When coders are reliable: The application of three measures to assess inter-rater reliability/agreement with doctor–patient communication data coded with the VR-CoDES

To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. The raw data from an int...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Patient education and counseling Vol. 82; no. 3; pp. 341 - 345
Main Authors:	Fletcher, Ian, Mazzi, Mariangela, Nuebling, Matthias
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Oxford Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.03.2011 Elsevier
Subjects:	Biological and medical sciences Clinical Coding - methods Clinical Coding - standards Clinical Competence - standards Coding Communication Doctor-Patient communication Guidance Humans Inter-rater study Internal Medicine Intraclass correlation coefficient Kappa Medical sciences Miscellaneous Observer Variation Physician-Patient Relations Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Reliability Reproducibility of Results Research Design Sensitivity Sensitivity analysis Sensitivity and specificity Videotape Recording VR-CoDES Sensitivity and specificity Intraclass correlation coefficient Inter-rater study VR-CoDES Kappa Statistical data Evaluation Coefficient Physician patient relation Computerized processing Reliability Statistics Data gathering Communication
ISSN:	0738-3991, 1873-5134, 1873-5134
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κ j , and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Minor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin = 0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κ j (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. It is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC. Alternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients.
AbstractList	To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κ j , and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Minor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin = 0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κ j (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. It is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC. Alternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κj, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Minor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin=0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κj (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. It is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC. Alternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments.OBJECTIVETo investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments.The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κj, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).METHODSThe raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κj, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Minor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin=0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κj (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates.RESULTSMinor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin=0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κj (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates.It is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC.CONCLUSIONIt is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC.Alternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients.PRACTICE IMPLICATIONAlternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. Abstract Objective To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. Methods The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's κ , sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater κ j , and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Minor differences were found between Cohen's κ and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin = 0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. κ j (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. Conclusion It is more practical to analyse nominal data with >2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's κ or an ICC. Practice implication Alternatives to Cohen's κ are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. Objective: To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication studies. To make recommendations how reliability should be computed and described for communication coding instruments. Methods: The raw data from an inter-rater study with three coders were analysed with; Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity measures, Fleiss's multirater kappa-j, and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Minor differences were found between Cohen's kappa and an ICC model across paired data (largest margin = 0.01). There were negligible differences between the multirater estimates e.g. kappa-j (0.52) and ICC (0.53). Sensitivity analyses were in general agreement with the multirater estimates. Conclusion: It is more practical to analyse nominal data with more than 2 raters with an appropriate model ICC for inter-rater studies, and little difference exists between Cohen's kappa or an ICC. Practice implication: Alternatives to Cohen's kappa are readily available, but researchers need to be aware of the different ICC definitions. An ICC model should be fully described in reports. Investigators are encouraged to supply confidence limits with inter-rater data, and to revisit guidance regarding the relative strengths of agreement of reliability coefficients. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.]
Author	Fletcher, Ian Mazzi, Mariangela Nuebling, Matthias
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: Ian surname: Fletcher fullname: Fletcher, Ian email: ian.fletcher@liverpool.ac.uk organization: Division of Clinical Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: Mariangela surname: Mazzi fullname: Mazzi, Mariangela organization: Department of Public Health and Community Medicine and Public Health, Section of Clinical Psychology, University of Verona, Italy – sequence: 3 givenname: Matthias surname: Nuebling fullname: Nuebling, Matthias organization: GEB: Gesellschaft für Empirische Beratung mbH (Empirical Consulting), Denzlingen, Germany
BackLink	http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25927078$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21316896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark	eNqFkt-K1DAUxousuLOrD-CN5Ea86mxO06aNgiCz6x9YENxBL0OannEytk1NUmXu9h18CZ_LJzHdmUFYcBdCAuH3fedwzneSHPW2xyR5CnQOFPjZZj6gnmcUYE7jofmDZAZVydICWH6UzGjJqpQJAcfJifcbSinnOTxKjjNgwCvBZ8nvL2vsibYNOk-UQ-KwNapu8SVZrpGoYWiNVsHYntgVCWuHSDpUfnToSbBEeY_eE9MHdKlT8d47mNaE7Zn6GgUd9oH8NGFNGquDdX-ufw3RcvrVtuvG_lChUUHd9NLs8BA7-PwpXdjzi6vHycOVaj0-2b-nyfLtxXLxPr38-O7D4s1lqgsQIQXMoC4oQ51zXmmBNeiybKiqUfCyxkxXBRVKFUJUdbESuS6QghIcm6ZgGTtNXuxsB2e_j-iD7IzX2LaqRzt6WZVUCM5Kfj9Z5KwUDCCSz_bkWHfYyMGZTrmtPGwhAs_3gPJatSunem38P64QWUnLKnLljtPOeu9wJbUJN6MLTplWApVTLuRGxlzIKReSxkPzqIRbyoP5XZpXOw3Gcf8w6KTXcWkaG-NQB9lYc6f69S21bs206fYbbtFv7Oj6uEcJ0meSyqspq1NUAWJMgU8G4v8G9xT_C3Ic-vI
