A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014

Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user stud...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Frontiers in robotics and AI Ročník 5; s. 37
Hlavní autoři: Dey, Arindam, Billinghurst, Mark, Lindeman, Robert W., Swan, J. Edward
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 17.04.2018
Témata:
augmented reality
classifications
experimentation
Robotics and AI
systematic review
usability
user studies
classifications
augmented reality
usability
systematic review
experimentation
user studies
ISSN:2296-9144, 2296-9144
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces have been studied extensively over the last few decades, with a growing number of user-based experiments. In this paper, we systematically review 10 years of the most influential AR user studies, from 2005 to 2014. A total of 291 papers with 369 individual user studies have been reviewed and classified based on their application areas. The primary contribution of the review is to present the broad landscape of user-based AR research, and to provide a high-level view of how that landscape has changed. We summarize the high-level contributions from each category of papers, and present examples of the most influential user studies. We also identify areas where there have been few user studies, and opportunities for future research. Among other things, we find that there is a growing trend toward handheld AR user studies, and that most studies are conducted in laboratory settings and do not involve pilot testing. This research will be useful for AR researchers who want to follow best practices in designing their own AR user studies.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Doug A. Bowman, Virginia Tech, United States
Reviewed by: John Quarles, University of Texas at San Antonio, United States; George Papagiannakis, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece
This article was submitted to Virtual Environments, a section of the journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI
ISSN:2296-9144
2296-9144
DOI:10.3389/frobt.2018.00037