Personality-based pair programming: toward intrinsic motivation alignment in very small entities
This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs). We employed a mixed-methods desi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | PeerJ. Computer science Vol. 11; p. e2774 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
United States
PeerJ. Ltd
01.04.2025
PeerJ Inc |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 2376-5992, 2376-5992 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs).
We employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets (
= 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing (
= 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights.
Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences.
Building on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability.
Personality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs). We employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets (n = 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing (n = 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights. Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences. Building on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability. Personality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted. This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs). We employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets ( = 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing ( = 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights. Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences. Building on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability. Personality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted. Aim This study explores whether personality‐based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource‐constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs). Method We employed a mixed‐methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets (n = 73 participants), applying linear mixed‐effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing (n = 25) interviews for socio‐psychological insights. Findings Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles—each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60–65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences. Implications Building on these results, we propose the role‐optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1–T7) to facilitate systematic role–trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen‐Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability. Conclusion Personality‐driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI‐assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted. This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs).AimThis study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on designing a framework and process extension for the resource-constrained environment of very small entities (VSEs).We employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets (n = 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing (n = 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights.MethodWe employed a mixed-methods design across three quasi-experimental datasets (n = 73 participants), applying linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling to assess motivational outcomes and thematically analyzing (n = 25) interviews for socio-psychological insights.Openness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences.FindingsOpenness strongly correlates with Pilot roles; Extraversion & Agreeableness favor Navigator roles; and Neuroticism aligns more comfortably with Solo roles-each yielding substantial boosts in intrinsic motivation (up to 60-65%). Twelve qualitative themes underscore the influence of mentorship, pairing constellations, and flow disruptions on developer experiences.Building on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability.ImplicationsBuilding on these results, we propose the role-optimization motivation alignment (ROMA) framework, mapped to the ISO/IEC 29110 Software Basic Profile and Agile Guidelines, with practical tasks (T1-T7) to facilitate systematic role-trait alignments in small agile teams. Although our data primarily involve Gen-Z undergraduates, the recurring patterns suggest broader applicability, further supported by a separately published application for ongoing generalizability.Personality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted.ConclusionPersonality-driven role optimization may significantly enhance collaboration and developer satisfaction in VSEs, though further studies in professional settings and investigations into AI-assisted or distributed pair programming are warranted. |
| ArticleNumber | e2774 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Valovy, Marcel Buchalcevova, Alena |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marcel orcidid: 0000-0001-7074-0918 surname: Valovy fullname: Valovy, Marcel – sequence: 2 givenname: Alena surname: Buchalcevova fullname: Buchalcevova, Alena |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40567791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNptkk1v1DAQhiNUREvpkSuKxAUOWWzHiWMuqKr4WKkSiI-zmTiT4FVip7Z3Yf893m6pGgnPwaOZZ157pPdpdmKdxSx7TslKCCrezIh-U-iwYkLwR9kZK0VdVFKykwf5aXYRwoYQQiuajnySnXJS1UJIepb9_II-OAujifuihYBdPoPx-ezd4GGajB3e5tH9Bt_lxkZvbDA6n1w0O4jG2TxNDnZCG1M736Hf52GCccxTxUSD4Vn2uIcx4MXdfZ79-PD--9Wn4vrzx_XV5XWhK1rGQvaaIyeUy5YDIbzpaAWN1IK0vG-JAMYbYA0Cg07yuk8hKEJTEa2xZF15nq2Pup2DjZq9mcDvlQOjbgvODwp8NHpElXhONBXYQp0e7VuGtCsrqXsmGsHKpPXuqDVv2wk7nXbxMC5Elx1rfqnB7RRlVBJBq6Tw6k7Bu5sthqgmEzSOI1h026BKxjirJCcioS-P6ADpb8b2LknqA64um7LktBG0TtTqP1SKDiejkyt6k-qLgdeLgcRE_BMH2Iag1t--LtkXD_e9X_SfTRJQHAHtXQge-3uEEnVworp1otJBHZxY_gXLHtIN |
| Cites_doi | 10.1109/TSE.2009.41 10.4135/9781506335520 10.1080/19312450709336664 10.1007/s10664-008-9093-5 10.1007/s10664-018-9655-0 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545 10.1111/bjet.13412 10.1177/1077800404273413 10.1109/TSE.2025.3538751 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.001 10.1177/0735633120949787 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111740 10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.084 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 10.1109/MS.2017.4541041 10.1080/08839514.2024.2327890 10.1177/1609406919899220 10.1007/s10664-012-9238-4 10.1177/0049124113500475 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.008 10.1177/1558689806298224 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892 10.1037/qup0000196 10.1002/per.629 10.4018/IJITSA 10.48550/arXiv.2002.03121 10.1177/1525822X05279903 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.01.001 10.1002/0471264385.wei1205 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x 10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2 10.1521/978.14625/28806 10.7717/peerj.289 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 10.1002/per.760 10.1111/spc3.12016 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 10.1145/3469888 10.1080/19345747.2020.1799464 10.1037/rev0000082 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145 10.1109/TSE.2007.17 10.1109/MC.1987.1663532 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova. COPYRIGHT 2025 PeerJ. Ltd. 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 PeerJ. Ltd. – notice: 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM ISR 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Gale In Context: Science MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Computer Science |
| EISSN | 2376-5992 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_e3240c17eba64e4fb2e1d359cf278723 PMC12190715 A833418716 40567791 10_7717_peerj_cs_2774 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United States United Kingdom New Jersey |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: New Jersey – name: United States |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Prague University of Economics and Business grantid: F4/34/2021 |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 8FE 8FG AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFFHD AFKRA AFPKN ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS ARCSS AZQEC BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION DWQXO FRP GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ HCIFZ IAO ICD IEA ISR ITC K6V K7- M~E OK1 P62 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC RPM H13 NPM 7X8 PUEGO 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-9fc4e40149b4a0048d15a89c70b4fb07a248a28ea2ad946f6f671ea850cce32d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 0 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001480531200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2376-5992 |
| IngestDate | Fri Oct 03 12:37:10 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 02:03:31 EST 2025 Fri Sep 05 15:48:15 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 11 10:49:59 EST 2025 Tue Nov 04 18:20:53 EST 2025 Thu Nov 13 15:58:14 EST 2025 Sat Jun 28 01:34:21 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 08:05:51 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Big Five Intrinsic motivation Agile software development ISO/IEC 29110 Inter-coder reliability Large language models (LLMs) Pair programming Linear mixed-effects Mixed-methods research Software engineering |
| Language | English |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2025 Valovy and Buchalcevova. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c513t-9fc4e40149b4a0048d15a89c70b4fb07a248a28ea2ad946f6f671ea850cce32d3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7074-0918 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/e3240c17eba64e4fb2e1d359cf278723 |
| PMID | 40567791 |
| PQID | 3224259407 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | e2774 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3240c17eba64e4fb2e1d359cf278723 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12190715 proquest_miscellaneous_3224259407 gale_infotracmisc_A833418716 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A833418716 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A833418716 pubmed_primary_40567791 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_cs_2774 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2025-04-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: 2025-04-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Diego, USA |
| PublicationTitle | PeerJ. Computer science |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | PeerJ Comput Sci |
| PublicationYear | 2025 |
| Publisher | PeerJ. Ltd PeerJ Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: PeerJ. Ltd – name: PeerJ Inc |
| References | Sfetsos (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-65) 2009; 14 Chong (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-15) 2007 Graziotin (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-32) 2014; 2 Penke (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-52) 2007; 21 Vinson (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-75) 2008 Valovy (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-69) 2025 Vanhanen (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-74) 2005 Braun (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-11) 2022; 9 ISO/IEC DIS 29110-5-1-2 (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-37) 2023 Williams (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-76) 2003 Bhaskar (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-7) 1975 Gagné (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-28) 2015; 24 Katira (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-40) 2004 Barrick (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-4) 2002; 87 Feldt (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-24) 2010; 52 Zieris (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-81) 2020b Hayes (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-36) 2007; 1 Salleh (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-61) 2014; 19 Riemann (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-56) 2010; 24 Beck (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-5) 2001 Valový (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-73) 2023 Aghaee (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-2) 2015 Laporte (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-42) 2018; 35 McCrae (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-47) 2008 Marzi (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-45) 2024; 12 Smite (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-67) 2021 Campbell (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-14) 2013; 42 Cruz (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-18) 2015; 46 Braun (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-10) 2006; 3 Falessi (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-23) 2018; 23 ISO/IEC DIS 29110-5-4 (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-38) 2024 Ryan (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-58) 2017 Valový (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-72) 2023b Johnson (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-39) 2007; 1 Feldt (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-25) 2018; 23 Bowman (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-9) 2020; 13 Williams (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-78) 2008 Rammstedt (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-55) 2007; 41 Nettle (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-49) 2006; 61 O’Connor (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-51) 2014; 7 Sjøberg (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-66) 2002 Demir (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-19) 2021; 59 Gallis (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-29) 2003 Seaman (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-64) 2025; 51 Valový (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-71) 2023a; 576 Valový (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-70) 2022 Guest (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-33) 2006; 18 Hannay (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-34) 2009a; 36 Mbanaso (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-46) 2023 Salleh (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-60) 2011 DiDomenico (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-21) 2017; 11 Kuusinen (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-41) 2016 Wohlin (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-79) 2012; 236 Galván-Cruz (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-30) 2021 Tan (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-68) 2023; 55 Zieris (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-80) 2020a; 50 Creswell (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-17) 2022 Belshee (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-6) 2005 Brooks (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-13) 1987; 20 Pinheiro (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-53) 2000 Schmitt (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-63) 2003; 12 Latham (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-43) 2012 Forsyth (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-27) 1999 Plonka (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-54) 2015; 73 Abrahamsson (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-1) 2017 Corr (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-16) 2013; 7 O’Connor (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-50) 2020; 19 Ryan (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-57) 2000; 55 Schleiger (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-62) 2024; 38 Dweck (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-22) 2017; 124 Braun (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-12) 2019; 11 Williams (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-77) 2006 Felipe (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-26) 2023; 203 Nakagawa (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-48) 2013; 4 Bird (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-8) 2005; 11 Ryan (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-59) 2024 Hannay (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-35) 2009b; 51 Lenberg (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-44) 2015; 107 Arisholm (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-3) 2007; 33 DeYoung (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-20) 2015; 56 Graziotin (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-31) 2021; 31 Zuill (10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-82) 2014; 3 |
| References_xml | – volume: 36 start-page: 61 issue: 1 year: 2009a ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-34 article-title: Effects of personality on pair programming publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering doi: 10.1109/TSE.2009.41 – volume-title: Work motivation: history, theory, research, and practice year: 2012 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-43 doi: 10.4135/9781506335520 – volume: 1 start-page: 77 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-36 article-title: Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data publication-title: Communication Methods and Measures doi: 10.1080/19312450709336664 – volume: 14 start-page: 187 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-65 article-title: An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering doi: 10.1007/s10664-008-9093-5 – volume: 23 start-page: 3801 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-25 article-title: Four commentaries on the use of students and professionals in empirical software engineering experiments publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering doi: 10.1007/s10664-018-9655-0 – volume: 12 start-page: 102545 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-45 article-title: K-Alpha calculator—Krippendorff’s alpha calculator: a user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff’s alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient publication-title: MethodsX doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545 – volume: 55 start-page: 1060 issue: 3 year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-68 article-title: Collaborative dialogue patterns of pair programming and their impact on programming self-efficacy and coding performance publication-title: British Journal of Educational Technology doi: 10.1111/bjet.13412 – volume: 11 start-page: 226 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-8 article-title: How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription publication-title: Qualitative Inquiry doi: 10.1177/1077800404273413 – volume-title: Systems and software engineering—life cycle profiles for very small entities (VSEs)—Part 5-1-2: Software engineering: management and engineering guidelines: generic profile group: basic profile year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-37 – start-page: 20 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-30 article-title: Building a guideline to reinforce agile software development with the basic profile of ISO/IEC 29110 in very small entities – start-page: 385 year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-73 article-title: The psychological effects of AI-assisted programming on students and professionals – start-page: 159 volume-title: Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-47 article-title: The five-factor theory of personality – volume: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-82 article-title: Mob programming: a whole team approach – volume: 51 start-page: 1 issue: 3 year: 2025 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-64 article-title: Qualitative research methods in software engineering: past, present, and future publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering doi: 10.1109/TSE.2025.3538751 – start-page: 104 year: 2016 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-41 article-title: Flow, Intrinsic motivation, and developer experience in software engineering – year: 2024 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-59 article-title: Intrinsic motivation inventory publication-title: Self-Determination Theory – start-page: 132 year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-29 article-title: An initial framework for research on pair programming – volume: 51 start-page: 1110 issue: 7 year: 2009b ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-35 article-title: The effectiveness of pair programming: a meta-analysis publication-title: Information and Software Technology doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001 – volume: 73 start-page: 66 issue: 9 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-54 article-title: Knowledge transfer in pair programming: an in-depth analysis publication-title: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.001 – start-page: 17 year: 2002 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-66 article-title: Conducting realistic experiments in software engineering – start-page: 339 volume-title: The Social Psychology of Emotional and Behavioral Problems: Interfaces of Social and Clinical Psychology year: 1999 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-27 article-title: Group dynamics and psychological well-being: the impact of groups on adjustment and dysfunction – volume: 59 start-page: 41 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-19 article-title: The effect of determining pair programming groups according to various individual difference variables on group compatibility, flow, and coding performance publication-title: Journal of Educational Computing Research doi: 10.1177/0735633120949787 – volume: 203 start-page: 111740 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-26 article-title: Psychometric instruments in software engineering research on personality: status quo after fifty years publication-title: Journal of Systems and Software doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111740 – volume-title: Systems and software engineering—life cycle profiles for very small entities (VSEs)—software engineering—Part 5-4: Agile software development guidelines using the basic profile of ISO/IEC 29110 year: 2024 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-38 – volume: 23 start-page: 452 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-23 article-title: Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering doi: 10.1007/s10664-017-9523-3 – volume: 55 start-page: 68 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-57 article-title: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 – start-page: 10 year: 2006 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-77 article-title: Examining the compatibility of student pair programmers – volume: 87 start-page: 43 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-4 article-title: Personality and job performance: test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives publication-title: Journal of Applied Psychology doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43 – volume: 107 start-page: 15 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-44 article-title: Behavioral software engineering: a definition and systematic literature review publication-title: Journal of Systems and Software doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.084 – year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-1 article-title: Agile software development methods: review and analysis – volume: 3 start-page: 77 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-10 article-title: Using thematic analysis in psychology publication-title: Qualitative Research in Psychology doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa – start-page: 81 year: 2023 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-46 article-title: Research philosophy, design and methodology – start-page: 3 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-67 article-title: From collaboration to solitude and back: remote pair programming during COVID-19 – volume: 35 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-42 article-title: Applying software engineering standards in very small entities: from startups to grownups publication-title: IEEE Software doi: 10.1109/MS.2017.4541041 – start-page: 354 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-15 article-title: The social dynamics of pair programming – volume: 38 start-page: 2327890 issue: 1 year: 2024 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-62 article-title: Collaborative intelligence: a scoping review of current applications publication-title: Applied Artificial Intelligence doi: 10.1080/08839514.2024.2327890 – volume: 19 start-page: 1 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-50 article-title: Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines publication-title: International Journal of Qualitative Methods doi: 10.1177/1609406919899220 – start-page: 445 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-78 article-title: Eleven guidelines for implementing pair programming in the classroom – volume: 19 start-page: 714 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-61 article-title: Investigating the effects of personality traits on pair programming in a higher education setting through