Characterization of the mechanism of drug-drug interactions from PubMed using MeSH terms

Identifying drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for the development of safe pharmaceutical drugs and for the optimization of multidrug regimens for complex diseases such as cancer and HIV. There have been about 150,000 publications on DDIs in PubMed, which is a great resource for DDI s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 12; no. 4; p. e0173548
Main Authors: Lu, Yin, Figler, Bryan, Huang, Hong, Tu, Yi-Cheng, Wang, Ju, Cheng, Feng
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 19.04.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
ISSN:1932-6203, 1932-6203
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Identifying drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for the development of safe pharmaceutical drugs and for the optimization of multidrug regimens for complex diseases such as cancer and HIV. There have been about 150,000 publications on DDIs in PubMed, which is a great resource for DDI studies. In this paper, we introduced an automatic computational method for the systematic analysis of the mechanism of DDIs using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms from PubMed literature. MeSH term is a controlled vocabulary thesaurus developed by the National Library of Medicine for indexing and annotating articles. Our method can effectively identify DDI-relevant MeSH terms such as drugs, proteins and phenomena with high accuracy. The connections among these MeSH terms were investigated by using co-occurrence heatmaps and social network analysis. Our approach can be used to visualize relationships of DDI terms, which has the potential to help users better understand DDIs. As the volume of PubMed records increases, our method for automatic analysis of DDIs from the PubMed database will become more accurate.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceptualization: YL BF HH YCT JW FC.Data curation: YL BF FC.Formal analysis: YL BF JW FC.Funding acquisition: JW FC YCT.Investigation: YL BF FC.Methodology: YL HH FC.Project administration: HH YCT JW FC.Resources: YCT FC.Software: YL YCT FC.Supervision: YCT FC.Validation: YL BF HH FC.Visualization: YL FC.Writing – original draft: YL BF YCT FC.Writing – review & editing: YL BF YCT JW FC.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0173548