Minimum complexity drives regulatory logic in Boolean models of living systems

The properties of random Boolean networks have been investigated extensively as models of regulation in biological systems. However, the Boolean functions (BFs) specifying the associated logical update rules should not be expected to be random. In this contribution, we focus on biologically meaningf...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:PNAS nexus Ročník 1; číslo 1; s. pgac017
Hlavní autoři: Subbaroyan, Ajay, Martin, Olivier C, Samal, Areejit
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Oxford University Press 01.03.2022
Témata:
ISSN:2752-6542, 2752-6542
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:The properties of random Boolean networks have been investigated extensively as models of regulation in biological systems. However, the Boolean functions (BFs) specifying the associated logical update rules should not be expected to be random. In this contribution, we focus on biologically meaningful types of BFs, and perform a systematic study of their preponderance in a compilation of 2,687 functions extracted from published models. A surprising feature is that most of these BFs have odd “bias”, that is they produce “on” outputs for a total number of input combinations that is odd. Upon further analysis, we are able to explain this observation, along with the enrichment of read-once functions (RoFs) and its nested canalyzing functions (NCFs) subset, in terms of 2 complexity measures: Boolean complexity based on string lengths in formal logic, which is yet unexplored in biological contexts, and the so-called average sensitivity. RoFs minimize Boolean complexity and all such functions have odd bias. Furthermore, NCFs minimize not only the Boolean complexity but also the average sensitivity. These results reveal the importance of minimum complexity in the regulatory logic of biological networks.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2752-6542
2752-6542
DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac017