Nutrient limitation may induce microbial mining for resources from persistent soil organic matter
Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition su...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) Jg. 102; H. 6; S. 1 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
United States
John Wiley and Sons, Inc
01.06.2021
Ecological Society of America |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 0012-9658, 1939-9170, 1939-9170 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13C signature in respired CO₂ and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO₂ was more δ13C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ13C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal‐dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old‐growth coniferous forest, where above‐ and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ 13 C signature in respired CO 2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ 13 C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ 13 C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ 13 C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal‐to‐bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO 2 was more δ 13 C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal‐to‐bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N‐rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N‐mining. Consistent with the δ 13 C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant‐derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high‐quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade‐off in OM use that may be related to the growth‐limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13 C signature in respired CO2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13 C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13 C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13 C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO2 was more δ13 C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ13 C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem.Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13 C signature in respired CO2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13 C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13 C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13 C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO2 was more δ13 C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ13 C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal‐dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old‐growth coniferous forest, where above‐ and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13C signature in respired CO2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal‐to‐bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO2 was more δ13C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal‐to‐bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N‐rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N‐mining. Consistent with the δ13C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant‐derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high‐quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade‐off in OM use that may be related to the growth‐limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ C signature in respired CO and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO was more δ C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13C signature in respired CO₂ and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO₂ was more δ13C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ13C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal‐dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old‐growth coniferous forest, where above‐ and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ¹³C signature in respired CO₂ and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ¹³C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ¹³C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ¹³C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal‐to‐bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO₂ was more δ¹³C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal‐to‐bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N‐rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N‐mining. Consistent with the δ¹³C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant‐derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high‐quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade‐off in OM use that may be related to the growth‐limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal‐dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old‐growth coniferous forest, where above‐ and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13C signature in respired CO2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13C signature indicates whether the C used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal‐to‐bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO2 was more δ13C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal‐to‐bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N‐rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N‐mining. Consistent with the δ13C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant‐derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high‐quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade‐off in OM use that may be related to the growth‐limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition is thought to impact biogeochemical cycling at the ecosystem scale, whereby bacterially dominated decomposition supports the fast turnover of easily available substrates, whereas fungal-dominated decomposition leads to the slower turnover of more complex OM. However, empirical support for this is lacking. We used soils from a detritus input and removal treatment experiment in an old-growth coniferous forest, where above- and belowground litter inputs have been manipulated for 20 yr. These manipulations have generated variation in OM quality, as defined by energetic content and proxied as respiration per g soil organic matter (SOM) and the δ13C signature in respired CO2 and microbial PLFAs. Respiration per g SOM reflects the availability and lability of C substrate to microorganisms, and the δ13C signature indicates whether theC used by microorganisms is plant derived and higher quality (more δ13C depleted) or more microbially processed and lower quality (more δ13C enriched). Surprisingly, higher quality C did not disproportionately benefit bacterial decomposers. Both fungal and bacterial growth increased with C quality, with