Biometry and Formula Accuracy With Intraocular Lenses Used for Cataract Surgery in Extreme Hyperopia
To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types. A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters...
Uloženo v:
| Vydáno v: | American journal of ophthalmology Ročník 143; číslo 6; s. 920 - 931.e3 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autoři: | , , , , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Vydáno: |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.06.2007
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
| Témata: | |
| ISSN: | 0002-9394, 1879-1891 |
| On-line přístup: | Získat plný text |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
| Abstract | To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types.
A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D).
Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula.
In practice, 55% of patients were within ±1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 ± 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (−0.70 ± 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (−1.11 ± 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (−1.45 ± 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery.
This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types. Design A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D). Methods Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula. Results In practice, 55% of patients were within ±1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 ± 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (−0.70 ± 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (−1.11 ± 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (−1.45 ± 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery. Conclusion This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types. A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D). Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula. In practice, 55% of patients were within ±1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 ± 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (−0.70 ± 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (−1.11 ± 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (−1.45 ± 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery. This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. Purpose To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types. Design A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D). Methods Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula. Results In practice, 55% of patients were within ±1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 ± 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 ± 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 ± 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 ± 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery. Conclusion This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types.PURPOSETo audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types.A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D).DESIGNA retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D).Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula.METHODSAxial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula.In practice, 55% of patients were within +/-1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 +/- 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 +/- 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 +/- 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 +/- 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery.RESULTSIn practice, 55% of patients were within +/-1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 +/- 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 +/- 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 +/- 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 +/- 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery.This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia.CONCLUSIONThis represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and IOL types. A retrospective analysis of 76 eyes from 56 patients undergoing cataract surgery with IOLs ranging in power from 30 to 35 diopters (D). Axial lengths, corneal powers and anterior chamber depths were measured with ultrasound or optical methods, and the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditech, Inc, Dublin, California, USA) software was used to predict the refractive outcome for each IOL used. Differences between the predicted and actual postoperative refraction were then analyzed for each formula. In practice, 55% of patients were within +/-1.0 D of the refraction predicted by their surgeon. In theory, the Haigis formula would have given the smallest mean refractive error (+0.51 +/- 0.12 D), followed by the Hoffer Q (-0.70 +/- 0.14 D), Holladay 1 (-1.11 +/- 0.13 D), and SRK/T formulae (-1.45 +/- 0.14 D). The Haigis formula overpredicted the lens power required, which would have generated a myopic result. The other formulae underpredicted the lens power required and would have generated a hyperopic result. There was a significant difference between lens designs: the Haigis was more accurate for open-loop, whereas the Hoffer Q was more accurate for plate-haptic lenses. The anterior chamber depth measurement could also be used to predict changes in intraocular pressure after surgery. This represents the largest published series to date of biometry predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and confirms the Haigis formula to be the most accurate. A consistent difference between open-loop and plate-haptic lenses suggests that haptic design may influence the effective lens position in very small eyes. We further propose a simple formula to optimize the Haigis and Hoffer Q formulae in patients with extreme hyperopia. |
