Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Stigmatizing Language in Labor and Birth Clinical Notes

Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natura...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Maternal and child health journal Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 578 - 586
Main Authors: Barcelona, Veronica, Scharp, Danielle, Moen, Hans, Davoudi, Anahita, Idnay, Betina R., Cato, Kenrick, Topaz, Maxim
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01.03.2024
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
ISSN:1092-7875, 1573-6628, 1573-6628
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Significance What is Already Known on this Subject? Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records. What this Study Adds? We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities.
AbstractList Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.
Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.SignificanceWhat is Already Known on this Subject?Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records.What this Study Adds?We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities.
Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Significance What is Already Known on this Subject? Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records. What this Study Adds? We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities.
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.INTRODUCTIONStigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.METHODSWe analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.RESULTSFor marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.CONCLUSIONWe identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.
Audience Academic
Author Barcelona, Veronica
Scharp, Danielle
Davoudi, Anahita
Cato, Kenrick
Idnay, Betina R.
Moen, Hans
Topaz, Maxim
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Veronica
  orcidid: 0000-0003-3070-1716
  surname: Barcelona
  fullname: Barcelona, Veronica
  email: vb2534@cumc.columbia.edu
  organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Danielle
  surname: Scharp
  fullname: Scharp, Danielle
  organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hans
  surname: Moen
  fullname: Moen, Hans
  organization: Department of Computer Science, Aalto University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Anahita
  surname: Davoudi
  fullname: Davoudi, Anahita
  organization: VNS Health
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Betina R.
  surname: Idnay
  fullname: Idnay, Betina R.
  organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Kenrick
  surname: Cato
  fullname: Cato, Kenrick
  organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University, University of Pennsylvania
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Maxim
  surname: Topaz
  fullname: Topaz, Maxim
  organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38147277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kk1r3DAQhkVJaZJt_0APxVAovTiVrC_7mCz9CCxpoc1ZyPLIq-CVUkk-pL--2mzSNGEJOmjQPO_LaGaO0YEPHhB6S_AJwVh-SgR3Ha9xQ2tMWy5r9gIdES5pLUTTHpQYd00tW8kP0XFKVxgXGWav0CFtCZONlEcILpPzY3Wh8xz1VK20H2c9QvUjBgPpNpdDdT6Az87eVD-zGzc6uz_bxD_Y-RL3IVbaD9WZi3ldLSfnnSmOFyFDeo1eWj0leHN3L9Dll8-_lt_q1fev58vTVW04IbnmhLZi0FrbgVlte6GHHjPB-t5YwFQQYVop5NBiKjkb-kZa0pQQmABuqaYL9HHnex3D7xlSVhuXDEyT9hDmpJoOCyI7XFq2QO-foFdhjr5UVygqmeC84w_UqCdQztuQozZbU3UqW86Y7BguVL2HGsFD6WmZmXXl-RF_socvZ4CNM3sFH_4TrEFPeZ3CNGcXfHoMvrv71dxvYFDX0W10vFH3Ay9AuwNMDClFsMq4rLc-pQQ3KYLVdrfUbrdUaZS63S3FirR5Ir13f1ZEd6JUYD9CfGjzM6q_kWrdfQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_eurjcn_zvaf020
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae290
crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_0009_70026
crossref_primary_10_1177_10848223251367385
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2025_105918
crossref_primary_10_1177_01939459241306946
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_9599
crossref_primary_10_2196_69753
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_outlook_2025_102472
crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae310
crossref_primary_10_2196_68955
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10943_025_02414_3
Cites_doi 10.1097/aco.0000000000001131
10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967
10.1017/CBO9780511809071
10.1093/jamia/ocab275
10.1111/nin.12557
10.1111/inm.12763
10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2
10.1097/psy.0000000000001092
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052
10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903
10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28
10.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005
10.1177/1049732305276687
10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423
10.1186/1471-2393-14-58
10.1097/AOG.0000000000005333
10.1145/1656274.1656280
10.1055/s-0041-1739433
10.1080/01612840802694668
10.1007/BFb0026683
10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z
10.3389/frph.2021.684207
10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2
10.1186/s12889-019-8127-9
10.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007
10.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015
10.1093/tbm/iby029
10.1002/nur.20362
10.1002/nur.21768
10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7
10.1007/s10995-020-03020-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
– notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9-
K9.
