review of the use of direct seeding and seedling plantings in restoration: what do we know and where should we go?
QUESTIONS: To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration techniques. What method results in the most timely and cost‐effective means of reinstating biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions and...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Applied vegetation science Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 561 - 568 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Malden
Opulus Press
01.10.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd John Wiley & Sons Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1402-2001, 1654-109X |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | QUESTIONS: To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration techniques. What method results in the most timely and cost‐effective means of reinstating biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions and services? METHODS: We explored the efficacy and costs of two re‐vegetation techniques commonly used in ecosystem restoration: direct seeding and planting of seedlings. Our analysis focused on 120 scientific peer‐reviewed publications reporting on experiments using seeds or seedlings, and encompassed a range of ecosystems such as wetlands, savannas and forests. We examined current restoration issues, including species diversity, survival, species selection, costs and how future climate change may influence restoration efforts. RESULTS: Direct seeding experiments used more species than seedling studies, yet showed lower survivorship. Species availability is the major constraint in the selection of which species were used, regardless of the approach employed. Although costs are extremely important when planning a restoration project, few published findings report on the economic aspects of ecosystem restoration. Further, we did not find any study addressing the impacts of global climate change on restoration programmes or how studies should consider future shifts in the environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species. Restoration efforts are in need of detailed reporting that includes time frames and costs. We need to consider future climate scenarios that will affect ecosystem restoration efforts. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Questions: To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration techniques. What method results in the most timely and cost-effective means of reinstating biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions and services? Methods: We explored the efficacy and costs of two re-vegetation techniques commonly used in ecosystem restoration: direct seeding and planting of seedlings. Our analysis focused on 120 scientific peer-reviewed publications reporting on experiments using seeds or seedlings, and encompassed a range of ecosystems such as wetlands, savannas and forests. We examined current restoration issues, including species diversity, survival, species selection, costs and how future climate change may influence restoration efforts. Results: Direct seeding experiments used more species than seedling studies, yet showed lower survivorship. Species availability is the major constraint in the selection of which species were used, regardless of the approach employed. Although costs are extremely important when planning a restoration project, few published findings report on the economic aspects of ecosystem restoration. Further, we did not find any study addressing the impacts of global climate change on restoration programmes or how studies should consider future shifts in the environment. Conclusions: Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species. Restoration efforts are in need of detailed reporting that includes time frames and costs. We need to consider future climate scenarios that will affect ecosystem restoration efforts. Questions To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration techniques. What method results in the most timely and cost-effective means of reinstating biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions and services? Methods We explored the efficacy and costs of two re-vegetation techniques commonly used in ecosystem restoration: direct seeding and planting of seedlings. Our analysis focused on 120 scientific peer-reviewed publications reporting on experiments using seeds or seedlings, and encompassed a range of ecosystems such as wetlands, savannas and forests. We examined current restoration issues, including species diversity, survival, species selection, costs and how future climate change may influence restoration efforts. Results Direct seeding experiments used more species than seedling studies, yet showed lower survivorship. Species availability is the major constraint in the selection of which species were used, regardless of the approach employed. Although costs are extremely important when planning a restoration project, few published findings report on the economic aspects of ecosystem restoration. Further, we did not find any study addressing the impacts of global climate change on restoration programmes or how studies should consider future shifts in the environment. Conclusions Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species. Restoration efforts are in need of detailed reporting that includes time frames and costs. We need to consider future climate scenarios that will affect ecosystem restoration efforts. Direct seeding and planting of seedlings are the most common techniques use in ecosystem restoration. We reviewed 120 papers that included these techniques and examined current restoration issues. Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species and consider future climate scenarios that will affect restoration efforts. Additionally, detailed reporting of outcomes and costs are essential. Questions To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration techniques. What method results in the most timely and cost‐effective means of reinstating biodiversity and restoring ecosystem functions and services? Methods We explored the efficacy and costs of two re‐vegetation techniques commonly used in ecosystem restoration: direct seeding and planting of seedlings. Our analysis focused on 120 scientific peer‐reviewed publications reporting on experiments using seeds or seedlings, and encompassed a range of ecosystems such as wetlands, savannas and forests. We examined current restoration issues, including species diversity, survival, species selection, costs and how future climate change may influence restoration efforts. Results Direct seeding experiments used more species than seedling studies, yet showed lower survivorship. Species availability is the major constraint in the selection of which species were used, regardless of the approach employed. Although costs are extremely important when planning a restoration project, few published findings report on the economic aspects of ecosystem restoration. Further, we did not find any study addressing the impacts of global climate change on restoration programmes or how studies should consider future shifts in the environment. Conclusions Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species. Restoration efforts are in need of detailed reporting that includes time frames and costs. We need to consider future climate scenarios that will affect ecosystem restoration efforts. Direct seeding and planting of seedlings are the most common techniques use in ecosystem restoration. We reviewed 120 papers that included these techniques and examined current restoration issues. Our results highlight the need for restoration experiments to explore more species and consider future climate scenarios that will affect restoration efforts. Additionally, detailed reporting of outcomes and costs are essential. |