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2024_108241 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2020_01_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2012_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2021_03_042 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10461_019_02466_z crossref_primary_10_1111_jpm_12279 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12061 crossref_primary_10_1111_hex_13502 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10111_020_00647_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2020_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2017_06_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2019_03_025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00520_018_4484_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_etc_3010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychores_2018_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0263433 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2012_05_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2020_03_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_018 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_4579178
Cites_doi	10.2307/2529310 10.1191/096228098672090967 10.1037/h0031619 10.1002/sim.4780132310 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.376 10.1177/001316446002000104 10.1037/h0026256 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30 10.1177/001316448104100307
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier Ireland Ltd Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd – notice: Elsevier Ireland Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
DBID	AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QJ
DOI	10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004
DatabaseName	CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
DatabaseTitleList	MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
Database_xml	– sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Medicine Public Health
EISSN	1873-5134
EndPage	345
ExternalDocumentID	21316896 25927078 10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_004 S0738399111000164 1_s2_0_S0738399111000164
Genre	Evaluation Studies Journal Article
GroupedDBID	--- --K --M -ET .1- .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 123 186 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29O 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABFNM ABIVO ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACHQT ACIEU ACIUM ACLOT ACNCT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HEA HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IHE J1W KOM LZ2 M29 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OHT OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SAE SCC SCU SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UV1 WH7 WUQ XPP YNT Z5R ZGI ~G- ~HD AACTN AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW PKN RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AJBFU LCYCR 9DU AAYXX CITATION AGCQF AGRNS IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7QJ
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-1e21b503ec4668c9eb1c77d0abe967be2c8509aa5998b5f94c5e01a96edd5323
ISICitedReferencesCount	23
ISICitedReferencesURI	http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000288837800010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN	0738-3991 1873-5134
IngestDate	Thu Oct 02 08:42:58 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 17:06:03 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:50:18 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:17:26 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:22:19 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 06:06:10 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:28:58 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:47 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:24:58 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	3
Keywords	Sensitivity and specificity Intraclass correlation coefficient Inter-rater study VR-CoDES Kappa Statistical data Evaluation Coefficient Physician patient relation Computerized processing Reliability Statistics Data gathering Communication
Language	English
License	https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c519t-1e21b503ec4668c9eb1c77d0abe967be2c8509aa5998b5f94c5e01a96edd5323
Notes	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID	21316896
PQID	854379311
PQPubID	23479
PageCount	5
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_870996376 proquest_miscellaneous_854379311 pubmed_primary_21316896 pascalfrancis_primary_25927078 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_004 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0738399111000164 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_pec_2011_01_004
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2011-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2011-03-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 03 year: 2011 text: 2011-03-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Oxford – name: Ireland
PublicationTitle	Patient education and counseling
PublicationTitleAlternate	Patient Educ Couns
PublicationYear	2011
Publisher	Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier Ireland Ltd – name: Elsevier
References	Streiner, Norman (bib0040) 2008 Streiner, Norman (bib0030) 2008 Altman (bib0075) 1991 Campbell, Machin (bib0080) 1999 Bakeman, Gottman (bib0025) 1997 Cohen (bib0045) 1968; 70 Brennan, Prediger (bib0055) 1981; 41 Barko (bib0060) 1966; 19 McGraw, Wong (bib0065) 1996; 1 Eide, Eide, Rustoen, Finset (bib0100) 2010 Cohen (bib0035) 1960; 20 Shrout, Fleiss (bib0070) 1979; 86 Berk (bib0105) 1979; 83 Fleiss (bib0050) 1971; 76 Muller, Buttner (bib0020) 1994; 13 Zimmermann, Del Piccolo, Bensing, Bergvik, De Haes, Eide (bib0090) 2010 Traub (bib0015) 1994 . Landis, Koch (bib0110) 1977; 33 Mitchell (bib0005) 1979; 86 Dunn (bib0010) 2004 Dunn (bib0115) 1989 Shrout (bib0120) 1998; 7 Rothman, Greenland, Lash (bib0085) 2008 Zimmermann C, Del Piccolo L, Finset A, Verona Network Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES). Cue and Concern Manual European Association for Communication in Health Care; 2009. Available from Brennan (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0055) 1981; 41 Dunn (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0115) 1989 Cohen (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0035) 1960; 20 Fleiss (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0050) 1971; 76 Mitchell (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0005) 1979; 86 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0095 Shrout (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0120) 1998; 7 Dunn (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0010) 2004 Cohen (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0045) 1968; 70 Altman (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0075) 1991 Rothman (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0085) 2008 Muller (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0020) 1994; 13 McGraw (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0065) 1996; 1 Traub (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0015) 1994 Bakeman (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0025) 1997 Barko (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0060) 1966; 19 Zimmermann (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0090) 2010 Shrout (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0070) 1979; 86 Berk (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0105) 1979; 83 Streiner (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0030) 2008 Streiner (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0040) 2008 Eide (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0100) 2010 Landis (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0110) 1977; 33 Campbell (10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0080) 1999