KB0
M0R
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s10995-023-03857-4
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Consumer Health Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic (retired)
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Family Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)

MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7RV
  name: Nursing & Allied Health Database
  url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Public Health
EISSN 1573-6628
EndPage 586
ExternalDocumentID A785447940
38147277
10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  grantid: GBMF9048
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000936
– fundername: Data Science Institute, Columbia University
  grantid: Data Science Institute, Columbia University
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100018085
– fundername: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  grantid: GBMF9048
– fundername: Data Science Institute, Columbia University
  grantid: Data Science Institute, Columbia University
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0B8
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
1SB
203
29M
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
44B
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
78A
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDBF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACUHS
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADOJX
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADUKH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEUYN
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
AZQEC
B-.
B0M
BA0
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BKEYQ
BKNYI
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EHN
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EN4
ENC
EPL
EPT
ESBYG
ESX
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IAO
IEA
IHE
IHR
IHW
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
INH
INR
IOF
IPY
ITC
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
K9-
KDC
KOV
KPH
LAK
LLZTM
M0R
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
NAPCQ
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P2P
P9S
PF-
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOR
QOS
Q~Q
R89
R9I
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZC
RZE
RZK
S16
S1Z
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SDH
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
TUS
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
WQ9
YHZ
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7W
Z82
Z83
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~8M
~A9
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ABRTQ
ACSTC
ADHKG
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFFHD
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PPXIY
NPM
7XB
8FK
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-51386daaafd4fafb6adb0464bbcfe03616c8767d803754db27f12375e46e5f3a3
IEDL.DBID RSV
ISICitedReferencesCount 13
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001131606200003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 1092-7875
1573-6628
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 10:19:19 EST 2025
Wed Nov 05 09:31:25 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 13:48:45 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 11:55:42 EST 2025
Mon Nov 24 15:41:07 EST 2025
Thu May 22 21:23:44 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:05:45 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 03:28:59 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:05:56 EST 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:41:37 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Electronic health records
Bias
Natural language processing
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-51386daaafd4fafb6adb0464bbcfe03616c8767d803754db27f12375e46e5f3a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-3070-1716
PMID 38147277
PQID 2937465595
PQPubID 46954
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2906179002
proquest_journals_2937465595
gale_infotracmisc_A785447940
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A785447940
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A785447940
gale_healthsolutions_A785447940
pubmed_primary_38147277
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4
springer_journals_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20240300
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 3
  year: 2024
  text: 20240300
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Maternal and child health journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev Matern Child Health J
PublicationTitleAlternate Matern Child Health J
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Springer US
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References MartinJAOstermanMJKDescribing the increase in Preterm Births in the United States, 2014–2016NCHS data Brief2018(312)31218
CoyneITSampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?Journal of Advanced Nursing19972636236301:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitVylsA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
DrewniakDKronesTWildVDo attitudes and behavior of health care professionals exacerbate health care disparities among immigrant and ethnic minority groups? An integrative literature reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies201770899810.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015
BeachMCSahaSParkJTaylorJDrewPPlankECheeBTestimonial injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and womenJournal of General Internal Medicine20213661708171410.1007/s11606-021-06682-z[doi]
KravitzESuhMRussellMOjedaALevisonJMcKinneyJScreening for Substance Use disorders during pregnancy: A decision at the intersection of racial and Reproductive JusticeAmerican Journal of Perinatology202110.1055/s-0041-1739433
EverettBGLimburgAMcKettaSHatzenbuehlerMLState-Level regulations regarding the protection of sexual minorities and birth outcomes: Results from a Population-based Cohort StudyPsychosomatic Medicine202284665866810.1097/psy.0000000000001092
KimHSefcikJSBradwayCCharacteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic reviewResearch in Nursing & Health201740123421:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFKlt77N10.1002/nur.21768
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.