| Author | Laurance, Susan G.W. Palma, Ana Cristina |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Palma, Ana Cristina – sequence: 2 fullname: Laurance, Susan G.W – sequence: 3 fullname: Marrs, Rob |
| BookMark | eNqFks1v1DAQxSNUJNrChTvCEhdUKWX8kTjmgkpUCtIKJEoLN8vEs7vepvFiJw3973E20EOFwBc_e37PGvv5INvrfIdZ9pTCMU3jlbmJzTFlVPIH2T4tC5FTUN_2khbAcgZAH2UHMW6SkKpQ-1kIeONwJH5J-jWSIeIkrQvY9CQiWtetiOnsTrfTYtuark8iEteRgLH3wfTOd6_JuDY9sZ6MSK46P-5s4xoDkrj2Q2unwsq_eZw9XJo24pPf82F28e70S_0-X3w6-1CfLPKmYJTnAirKbMG5RVsViMqiYJRWhbVSGFt-F-lqyBsJoIQoG2TSLtM2KI4GG8oPs5fzudvgfwypUX3tYoNt6h_9EDWtgEPFOa_-j0qW3lQBVwl9cQ_d-CF06SKJolBSEJVMFMxUE3yMAZe6cf3umfpgXKsp6CkvPeWld3kly9E9yza4axNu_w7TGR5di7f_IPXJ5Xn9x_Ns9mymzO48gqv0UVSZ6vlcd7HHn3d1E650Kbks9NePZ_rtombisv6sIfHPZ35pvDar4KK-OGdAS0iJgFSS_wL0isk4 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1051_bioconf_202412301036 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12535 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70034 crossref_primary_10_3390_d16070376 crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_13166 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_117802 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10531_025_03076_z crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13915 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_024_01451_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2022_120706 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fecs_2023_100133 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_70015 crossref_primary_10_21829_abm129_2022_1917 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10050899 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2017_11_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_marpolbul_2024_117287 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14283 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14299 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13482 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14325 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14600 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12420 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2025_1576147 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2019_07_025 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12625 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0326596 crossref_primary_10_1002_inc3_70025 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12507 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12644 crossref_primary_10_1111_aec_13054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_10_049 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13807 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12804 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13157_024_01874_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sajb_2021_04_024 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13534 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14331 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12567 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13255 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13532 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2024_122190 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14459 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12495 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13372 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13096 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0259552 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_022_02358_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_4492 crossref_primary_10_3390_f15040674 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12278 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13370 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12315 crossref_primary_10_3390_land13122033 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5615 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13595_019_0833_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hazadv_2023_100293 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12396 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11273_024_10015_2 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13977 crossref_primary_10_1002_glr2_12018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2022_106598 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13221 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11056_022_09917_x crossref_primary_10_3389_ffgc_2020_571352 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2025_152825 crossref_primary_10_1139_cjfr_2022_0018 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12305 crossref_primary_10_1111_btp_13355 crossref_primary_10_1088_1748_9326_accdf2 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2000 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2024_152479 crossref_primary_10_3390_app13148333 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10080826 crossref_primary_10_3390_su17157152 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2023_121628 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12131 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2023_121629 crossref_primary_10_36930_40340504 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envexpbot_2022_105094 crossref_primary_10_1111_csp2_13180 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_024_06554_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13631 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14167 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2022_04_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110671 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14289 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2023_117713 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2020_125935 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2024_107410 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70050 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70054 crossref_primary_10_17660_ActaHortic_2025_1424_11 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2020_00109 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_12_028 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10091321 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2024_121576 crossref_primary_10_1080_21580103_2024_2445255 crossref_primary_10_2478_forj_2023_0011 crossref_primary_10_1080_21580103_2023_2198549 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_06_032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118150 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13959 