Trading-off: Rural food security and land rights in South Africa

•South Africa needs a new food security policy that is integrated with its land reform program.•Food security and land reform policies should respect, and be based on, a broader understanding of dynamic land use practices in poor rural areas.•Land deals between semi-private business interests and ru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy Jg. 36; S. 267 - 274
Hauptverfasser: Kepe, Thembela, Tessaro, Danielle
Format: Journal Article
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2014
Elsevier
Schlagworte:
ISSN:0264-8377, 1873-5754
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•South Africa needs a new food security policy that is integrated with its land reform program.•Food security and land reform policies should respect, and be based on, a broader understanding of dynamic land use practices in poor rural areas.•Land deals between semi-private business interests and rural people need a decisive action by the government, to better protect the land rights of the rural poor. In light of the high percentage of poor people in rural areas of South Africa, the post-apartheid government has, among other things, prioritized food security in their policy processes. However, these food security policies stop short of workable strategies for the most difficult situations, particularly in the former reserves (Bantustans). A case study of the Eastern Cape Province reveals that food security managed by government agencies experience difficulties at implementation stage due to land issues. At the heart of the problem is the poor understanding of rural people's land use plans and multiple livelihood strategies. The paper concludes that food security projects in the former Bantustans will continue to suffer unless food security policies are efficiently integrated to those of land reform.
Bibliographie:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0264-8377
1873-5754
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.013