APA (7th ed.) Citation

Ayati, N., McIntosh, L., Buteau, J., Alipour, R., Pudis, M., Daw, N., . . . Hofman, M. S. (2024). Comparison of quantitative whole body PET parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT using ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) vs. bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer imaging, 24(1), 57-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Ayati, Narjess, Lachlan McIntosh, James Buteau, Ramin Alipour, Michal Pudis, Nicholas Daw, Price Jackson, and Michael S. Hofman. "Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) Vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer." Cancer Imaging 24, no. 1 (2024): 57-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Ayati, Narjess, et al. "Comparison of Quantitative Whole Body PET Parameters on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Using Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM) Vs. Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) Reconstruction Algorithms in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer." Cancer Imaging, vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, pp. 57-8, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-024-00702-x.