no systematic change in the fungal-to-bacterial growth ratio, reflecting the relative contribution of fungi and bacteria to decomposition. There was also no difference in the quality of C targeted by bacterial and fungal decomposers either for catabolism or anabolism. Interestingly, respired CO2 was more δ13C enriched than soil C, suggesting preferential use of more microbially processed C, despite its lower quality. Gross N mineralization and consumption were also unaffected by differences in the ratio of fungal-to-bacterial growth. However, the ratio of C to gross N mineralization was lower than the average C/N of SOM, meaning that microorganisms specifically targeted N-rich components of OM, indicative of selective microbial N-mining. Consistent with the δ13C data, this reinforces evidence for the use of more microbially processed OM with a lower C/N ratio, rather than plant-derived OM. These results challenge the widely held assumption that microorganisms favor high-quality C sources and suggest that there is a trade-off in OM use that may be related to the growth-limiting factor for microorganisms in the ecosystem. |
| Author | Lajtha, Kate Rousk, Johannes Hicks, Lettice C. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lettice C. surname: Hicks fullname: Hicks, Lettice C. – sequence: 2 givenname: Kate surname: Lajtha fullname: Lajtha, Kate – sequence: 3 givenname: Johannes surname: Rousk fullname: Rousk, Johannes |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFkkuLFDEUhYOMOD2j4B9QCty4qTaPSiVZSjM-YNCNLlyFVOpmTJOqtEmKof-9abttYVDMJll8Ofeee-4VupjjDAg9J3hNMKZvwO7XjFH5CK2IYqpVROALtMKY0Fb1XF6iq5y3uB7SySfokjGBOe_FCplPS0ke5tIEP_liio9zM5l94-dxsdBM3qY4eBPqa_bzXeNiahLkuCQLuXEpTs0OUva5HERy9KGJ6c7M3laZUiA9RY-dCRmene5r9PXdzZfNh_b28_uPm7e3reVUynawBJizHcecuY5RS4SUlHWUgyGUOsV6wFJZNfaj47K6ZINwZlSCODyKgV0jc9TN97BbBr1LfjJpr6PxehdTMUHXvsEk-12HRWfQlQre_rKcNbYW8GidJpKD7khPtKGUaSBGsdER2wtca7w-1til-GOBXPTks4UQzAxxyZoq2Xed4B3_P8prOD2ufEVfPUC3dbxzHValmJDVLaeVenmilmGC8ezvd5Z_KtbEck7gzgjB-rAmuq6JPqxJRdcPUHvKviTjw98-tMcP9z7A_p_C-mbz7cS_OPLbXGI681Tg2qxi7Ce2h9fv |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s42832_024_0284_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_122669 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_172774 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_158907 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2022_106759 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2023_116678 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_16107 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2021_115662 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_025_07427_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109196 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108779 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108937 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2024_1324798 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108859 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geodrs_2025_e00928 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jwpe_2024_105762 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108651 crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems8010004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2024_108629 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2023_116516 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_883463 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecs2_4672 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_crsus_2023_100003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2021_108492 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2023_105198 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2023_118037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108928 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_13214 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy14092050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2025_117437 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2025_1602633 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108889 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoderma_2025_117194 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_174088 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109186 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5101 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture15131447 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_022_00800_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2025_119052 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13030629 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2022_108884 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_16456 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2025_127131 crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2023_1136354 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_025_07776_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148684 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10021_022_00759_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2022_104776 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_70021 crossref_primary_10_1128_aem_02437_24 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejsobi_2023_103573 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41522_024_00616_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_022_01655_8 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsagscitech_5c00098 crossref_primary_10_1080_03650340_2023_2266218 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2024_108006 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1002542 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_023_00876_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_025_07780_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15060979 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2022_106342 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2024_121812 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jia_2025_09_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2025_109840 crossref_primary_10_1029_2024AV001625 crossref_primary_10_1139_cjfr_2025_0037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2023_109242 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2023_107754 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_7535594 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_025_07345_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2022_120241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2023_117927 crossref_primary_10_1111_geb_13605 