Minimum complexity drives regulatory logic in Boolean models of living systems

The properties of random Boolean networks have been investigated extensively as models of regulation in biological systems. However, the Boolean functions (BFs) specifying the associated logical update rules should not be expected to be random. In this contribution, we focus on biologically meaningf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PNAS nexus Jg. 1; H. 1; S. pgac017
Hauptverfasser: Subbaroyan, Ajay, Martin, Olivier C, Samal, Areejit
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: England Oxford University Press 01.03.2022
Schlagworte:
ISSN:2752-6542, 2752-6542
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The properties of random Boolean networks have been investigated extensively as models of regulation in biological systems. However, the Boolean functions (BFs) specifying the associated logical update rules should not be expected to be random. In this contribution, we focus on biologically meaningful types of BFs, and perform a systematic study of their preponderance in a compilation of 2,687 functions extracted from published models. A surprising feature is that most of these BFs have odd “bias”, that is they produce “on” outputs for a total number of input combinations that is odd. Upon further analysis, we are able to explain this observation, along with the enrichment of read-once functions (RoFs) and its nested canalyzing functions (NCFs) subset, in terms of 2 complexity measures: Boolean complexity based on string lengths in formal logic, which is yet unexplored in biological contexts, and the so-called average sensitivity. RoFs minimize Boolean complexity and all such functions have odd bias. Furthermore, NCFs minimize not only the Boolean complexity but also the average sensitivity. These results reveal the importance of minimum complexity in the regulatory logic of biological networks.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2752-6542
2752-6542
DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac017