What is considered deception in experimental economics?

In experimental economics there is a norm against using deception. But precisely what constitutes deception is unclear. While there is a consensus view that providing false information is not permitted, there are also “gray areas” with respect to practices that omit information or are misleading wit...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Experimental economics : a journal of the Economic Science Association Ročník 25; číslo 2; s. 385 - 412
Hlavní autoři: Charness, Gary, Samek, Anya, van de Ven, Jeroen
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: New York Springer US 01.04.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Témata:
Behavioral/Experimental Economics
Deception
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Experimental economics
Experimental methods
Game Theory
Microeconomics
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Original Paper
Respondents
Social and Behav. Sciences
Student attitudes
Students
Deception
B49
Attitudes
C80
C91
Experimental methodology
C93
C92
ISSN:1386-4157, 1573-6938
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:In experimental economics there is a norm against using deception. But precisely what constitutes deception is unclear. While there is a consensus view that providing false information is not permitted, there are also “gray areas” with respect to practices that omit information or are misleading without an explicit lie being told. In this paper, we report the results of a large survey among experimental economists and students concerning various specific gray areas. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity across respondent choices. The data indicate a perception that costs and benefits matter, so that such practices might in fact be appropriate when the topic is important and there is no other way to gather data. Compared to researchers, students have different attitudes about some of the methods in the specific scenarios that we ask about. Few students express awareness of the no-deception policy at their schools. We also briefly discuss some potential alternatives to “gray-area” deception, primarily based on suggestions offered by respondents.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1386-4157
1573-6938
DOI:10.1007/s10683-021-09726-7