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2023_107040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2021_125281 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2025_109825 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2024_105515 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejss_70156 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy15061436 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2025_122708 crossref_primary_10_1080_23311932_2023_2294542 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_catena_2022_106293 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2023_109256 crossref_primary_10_3390_d16010066 crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_17003 crossref_primary_10_1029_2021GB007109 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy12020316 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1128/aem.59.11.3605-3617.1993 10.1890/04-1254 10.1007/s10533-004-7314-6 10.1111/gcb.14859 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.024 10.1007/BF00384433 10.1890/08-0296.1 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00258 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00137-7 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.004 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.016 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.027 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.12.017 10.1111/gcb.14962 10.1126/science.1094875 10.1023/A:1005744131385 10.1525/9780520407114 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.023 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.008 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 10.1007/s10021-002-0124-6 10.1002/ecy.3094 10.1128/AEM.03181-12 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040023x 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x 10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3 10.1111/gcb.12113 10.1007/s00442-006-0402-7 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00813.x 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.015 10.1890/05-1839 10.1038/ngeo1009 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.005 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.007 10.1139/x93-177 10.1016/0038-0717(78)90099-8 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.009 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03427.x 10.1007/s11104-010-0563-3 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01844.x 10.1038/ngeo230 10.1111/geb.12029 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.014 10.1016/B978-0-12-812766-7.00006-8 10.1007/s10533-015-0171-7 10.1023/A:1021171016945 10.1128/AEM.02775-08 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.021 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.001 10.1111/gcb.13803 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.023 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062614 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 10.1111/1365-2435.12512 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8534 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0846:TIBDPI]2.0.CO;2 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01247 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13800.x 10.1021/es403941h 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.010 10.1016/S0065-2504(05)38005-6 10.1007/s10533-016-0246-0 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00073-6 10.1126/science.1134853 10.2307/1941915 10.1890/14-1796.1 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 10.1093/femsec/fix006 10.2307/1936780 10.1038/nature16069 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.015 10.2307/1940954 10.1038/s41396-018-0313-8 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.001 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8 10.1007/BF00260580 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.010 10.1038/ncomms13630 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.027 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2021 The Authors 2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America 2021 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America. 2021. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution License~https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 The Authors – notice: 2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America – notice: 2021 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America. – notice: 2021. This work is published under Creative Commons Attribution License~https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| CorporateAuthor | Forskargrupper vid Biologiska institutionen Lunds universitet Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten Profile areas and other strong research environments BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate MEMEG Faculty of Science Lund University Microbial Ecology Department of Biology Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO) Biologiska institutionen Microbial Biogeochemistry in Lund Strategic research areas (SRA) Research groups at the Department of Biology Mikrobiell biogeokemi i Lund Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer Mikrobiologisk ekologi |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten – name: Strategiska forskningsområden (SFO) – name: MEMEG – name: BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate – name: Mikrobiell biogeokemi i Lund – name: Forskargrupper vid Biologiska institutionen – name: Strategic research areas (SRA) – name: Faculty of Science – name: Lunds universitet – name: Microbial Ecology – name: Profilområden och andra starka forskningsmiljöer – name: Lund University – name: Biologiska institutionen – name: Profile areas and other strong research environments – name: Mikrobiologisk ekologi – name: Department of Biology – name: Research groups at the Department of Biology – name: Microbial Biogeochemistry in Lund |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC |
| DOI | 10.1002/ecy.3328 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Open Access CrossRef PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic SwePub SWEPUB Lunds universitet full text SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Lunds universitet SwePub Articles full text |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Entomology Abstracts PubMed AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Ecology Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 1939-9170 |
| EndPage | 16 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_0cce0dcf_185e_4161_a223_e1a93df1c670 33705567 10_1002_ecy_3328 ECY3328 27070593 |
| Genre | article Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Vetenskapsrådet funderid: 2020‐03858; 2020‐04083 – fundername: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas funderid: 2018‐01315 – fundername: The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation funderid: KAW 1017.0171 – fundername: The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation grantid: KAW 1017.0171 – fundername: Vetenskapsrådet grantid: 2020-03858 – fundername: Vetenskapsrådet grantid: 2020-04083 – fundername: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas grantid: 2018-01315 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X 0R~ 1OB 1OC 2AX 33P 4.4 5GY 85S AAESR AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAIHA AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCUV ABDQB ABEFU ABGFU ABJNI ABLJU ABPFR ABPLY ABPPZ ABPQH ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACHIC ACKOT ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSTJ ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADKYN ADMHG ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFFPM AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIAGR AIDAL AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMYDB AZFZN AZVAB BENPR BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BRXPI CBGCD CS3 CUYZI D0L DCZOG DEVKO DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBS ECGQY F5P HF~ HGLYW IAO IEA IGH IGS IOF IPO IPSME JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST LATKE LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LU7 LUTES LYRES MEWTI MV1 MW2 N9A NHB NXSMM O9- OK1 P2P P2W PALCI ROL RSZ RWL RXW SA0 SJN SUPJJ TAE TN5 U5U UHB UKR V62 WBKPD WH7 WOHZO WXSBR XSW YR2 YV5 YYM YZZ Z0I ZCA ZO4 ZZTAW ~02 ~KM .-4 0VX 24P 29G 2KS 3V. 42X 53G 692 6TJ 7X2 7X7 7XC 88A 88E 88I 8CJ 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 8WZ A.K A6W AAFWJ AAHHS AASGY ABRJW ABUWG ABYAD ACCFJ ACKIV ACTWD ACUBG ADULT ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AEUYN AFKRA AFQQW AGNAY AHXOZ AILXY AIWBW AJBDE ALIPV AQVQM AS~ ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BCR BCU BEC BES BHPHI BKSAR BLC BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CCPQU D1J DDYGU DOOOF DWQXO E.L EJD FVMVE FYUFA GNUQQ GTFYD GUQSH HCIFZ HGD HMCUK HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF IAG IEP ITC JSODD KQ8 LK8 M0K M0L M1P M2O M2P M7P MVM OMK PATMY PCBAR PQQKQ PRG PROAC PSQYO PYCSY Q2X QZG R05 RJQFR SAMSI SJFOW UBC UKHRP VOH VQA WHG WYJ XIH Y6R YXE YYP ZCG AAYXX ABAWQ ABSQW ABUFD ACHJO ADXHL AFFHD AGUYK AIQQE CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB NPM YIN Z5M 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7T7 8FD C1K FR3 K9. P64 RC3 SOI 7X8 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AGCHP AOWAS D8T D95 ZZAVC |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5288-bc1e3fc45053f432c178823425ea122f936e089c9d6df589393b7fad971f0d7b3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 24P |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 94 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000646195600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
| IngestDate | Tue Dec 02 03:10:43 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 17:22:03 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 08:59:54 EDT 2025 Sat Oct 18 23:55:39 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:28:35 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:19:16 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:37:23 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:30:36 EST 2025 Tue Sep 30 07:10:03 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | soil C and N cycling fungal and bacterial decomposers decomposition microbial N mining microbial ecology soil organic matter biogeochemistry soil C sequestration |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution 2021 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5288-bc1e3fc45053f432c178823425ea122f936e089c9d6df589393b7fad971f0d7b3 |
| Notes | Corresponding Editor: Sara Vicca. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4985-7262 0000-0002-6430-4818 0000-0002-0265-3887 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fecy.3328 |
| PMID | 33705567 |
| PQID | 2537858952 |
| PQPubID | 34868 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_portal_research_lu_se_publications_0cce0dcf_185e_4161_a223_e1a93df1c670 proquest_miscellaneous_2986447545 proquest_miscellaneous_2501260864 proquest_journals_2537858952 pubmed_primary_33705567 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_3328 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ecy_3328 wiley_primary_10_1002_ecy_3328_ECY3328 jstor_primary_27070593 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | June 2021 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2021 text: June 2021 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Brooklyn |
| PublicationTitle | Ecology (Durham) |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Ecology |
| PublicationYear | 2021 |
| Publisher | John Wiley and Sons, Inc Ecological Society of America |
| Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley and Sons, Inc – name: Ecological Society of America |
| References | 2007; 39 2006; 70 1993; 23 1987; 3 2009; 41 2017; 2 2013; 22 2013; 67 2006; 38 2018; 124 2019; 13 2013; 63 2016; 102 2010; 188 2016; 30 2020; 13 2015; 80 2012; 15 2008; 1 2017; 112 2012; 55 1993; 3 2018; 49 1979 2013; 19 2020; 7 2013; 59 2015; 81 1982; 63 2003; 6 2015; 85 2019; 26 2009; 90 2005; 73 1996; 60 2006; 440 1999; 96 2005; 37 2010; 3 2005; 38 2003; 84 1996; 22 2011; 339 2005; 111 1978; 10 1991; 72 2017; 23 2003; 35 2014; 48 2005; 86 2015; 528 2020; 101 2004 2016; 127 2004; 304 2009; 258 1993; 59 2010; 42 2016; 7 2012; 3 2017; 93 2012; 1 2007; 315 2009; 75 2013; 79 2005; 8 1997; 36 2013; 178 2018 2020; 26 2011; 43 2007; 85 2001; 33 2006; 148 2007; 88 2003; 62 2016; 130 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 Millar C. S. (e_1_2_7_51_1) 2012; 1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_60_1 e_1_2_7_83_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_62_1 e_1_2_7_81_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_64_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_66_1 e_1_2_7_85_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_68_1 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_49_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_73_1 e_1_2_7_50_1 e_1_2_7_71_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_52_1 e_1_2_7_77_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_54_1 e_1_2_7_75_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_56_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_58_1 e_1_2_7_79_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_80_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_84_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_61_1 e_1_2_7_82_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_63_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_65_1 Nadelhoffer K. J. (e_1_2_7_55_1) 2004 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 e_1_2_7_67_1 e_1_2_7_48_1 e_1_2_7_69_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 e_1_2_7_72_1 e_1_2_7_70_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_53_1 e_1_2_7_76_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_74_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_57_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_59_1 e_1_2_7_78_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 112 start-page: 153 year: 2017 end-page: 164 article-title: Using community trait‐distributions to assign microbial responses to pH changes and Cd in forest soils treated with wood ash publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 38 start-page: 2092 year: 2006 end-page: 2103 article-title: Fungal/bacterial ratios in grasslands with contrasting nitrogen management publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 42 start-page: 1385 year: 2010 end-page: 1395 article-title: Considering fungal: bacterial dominance in soils methods, controls, and ecosystem implications publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 22 start-page: 737 year: 2013 end-page: 749 article-title: A global analysis of soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in terrestrial ecosystems publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 148 start-page: 650 year: 2006 end-page: 659 article-title: Root controls on soil microbial community structure in forest soils publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 528 start-page: 60 year: 2015 end-page: 68 article-title: The contentious nature of soil organic matter publication-title: Nature – volume: 43 start-page: 1051 year: 2011 end-page: 1058 article-title: Biological, chemical and thermal indices of soil organic matter stability in four grassland soils publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 3 start-page: 348 year: 2012 article-title: Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 8 start-page: 1075 year: 2005 end-page: 1087 article-title: Size and functional diversity of microbe populations control plant persistence and long‐term soil carbon accumulation publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 19 start-page: 988 year: 2013 end-page: 995 article-title: The Microbial Efficiency‐Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 3 start-page: 57 year: 1987 end-page: 68 article-title: The detrital food web in a shortgrass prairie publication-title: Biology and Fertility of Soils – volume: 440 start-page: 165 year: 2006 end-page: 173 article-title: Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change publication-title: Nature – volume: 23 start-page: 1402 year: 1993 end-page: 1407 article-title: Contributions of aboveground litter, belowground litter, and root respiration to total soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest publication-title: Canadian Journal of Forest Research – volume: 86 start-page: 320 year: 2005 end-page: 326 article-title: Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition publication-title: Ecology – volume: 1 start-page: 430 year: 2008 end-page: 437 article-title: Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks publication-title: Nature Geoscience – volume: 130 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 12 article-title: The energetic and chemical signatures of persistent soil organic matter publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 55 start-page: 78 year: 2012 end-page: 84 article-title: Detecting microbial N‐limitation in tussock tundra soil: implications for Arctic soil organic carbon cycling publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – year: 1979 – volume: 3 start-page: 459 year: 1993 end-page: 472 article-title: A spatial model of atmospheric deposition for the northeastern US publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 80 start-page: 199 year: 2015 end-page: 208 article-title: Biochemistry of hexose and pentose transformations in soil analyzed by position‐specific labeling and C‐PLFA publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 75 start-page: 1589 year: 2009 end-page: 1596 article-title: Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 73 start-page: 231 year: 2005 end-page: 256 article-title: Contribution of aboveground litter, belowground litter, and rhizosphere respiration to total soil CO efflux in an old growth coniferous forest publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 22 start-page: 59 year: 1996 end-page: 65 article-title: The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil publication-title: Biology and Fertility of Soils – volume: 59 start-page: 3605 year: 1993 end-page: 3617 article-title: Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – start-page: 167 year: 2018 end-page: 205 – volume: 41 start-page: 2292 year: 2009 end-page: 2298 article-title: Environmental and spatial characterisation of bacterial community composition in soil to inform sampling strategies publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 38 start-page: 759 year: 2006 end-page: 768 article-title: Carbon flow from C‐labeled straw and root residues into the phospholipid fatty acids of a soil microbial community under field conditions publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 38 start-page: 157 year: 2005 end-page: 183 article-title: Nitrogen dynamics in decomposing litter publication-title: Advances in Ecological Research – volume: 124 start-page: 227 year: 2018 end-page: 235 article-title: The legacy of mixed planting and precipitation reduction treatments on soil microbial activity, biomass and community composition in a young tree plantation publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 7 start-page: 13630 year: 2016 article-title: Direct evidence for microbial‐derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls publication-title: Nature Communications – volume: 96 start-page: 8534 year: 1999 end-page: 8539 article-title: Natural C abundance reveals trophic status of fungi and host‐origin of carbon in mycorrhizal fungi in mixed forests publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA – volume: 36 start-page: 43 year: 1997 end-page: 65 article-title: Export of DOC from forested catchments on the