Characterization of the mechanism of drug-drug interactions from PubMed using MeSH terms
Identifying drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for the development of safe pharmaceutical drugs and for the optimization of multidrug regimens for complex diseases such as cancer and HIV. There have been about 150,000 publications on DDIs in PubMed, which is a great resource for DDI s...
Saved in:
| Published in: | PloS one Vol. 12; no. 4; p. e0173548 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
19.04.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203, 1932-6203 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Identifying drug-drug interaction (DDI) is an important topic for the development of safe pharmaceutical drugs and for the optimization of multidrug regimens for complex diseases such as cancer and HIV. There have been about 150,000 publications on DDIs in PubMed, which is a great resource for DDI studies. In this paper, we introduced an automatic computational method for the systematic analysis of the mechanism of DDIs using MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms from PubMed literature. MeSH term is a controlled vocabulary thesaurus developed by the National Library of Medicine for indexing and annotating articles. Our method can effectively identify DDI-relevant MeSH terms such as drugs, proteins and phenomena with high accuracy. The connections among these MeSH terms were investigated by using co-occurrence heatmaps and social network analysis. Our approach can be used to visualize relationships of DDI terms, which has the potential to help users better understand DDIs. As the volume of PubMed records increases, our method for automatic analysis of DDIs from the PubMed database will become more accurate. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Conceptualization: YL BF HH YCT JW FC.Data curation: YL BF FC.Formal analysis: YL BF JW FC.Funding acquisition: JW FC YCT.Investigation: YL BF FC.Methodology: YL HH FC.Project administration: HH YCT JW FC.Resources: YCT FC.Software: YL YCT FC.Supervision: YCT FC.Validation: YL BF HH FC.Visualization: YL FC.Writing – original draft: YL BF YCT FC.Writing – review & editing: YL BF YCT JW FC. |
| ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0173548 |