Relation of Drug-Eluting Stent Strut Distribution to Stent Thrombosis in Coronary Arteries

The distribution of stent struts is critical to drug deposition and, therefore, may affect the amount of neointima and the risk of thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate stent strut distribution in the setting of a drug-eluting stent thrombosis (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology Vol. 104; no. 3; pp. 343 - 348
Main Authors: Opolski, Maksymilian P., Pracon, Radoslaw, Mintz, Gary S., Okabe, Teruo, Pregowski, Jerzy, Lee, Sung Yun, van der Waal, Eva C., Kalinczuk, Lukasz, Roy, Probal, Smith, Kimberly A., Torguson, Rebecca, Xue, Zhenyi, Satler, Lowell F., Kent, Kenneth M., Pichard, Augusto D., Waksman, Ron, Weissman, Neil J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2009
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
ISSN:0002-9149, 1879-1913, 1879-1913
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The distribution of stent struts is critical to drug deposition and, therefore, may affect the amount of neointima and the risk of thrombosis after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate stent strut distribution in the setting of a drug-eluting stent thrombosis (ST). We retrospectively analyzed postprocedural intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images of 13 patients who subsequently developed ST (14 DES thrombotic lesions) and a control group of 27 patients (30 DES lesions) matched for stent type and presence of chronic renal failure. In addition to standard IVUS measurements, visible struts were counted and maximum interstrut angle was measured at 1-mm intervals. Early ST was defined as ≤30 days after DES deployment and late ST as >30 days after DES deployment. Compared with DES controls, the ST group had a larger maximum interstrut angle (60.8 ± 8.3° vs 55.7 ± 4.8°, p = 0.014) and a similar number of stent struts (8.4 ± 0.6 vs 8.7 ± 0.6, p = NS). Maximum interstrut angle tended to be larger in late ST than in early ST (66.1 ± 10.8° vs 57.8 ± 5.0°, p = 0.071). The incidence of maximum interstrut angles ≥90° and ≥120° observed continuously for ≥2 mm of stent length was higher in the ST group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.096, respectively). In conclusion, DES-treated lesions leading to ST had larger maximum interstrut gaps distributed circumferentially and longitudinally, but a similar number of struts at the time of DES implantation compared with DES controls.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.047