Precambrian Shield of Central Ontario: clues from C and C publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 93 start-page: fix006 year: 2017 article-title: Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Ecology – volume: 315 start-page: 361 year: 2007 end-page: 364 article-title: Global‐scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long‐term decomposition publication-title: Science – year: 2004 – volume: 15 start-page: 1230 year: 2012 end-page: 1239 article-title: Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape‐scale patterns in soil microbial communities publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 101 start-page: 3094 year: 2020 article-title: Simulated rhizosphere deposits induce microbial N‐mining that may accelerate shrubification in the Subarctic publication-title: Ecology – volume: 13 start-page: 529 year: 2020 end-page: 534 article-title: Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity publication-title: Nature Geoscience – volume: 3 start-page: 854 year: 2010 end-page: 857 article-title: Widespread coupling between the rate and temperature sensitivity of organic matter decay publication-title: Nature Geoscience – volume: 111 start-page: 81 year: 2005 end-page: 90 article-title: Relieving substrate limitation soil moisture and temperature determine gross N transformation rates publication-title: Oikos – volume: 79 start-page: 1385 year: 2013 end-page: 1392 article-title: Soil microbe active community composition and capability of responding to litter addition after 12 years of no inputs publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology – volume: 102 start-page: 4 year: 2016 end-page: 9 article-title: Eating from the same plate? Revisiting the role of labile carbon inputs in the soil food web publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 43 start-page: 997 year: 2011 end-page: 1005 article-title: Nitrogen losses from two grassland soils with different fungal biomass publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 102 start-page: 45 year: 2016 end-page: 47 article-title: Biomass or growth? How to measure soil food webs to understand structure and function publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 67 start-page: 192 year: 2013 end-page: 211 article-title: Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 35 start-page: 837 year: 2003 end-page: 843 article-title: The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 26 start-page: 261 year: 2019 end-page: 273 article-title: Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral‐associated forms to address global change in the 21 century publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 39 start-page: 2173 year: 2007 end-page: 2177 article-title: Fungal biomass production and turnover in soil estimated using the acetate‐in‐ergosterol technique publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 33 start-page: 1571 year: 2001 end-page: 1574 article-title: Adaptation of a rapid and economical microcentrifugation method to measure thymidine and leucine incorporation by soil bacteria publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 42 start-page: 926 year: 2010 end-page: 934 article-title: Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 72 start-page: 1547 year: 1991 end-page: 1559 article-title: Toward a method for measuring instantaneous fungal growth rates in field samples publication-title: Ecology – volume: 1 start-page: 105 year: 2012 end-page: 128 article-title: Decomposition of coniferous leaf litter publication-title: Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition – volume: 188 start-page: 1055 year: 2010 end-page: 1064 article-title: Labile soil carbon inputs mediate the soil microbial community composition and plant residue decomposition rates publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 30 start-page: 479 year: 2016 end-page: 489 article-title: Small but active–pool size does not matter for carbon incorporation in below‐ground food webs publication-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 63 start-page: 5 year: 2013 end-page: 13 article-title: Spatial variability of soil fungal and bacterial abundance: consequences for carbon turnover along a transition from a forested to clear‐cut site publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 85 start-page: 457 year: 2015 end-page: 472 article-title: Revisiting the hypothesis that fungal‐to‐bacterial dominance characterizes turnover of soil organic matter and nutrients publication-title: Ecological Monographs – volume: 62 start-page: 87 year: 2003 end-page: 117 article-title: Biogeochemistry of unpolluted forested watersheds in the Oregon Cascades: temporal patterns of precipitation and stream nitrogen fluxes publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 85 start-page: 235 year: 2007 end-page: 252 article-title: C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 37 start-page: 937 year: 2005 end-page: 944 article-title: Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 23 start-page: 5372 year: 2017 end-page: 5382 article-title: Warmer winters increase the rhizosphere carbon flow to mycorrhizal fungi more than to other microorganisms in a temperate grassland publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 7 start-page: 1247 year: 2016 article-title: Soil fungal: bacterial ratios are linked to altered carbon cycling publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology – volume: 42 start-page: 186 year: 2010 end-page: 192 article-title: Sorption, microbial uptake and decomposition of acetate in soil: transformations revealed by position‐specific C labeling publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 2 start-page: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 6 article-title: The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage publication-title: Nature Microbiology – volume: 81 start-page: 236 year: 2015 end-page: 243 article-title: Rhizosphere priming can promote mobilisation of N‐rich compounds from soil organic matter publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 7 start-page: 7 year: 2020 article-title: Carbon limitation leads to thermodynamic regulation of aerobic metabolism publication-title: Environmental Science & Technology Letters – volume: 60 start-page: 1121 year: 1996 end-page: 1126 article-title: Isotope discrimination during decomposition of organic matter: a theoretical analysis publication-title: Soil Science Society of America Journal – volume: 339 start-page: 163 year: 2011 end-page: 175 article-title: Nature and nurture in the dynamics of C, N and P during litter decomposition in Canadian