Royal Soc. Interface
  doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0945
– volume: 7
  issue: 8
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b30
  article-title: Inference for nonlinear epidemiological models using genealogies and time series
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002136
– volume: 5
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b23
  article-title: Inferring time-dependent migration and coalescence patterns from genetic sequence and predictor data in structured populations
  publication-title: Virus Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/ve/vez030
– volume: 368
  issue: 1614
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b35
  article-title: Uncovering epidemiological dynamics in heterogeneous host populations using phylogenetic methods
  publication-title: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0198
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  issue: 8
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b6
  article-title: New routes to phylogeography: A Bayesian structured coalescent approximation
  publication-title: PLoS Genet.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005421
– volume: 10
  issue: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b4
  article-title: Inference of epidemiological dynamics based on simulated phylogenies using birth-death and coalescent models
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003913
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2414
  issue: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b29
  article-title: Jointly inferring the dynamics of population size and sampling intensity from molecular sequences
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa016
– volume: 10
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b31
  article-title: Phylodynamic inference for structured epidemiological models
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003570
– volume: 29
  start-page: 347
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b36
  article-title: Estimating the basic reproductive number from viral sequence data
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr217
– volume: 488
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b12
  article-title: The probability distribution of the reconstructed phylogenetic tree with occurrence data
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110115
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b13
  article-title: Gene genealogies and the coalescent process
  publication-title: Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol.
– volume: 509
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b20
  article-title: The probability distribution of the ancestral population size conditioned on the reconstructed phylogenetic tree with occurrence data
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110400
– volume: 181
  start-page: 341
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b43
  article-title: Extensions of the coalescent effective population size
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.092460
– volume: 10
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b5
  article-title: BEAST 2: A software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537
– ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b21
– volume: 119
  issue: 50
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b44
  article-title: Multiclonal human origin and global expansion of an endemic bacterial pathogen of livestock
  publication-title: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211217119
– volume: 29
  start-page: 59
  issue: 1
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b27
  article-title: The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population
  publication-title: J. Math. Biol.
  doi: 10.1007/BF00173909
– year: 2024
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b22
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1480
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b37
  article-title: A stochastic simulator of birth-death master equations with application to phylodynamics
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst057
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2102
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b17
  article-title: Phylodynamics with migration: A computational framework to quantify population structure from genomic data
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw064
– year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b1
– volume: 10
  start-page: 88
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b9
  article-title: Eight challenges in phylodynamic inference
  publication-title: Epidemics
  doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2014.09.001
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2970
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b24
  article-title: The structured coalescent and its approximations
  publication-title: Mol. Biol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx186
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2272
  issue: 16
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b38
  article-title: Efficient Bayesian inference under the structured coalescent
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu201
– volume: 23
  start-page: 547
  issue: 9
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b2
  article-title: Phylogenetic and phylodynamic approaches to understanding and combating the early SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
  publication-title: Nature Rev. Genet.
  doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00483-8
– volume: 12
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b14
  article-title: Quantifying and mitigating the effect of preferential sampling on phylodynamic inference
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004789
– volume: 5
  issue: 9
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b19
  article-title: Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots
  publication-title: PLoS Comput. Biol.
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520
– volume: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b18
  article-title: Green algorithms: Quantifying the carbon footprint of computation
  publication-title: Adv. Sci.
  doi: 10.1002/advs.202100707
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1498
  issue: 8
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b8
  article-title: Infectious disease phylodynamics with occurrence data
  publication-title: Methods Ecol. Evol.
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13620
– volume: 29
  start-page: 59
  issue: 1
  year: 1990
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b28
  article-title: The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population
  publication-title: J. Math. Biol.
  doi: 10.1007/BF00173909
– volume: 261
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795_b33
  article-title: On incomplete sampling under birth-death models and connections to the sampling-based coalescent
  publication-title: J. Theoret. Biol.
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.07.018
SSID ssj0064113
Score 2.327582
Snippet Elucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have emerged...
AbstractElucidating disease spread between subpopulations is crucial in guiding effective disease control efforts. Genomic epidemiology and phylodynamics have...
SourceID doaj
proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 100795
SubjectTerms Birth–death
Coalescent
Communicable Diseases - epidemiology
Communicable Diseases - transmission
Computer Simulation
Disease Outbreaks - statistics & numerical data
Epidemics - statistics & numerical data
Epidemiological Models
Humans
Infectious Disease
Internal Medicine
Pathogen spread
Phylodynamics
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Population Density
Population Dynamics
Title Estimating pathogen spread using structured coalescent and birth–death models: A quantitative comparison
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1755436524000562
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1755436524000562
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100795
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39461051
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3121277440
https://doaj.org/article/a4b0f3d332564a1cb8128a76d2cf6a0f
Volume 49
WOSCitedRecordID wos001347061500001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1878-0067
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064113
  issn: 1755-4365
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20140101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWg4oCEEN9sKZWRuEY4sR0n3ErVigOqkPjQ3izb45TtIdtudjnzH_iH_JLO2MlqkUDlwDVKYmv8ZuY5Gb9h7DWUAbSKphBOx0LpCuNgK0ShfCPqtqvAJ53trx_M2Vkzn7cfd1p9UU1YlgfOhnvjlBedBCkxNytXBo8ZqXGmhip0tRMdRV9h2mkzlWNwrcrUGBlzoy6UrPV0aC5VdsXUexX3hpVKRQLUW2InKSXt_t9y09-4Z8pBpw_Y_ZE88qM86YfsVuwfsXv5yxvPB4oes4sT9Friof05p37DS4QIHy6RHAKnKvdznjVjN6sIPCzdKOjEXQ_cL1brb79-_AQihjx1yRne8iN-tXF9Oo2GsZGHbevCJ-zL6cnn4_fF2FGhCOhr6wKUCtIFbVwroaqd19GY4LUGXelOInWouxhUG4IObYRYeQfIYUCYkKTt5FO21y_7-JzxRoLvgqyld7jFdMo1uoLSdCrGxskGZqyYTGovs3CGnSrKLmxeAktLYPMSzNg7svv2XpK9ThcQDHYEg70JDDOmp1Wz08lSjIX4osUNg5s_PReH0aEHW9qhssJ-IkQRoKj0lrjj7pMjZ8lc5B_GfDXByqJL038a18flZrCyJNl9Um6csWcZb1uzyJYE8nW5_z_M9YLdpQnl6pwDtofoiy_ZnfB9vRhWh-y2mTeHya-uATe0JvE
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating+pathogen+spread+using+structured+coalescent+and+birth%E2%80%93death+models%3A+A+quantitative+comparison&rft.jtitle=Epidemics&rft.au=Seidel%2C+Sophie&rft.au=Stadler%2C+Tanja&rft.au=Vaughan%2C+Timothy+G&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.issn=1755-4365&rft.volume=49&rft.spage=100795&rft.epage=100795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.epidem.2024.100795&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S1755436524000562&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S1755436524000562
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F17554365%2FS1755436524X00043%2Fcov150h.gif