a family of experiments publication-title: Empirical Software Engineering doi: 10.1007/s10664-012-9238-4 – start-page: 210 year: 2023b ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-72 article-title: Psychological aspects of pair programming: a mixed-methods experimental study – volume: 42 start-page: 294 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-14 article-title: Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement publication-title: Sociological Methods & Research doi: 10.1177/0049124113500475 – volume: 46 start-page: 94 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-18 article-title: Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: a mapping study publication-title: Computers in Human Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.008 – volume: 1 start-page: 112 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-39 article-title: Toward a definition of mixed methods research publication-title: Journal of Mixed Methods Research doi: 10.1177/1558689806298224 – volume: 61 start-page: 622 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-49 article-title: The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals publication-title: American Psychologist doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622 – volume: 24 start-page: 178 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-28 article-title: The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries publication-title: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892 – volume: 9 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-11 article-title: Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis publication-title: Qualitative Psychology doi: 10.1037/qup0000196 – volume-title: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-17 – volume: 21 start-page: 549 issue: 5 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-52 article-title: The evolutionary genetics of personality publication-title: European Journal of Personality: Published for the European Association of Personality Psychology doi: 10.1002/per.629 – volume: 7 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-51 article-title: An innovative approach to the development of an international software process lifecycle standard for very small entities publication-title: International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach (IJITSA) doi: 10.4018/IJITSA – start-page: 29 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-2 article-title: Personality and intrinsic motivational factors in end-user programming – start-page: 3 year: 2000 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-53 article-title: Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples – volume: 50 start-page: 9 year: 2020a ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-80 article-title: PP-ind: a repository of industrial pair programming session recordings publication-title: Context doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2002.03121 – volume: 18 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-33 article-title: How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability publication-title: Field Methods doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903 – volume-title: Pair programming illuminated year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-76 – volume: 576 start-page: 84 volume-title: New Perspectives in Software Engineering. CIMPS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems year: 2023a ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-71 article-title: Effects of pilot, navigator, and solo programming roles on motivation: an experimental study – volume: 52 start-page: 611 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-24 article-title: Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers publication-title: Information and Software Technology doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.01.001 – start-page: 149 year: 2011 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-60 article-title: The effects of openness to experience on pair programming in a higher education context – volume-title: A realist theory of science year: 1975 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-7 – start-page: 7 year: 2004 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-40 article-title: On understanding compatibility of student pair programmers – year: 2025 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-69 article-title: Blockchain-driven research in personality-based distributed pair programming – volume: 12 start-page: 77 volume-title: Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology year: 2003 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-63 article-title: Personnel selection and employee performance doi: 10.1002/0471264385.wei1205 – volume: 4 start-page: 133 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-48 article-title: A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x – volume: 236 volume-title: Experimentation in software engineering year: 2012 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-79 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2 – volume-title: Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-58 doi: 10.1521/978.14625/28806 – volume: 2 start-page: e289 year: 2014 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-32 article-title: Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering publication-title: PeerJ doi: 10.7717/peerj.289 – volume: 11 start-page: 589 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-12 article-title: Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis publication-title: Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 – volume: 24 start-page: 258 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-56 article-title: Construct validation using multitrait-multimethod-twin data: the case of a general factor of personality publication-title: European Journal of Personality doi: 10.1002/per.760 – volume: 7 start-page: 158 issue: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-16 article-title: Motivation and personality: a neuropsychological perspective publication-title: Social and Personality Psychology Compass doi: 10.1111/spc3.12016 – volume: 41 start-page: 203 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-55 article-title: Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German publication-title: Journal