References_xml	– year: 2010 ident: bib0090 article-title: Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES) publication-title: Patient Educ Couns – year: 2008 ident: bib0030 article-title: Health measurement scales – reference: Zimmermann C, Del Piccolo L, Finset A, Verona Network Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES). Cue and Concern Manual European Association for Communication in Health Care; 2009. Available from: – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 end-page: 174 ident: bib0110 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics – year: 2010 ident: bib0100 article-title: Patient validation of cues and concerns identified according to Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES): a video- and interview-based approach publication-title: Patient Educ Couns – year: 2008 ident: bib0040 article-title: Biostatistics: the bare essentials – year: 1999 ident: bib0080 article-title: Medical statistics: a commonsense approach – year: 1994 ident: bib0015 article-title: Reliability for the social sciences: theory and applications – volume: 70 start-page: 213 year: 1968 end-page: 220 ident: bib0045 article-title: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit publication-title: Psychol Bull – year: 1997 ident: bib0025 article-title: Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis – volume: 20 start-page: 37 year: 1960 end-page: 46 ident: bib0035 article-title: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales publication-title: Educ Psychol Meas – volume: 41 start-page: 687 year: 1981 end-page: 699 ident: bib0055 article-title: Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives publication-title: Educ Psychol Meas – volume: 19 start-page: 3 year: 1966 end-page: 11 ident: bib0060 article-title: The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability publication-title: Psychol Rep – year: 2004 ident: bib0010 article-title: Statistical evaluation of measurement errors – volume: 7 start-page: 301 year: 1998 end-page: 317 ident: bib0120 article-title: Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res – volume: 76 start-page: 378 year: 1971 end-page: 382 ident: bib0050 article-title: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters publication-title: Psychol Bull – year: 2008 ident: bib0085 article-title: Modern epidemiology – volume: 1 start-page: 30 year: 1996 end-page: 46 ident: bib0065 article-title: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients publication-title: Psychol Methods – volume: 86 start-page: 376 year: 1979 end-page: 390 ident: bib0005 article-title: Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalisability of data collected in observational studies publication-title: Psychol Bull – volume: 86 start-page: 420 year: 1979 end-page: 428 ident: bib0070 article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychol Bull – year: 1991 ident: bib0075 article-title: Practical statistics for medical research – volume: 13 start-page: 2465 year: 1994 end-page: 2476 ident: bib0020 article-title: A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients publication-title: Stat Med – volume: 83 start-page: 460 year: 1979 end-page: 472 ident: bib0105 article-title: Generalizability of behavioural observation: a clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability publication-title: Am J Ment Def – year: 1989 ident: bib0115 article-title: Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors – reference: . – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0110 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2529310 – volume: 83 start-page: 460 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0105 article-title: Generalizability of behavioural observation: a clarification of interobserver agreement and interobserver reliability publication-title: Am J Ment Def – volume: 7 start-page: 301 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0120 article-title: Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res doi: 10.1191/096228098672090967 – volume: 76 start-page: 378 year: 1971 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0050 article-title: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/h0031619 – volume: 13 start-page: 2465 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0020 article-title: A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4780132310 – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0080 – volume: 86 start-page: 420 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0070 article-title: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 – year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0115 – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0025 – year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0010 – volume: 86 start-page: 376 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0005 article-title: Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalisability of data collected in observational studies publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.376 – year: 1991 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0075 – volume: 20 start-page: 37 year: 1960 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0035 article-title: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales publication-title: Educ Psychol Meas doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0100 article-title: Patient validation of cues and concerns identified according to Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES): a video- and interview-based approach publication-title: Patient Educ Couns – volume: 70 start-page: 213 year: 1968 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0045 article-title: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit publication-title: Psychol Bull doi: 10.1037/h0026256 – ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0095 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0030 – volume: 19 start-page: 3 year: 1966 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0060 article-title: The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability publication-title: Psychol Rep doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3 – volume: 1 start-page: 30 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0065 article-title: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients publication-title: Psychol Methods doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30 – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0040 – year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0015 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0090 article-title: Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES) publication-title: Patient Educ Couns – year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0085 – volume: 41 start-page: 687 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004_bib0055 article-title: Coefficient kappa: some uses, misuses, and alternatives publication-title: Educ Psychol Meas doi: 10.1177/001316448104100307
SSID	ssj0006641
Score	2.0886967
Snippet	To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in communication... Abstract Objective To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered... Objective: To investigate whether different measures of inter-rater reliability will compute similar estimates with nominal data commonly encountered in...