MartinKStanfordCAn analysis of documentation language and word choice among forensic mental health nursesInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing20202961241125210.1111/inm.12763
LockeSBAl-AdelyAMooreSWilsonJKitchenANatural language processing in medicine: A reviewTrends in Anaesthesia and Critical care2021384910.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007
Manning, C. D. R., & Schütze, P., H (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 39). Cambridge University Press.
HsiehHFShannonSEThree approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research20051591277128810.1177/1049732305276687
GohYCCaiXQTheseiraWKoGKhorKAEvaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstractsScientometrics20201252119712121:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhsVOjt7zM10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2
PhilipsbornRPSorscherEASexsonWEvansHHBorn on U.S. Soil: Access to Healthcare for neonates of non-citizensMaternal and Child Health Journal202125191410.1007/s10995-020-03020-3
MinehartRDBryantASJacksonJDalyJLRacial/Ethnic inequities in pregnancy-related morbidity and mortalityObstet Gynecol Clin North Am2021481315110.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005
LandauAYBlanchardACatoKAtkinsNSalazarSPattonDUTopazMConsiderations for development of Child Abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: A qualitative studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association202229351251910.1093/jamia/ocab275
Quinlan, J. R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. 58–60. https://books.google.com/books/about/C4_5.html?id=b3ujBQAAQBAJ.
GodduAPO’ConorKJLanzkronSSaheedMOSahaSPeekMEBeachMCDo words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the transmission of Bias in the medical recordJournal of General Internal Medicine201833568569110.1007/s11606-017-4289-2[doi]
Bridle, J. S. (1990). Probabilistic interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition. In F. F. Soulié, & J. Hérault (Eds.), Neurocomputing (Vol. 68). Springer.
SandelowskiMWhat’s in a name? Qualitative description revisitedResearch in Nursing & Health2010331778410.1002/nur.20362
Tiwary, U. S. S., T (2008). Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1481140.
TogiokaBMSeligmanKMDelgadoCMLimited English proficiency in the labor and delivery unitCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology202235328529110.1097/aco.0000000000001131
AlpertJMMorrisBBThomsonMDMatinKGeyerCEBrownRFOpenNotes in oncology: Oncologists’ perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes Translational Behavioral Medicine20199234735610.1093/tbm/iby029
OmenkaOIWatsonDPHendrieHCUnderstanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: A scoping reviewBMC Public Health20202012710.1186/s12889-019-8127-9
Barcelona, V., Scharp, D., Idnay, B. R., Moen, H., Goffman, D., Cato, K., & Topaz, M. (2023b). A qualitative analysis of stigmatizing language in birth admission clinical notes. Nursing Inquiry, e12557. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12557.
SunMOliwaTPeekMETungELNegative patient descriptors: Documenting racial BiasHealth Aff (Millwood)202241220321110.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423
BertholdMRCDillNGabrielFKotterTRMeinlTOhlTThielPWiswedelKKNIME – the Konstanz Information MinerAcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter2009111263110.1145/1656274.1656280
HooverKLockhartSCallisterCHoltropJSCalcaterraSLExperiences of stigma in hospitals with addiction consultation services: A qualitative analysis of patients’ and hospital-based providers’ perspectivesJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment20221381087081:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XitVehurjK10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708
JindalMThorntonRLJMcRaeAUnakaNJohnsonTJMistryKBEffects of a curriculum addressing racism on Pediatric residents’ racial biases and EmpathyJ Grad Med Educ202214440741310.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1
Braveman, P., Dominguez, T. P., Burke, W., Dolan, S. M., Stevenson, D. K., Jackson, F. M., & Waddell, L. (2021). Explaining the black-white disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement from a Multi-disciplinary Scientific Work Group convened by the March of dimes [Review]. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.684207.
Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. The Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition.
MaloufRRedshawMKurinczukJJGrayRSystematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal periodBmc Pregnancy and Childbirth2014145810.1186/1471-2393-14-58
United States Department of Health and Human Services (2020). 08/04/2020). 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC health IT certification program National Archives. Retrieved November 5 from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification.
HimmelsteinGBatesDZhouLExamination of stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health RecordJAMA Netw Open202251e214496710.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967
BarcelonaVHortonRLRivlinKHarkinsSGreenCRobinsonKTopazMThe Power of Language in Hospital Care for pregnant and Birthing people: A vision for changeObstetrics & Gynecology202310.1097/AOG.0000000000005333
ShattellMMStigmatizing language with unintended meanings: Persons with mental Illness or mentally ill persons?Issues in Mental Health Nursing200930319910.1080/01612840802694668
Park, J., Saha, S., Chee, B., Taylor, J., & Beach, M. C. (2021). Physician use of stigmatizing Language in Patient Medical records. JAMA Network open, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052.
FernándezLFossaADongZDelbancoTElmoreJFitzgeraldPDesRochesCWords Matter: What do patients find judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient notes?Journal of General Internal Medicine20213692571257810.1007/s11606-020-06432-7
Vaswani, A. S., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, N., Jones, J., Gomez, L., Kaiser, A. N., & Polosukhin, L. (2017). I. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762.
Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning, fourth edition. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=tZnSDwAAQBAJ.
HallWJChapmanMVLeeKMMerinoYMThomasTWPayneBKCoyne-BeasleyTImplicit Racial/Ethnic Bias among Health Care Professionals and its influence on Health Care outcomes: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Public Health201510512e607610.2105/AJPH.2015.302903[doi]
Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. European conference on machine learning Berlin, Heidelberg.
K Martin (3857_CR30) 2020; 29
V Barcelona (3857_CR3) 2023
M Sandelowski (3857_CR36) 2010; 33
3857_CR33
3857_CR10
K Hoover (3857_CR19) 2022; 138
BG Everett (3857_CR12) 2022; 84
RP Philipsborn (3857_CR34) 2021; 25
3857_CR35
3857_CR18
3857_CR39
E Kravitz (3857_CR24) 2021
G Himmelstein (3857_CR17) 2022; 5
IT Coyne (3857_CR9) 1997; 26
D Drewniak (3857_CR11) 2017; 70
M Jindal (3857_CR21) 2022; 14
AP Goddu (3857_CR14) 2018; 33
OI Omenka (3857_CR32) 2020; 20
MM Shattell (3857_CR37) 2009; 30
MRC Berthold (3857_CR6) 2009; 11
JA Martin (3857_CR29) 2018; (312)
WJ Hall (3857_CR16) 2015; 105
YC Goh (3857_CR15) 2020; 125
3857_CR22
3857_CR42
R Malouf (3857_CR27) 2014; 14
3857_CR41
AY Landau (3857_CR25) 2022; 29
HF Hsieh (3857_CR20) 2005; 15
3857_CR8
3857_CR7
M Sun (3857_CR38) 2022; 41
3857_CR28
SB Locke (3857_CR26) 2021; 38
RD Minehart (3857_CR31) 2021; 48
3857_CR4
JM Alpert (3857_CR2) 2019; 9
BM Togioka (3857_CR40) 2022; 35
H Kim (3857_CR23) 2017; 40
3857_CR1
MC Beach (3857_CR5) 2021; 36
L Fernández (3857_CR13) 2021; 36
References_xml – reference: ShattellMMStigmatizing language with unintended meanings: Persons with mental Illness or mentally ill persons?Issues in Mental Health Nursing200930319910.1080/01612840802694668
– reference: Vaswani, A. S., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, N., Jones, J., Gomez, L., Kaiser, A. N., & Polosukhin, L. (2017). I. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762.
– reference: Quinlan, J. R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. 58–60. https://books.google.com/books/about/C4_5.html?id=b3ujBQAAQBAJ.
– reference: Manning, C. D. R., & Schütze, P., H (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 39). Cambridge University Press.
– reference: PhilipsbornRPSorscherEASexsonWEvansHHBorn on U.S. Soil: Access to Healthcare for neonates of non-citizensMaternal and Child Health Journal202125191410.1007/s10995-020-03020-3
– reference: DrewniakDKronesTWildVDo attitudes and behavior of health care professionals exacerbate health care disparities among immigrant and ethnic minority groups? An integrative literature reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies201770899810.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015
– reference: GohYCCaiXQTheseiraWKoGKhorKAEvaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstractsScientometrics20201252119712121:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhsVOjt7zM10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2
– reference: HooverKLockhartSCallisterCHoltropJSCalcaterraSLExperiences of stigma in hospitals with addiction consultation services: A qualitative analysis of patients’ and hospital-based providers’ perspectivesJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment20221381087081:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XitVehurjK10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708
– reference: SandelowskiMWhat’s in a name? Qualitative description revisitedResearch in Nursing & Health2010331778410.1002/nur.20362
– reference: AlpertJMMorrisBBThomsonMDMatinKGeyerCEBrownRFOpenNotes in oncology: Oncologists’ perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes Translational Behavioral Medicine20199234735610.1093/tbm/iby029
– reference: Bridle, J. S. (1990). Probabilistic interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition. In F. F. Soulié, & J. Hérault (Eds.), Neurocomputing (Vol. 68). Springer.
– reference: MartinJAOstermanMJKDescribing the increase in Preterm Births in the United States, 2014–2016NCHS data Brief2018(312)31218
– reference: BarcelonaVHortonRLRivlinKHarkinsSGreenCRobinsonKTopazMThe Power of Language in Hospital Care for pregnant and Birthing people: A vision for changeObstetrics & Gynecology202310.1097/AOG.0000000000005333
– reference: BeachMCSahaSParkJTaylorJDrewPPlankECheeBTestimonial injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and womenJournal of General Internal Medicine20213661708171410.1007/s11606-021-06682-z[doi]
– reference: JindalMThorntonRLJMcRaeAUnakaNJohnsonTJMistryKBEffects of a curriculum addressing racism on Pediatric residents’ racial biases and EmpathyJ Grad Med Educ202214440741310.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1
– reference: Barcelona, V., Scharp, D., Idnay, B. R., Moen, H., Goffman, D., Cato, K., & Topaz, M. (2023b). A qualitative analysis of stigmatizing language in birth admission clinical notes. Nursing Inquiry, e12557. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12557.
– reference: Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. The Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition.
– reference: LockeSBAl-AdelyAMooreSWilsonJKitchenANatural language processing in medicine: A reviewTrends in Anaesthesia and Critical care2021384910.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007
– reference: HsiehHFShannonSEThree approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research20051591277128810.1177/1049732305276687
– reference: FernándezLFossaADongZDelbancoTElmoreJFitzgeraldPDesRochesCWords Matter: What do patients find judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient notes?Journal of General Internal Medicine20213692571257810.1007/s11606-020-06432-7
– reference: BertholdMRCDillNGabrielFKotterTRMeinlTOhlTThielPWiswedelKKNIME – the Konstanz Information MinerAcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter2009111263110.1145/1656274.1656280
– reference: GodduAPO’ConorKJLanzkronSSaheedMOSahaSPeekMEBeachMCDo words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the transmission of Bias in the medical recordJournal of General Internal Medicine201833568569110.1007/s11606-017-4289-2[doi]
– reference: Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning, fourth edition. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=tZnSDwAAQBAJ.
– reference: Park, J., Saha, S., Chee, B., Taylor, J., & Beach, M. C. (2021). Physician use of stigmatizing Language in Patient Medical records. JAMA Network open, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052.
– reference: OmenkaOIWatsonDPHendrieHCUnderstanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: A scoping reviewBMC Public Health20202012710.1186/s12889-019-8127-9
– reference: MartinKStanfordCAn analysis of documentation language and word choice among forensic mental health nursesInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing20202961241125210.1111/inm.12763
– reference: Braveman, P., Dominguez, T. P., Burke, W., Dolan, S. M., Stevenson, D. K., Jackson, F. M., & Waddell, L. (2021). Explaining the black-white disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement from a Multi-disciplinary Scientific Work Group convened by the March of dimes [Review]. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.684207.
– reference: MaloufRRedshawMKurinczukJJGrayRSystematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal periodBmc Pregnancy and Childbirth2014145810.1186/1471-2393-14-58
– reference: KimHSefcikJSBradwayCCharacteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic reviewResearch in Nursing & Health201740123421:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFKlt77N10.1002/nur.21768
– reference: SunMOliwaTPeekMETungELNegative patient descriptors: Documenting racial BiasHealth Aff (Millwood)202241220321110.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423
– reference: HallWJChapmanMVLeeKMMerinoYMThomasTWPayneBKCoyne-BeasleyTImplicit Racial/Ethnic Bias among Health Care Professionals and its influence on Health Care outcomes: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Public Health201510512e607610.2105/AJPH.2015.302903[doi]
– reference: Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. European conference on machine learning Berlin, Heidelberg.
– reference: KravitzESuhMRussellMOjedaALevisonJMcKinneyJScreening for Substance Use disorders during pregnancy: A decision at the intersection of racial and Reproductive JusticeAmerican Journal of Perinatology202110.1055/s-0041-1739433
– reference: TogiokaBMSeligmanKMDelgadoCMLimited English proficiency in the labor and delivery unitCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology202235328529110.1097/aco.0000000000001131
– reference: EverettBGLimburgAMcKettaSHatzenbuehlerMLState-Level regulations regarding the protection of sexual minorities and birth outcomes: Results from a Population-based Cohort StudyPsychosomatic Medicine202284665866810.1097/psy.0000000000001092
– reference: LandauAYBlanchardACatoKAtkinsNSalazarSPattonDUTopazMConsiderations for development of Child Abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: A qualitative studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association202229351251910.1093/jamia/ocab275
– reference: Tiwary, U. S. S., T (2008). Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1481140.
– reference: HimmelsteinGBatesDZhouLExamination of stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health RecordJAMA Netw Open202251e214496710.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967
– reference: MinehartRDBryantASJacksonJDalyJLRacial/Ethnic inequities in pregnancy-related morbidity and mortalityObstet Gynecol Clin North Am2021481315110.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005
– reference: CoyneITSampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?Journal of Advanced Nursing19972636236301:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitVylsA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
– reference: United States Department of Health and Human Services (2020). 08/04/2020). 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC health IT certification program National Archives. Retrieved November 5 from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification.
– reference: Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies.
– volume: 35
  start-page: 285
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR40
  publication-title: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001131
– volume: 138
  start-page: 108708
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR19
  publication-title: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708
– ident: 3857_CR18
– volume: 5
  start-page: e2144967
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR17
  publication-title: JAMA Netw Open
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967
– ident: 3857_CR28
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809071
– ident: 3857_CR39
– volume: (312)
  start-page: 1
  issue: 312
  year: 2018
  ident: 3857_CR29
  publication-title: NCHS data Brief
– volume: 29
  start-page: 512
  issue: 3
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR25
  publication-title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab275
– ident: 3857_CR4
  doi: 10.1111/nin.12557
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1241
  issue: 6
  year: 2020
  ident: 3857_CR30
  publication-title: International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
  doi: 10.1111/inm.12763
– volume: 125
  start-page: 1197
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 3857_CR15
  publication-title: Scientometrics
  doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2
– volume: 84
  start-page: 658
  issue: 6
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR12
  publication-title: Psychosomatic Medicine
  doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001092
– ident: 3857_CR33
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052
– volume: 105
  start-page: e60
  issue: 12
  year: 2015
  ident: 3857_CR16
  publication-title: American Journal of Public Health
  doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903
– ident: 3857_CR8
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28
– ident: 3857_CR1
– volume: 48
  start-page: 31
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR31
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am
  doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1277
  issue: 9
  year: 2005
  ident: 3857_CR20
  publication-title: Qualitative Health Research
  doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
– volume: 41
  start-page: 203
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR38
  publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood)
  doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423
– volume: 14
  start-page: 58
  year: 2014
  ident: 3857_CR27
  publication-title: Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-58
– ident: 3857_CR41
– year: 2023
  ident: 3857_CR3
  publication-title: Obstetrics & Gynecology
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005333
– volume: 11
  start-page: 26
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: 3857_CR6
  publication-title: AcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
  doi: 10.1145/1656274.1656280
– year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR24
  publication-title: American Journal of Perinatology
  doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739433
– volume: 30
  start-page: 199
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 3857_CR37
  publication-title: Issues in Mental Health Nursing
  doi: 10.1080/01612840802694668
– ident: 3857_CR22
  doi: 10.1007/BFb0026683
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1708
  issue: 6
  year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR5
  publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z
– ident: 3857_CR7
  doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.684207
– volume: 33
  start-page: 685
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 3857_CR14
  publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2
– volume: 20
  start-page: 27
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 3857_CR32
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8127-9
– ident: 3857_CR10
– volume: 38
  start-page: 4
  year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR26
  publication-title: Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical care
  doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007
– volume: 14
  start-page: 407
  issue: 4
  year: 2022
  ident: 3857_CR21
  publication-title: J Grad Med Educ
  doi: 10.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1
– ident: 3857_CR35
– volume: 26
  start-page: 623
  issue: 3
  year: 1997
  ident: 3857_CR9
  publication-title: Journal of Advanced Nursing
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
– volume: 70
  start-page: 89
  year: 2017
  ident: 3857_CR11
  publication-title: International Journal of Nursing Studies
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015
– volume: 9
  start-page: 347
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 3857_CR2
  publication-title: Translational Behavioral Medicine
  doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby029
– volume: 33
  start-page: 77
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 3857_CR36
  publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health
  doi: 10.1002/nur.20362
– volume: 40
  start-page: 23
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 3857_CR23
  publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health
  doi: 10.1002/nur.21768
– ident: 3857_CR42
– volume: 36
  start-page: 2571
  issue: 9
  year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR13
  publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7
– volume: 25
  start-page: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 3857_CR34