| Author | Bourne, Rupert R.A. MacLaren, Robert E. Restori, Marie Natkunarajah, Mythili Riaz, Yasmin Allan, Bruce D.S. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Robert E. surname: MacLaren fullname: MacLaren, Robert E. email: robert.maclaren@moorfields.nhs.uk organization: Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 2 givenname: Mythili surname: Natkunarajah fullname: Natkunarajah, Mythili organization: Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Yasmin surname: Riaz fullname: Riaz, Yasmin organization: Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 4 givenname: Rupert R.A. surname: Bourne fullname: Bourne, Rupert R.A. organization: Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 5 givenname: Marie surname: Restori fullname: Restori, Marie organization: Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom – sequence: 6 givenname: Bruce D.S. surname: Allan fullname: Allan, Bruce D.S. organization: Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London, United Kingdom |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19938981$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17524766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFklFrFDEUhYNU7Lb6A3yRgOjbrskkk0wQhLq0trDgQy0-hmzmjmadSbZJRpx_b5ZdLSxYn5KQ75zcnHvP0IkPHhB6ScmCEirebRZmExYVIXJBqgXh7Ama0UaqOW0UPUEzQkg1V0zxU3SW0qYcheTyGTqlsq64FGKG2o8uDJDjhI1v8VWIw9gbfGHtGI2d8FeXv-Mbn6MJtlxEvAKfIOG7BC3uQsRLk00hM74d4zcoNs7jy185wgD4etpCDFtnnqOnnekTvDis5-ju6vLL8nq--vzpZnmxmtua8jznVpimNUyoNadgZEWg6Ri13DTruhRPQAKhFW9Ya2S7ZgzWVgirKFFV1XFg5-jt3ncbw_0IKevBJQt9bzyEMWlJas64qAv4-gjchDH6UpumgnMlmrpRhXp1oMb1AK3eRjeYOOk_6RXgzQEwyZq-i8Zblx44pVijGlo4uedsDClF6LR12WQXdsG6XlOid_3UG136qXf91KTSpZ9FSY-Uf80f0bzfa6BE_dNB1Mk68BZaF8Fm3Qb3qPrDkdr2zrvyvR8wQXrISaci0Le7GduNGJFlwxgvBurfBv95_DfCF95n |
| CODEN | AJOPAA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41433_021_01548_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00347_008_1828_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_1120672118803509 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_018_1001_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2014_11_036 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2009_12_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2013_07_014 crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20250317_05 crossref_primary_10_1016_S2173_5794_10_70028_1 crossref_primary_10_1136_bjo_2024_326998 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2012_08_057 crossref_primary_10_18502_jovr_v17i3_11571 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2017_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_020_01628_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1755_3768_2012_02499_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2015_07_046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_07_044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2016_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sjopt_2012_05_005 crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2016_30_4_280 crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_12262 crossref_primary_10_1038_eye_2009_339 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0365_6691_10_70038_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000649 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2010_12_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9071_2010_02211_x crossref_primary_10_3129_i08_133 crossref_primary_10_3390_photonics9080567 crossref_primary_10_1097_j_jcrs_0000000000000085 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2015_05_029 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sjopt_2016_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_017_0454_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_12_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2021_07_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2009_02_031 crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20090617_02 crossref_primary_10_1097_ICU_0000000000000018 crossref_primary_10_1136_bjophthalmol_2017_311447 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2013_03_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2009_09_016 crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2011_25_6_375 crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2018_1488265 crossref_primary_10_1038_eye_2013_248 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2018_07_023 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina57070700 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2016_07_021 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1442_9071_2012_02810_x crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S342392 crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_13058 crossref_primary_10_4103_2277_9175_210657 crossref_primary_10_1186_1745_6215_12_133 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_016_0271_8 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1444_0938_2009_00393_x crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2011_25_3_151 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijo_IJO_780_19 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep43414 crossref_primary_10_1097_IIO_0000000000000119 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2008_03_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2010_09_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0008_4182_08_80002_6 crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2020_1858486 crossref_primary_10_1080_08820538_2022_2102929 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcrs_2010_07_032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ophtha_2009_10_037 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80705-5 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00556-X 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00453-3 10.3928/1081-597X-20051101-14 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80115-0 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90531-6 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01039-2 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790506.x 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.054 10.1073/pnas.0501451102 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00243-8 10.1136/bjo.87.8.960 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00459-0 10.1007/s004170000188 10.1136/bjo.2004.047662 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01817-5 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00410-3 10.1177/096228029700600202 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00405-6 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.052 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00617.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2007 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. 2008 INIST-CNRS Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2007 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2007 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2008 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2007 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1879-1891 |