SourceID	proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher
StartPage	341
SubjectTerms	Biological and medical sciences Clinical Coding - methods Clinical Coding - standards Clinical Competence - standards Coding Communication Doctor-Patient communication Guidance Humans Inter-rater study Internal Medicine Intraclass correlation coefficient Kappa Medical sciences Miscellaneous Observer Variation Physician-Patient Relations Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Reliability Reproducibility of Results Research Design Sensitivity Sensitivity analysis Sensitivity and specificity Videotape Recording VR-CoDES
Title	When coders are reliable: The application of three measures to assess inter-rater reliability/agreement with doctor–patient communication data coded with the VR-CoDES
URI	https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0738399111000164 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0738399111000164 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21316896 https://www.proquest.com/docview/854379311 https://www.proquest.com/docview/870996376
Volume	82
WOSCitedRecordID	wos000288837800010&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights	– providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect customDbUrl: eissn: 1873-5134 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006641 issn: 0738-3991 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950201 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier
link	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLa6DSGkCcG4lUvlB8QDU1hutmPeptGJoa1MUKa-Wbm4UqfSll6msR_ED-GXcU5spynsAg9IUdREcZLqfDk-tr_zHUJeRrxgmRapF8RBBgMUXngpC-Aw60epn0nGyjpkJ4ei00l6PXncaPx0uTBnQzEaJefncvJfTQ3nwNiYOvsP5q5uCifgNxgd9mB22P-V4cG9IrUcCcrbSOua6uEA86Mcv6K2ZG0IAlOtt7-aqcJS7iEt14FLIYmph0oSU3sPpNF-R68OY_RyVtHM4hZjnPj3rEIrktSXKSfbyEAt38ay3DHOPfnk7Y3f2TDUBsbHtrV2hBObcOcy5i_D2cES2UfpxcXA5h4NMF9iWHU3nQUS4Y1LK6ubD9KVuY6gRvayLlGAe4aQKqj77ySs4TSqOePISGrZfj0yspV_dBlm9uL0zUTnVtEVNlMSeVWeu_NR7X85PFTddq_7avLNw8pluMJvy7iskY1QMAmdw8buQbv3oYoHOC_rp1bv7tbWS5bhb0-9KjranKQz-Gb7ptjK1aOhMirq3iN37XCG7hoY3icNPdoit48sYWOLbJppYWqy3R6QH4hOatBJAZ3UofMtBWzSGjbpuE9LbFKHTTofU4NNWsMmrWFzp0ImRbDRVWTSFWRSRGb5JoW5GJBJHTIfku5-u7v33rOlQrwchiBzL9BhkDE_0nnMeZJLiEByIQo_zbTkItNhnkBknKZMyiRjfRnnTPtBKrkuChaF0SOyPhqP9BNCuZ_kfpSzsIhlrEUsRV8zTFUpIh7FOW8S31lI5VZGH6u5DJXjS54qMKpCoyofNj9uktdVk4nRkLnu4tCZXbnkaOjOFcD1ukbiskZ6Zv3STAVqFipffUYUIghRKRLV9ZokrlramNvE0jc9sLWCyOp_hUyGKCDWJNRBVEGHhauQ6UiPFzOVMJRAjYLgmksEjFs5hD5N8tige3n_ACvtSf705sbPyJ2lD3lO1ufThX5BbuVn88Fs2iJrope07Lf6C9q7KN0
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When+coders+are+reliable%3A+The+application+of+three+measures+to+assess+inter-rater+reliability%2Fagreement+with+doctor-patient+communication+data+coded+with+the+VR-CoDES&rft.jtitle=Patient+education+and+counseling&rft.au=Fletcher%2C+Ian&rft.au=Mazzi%2C+Mariangela&rft.au=Nuebling%2C+Matthias&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.issn=0738-3991&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.pec.2011.01.004&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m	http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F07383991%2FS0738399111X00022%2Fcov150h.gif