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119243 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_12498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2024_152570 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11258_020_01031_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_02_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118304 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2021_119912 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2025_1534920 crossref_primary_10_3390_land10010071 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2022_1045591 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15043231 crossref_primary_10_3390_f16050800 crossref_primary_10_1080_00049158_2024_2411783 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12862_024_02236_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118827 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14128 crossref_primary_10_1590_1519_6984_268716 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_70116 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70087 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compag_2022_107421 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2024_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_148239 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0250256 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_144647 crossref_primary_10_3390_f16091401 crossref_primary_10_2478_forj_2024_0024 crossref_primary_10_1111_emr_70013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2016_09_020 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13576 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14534 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rama_2017_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1590_1519_6984_264348 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_70079 crossref_primary_10_1093_aobpla_plac045 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12758 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70136 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11056_020_09777_3 crossref_primary_10_3390_d17080570 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2025_122958 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_019_01902_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2021_151772 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13538 crossref_primary_10_31413_nativa_v9i4_11783 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14112140 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_14117 crossref_primary_10_3390_rs11080928 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11629_021_7172_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2020_105788 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_021_00475_3 crossref_primary_10_1061_JIDEDH_IRENG_10538 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13421 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40415_017_0371_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13898 crossref_primary_10_1002_2688_8319_12202 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_70034 crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_20247 crossref_primary_10_3390_f14030547 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2023_117645 crossref_primary_10_17221_1_2024_JFS crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2019_117559 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ufug_2021_127271 crossref_primary_10_5814_j_issn_1674_764x_2023_04_019 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13162256 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2021_106389 crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_5246 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2023_110172 crossref_primary_10_1080_0028825X_2024_2432314 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2023_107039 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0262410 crossref_primary_10_3897_neotropical_14_e38290 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_025_02659_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_12460 crossref_primary_10_3390_plants10061035 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13271 crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_70097 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2018_05_025 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01394.x 10.1126/science.1057544 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.013 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95311.x 10.1017/S1464793105006950 10.1139/x92-100 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1994.tb00054.x 10.1126/science.1060391 10.1002/ldr.736 10.1111/rec.12028 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00135.x 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00535-1 10.1002/1099-145X(200007/08)11:4<375::AID-LDR400>3.0.CO;2-G 10.1007/s004420000616 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.014 10.1007/s11258-011-9922-2 10.1093/icb/ics041 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.019 10.2307/2389094 10.1126/science.1215855 10.1007/s00267-011-9777-2 10.1007/0-387-29112-1_51 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01156.x 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00242.x 10.1071/MF99037 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00599-6 10.1093/jxb/ert211 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00674.x 10.1017/S026646740400135X 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00695.x 10.1016/j.jnc.2003.08.003 10.1016/j.ppees.2012.05.001 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990204.x 10.1126/science.1187512 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00098.x 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00423.x 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00688.x 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80049.x 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00600-9 10.1098/rstb.1996.0114 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science – notice: 2015 International Association for Vegetation Science |
| DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7SN C1K 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| DOI | 10.1111/avsc.12173 |
| DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Ecology Abstracts Ecology Abstracts AGRICOLA |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Botany |
| EISSN | 1654-109X |
| Editor | Marrs, Rob |
| Editor_xml | – sequence: 3 givenname: Rob surname: Marrs fullname: Marrs, Rob |
| EndPage | 568 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3801954411 10_1111_avsc_12173 AVSC12173 43916596 ark_67375_WNG_BLC24VCR_0 US201600090797 |
| Genre | article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Australian Research Council and Queensland Herbarium – fundername: Colciencias (Colombian Department for the Administration of Science, Technology and Innovation) – fundername: ARC Linkage Grant funderid: LP110201093 |
| GroupedDBID | -JH .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OC 23M 2~F 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 4P2 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AAHKG AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AAPSS AASGY AAXRX AAXTN AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPLY ABPVW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACHIC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADHSS ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEJZ AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEPYG AEQDE AEUPB AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFFIJ AFFPM AFGKR AFNWH AFRAH AFWVQ AGHNM AGUYK AHBTC AHXOZ AICQM AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR AKPMI ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ANHSF AQVQM ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 D-E D-F DATOO DC7 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EAD EAP EBD EBS ECGQY EDH EJD EMK ESX F00 F01 F04 FBQ FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X H13 HF~ HGD HGLYW HTVGU HVGLF HZ~ IAG IAO IEP IGH IHR IPSME ITC IX1 J.8 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JST KPI LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PQ0 Q.N Q11 Q5J QB0 R.K RBO ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WUPDE WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XV2 Y6R ZZTAW ~8M ~IA ~KM ~WT AAMMB AEFGJ AEYWJ AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY BSCLL AAYXX BANNL CITATION O8X 7SN C1K 7ST 7U6 7S9 L.6 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5213-40812d533ded85ee9de421185dd74ad6b4109e3c7009446ce27dfd6b093eaec13 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 213 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000361181500003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1402-2001 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:37:02 EDT 2025 Tue Oct 07 09:50:56 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:36:29 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:38:08 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:01:45 EST 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:24:52 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:31:42 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:17:36 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 09:43:02 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5213-40812d533ded85ee9de421185dd74ad6b4109e3c7009446ce27dfd6b093eaec13 |
| Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12173 Colciencias (Colombian Department for the Administration of Science, Technology and Innovation) Australian Research Council and Queensland Herbarium istex:C24C48E508ADD6C6E74EFA520F292CAFFE66EEEE ArticleID:AVSC12173 ARC Linkage Grant - No. LP110201093 Appendix S1. Data and studies included in the review. ark:/67375/WNG-BLC24VCR-0 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2083-3037 |
| PQID | 1710610487 |
| PQPubID | 946338 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1803083338 proquest_miscellaneous_1722179039 proquest_journals_1710610487 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_avsc_12173 crossref_primary_10_1111_avsc_12173 wiley_primary_10_1111_avsc_12173_AVSC12173 jstor_primary_43916596 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_BLC24VCR_0 fao_agris_US201600090797 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | October 2015 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2015 text: October 2015 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Malden |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden |
| PublicationTitle | Applied vegetation science |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Appl Veg Sci |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | Opulus Press Blackwell Publishing Ltd John Wiley & Sons Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Opulus Press – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: John Wiley & Sons Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | Dalling, J.W. & Hubbell, S.P. 2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90: 557-568. Higgs, E.S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11: 338-348. Guariguata, M.R. & Ostertag, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 185-206. Westoby, M., Leishman, M. & Lord, J. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, Biological Science 351: 1309-1318. Zahawi, R.A. & Holl, K.D. 2009. Comparing the performance of tree stakes and seedlings to restore abandoned tropical pastures. Restoration Ecology 17: 854-864. Moles, A.T. & Westoby, M. 2002. Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger-seeded species. Oikos 99: 241-248. Ellis, E.C., Goldewijk, K.K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D. & Ramankutty, N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 589-606. Florentine, S.K. & Westbrooke, M.E. 2004. Restoration on abandoned tropical pasturelands - do we know enough? Journal for Nature Conservation 12: 85-94. Sampaio, A.B., Holl, K.D. & Scariot, A. 2007. Does restoration enhance regeneration of seasonal deciduous forests in pastures in central Brazil? Restoration Ecology 15: 462-471. Chazdon, R.L. 2014. Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, US. Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., (...) & Snyder, P.K. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574. McCullough, S.A. & Endress, B.A. 2012. Do postfire mulching treatments affect plant community recovery in California coastal sage scrub lands? Environmental Management 49: 142-150. Holl, K.D., Zahawi, R.A., Cole, R.J., Ostertag, R. & Cordell, S. 2011. Planting seedlings in tree islands versus plantations as a large-scale tropical forest restoration strategy. Restoration Ecology 19: 470-479. Gaertner, M., Nottebrock, H., Fourie, H., Privett, S.D.J. & Richardson, D.M. 2012. Plant invasions, restoration, and economics: perspectives from South African fynbos. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14: 341-353. Khurana, E. & Singh, J.S. 2004. Germination and seedling growth of five tree species from tropical dry forest in relation to water stress: impact of seed size. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20: 385-396. Naeem, S., Duffy, J.E. & Zavaleta, E. 2012. The Functions of Biological Diversity in an Age of Extinction. Science 336: 1401-1406. SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Global biodiversity outlook 3. SCBD, Montréal, QC, CA. Vandendriessche, R. 1992. Changes in drought resistance and root-growth capacity of container seedlings in response to nursery drought, nitrogen, and potassium treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 740-749. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration), & International Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. SER, Washington, DC, US. Hallett, L.M., Standish, R.J. & Hobbs, R.J. 2011. Seed mass and summer drought survival in a Mediterranean-climate ecosystem. Plant Ecology 212: 1479-1489. Holl, K.D. 1999. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil. Biotropica 31: 229-242. Kartawinata, K. 1994. The use of secondary forest species in rehabilitation of degraded forest lands. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 7: 76-86. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. TEEB, Geneva, CH. Brofas, G. & Varelides, C. 2000. Hydro-seeding and mulching for establishing vegetation on mining spoils in Greece. Land Degradation & Development 11: 375-382. Cramer, V.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Standish, R.J. 2008. What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 104-112. Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W.H., Simberloff, D. & Swackhamer, D. 2001b. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292: 281-284. Celentano, D., Zahawi, R.A., Finegan, B., Ostertag, R., Cole, R.J. & Holl, K.D. 2011. Litterfall dynamics under different tropical forest restoration strategies in Costa Rica. Biotropica 43: 279-287. Edwards, W. & Krockenberger, A. 2006. Seedling mortality due to drought and fire associated with the 2002 El Nino event in a tropical rain forest in north-east Queensland, Australia. Biotropica 38: 16-26. Holl, K.D., Loik, M.E., Lin, E.H.V. & Samuels, I.A. 2000. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8: 339-349. Engel, V.L. & Parrotta, J.A. 2001. An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 152: 169-181. Tilman, D., Reich, P.B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T. & Lehman, C. 2001a. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843-845. Arellano, G. & Peco, B. 2012. Testing the role of seed size in annual legume seedling performance under experimental autumn moisture conditions. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 690-697. Herman, J.J., Sultan, S.E., Horgan-Kobelski, T. & Riggs, C. 2012. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil. Integrative and Comparative Biology 52: 77-88. Kirmer, A., Baasch, A. & Tischew, S. 2012. Sowing of low and high diversity seed mixtures in ecological restoration of surface mined-land. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 198-207. Long, H.L., Heilig, G.K., Wang, J., Li, X.B., Luo, M., Wu, X.Q. & Zhang, M. 2006. Land use and soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River: some socio-economic considerations on China's Grain-for-Green Programme. Land Degradation & Development 17: 589-603. Gilbert, G.S., Harms, K.E., Hamill, D.N. & Hubbell, S.P. 2001. Effects of seedling size, El Nino drought, seedling density, and distance to nearest conspecific adult on 6-year survival of Ocotea whitei seedlings in Panama. Oecologia 127: 509-516. Thomlinson, J.R., Serrano, M.I., Lopez, T.D., Aide, T.M. & Zimmerman, J.K. 1996. Land-use dynamics in a post-agricultural Puerto Rican landscape (1936-1988). Biotropica 28: 525-536. Doust, S.J., Erskine, P.D. & Lamb, D. 2006. Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 234: 333-343. Doust, S.J., Erskine, P.D. & Lamb, D. 2008. Restoring rainforest species by direct seeding: tree seedling establishment and growth performance on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1178-1188. Funk, J.L., Cleland, E.E., Suding, K.N. & Zavaleta, E.S. 2008. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 695-703. Cheesman, A.W. & Winter, K. 2013. Growth response and acclimation of CO2 exchange characteristics to elevated temperatures in tropical tree seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 3817-3828. Aide, T.M. & Cavelier, J. 1994. Barriers to lowland tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Restoration Ecology 2: 219-229. de Jong, N.H. 2000. Woody plant restoration and natural regeneration in wet meadow at Coomonderry Swamp on the south coast of New South Wales. Marine and Freshwater Research 51: 81-89. Espelta, J.M., Retana, J. & Habrouk, A. 2003. An economic and ecological multi-criteria evaluation of reforestation methods to recover burned Pinus nigra forests in NE Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 185-198. Wortley, L., Hero, J.M. & Howes, M. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21: 537-543. Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A., Baillie, J.E.M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., (...) & Watson, R. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164-1168. 2011; 212 2004; 20 2001b; 292 2010; 328 2010; 19 2013; 21 2010 2006; 38 2006; 17 2013; 64 2000; 8 2002; 99 2000; 51 2005 2004 2012; 15 2012; 14 2011; 19 2001; 148 2012; 52 2007; 15 2006; 234 2001; 127 1996; 28 2001; 152 1997; 11 2001 2000; 11 2001a; 294 2004; 12 2008; 23 2011; 43 2003; 180 2005; 309 1999; 31 2014 2002; 90 2012; 49 1996; 351 2008; 256 2012; 23 2012; 336 1992; 22 1994; 2 1994; 7 2009; 17 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) (e_1_2_6_42_1) 2004 e_1_2_6_20_1 TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) (e_1_2_6_43_1) 2010 e_1_2_6_9_1 SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) (e_1_2_6_41_1) 2010 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_49_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 Kartawinata K. (e_1_2_6_31_1) 1994; 7 e_1_2_6_45_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 e_1_2_6_47_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_50_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_48_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_44_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_46_1 |
| References_xml | – reference: TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. TEEB, Geneva, CH. – reference: Engel, V.L. & Parrotta, J.A. 2001. An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 152: 169-181. – reference: Holl, K.D., Loik, M.E., Lin, E.H.V. & Samuels, I.A. 2000. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restoration Ecology 8: 339-349. – reference: Guariguata, M.R. & Ostertag, R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 185-206. – reference: Higgs, E.S. 1997. What is good ecological restoration? Conservation Biology 11: 338-348. – reference: de Jong, N.H. 2000. Woody plant restoration and natural regeneration in wet meadow at Coomonderry Swamp on the south coast of New South Wales. Marine and Freshwater Research 51: 81-89. – reference: Celentano, D., Zahawi, R.A., Finegan, B., Ostertag, R., Cole, R.J. & Holl, K.D. 2011. Litterfall dynamics under different tropical forest restoration strategies in Costa Rica. Biotropica 43: 279-287. – reference: Kirmer, A., Baasch, A. & Tischew, S. 2012. Sowing of low and high diversity seed mixtures in ecological restoration of surface mined-land. Applied Vegetation Science 15: 198-207. – reference: Florentine, S.K. & Westbrooke, M.E. 2004. Restoration on abandoned tropical pasturelands - do we know enough? Journal for Nature Conservation 12: 85-94. – reference: Gaertner, M., Nottebrock, H., Fourie, H., Privett, S.D.J. & Richardson, D.M. 2012. Plant invasions, restoration, and economics: perspectives from South African fynbos. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 14: 341-353. – reference: Sampaio, A.B., Holl, K.D. & Scariot, A. 2007. Does restoration enhance regeneration of seasonal deciduous forests in pastures in central Brazil? Restoration Ecology 15: 462-471. – reference: Westoby, M., Leishman, M. & Lord, J. 1996. Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, Biological Science 351: 1309-1318. – reference: Moles, A.T. & Westoby, M. 2002. Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger-seeded species. Oikos 99: 241-248. – reference: SER (Society for Ecological Restoration), & International Science & Policy Working Group. 2004. The SER international primer on ecological restoration. SER, Washington, DC, US. – reference: Vandendriessche, R. 1992. Changes in drought resistance and root-growth capacity of container seedlings in response to nursery drought, nitrogen, and potassium treatments. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 740-749. – reference: Doust, S.J., Erskine, P.D. & Lamb, D. 2006. Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 234: 333-343. – reference: Arellano, G. & Peco, B. 2012. Testing the role of seed size in annual legume seedling performance under experimental autumn moisture conditions. Journal of Vegetation Science 23: 690-697. – reference: Dalling, J.W. & Hubbell, S.P. 2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90: 557-568. – reference: Long, H.L., Heilig, G.K., Wang, J., Li, X.B., Luo, M., Wu, X.Q. & Zhang, M. 2006. Land use and soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River: some socio-economic considerations on China's Grain-for-Green Programme. Land Degradation & Development 17: 589-603. – reference: Doust, S.J., Erskine, P.D. & Lamb, D. 2008. Restoring rainforest species by direct seeding: tree seedling establishment and growth performance on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1178-1188. – reference: Tilman, D., Reich, P.B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T. & Lehman, C. 2001a. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843-845. – reference: Brofas, G. & Varelides, C. 2000. Hydro-seeding and mulching for establishing vegetation on mining spoils in Greece. Land Degradation & Development 11: 375-382. – reference: Hallett, L.M., Standish, R.J. & Hobbs, R.J. 2011. Seed mass and summer drought survival in a Mediterranean-climate ecosystem. Plant Ecology 212: 1479-1489. – reference: Naeem, S., Duffy, J.E. & Zavaleta, E. 2012. The Functions of Biological Diversity in an Age of Extinction. Science 336: 1401-1406. – reference: Thomlinson, J.R., Serrano, M.I., Lopez, T.D., Aide, T.M. & Zimmerman, J.K. 1996. Land-use dynamics in a post-agricultural Puerto Rican landscape (1936-1988). Biotropica 28: 525-536. – reference: Espelta, J.M., Retana, J. & Habrouk, A. 2003. An economic and ecological multi-criteria evaluation of reforestation methods to recover burned Pinus nigra forests in NE Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 185-198. – reference: Cheesman, A.W. & Winter, K. 2013. Growth response and acclimation of CO2 exchange characteristics to elevated temperatures in tropical tree seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 3817-3828. – reference: Holl, K.D., Zahawi, R.A., Cole, R.J., Ostertag, R. & Cordell, S. 2011. Planting seedlings in tree islands versus plantations as a large-scale tropical forest restoration strategy. Restoration Ecology 19: 470-479. – reference: McCullough, S.A. & Endress, B.A. 2012. Do postfire mulching treatments affect plant community recovery in California coastal sage scrub lands? Environmental Management 49: 142-150. – reference: Cramer, V.A., Hobbs, R.J. & Standish, R.J. 2008. What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 104-112. – reference: Holl, K.D. 1999. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil. Biotropica 31: 229-242. – reference: SCBD (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Global biodiversity outlook 3. SCBD, Montréal, QC, CA. – reference: Kartawinata, K. 1994. The use of secondary forest species in rehabilitation of degraded forest lands. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 7: 76-86. – reference: Aide, T.M. & Cavelier, J. 1994. Barriers to lowland tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Restoration Ecology 2: 219-229. – reference: Edwards, W. & Krockenberger, A. 2006. Seedling mortality due to drought and fire associated with the 2002 El Nino event in a tropical rain forest in north-east Queensland, Australia. Biotropica 38: 16-26. – reference: Butchart, S.H.M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., Van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J.P.W., Almond, R.E.A., Baillie, J.E.M., Bomhard, B., Brown, C., (...) & Watson, R. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164-1168. – reference: Herman, J.J., Sultan, S.E., Horgan-Kobelski, T. & Riggs, C. 2012. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil. Integrative and Comparative Biology 52: 77-88. – reference: Funk, J.L., Cleland, E.E., Suding, K.N. & Zavaleta, E.S. 2008. Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 695-703. – reference: Chazdon, R.L. 2014. Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, US. – reference: Wortley, L., Hero, J.M. & Howes, M. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restoration Ecology 21: 537-543. – reference: Zahawi, R.A. & Holl, K.D. 2009. Comparing the performance of tree stakes and seedlings to restore abandoned tropical pastures. Restoration Ecology 17: 854-864. – reference: Gilbert, G.S., Harms, K.E., Hamill, D.N. & Hubbell, S.P. 2001. Effects of seedling size, El Nino drought, seedling density, and distance to nearest conspecific adult on 6-year survival of Ocotea whitei seedlings in Panama. Oecologia 127: 509-516. – reference: Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., (...) & Snyder, P.K. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309: 570-574. – reference: Khurana, E. & Singh, J.S. 2004. Germination and seedling growth of five tree species from tropical dry forest in relation to water stress: impact of seed size. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20: 385-396. – reference: Ellis, E.C., Goldewijk, K.K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D. & Ramankutty, N. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 589-606. – reference: Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Wolff, B., D'Antonio, C., Dobson, A., Howarth, R., Schindler, D., Schlesinger, W.H., Simberloff, D. & Swackhamer, D. 2001b. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292: 281-284. – volume: 23 start-page: 695 year: 2008 end-page: 703 article-title: Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 309 start-page: 570 year: 2005 end-page: 574 article-title: Global consequences of land use publication-title: Science – volume: 294 start-page: 843 year: 2001a end-page: 845 article-title: Diversity and productivity in a long‐term grassland experiment publication-title: Science – volume: 17 start-page: 854 year: 2009 end-page: 864 article-title: Comparing the performance of tree stakes and seedlings to restore abandoned tropical pastures publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 152 start-page: 169 year: 2001 end-page: 181 article-title: An evaluation of direct seeding for reforestation of degraded lands in central Sao Paulo state, Brazil publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 292 start-page: 281 year: 2001b end-page: 284 article-title: Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change publication-title: Science – volume: 15 start-page: 198 year: 2012 end-page: 207 article-title: Sowing of low and high diversity seed mixtures in ecological restoration of surface mined‐land publication-title: Applied Vegetation Science – volume: 38 start-page: 16 year: 2006 end-page: 26 article-title: Seedling mortality due to drought and fire associated with the 2002 El Nino event in a tropical rain forest in north‐east Queensland, Australia publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 180 start-page: 185 year: 2003 end-page: 198 article-title: An economic and ecological multi‐criteria evaluation of reforestation methods to recover burned forests in NE Spain publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 99 start-page: 241 year: 2002 end-page: 248 article-title: Seed addition experiments are more likely to increase recruitment in larger‐seeded species publication-title: Oikos – volume: 336 start-page: 1401 year: 2012 end-page: 1406 article-title: The Functions of Biological Diversity in an Age of Extinction publication-title: Science – volume: 11 start-page: 375 year: 2000 end-page: 382 article-title: Hydro‐seeding and mulching for establishing vegetation on mining spoils in Greece publication-title: Land Degradation & Development – volume: 212 start-page: 1479 year: 2011 end-page: 1489 article-title: Seed mass and summer drought survival in a Mediterranean‐climate ecosystem publication-title: Plant Ecology – year: 2001 – volume: 51 start-page: 81 year: 2000 end-page: 89 article-title: Woody plant restoration and natural regeneration in wet meadow at Coomonderry Swamp on the south coast of New South Wales publication-title: Marine and Freshwater Research – volume: 7 start-page: 76 year: 1994 end-page: 86 article-title: The use of secondary forest species in rehabilitation of degraded forest lands publication-title: Journal of Tropical Forest Science – volume: 2 start-page: 219 year: 1994 end-page: 229 article-title: Barriers to lowland tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 234 start-page: 333 year: 2006 end-page: 343 article-title: Direct seeding to restore rainforest species: microsite effects on the early establishment and growth of rainforest tree seedlings on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 22 start-page: 740 year: 1992 end-page: 749 article-title: Changes in drought resistance and root‐growth capacity of container seedlings in response to nursery drought, nitrogen, and potassium treatments publication-title: Canadian Journal of Forest Research – volume: 127 start-page: 509 year: 2001 end-page: 516 article-title: Effects of seedling size, El Nino drought, seedling density, and distance to nearest conspecific adult on 6‐year survival of seedlings in Panama publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 14 start-page: 341 year: 2012 end-page: 353 article-title: Plant invasions, restoration, and economics: perspectives from South African fynbos publication-title: Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics – volume: 31 start-page: 229 year: 1999 end-page: 242 article-title: Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil publication-title: Biotropica – start-page: 1132 year: 2014 – volume: 17 start-page: 589 year: 2006 end-page: 603 article-title: Land use and soil erosion in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River: some socio‐economic considerations on China's Grain‐for‐Green Programme publication-title: Land Degradation & Development – year: 2014 – volume: 23 start-page: 104 year: 2008 end-page: 112 article-title: What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 49 start-page: 142 year: 2012 end-page: 150 article-title: Do postfire mulching treatments affect plant community recovery in California coastal sage scrub lands? publication-title: Environmental Management – year: 2010 – volume: 52 start-page: 77 year: 2012 end-page: 88 article-title: Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil publication-title: Integrative and Comparative Biology – volume: 23 start-page: 690 year: 2012 end-page: 697 article-title: Testing the role of seed size in annual legume seedling performance under experimental autumn moisture conditions publication-title: Journal of Vegetation Science – volume: 90 start-page: 557 year: 2002 end-page: 568 article-title: Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 19 start-page: 589 year: 2010 end-page: 606 article-title: Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000 publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 19 start-page: 470 year: 2011 end-page: 479 article-title: Planting seedlings in tree islands versus plantations as a large‐scale tropical forest restoration strategy publication-title: Restoration Ecology – start-page: 356 year: 2005 end-page: 360 – volume: 64 start-page: 3817 year: 2013 end-page: 3828 article-title: Growth response and acclimation of CO exchange characteristics to elevated temperatures in tropical tree seedlings publication-title: Journal of Experimental Botany – volume: 328 start-page: 1164 year: 2010 end-page: 1168 article-title: Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines publication-title: Science – volume: 21 start-page: 537 year: 2013 end-page: 543 article-title: Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 12 start-page: 85 year: 2004 end-page: 94 article-title: Restoration on abandoned tropical pasturelands – do we know enough? publication-title: Journal for Nature Conservation – year: 2004 – volume: 43 start-page: 279 year: 2011 end-page: 287 article-title: Litterfall dynamics under different tropical forest restoration strategies in Costa Rica publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 20 start-page: 385 year: 2004 end-page: 396 article-title: Germination and seedling growth of five tree species from tropical dry forest in relation to water stress: impact of seed size publication-title: Journal of Tropical Ecology – volume: 28 start-page: 525 year: 1996 end-page: 536 article-title: Land‐use dynamics in a post‐agricultural Puerto Rican landscape (1936–1988) publication-title: Biotropica – volume: 351 start-page: 1309 year: 1996 end-page: 1318 article-title: Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, Biological Science – volume: 148 start-page: 185 year: 2001 end-page: 206 article-title: Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 11 start-page: 338 year: 1997 end-page: 348 article-title: What is good ecological restoration? publication-title: Conservation Biology – volume: 15 start-page: 462 year: 2007 end-page: 471 article-title: Does restoration enhance regeneration of seasonal deciduous forests in pastures in central Brazil? publication-title: Restoration Ecology – volume: 256 start-page: 1178 year: 2008 end-page: 1188 article-title: Restoring rainforest species by direct seeding: tree seedling establishment and growth performance on degraded land in the wet tropics of Australia publication-title: Forest Ecology and Management – volume: 8 start-page: 339 year: 2000 end-page: 349 article-title: Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment publication-title: Restoration Ecology – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01394.x – ident: e_1_2_6_46_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1057544 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.013 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95311.x – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950 – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_47_1 doi: 10.1139/x92-100 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1994.tb00054.x – ident: e_1_2_6_44_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1060391 