| EndPage | 931.e3 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 3556439261 17524766 19938981 10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 S0002939407002334 1_s2_0_S0002939407002334 |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Medical Research Council grantid: G0601588 |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -~X .1- .55 .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~. 1~5 23M 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 71M 8P~ AABNK AAEDT AAEDW AAHTB AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABCQX ABDPE ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABPEJ ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACLOT ACNCT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADFRT ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHMBA AI. AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKEYQ BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W J5H K-O KOM L7B M41 MO0 N4W N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OF- OPF OQ~ OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PROAC Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SPCBC SSH SSZ SV3 T5K UNMZH UV1 VH1 WH7 WOW X7M XPP Z5R ZGI ZXP ~G- ~HD 3V. 7RV 7X7 8FI AACTN AFCTW AFKRA AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW AZQEC BENPR FYUFA GUQSH M1P M2O PKN RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AHPSJ AJBFU G8K LCYCR ZA5 9DU AAYXX CITATION AGCQF AGRNS IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. NAPCQ 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-4c6a8da369b41ea720e8f31c4a8b50000e7e012483da7db33ebc66c910922f4e3 |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 75 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000247167000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0002-9394 |
| IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 16:15:42 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 06 18:32:19 EDT 2025 Fri May 30 11:00:29 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:15:27 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 07:35:25 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:18:28 EST 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:24:30 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:42 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:30:43 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 6 |
| Keywords | Cataract Vision disorder Use Hypermetropia Eye disease Accuracy Lens disease Treatment Surgery Refractive error Ophthalmology Intraocular lens Anterior segment disease |
| Language | English |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c514t-4c6a8da369b41ea720e8f31c4a8b50000e7e012483da7db33ebc66c910922f4e3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 17524766 |
| PQID | 1644968589 |
| PQPubID | 41749 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_70543465 proquest_journals_1644968589 pubmed_primary_17524766 pascalfrancis_primary_19938981 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0002939407002334 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2007-06-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-06-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2007 text: 2007-06-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States – name: Chicago |
| PublicationTitle | American journal of ophthalmology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Ophthalmol |
| PublicationYear | 2007 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier – name: Elsevier Limited |
| References | Wirtitsch, Findl, Menapace (bib19) 2004; 30 Saxena, Landesz, Noordzij, Luyten (bib2) 2003; 110 MacLaren, Sagoo, Restori, Allan (bib9) 2005; 31 Findl, Kriechbaum, Sacu (bib13) 2003; 29 Koranyi, Lydahl, Norrby, Taube (bib17) 2002; 28 Retzlaff, Sanders, Kraff (bib4) 1990; 16 Stigler (bib22) 1997; 6 Haigis, Lege, Miller, Schneider (bib8) 2000; 238 Rose, Moshegov (bib12) 2003; 31 Duffey, Leaming (bib3) 2005; 21 Sundin, Leppert, Silva (bib5) 2005; 102 Eleftheriadis (bib11) 2003; 87 Hu, Woung, Wang, Jian (bib20) 2000; 26 Hoffer (bib6) 1993; 19 Norrby, Lydahl, Koranyi, Taube (bib21) 2003; 29 Faktorovich, Maloney, Price (bib10) 1999; 167 Bourne, Sorensen, Klauber (bib14) 2001; 79 Petternel, Menapace, Findl (bib18) 2004; 30 Jin, Lyle, Merkley (bib1) 2005; 31 Issa, J Pacheco, Mahmood (bib16) 2005; 89 Cashwell, Martin (bib15) 1999; 106 Holladay (bib7) 1997; 23 Saxena (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib2) 2003; 110 Petternel (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib18) 2004; 30 Sundin (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib5) 2005; 102 Hoffer (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib6) 1993; 19 Rose (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib12) 2003; 31 Duffey (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib3) 2005; 21 Retzlaff (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib4) 1990; 16 Holladay (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib7) 1997; 23 Bourne (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib14) 2001; 79 MacLaren (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib9) 2005; 31 Norrby (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib21) 2003; 29 Wirtitsch (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib19) 2004; 30 Haigis (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib8) 2000; 238 Stigler (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib22) 1997; 6 Jin (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib1) 2005; 31 Findl (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib13) 2003; 29 Issa (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib16) 2005; 89 Cashwell (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib15) 1999; 106 Hu (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib20) 2000; 26 Koranyi (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib17) 2002; 28 Faktorovich (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib10) 1999; 167 Eleftheriadis (10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib11) 2003; 87 |
| References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 333 year: 1990 end-page: 340 ident: bib4 article-title: Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 21 start-page: 742 year: 2005 end-page: 748 ident: bib3 article-title: US trends in refractive surgery: 2004 ISRS/AAO survey publication-title: J Refract Surg – volume: 110 start-page: 1391 year: 2003 end-page: 1395 ident: bib2 article-title: Three-year follow-up of the Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hypermetropia publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 31 start-page: 121 year: 2003 end-page: 124 ident: bib12 article-title: Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation publication-title: Clin Experiment Ophthalmol – volume: 89 start-page: 543 year: 2005 end-page: 546 ident: bib16 article-title: A novel index for predicting intraocular pressure reduction following cataract surgery publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 29 start-page: 100 year: 2003 end-page: 105 ident: bib21 article-title: Reduction of trend errors in power calculation by linear transformation of measured axial lengths publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 19 start-page: 700 year: 1993 end-page: 712 ident: bib6 article-title: The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 31 start-page: 776 year: 2005 end-page: 784 ident: bib1 article-title: Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary hyperopia publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 28 start-page: 243 year: 2002 ident: bib17 article-title: Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 26 start-page: 1183 year: 2000 end-page: 1189 ident: bib20 article-title: Influence of laser posterior capsulotomy on anterior chamber depth, refraction, and intraocular pressure publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 23 start-page: 1356 year: 1997 end-page: 1370 ident: bib7 article-title: Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 102 start-page: 9553 year: 2005 end-page: 9558 ident: bib5 article-title: Extreme hyperopia is the result of null mutations in MFRP, which encodes a Frizzled-related protein publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA – volume: 30 start-page: 52 year: 2004 end-page: 57 ident: bib18 article-title: Effect of optic edge design and haptic angulation on postoperative intraocular lens position change publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 238 start-page: 765 year: 2000 ident: bib8 article-title: Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol – volume: 31 start-page: 280 year: 2005 end-page: 290 ident: bib9 article-title: Biometry accuracy using zero or negative powered intraocular lenses publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 79 start-page: 462 year: 2001 end-page: 467 ident: bib14 article-title: Glaucoma in East Greenlandic Inuit: population-based survey in Ittoqqortoormiit (Scoresbysund) publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol Scand – volume: 106 start-page: 2307 year: 1999 end-page: 2311 ident: bib15 article-title: Axial length decrease accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 167 start-page: 260 year: 1999 end-page: 279 ident: bib10 article-title: Effect of astigmatic keratotomy on spherical equivalent: results of the astigmatism reduction clinical trial publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol – volume: 87 start-page: 960 year: 2003 end-page: 963 ident: bib11 article-title: IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol – volume: 29 start-page: 1950 year: 2003 ident: bib13 article-title: Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 30 start-page: 52 year: 2004 end-page: 58 ident: bib19 article-title: Effect of haptic design on change in axial lens position after cataract surgery publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg – volume: 6 start-page: 103 year: 1997 end-page: 114 ident: bib22 article-title: Regression towards the mean, historically considered publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res – volume: 16 start-page: 333 year: 1990 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib4 article-title: Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens power calculation formula publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80705-5 – volume: 30 start-page: 52 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib18 article-title: Effect of optic edge design and haptic angulation on postoperative intraocular lens position change publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00556-X – volume: 26 start-page: 1183 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib20 article-title: Influence of laser posterior capsulotomy on anterior chamber depth, refraction, and intraocular pressure publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00453-3 – volume: 21 start-page: 742 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib3 article-title: US trends in refractive surgery: 2004 ISRS/AAO survey publication-title: J Refract Surg doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20051101-14 – volume: 23 start-page: 1356 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib7 article-title: Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80115-0 – volume: 106 start-page: 2307 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib15 article-title: Axial length decrease accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90531-6 – volume: 19 start-page: 700 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib6 article-title: The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0 – volume: 28 start-page: 243 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib17 article-title: Anterior chamber depth measurement: A-scan versus optical methods publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01039-2 – volume: 79 start-page: 462 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib14 article-title: Glaucoma in East Greenlandic Inuit: population-based survey in Ittoqqortoormiit (Scoresbysund) publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol Scand doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790506.x – volume: 31 start-page: 280 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib9 article-title: Biometry accuracy using zero or negative powered intraocular lenses publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.054 – volume: 102 start-page: 9553 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib5 article-title: Extreme hyperopia is the result of null mutations in MFRP, which encodes a Frizzled-related protein publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501451102 – volume: 29 start-page: 1950 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib13 article-title: Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00243-8 – volume: 87 start-page: 960 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib11 article-title: IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.8.960 – volume: 30 start-page: 52 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib19 article-title: Effect of haptic design on change in axial lens position after cataract surgery publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00459-0 – volume: 238 start-page: 765 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib8 article-title: Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/s004170000188 – volume: 89 start-page: 543 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib16 article-title: A novel index for predicting intraocular pressure reduction following cataract surgery publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.047662 – volume: 29 start-page: 100 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib21 article-title: Reduction of trend errors in power calculation by linear transformation of measured axial lengths publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01817-5 – volume: 167 start-page: 260 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib10 article-title: Effect of astigmatic keratotomy on spherical equivalent: results of the astigmatism reduction clinical trial publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00410-3 – volume: 6 start-page: 103 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib22 article-title: Regression towards the mean, historically considered publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res doi: 10.1177/096228029700600202 – volume: 110 start-page: 1391 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib2 article-title: Three-year follow-up of the Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hypermetropia publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00405-6 – volume: 31 start-page: 776 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib1 article-title: Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary hyperopia publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.052 – volume: 31 start-page: 121 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043_bib12 article-title: Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation publication-title: Clin Experiment Ophthalmol doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00617.x |
| SSID | ssj0006747 |
| Score | 2.1606557 |
| Snippet | To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry formulae and... Purpose To audit intraocular lens (IOL) power predictions for cataract surgery in extreme hyperopia and to compare the accuracy across different biometry... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 920 |
| SubjectTerms | Accuracy Anterior Chamber - anatomy & histology Anterior Chamber - diagnostic imaging Biological and medical sciences Biometrics Biometry Cataract Extraction Cataracts Cornea - anatomy & histology Diabetic retinopathy Eye surgery Hospitals Humans Hyperopia - surgery Lens diseases Lens Implantation, Intraocular Lenses, Intraocular Medical Audit Medical sciences Methods Miscellaneous Models, Theoretical Morbidity Ophthalmology Patient Satisfaction Postoperative Period Refraction, Ocular - physiology Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Surgery Ultrasonography Vision disorders Visual Acuity - physiology |
| Title | Biometry and Formula Accuracy With Intraocular Lenses Used for Cataract Surgery in Extreme Hyperopia |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0002939407002334 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0002939407002334 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.043 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17524766 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1644968589 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70543465 |
| Volume | 143 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000247167000002&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021 customDbUrl: eissn: 1879-1891 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006747 issn: 0002-9394 databaseCode: AIEXJ dateStart: 19950101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELf2gRASQnwNCmP4gSemVGnixvbjNnXaEJvQ2ER5ipzE0Vq6tGrSafu_-AO5ix23nbbBHniJqjS-JL5f7svnO0I-pVEqVSallwuReIznzFMyDb0oA9cnU2DD5qJuNsGPj0W_L7-trPxu9sJcjnhRiKsrOfmvrIZzwGzcOvsAdjuicAJ-A9PhCGyH4z8xfhc31FdTU1dpH0zS2UhhU4jZFDu7_8C46yFGdMcmA_Ur-LG63D4rwfLElMM9VdUlnEGk1BumMSDSu6owjLh9cI1lxScDtWjSujWfhSIU48l5da5GF0sxe0wzVlMj5kxC93av7YLRqvo1K-DOQ1UHeo6uKwz1uPWggaoj3T9VeTFweN51EdmT2QTpnbR32ktxDD7Pt1qQzTI0LY-dbDY1nCwIFyWtDPwFpS3DTluHt6oEE50YttVwbCtWBm3fkl0qv31DLbpkxSYPbhgDCWzbyWM_iIHEKlkPeFeCLF3fOez1vzgLIOKMN24XvlGzml7nFd54jrvsoacTVcJXmpv2Knf7P7UddPqcPLMODN0xwHtBVnTxkjw-sikar0jW4I8C_qjFH23wRxF_dAF_1OCPIv4o4I82-KMWf3RQUIs_6vD3mpzt9073DjzbysNLwSKvPJZGSmQqjGTCOlrxwNciDzspUyLBlhy-5hpMJSbCTPEsCUOdpBGIkY4vgyBnOtwga8W40G8J9TMFBlY3wzJTLBdJon3FukBXM53xRLaI30xonNo699huZRTfycgW-eyGTEyRl_suDhouxc3uZdC3MeDtvkH8tkG6tJ9mGXfiEq6MvyNoEDOgisGcDlmLMDfSGsXG2P3bDbeWADR_L3BIhBSdFtlsEBXPHwK8I4kdKWAWP7q_QeHgKqIq9HhWxtzH3ehRt0XeGBzOSfNuwHgUvXvIdL4nT-bSYJOsVdOZ_kAepZfVoJxukVXeF1v2-_oDAqECUg |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biometry+and+Formula+Accuracy+With+Intraocular+Lenses+Used+for+Cataract+Surgery+in+Extreme+Hyperopia&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=MacLaren%2C+Robert+E.&rft.au=Natkunarajah%2C+Mythili&rft.au=Riaz%2C+Yasmin&rft.au=Bourne%2C+Rupert+R.A.&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=920&rft.epage=931.e3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajo.2007.02.043&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_ajo_2007_02_043 |
| thumbnail_m | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00029394%2FS0002939407X10031%2Fcov150h.gif |