forests publication-title: Plant and Soil – volume: 49 start-page: 409 year: 2018 end-page: 432 article-title: Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics – volume: 304 start-page: 1629 year: 2004 end-page: 1633 article-title: Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota publication-title: Science – volume: 127 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 14 article-title: Long‐term doubling of litter inputs accelerates soil organic matter degradation and reduces soil carbon stocks publication-title: Biogeochemistry – volume: 48 start-page: 4344 year: 2014 end-page: 4352 article-title: Isothermal microcalorimetry provides new insight into terrestrial carbon cycling publication-title: Environmental Science & Technology – volume: 70 start-page: 555 year: 2006 end-page: 569 article-title: Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems publication-title: Soil Science Society of America Journal – volume: 33 start-page: 2011 year: 2001 end-page: 2018 article-title: Estimation of fungal growth rates in soil using C‐acetate incorporation into ergosterol publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 10 start-page: 215 year: 1978 end-page: 221 article-title: A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 84 start-page: 846 year: 2003 end-page: 857 article-title: Top‐down is bottom‐up: does predation in the rhizosphere regulate aboveground dynamics? publication-title: Ecology – volume: 88 start-page: 1354 year: 2007 end-page: 1364 article-title: Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria publication-title: Ecology – volume: 178 start-page: 152 year: 2013 end-page: 160 article-title: Carbon input manipulation affects soil respiration and microbial community composition in a subtropical coniferous forest publication-title: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology – volume: 26 start-page: 1953 year: 2020 end-page: 1961 article-title: Microbial carbon limitation: The need for integrating microorganisms into our understanding of ecosystem carbon cycling publication-title: Global Change Biology – volume: 63 start-page: 621 year: 1982 end-page: 626 article-title: Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics publication-title: Ecology – volume: 6 start-page: 129 year: 2003 end-page: 143 article-title: Interactions between carbon and nitrogen mineralization and soil organic matter chemistry in arctic tundra soils publication-title: Ecosystems – volume: 13 start-page: 836 year: 2019 end-page: 846 article-title: Linking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients publication-title: ISME Journal – volume: 258 start-page: 2224 year: 2009 end-page: 2232 article-title: Increased coniferous needle inputs accelerate decomposition of soil carbon in an old‐growth forest publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 59 start-page: 32 year: 2013 end-page: 37 article-title: Bacterial growth and growth‐limiting nutrients following chronic nitrogen additions to a hardwood forest soil publication-title: Soil Biology and Biochemistry – volume: 90 start-page: 441 year: 2009 end-page: 451 article-title: Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition publication-title: Ecology – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1128/aem.59.11.3605-3617.1993 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1890/04-1254 – ident: e_1_2_7_77_1 doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-7314-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14859 – ident: e_1_2_7_71_1 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.024 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00384433 – ident: e_1_2_7_75_1 doi: 10.1890/08-0296.1 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00258 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00137-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.004 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.016 – volume: 1 start-page: 105 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_7_51_1 article-title: Decomposition of coniferous leaf litter publication-title: Biology of Plant Litter Decomposition – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.027 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.12.017 – ident: e_1_2_7_74_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14962 – ident: e_1_2_7_81_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1094875 – ident: e_1_2_7_69_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1005744131385 – ident: e_1_2_7_78_1 doi: 10.1525/9780520407114 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.023 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_73_1 doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347 – ident: e_1_2_7_82_1 doi: 10.1007/s10021-002-0124-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1002/ecy.3094 – ident: e_1_2_7_85_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.03181-12 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000040023x – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1038/s41561-020-0612-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.12113 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0402-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00813.x – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.03.015 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1890/05-1839 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1038/ngeo1009 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.005 – ident: e_1_2_7_76_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.007 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1139/x93-177 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(78)90099-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_67_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03427.x – ident: e_1_2_7_53_1 doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0563-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01844.x – ident: e_1_2_7_63_1 doi: 10.1038/ngeo230 – ident: e_1_2_7_84_1 doi: 10.1111/geb.12029 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.014 – ident: e_1_2_7_48_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812766-7.00006-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_60_1 doi: 10.1007/s10533-015-0171-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_79_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1021171016945 – ident: e_1_2_7_66_1 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02775-08 – ident: e_1_2_7_80_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.021 – ident: e_1_2_7_64_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.001 