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1002/ldr.736 – ident: e_1_2_6_49_1 doi: 10.1111/rec.12028 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.1999.tb00135.x – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00535-1 – volume-title: Global biodiversity outlook 3 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1002/1099-145X(200007/08)11:4<375::AID-LDR400>3.0.CO;2-G – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.1007/s004420000616 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.014 – volume-title: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_6_43_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.1007/s11258-011-9922-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1093/icb/ics041 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.019 – ident: e_1_2_6_45_1 doi: 10.2307/2389094 – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1215855 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9777-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1007/0-387-29112-1_51 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01156.x – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00242.x – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1071/MF99037 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00599-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert211 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00674.x – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1017/S026646740400135X – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00695.x – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2003.08.003 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2012.05.001 – volume-title: The SER international primer on ecological restoration year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_42_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990204.x – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1187512 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00098.x – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 – ident: e_1_2_6_50_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00423.x – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00688.x – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80049.x – volume: 7 start-page: 76 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 article-title: The use of secondary forest species in rehabilitation of degraded forest lands publication-title: Journal of Tropical Forest Science – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00600-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_48_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0114 |
| SSID | ssj0017959 |
| Score | 2.5098207 |
| Snippet | QUESTIONS: To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration... Questions: To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration... Questions To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration... Questions To select the best method to restore an ecosystem requires an understanding of the various outcomes commonly achieved through different restoration... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref wiley jstor istex fao |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 561 |
| SubjectTerms | Aquatic ecosystems Biodiversity climate Climate change cost effectiveness Costs direct seeding Ecological function ecological restoration Ecosystem restoration Ecosystems Environmental restoration Experiments forests Global climate planning planting Planting methods Reforestation Restoration Revegetation savannas Seeding Seedlings Seeds Species diversity survival rate SYNTHESIS wetlands |
| Title | review of the use of direct seeding and seedling plantings in restoration: what do we know and where should we go? |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-BLC24VCR-0/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/43916596 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Favsc.12173 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1710610487 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1722179039 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1803083338 |
| Volume | 18 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000361181500003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1654-109X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0017959 issn: 1402-2001 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR1db9Mw8LR1e-CF72mBgYxASCBFSmKnThAS6gqFh6lCGx17sxzb2SamZGraFf49d04aNglNQjzFSc6Kc77z3dn3AfDKmYzrPIpCaYwMhRNZWKSFDk3O8Wrz0ojCF5uQ02l2cpJ_3YD361iYNj9Ev-FGnOHXa2JwXTTXmFxfNYZyI0i-CVsJEm46gK2Ph5PZQX-KQHW0fXQRhSDjfZeelDx5_vS-IZA2S12jmkoY_rn2ULyhe17XYL0Imtz7v8Hfh7ud6slGLa08gA1XPYTt_RrVw1-PYDFibRgLq0uGWiFbNo6arcxjTSvlmK6sb1MUO7u80L7QRMPOKzb3NWr8RL9jqzO9YLZmK8do1853WyF5ONacUVFtenFaf3gMs8mnb-MvYVeSITQo5zlam6gQWFQRrbNZ6lxunUATMkutlULbYSHiKHfcSPJYFFRtTNoSH0c5d9qZmO_AoKortwssikzquJa8TIWwQ52JQpexNbE2WmOPAN6s50WZLl85lc24UGu7hZCoPBIDeNnDXrZZOv4KtYvTq_QpLp9qdpRQcj0cZyRzGcBrP-d9bz3_QS5vMlXfp5_V_sE4EcfjQ4Wj2vFE0QP6yOU0Hwawt6YS1S0DjYolWdy4SOIHXvSvkYHpVEZXrl4STJJQmjSe3wKTUVohznkWwFtPV7f8phodH41968m_AD-FO4iRtHVU3IPBYr50z2DbXC3Om_nzjrV-Axl5JIU |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpR1db9Mw0NqXBC_jc1rGBkYgJJAiJbVTx7xMXUcZolRoW7e9WY7tbBNTMjXtCv-eOycNm4QmIZ7iJGfFOd_57uz7IOStMynTMopCYYwIueNpmCWZDo1kcLUyNzzzxSbEaJSencnvjW8OxsLU-SHaDTfkDL9eI4PjhvQtLtc3lcHkCIItk1UOdAQEvrp_OBgP22MELKTtw4swBhnum_yk6Mrzp_cdibSc6xL0VETxz4WL4h3l87YK62XQ4NF_jv4xWW-UT9qrqeUJWXLFU7K2V4KC-OsZmfZoHchCy5yCXkhnlcNmLfVoVcs5qgvr2xjHTq-vtC81UdHLgk58lRo_1R_p_EJPqS3p3FHct_Pd5kAgjlYXWFYbX5yXu8_JePDpuH8QNkUZQgOSnoG9CSqBBSXROpsmzknrOBiRaWKt4Np2Mx5H0jEj0GeRY70xYXN4HEnmtDMx2yArRVm4TUKjyCSOacHyhHPb1SnPdB5bE2ujNfQIyPvFxCjTZCzHwhlXamG5IBKVR2JA3rSw13Wejr9CbcL8Kn0OC6gaH3UwvR6MMxJSBOSdn_S2t578QKc3kajT0We1N-x3-En_UMGoNjxVtIA-djmR3YBsL8hENQtBpWKBNjcsk_CB1-1rYGE8l9GFK2cI0-lgojQm74FJMbEQYywNyAdPWPf8puqdHPV9a-tfgF-RBwfH34Zq-GX09QV5CNhJarfFbbIynczcDlkzN9PLavKy4bPflfAodQ |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-xbkK88D2tbIARCAmkSEntzAkvqOsoIKpq2ujYm-XYzjYxJVXTruO_585JwyahSYinOMlZcew739m-ux_AG2cSrtMwDKQxMhBOJEEWZzowKcerTXMjMg82Icfj5OQkPWh8cygWps4P0W64kWT4-ZoE3E1tfk3K9WVlKDmC5GuwLghFpgPr-4fDyag9RiAgbR9eRDHIeN_kJyVXnj-1b2iktVyXaKdSF1-tXBRvGJ_XTVivg4YP_rP1D-F-Y3yyfs0tj-COKx7Dxl6JBuKvJzDvszqQhZU5Q7uQLSpHxVrrsarWc0wX1pcpjp1NL7SHmqjYecFmHqXGD_UHtjzTc2ZLtnSM9u18tSUyiGPVGcFq04vT8uNTmAw_fR98CRpQhsCgpue43kSTwKKRaJ1NYudS6wQuIpPYWim03c1EFKaOG0k-i4LwxqTN8XGYcqedifgmdIqycFvAwtDEjmvJ81gIu6sTkek8sibSRmus0YV3q4FRpslYTsAZF2q1cqFOVL4Tu_C6pZ3WeTr-SrWF46v0KU6ganLUo_R62M5QprILb_2gt7X17Cc5vclY_Rh_VnujQU8cDw4VtmrTc0VL6GOXkf26sLNiE9VMBJWKJK25cZrED7xqX6MI07mMLly5IJpejxKl8fQWmoQSC3HOky6894x1y2-q_vHRwJee_QvxS7h7sD9Uo6_jb9twDzsnrr0Wd6Azny3cc9gwl_PzavaiEbPf5VIn8A |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+review+of+the+use+of+direct+seeding+and+seedling+plantings+in+restoration%3A+what+do+we+know+and+where+should+we+go%3F&rft.jtitle=Applied+vegetation+science&rft.au=Palma%2C+Ana+Cristina&rft.au=Laurance%2C+Susan+G.W.&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.issn=1402-2001&rft.eissn=1654-109X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Favsc.12173&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_avsc_12173 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1402-2001&client=summon |