of Research in Personality doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 – start-page: 437 year: 2022 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-70 article-title: Motivational differences among software professionals – volume: 56 start-page: 33 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-20 article-title: Cybernetic big five theory publication-title: Journal of Research in Personality doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 – volume: 31 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-31 article-title: Psychometrics in behavioral software engineering: a methodological introduction with guidelines publication-title: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) doi: 10.1145/3469888 – volume: 13 start-page: 731 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-9 article-title: Pair programming in perspective: effects on persistence, achievement, and equity in computer science publication-title: Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness doi: 10.1080/19345747.2020.1799464 – volume: 124 start-page: 689 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-22 article-title: From needs to goals and representations: foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development publication-title: Psychological Review doi: 10.1037/rev0000082 – volume: 11 start-page: 145 year: 2017 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-21 article-title: The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: a new frontier in self-determination research publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145 – start-page: 421 year: 2020b ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-81 article-title: Explaining pair programming session dynamics from knowledge gaps – start-page: 10 year: 2005 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-74 article-title: Effects of pair programming at the development team level: an experiment – start-page: 229 year: 2008 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-75 article-title: A practical guide to ethical research involving humans – year: 2001 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-5 article-title: Manifesto for Agile software development – start-page: 125 year: 2005 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-6 article-title: Promiscuous pairing and beginner’s mind: embrace inexperience [agile programming] – volume: 33 start-page: 65 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-3 article-title: Evaluating pair programming with respect to system complexity and programmer expertise publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering doi: 10.1109/TSE.2007.17 – volume: 20 start-page: 10 issue: 4 year: 1987 ident: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2774/ref-13 article-title: No silver bullet: essence and accidents of software engineering publication-title: IEEE Computer doi: 10.1109/MC.1987.1663532 |
| SSID | ssj0001511119 |
| Score | 2.2944894 |
| Snippet | This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on... Aim This study explores whether personality-based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on... Aim This study explores whether personality‐based role assignments (Pilot, Navigator, Solo) can raise intrinsic motivation in pair programming, focusing on... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
| StartPage | e2774 |
| SubjectTerms | Agile software development Big Five Computer programming Human-Computer Interaction Intrinsic motivation Linear mixed-effects Mixed-methods research Social Computing Software Engineering Web applications |
| Title | Personality-based pair programming: toward intrinsic motivation alignment in very small entities |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40567791 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3224259407 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12190715 https://doaj.org/article/e3240c17eba64e4fb2e1d359cf278723 |
| Volume | 11 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001480531200001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20150101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: P5Z dateStart: 20150527 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/hightechjournals providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Computer Science Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: K7- dateStart: 20150527 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/compscijour providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20150527 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Publicly Available Content Database customDbUrl: eissn: 2376-5992 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0001511119 issn: 2376-5992 databaseCode: PIMPY dateStart: 20150527 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://search.proquest.com/publiccontent providerName: ProQuest |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwEB7BwoEL70dgqQxCcDLb2HHtcNtFXbGCraLlocLFOI6zBG3TqmmRuPDbGTtpacSBC6rkQ8d9eL6xxyN9-QbgGUIsuOUxVQWXNFHG0TxRnBpeGFYwVvLAzfn0Tk4majpNs51WX54T1soDt447cF4xzsbS5WaUuKTMmYsLLlJbMow1FnQ-hzLdKaba54P9UZC2opoSS5aDhXPL79Q2L5mUSS8JBa3-v0_knZTUp0vu5J_jm3C9uziSw_YP34JLrr4NNzZNGUi3R-_A1-zP9Zr6HFWQhamWpCNizTBVvSKrQJYlFf5SVSNOZLZtc0bwk-eBIoBmgoH-kzQzc3FBNuqrd-Hj8fjD6ze0a6NArYj5iqalRcf5UihPjN-xRSyMSq0c5ujOoTQMIWLKGWaKNBmV-JKxM0oMrUXvF_we7NXz2j0AovCbrFNxwnKRSGZyga7NBdZxLrVFKSJ4vvGrXrRqGRqrDA-ADgBo22gPQARH3uvbSV7kOryB0OsOev0v6CN46jHTXsai9jyZc7NuGn3y_kwfKo7p2ReDEbzoJpVzRM-a7rEDXJBXvurN3O_NxH1me-Ynm9DQ3uTJabWbrxuNZyKefCmWxhHcb0NluzC8D4-kTOMIVC-IeivvW-rqW5D5jjGZ4AVQPPwfvnoE15jvXBw4R_uwt1qu3WO4an-sqmY5gMtyqgZw5Wg8yc4GYSvh-FZSHE9_jXHMxBe0Zyen2effHpsplQ |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality-based+pair+programming%3A+toward+intrinsic+motivation+alignment+in+very+small+entities&rft.jtitle=PeerJ.+Computer+science&rft.au=Marcel+Valovy&rft.au=Alena+Buchalcevova&rft.date=2025-04-01&rft.pub=PeerJ+Inc&rft.eissn=2376-5992&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=e2774&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717%2Fpeerj-cs.2774&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_e3240c17eba64e4fb2e1d359cf278723 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2376-5992&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2376-5992&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2376-5992&client=summon |