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1111/gcb.13803 – ident: e_1_2_7_61_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.024 – ident: e_1_2_7_65_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.023 – ident: e_1_2_7_70_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617-062614 – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105 – ident: e_1_2_7_59_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12512 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8534 – ident: e_1_2_7_52_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0846:TIBDPI]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_7_49_1 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01247 – volume-title: The DIRT experiment: litter and root influences on forest soil organic matter stocks and function. Forests in time: the environmental consequences of 1000 years of change in New England year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_7_55_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13800.x – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1021/es403941h – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1016/S0065-2504(05)38005-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1007/s10533-016-0246-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00073-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_58_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1134853 – ident: e_1_2_7_57_1 doi: 10.2307/1941915 – ident: e_1_2_7_68_1 doi: 10.1890/14-1796.1 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix006 – ident: e_1_2_7_50_1 doi: 10.2307/1936780 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1038/nature16069 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.015 – ident: e_1_2_7_56_1 doi: 10.2307/1940954 – ident: e_1_2_7_62_1 doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0313-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_83_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.07.001 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00260580 – ident: e_1_2_7_72_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13630 – ident: e_1_2_7_54_1 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.027 |
| SSID | ssj0000148 |
| Score | 2.626054 |
| Snippet | Fungi and bacteria are the two principal microbial groups in soil, responsible for the breakdown of organic matter (OM). The relative contribution of fungi and... |
| SourceID | swepub proquest pubmed crossref wiley jstor |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | anabolism Bacteria bacterial growth Biogeochemical cycles biogeochemistry Biologi Biological Sciences Carbon dioxide Carbon/nitrogen ratio Catabolism Coniferous forests Decomposition Detritus ecosystems fungal and bacterial decomposers Fungi Lability microbial ecology microbial N mining Microbiology Microorganisms Mikrobiologi Mineralization Natural Sciences Naturvetenskap Organic matter phospholipid fatty acids Respiration soil soil C and N cycling soil C sequestration Soil microorganisms Soil organic matter Soils Substrates |
| Title | Nutrient limitation may induce microbial mining for resources from persistent soil organic matter |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27070593 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fecy.3328 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33705567 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2537858952 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2501260864 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2986447545 |
| Volume | 102 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000646195600001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1939-9170 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000148 issn: 0012-9658 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED_BBhIvMD4KgW0yEoKnsMR24uQRjVY8oGpCTCq8WI5ja5X6pWZF6n_PXZxmmzTQpL0kUXK2nPOdfWf7fgfwwcvKJ8q4OEtdEsuMgpVxnojTWuSZUwo9iJBsQo3HxWRSnnWnKikWJuBD9AtupBnteE0Kbqrm5Ao01NntZyF48RD201QUlLaBy7Nr0FGyG4V5TAAnO-DZhJ_sSt6YisJpxNvszB5E9Kb92k5Ao2f3afoBPO3MTvYlyMlzeOAWL-BxSES5xaeh7Z4Gw6vINyzQqX7zEsyYcPvxLZtRTFTboWxutgydehQPNp-2kE5YZt7mnGBoDbN1tznQMApjYStanEOxwkqa5XTGQkopi9VQTNErOB8Nf55-i7v8DLHNOCpYZVMnvJVoRAkvBbcp-tNc4CjgTMq5L0XukqK0ZZ3XPkPDqBSV8qYuVeqTWlViAHuL5cK9AYZWg8uNlSqrrORJbgrLrXUiL7mt6tJE8GnXVdp2_0g5NGY6wC5zjTzVxNMI3veUqwDYcQvNoO3tnoArHPmyUkRwuOt-3elyo3kmVIHNzzjW3X9GLaStFbNwyw3RoJzl6B7K_9AQEj7-ocwieB1Eq2-AEC2qkYrgd5C1_gvBfwdPTHfwTxd6ttGN06tr67o6QW4ltfWaOKnJa9UGLT_tUlOK2qc2V0kEH1up_Cdf9PD0F93f3pXwHTzhdManXZU6hL3L9cYdwSP753LarI9bhcSrmhTHsP_1x-j8-18J-Tv8 |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9QwDLfGAMEL3weFAUFC8FTWJmnTiic03TTEOO1hSIOXKE0TcdJ96bpDuv8eu2m7TRoIiadWrROljp3YTv0zwFsvK58o4-IsdUksM0pWxn0iTmuRZ04p9CBCsQk1mRRnZ-XJDnzsc2ECPsQQcCPNaNdrUnAKSO9foIY6u_0gBC9uwE2JmwwJOZcnl7CjZLcM85gQTnrk2YTv9y2v7EXhd8TrDM0BRfSqAdvuQIf3_2vsD-BeZ3iyT0FSHsKOWzyC26EU5Rbvxra7G40vct-wQaf8zWMwE0Lux6dsRllR7ZSyudkydOtRQNh82oI6YZt5W3WCoT3M1t3xQMMokYWtKDyHgoWdNMvpjIWiUha7oayiJ_DtcHx6cBR3FRpim3FUscqmTngr0YwSXgpuU_SoucB1wJmUc1-K3CVFacs6r32GplEpKuVNXarUJ7WqxAh2F8uFewYM7QaXGytVVlnJk9wUllvrRF5yW9WlieB9P1fadt9IVTRmOgAvc4081cTTCN4MlKsA2XENzaid7oGAK1z7slJEsNfPv-60udE8E6rA4Wcc-x5eox7S4YpZuOWGaFDQcnQQ5V9oCAsfv1BmETwNsjUMQIgW10hF8CMI2_CGAMCDL6Y7AKiferbRjdOrS5FdnSC3ktp6TZzU5Ldqg7afdqkpRe1Tm6skgnetWP6RL3p88J2uz_-V8DXcOTr9eqyPP0--vIC7nP74aWNUe7B7vt64l3DL_jqfNutXrXb-BnBhPV8 |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3di9QwEB_OPRVf_N676qkRRJ_qtUnTtPgkd7soHsshHpy-hDRNcGG_2N4K-987adLeHZwi-NTQTkI6mUlmksxvAN7YrLKJUCbmqUnijLtgZVwn4rRmOTdCoAfhk02IyaQ4Py9Pd-BDFwvj8SH6DTenGe187RTcrGp7eIkaavT2PWO0uAW7mcshM4Dd46_js5Mr6FFZmIhp7DBOOuzZhB52da-tRv5C4k2mZo8jet2Ebdeg8YP_6v1DuB9MT_LRy8oj2DGLx3DHJ6PcYmmkQ2k4uox-wwpB_ZsnoCYOux_fkpmLi2oHlczVlqBjjyJC5tMW1gnrzNu8EwQtYrIOBwQNcaEsZOU26FC0sJFmOZ0Rn1ZKYzMurugpnI1H344-xSFHQ6w5RSWrdGqY1RkaUsxmjOoUfWrKcCYwKqXUliw3SVHqss5ry9E4KlklrKpLkdqkFhUbwmCxXJh9IGg5mFzpTPBKZzTJVaGp1oblJdVVXaoI3nVjJXX4R5dHYyY99DKVyFPpeBrB655y5UE7bqAZtsPdE1CBsx8vWQQH3fjLoM-NpJyJArvPKbbdf0ZNdMcramGWG0eDgpaji5j9hcah4eMfZjyCPS9bfQcYa5GNRAQ_vLD1XxwEuPfGZICA-ilnG9kYubqytysT5FZSaysdJ6XzXKVC60-aVJWstqnORRLB21Ys_8gXOTr67p7P_pXwFdw9PR7Lk8-TL8_hHnVXftpNqgMYXKw35gXc1r8ups36ZVDP31ujPnU |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient+limitation+may+induce+microbial+mining+for+resources+from+persistent+soil+organic+matter&rft.jtitle=Ecology+%28Durham%29&rft.au=Hicks%2C+Lettice+C&rft.au=Lajtha%2C+Kate&rft.au=Rousk%2C+Johannes&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.pub=Ecological+Society+of+America&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fecy.3328&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0012-9658&client=summon |