  publication-title: Maternal and Child Health Journal
  doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03020-3
SSID ssj0010004
Score 2.4463284
Snippet Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to...
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias...
Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 578
SubjectTerms Algorithms
Analysis
Bias
Childrens health
Computational linguistics
Decision trees
Deep learning
Demographic aspects
Electronic health records
Gynecology
Health aspects
Health disparities
Health problems
Informatics
Investment bankers
Language
Language processing
Machine learning
Maternal & child health
Maternal and Child Health
Maternal health services
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Natural language interfaces
Natural language processing
Pediatrics
Performance evaluation
Population Economics
Power
Public Health
Sociology
Stigma
Stigma (Social psychology)
Support vector machines
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB-0igjFj_rR2KoriD7UxXxssslTqWLxQQ9BhXtbNptsPShJvUsF_eud2d3LmaJ98e1gJ3eXzOzMLzM7vwF4Hos2S8u85nGWWy5SXfDapAkvMdZKLYxohHbDJuRsVs7n1aeQcFuFY5Vrn-gcddMbypG_xrAkieuryg_PvnOaGkXV1TBC4ypco7HZZOdyPr5wUeraVZXjClEkAvPQNBNa53xvcsapNia5mASmi-75j_h0oWDq4tDx7f-9gztwKyBQduRN5i5cabsduPEx1Nh3YNtn8phvULoHrTtVwGbaMXSwDyHByUKLAa0NPfMNv_Yn-zwsTggF_6KFUXjR4Wc0N6a7hr1ZLIdvLDCSnrJZj3D3Pnw9fvfl7XsehjNwgxht4HmSlUWjtbaNsNrWhW5qKpPWtbEthsWkMOhoZVO6IbtNnUqLQVLmrSja3GY6ewBbXd-1u8AanVeV1gW-HVkRm7IyiTFxlqWJsQhX6giStWaUCczlNEDjVG04l0mbCrWpnDaViOBgvObM83ZcKv2UFK587-m46dWRLHNBHPxxBC-dBG17_G2jQ_cC3gERaE0kX0wkTzx9-N8E9yeCuK_NdHltRir4lZXa2FAEz8ZlupLOynVtf04yBEsrDHURPPRWOz4CxGcCEauM4NXajDdf_u_n8-jy_7IHN1PEev5o3j5sDcvz9jFcNz-GxWr5xO3J3269OFI
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Stigmatizing Language in Labor and Birth Clinical Notes
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-023-03857-4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38147277
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2937465595
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906179002
Volume 28
WOSCitedRecordID wos001131606200003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAVX
  databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1573-6628
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0010004
  issn: 1092-7875
  databaseCode: RSV
  dateStart: 19970301
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22
  providerName: Springer Nature
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEB9sKyKIH1VrtNYVRB80kI9NdvPYlhYf7FGuWu4tbDbZelBy5S4V9K93ZneTNqUK-rIk7C9fk9mdXzI7MwDvIt6kicyqMEozE_JE5WGlkziUaGuF4prXXNliE2IykbNZceyDwlb9avfeJWln6mvBbi6aOA3JmyVCvgYbaO4kFWyYnpwOvgOiKdbHWSB3RDruQ2VuP8fIHN2clK9ZpRtuUmt9Dh_9330_hoeebbJdpx5P4E7TbsK9I-9P34QH7q8dc8FIT6GxKwjYRNlsHOyL_5nJfDgB9XUL5oJ7zU920s3PiPH-oo4BPG9xG1WLqbZme_Nl95357KPnbLJAavsMvh0efN3_HPpCDKFGPtaFWZzKvFZKmZobZapc1RW5RKtKmwZNYJxrnFRFLW1B3bpKhEGDKLKG501mUpU-h_V20TYvgNUqKwqlcvwSMjzSstCx1lGaJrE2SE2qAOL-fZTaZymnYhnn5VV-ZZJnifIsrTxLHsDH4ZgLl6Pjr-g39JpLF2c6DPByV8iMU779KIAPFkFDHK-tlY9UwCegZFkj5PsR8sylCr8NuD0C4hjW4-5e50o_h6xKJGKCstsVWQBvh246ktbFtc3ikjBEQQs0awFsOV0dRIBcjCM7FQF86hXz6uR_ls_Lf4O_gvsJ8jy3LG8b1rvlZfMa7uof3Xy13IE1MT2ldiZsK7GV-_EObOwdTI6nuHcUUYvj9zdgiDSD
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9QwEB6VggAJcZQrUKiROB4gIodzPSBUClWrbiMkitQ34zhxWalKym4KKj-K38hM7GRJBX3rA28reZJsnJlvPttzADz1eBUGaVS4XhhplwcydgsV-G6KvjaRXPGSy67ZRJLn6f5-9nEJfvW5MBRW2WNiB9Rlo2iP_DW6pYRqfWXR26NvLnWNotPVvoWGUYud6uQHLtnmb7bf4_d9FgSbH_Y2tlzbVcBVSC5aN_LDNC6llLrkWuoilmVB53tFoXSFeO7HChEiKdOuO2xZBIlGdE-iisdVpEMZ4n0vwEWqZEcWlW4MISW0Vd6dYnsZslZcCNgkHZuqZ3KhQ5fO4hKXjxzhaXfwhz88dUDb-b3NG__bjN2E65Zhs3VjErdgqapX4PKujSFYgWtmp5KZBKzbUHVREyyXXQUSNrEbuMymUNBY2zCT0KxP2Kd2ekAs_ycNDMLTGn-jOTFZl-zddNZ-Zbbi6iHLG6Tzd-Dzubz0XVium7q6D6yUUZZJGePqT3NPpZnylfLCMPCVRjpWOOD3miCUrcxODUIOxaKmNGmPQO0RnfYI7sDL4ZojU5fkTOk1UjBhcmsHUBPrSRpx6jHgOfCikyBYw2crabMz8A2oQNhI8vlI8sCUR_-b4OpIEHFLjYd7tRUWN-diobMOPBmG6UqKBayr5phkiHZn6ModuGesZJgC5J8cGXniwKvebBY3__f8PDj7v6zBla293YmYbOc7D-FqgLzWhCGuwnI7O64ewSX1vZ3OZ487PGDw5bzN6TcGWpZI
linkToPdf http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bT9RAFD5BNMTEeMFbFWVMvDxIQy_TTvtgDIobCbAhiglvZTrt4Cakxd2iwZ_mr_OczrRrifLGg2-bzGl32z3nO9_MuQE893gZBkmUu14YaZcHMnZzFfhugr5WSK54wWU7bEKMx8nBQbq3AL-6WhhKq-wwsQXqolZ0Rr6ObklQr680Wtc2LWJvc_T25JtLE6Qo0tqN0zAqsl2e_cDt2-zN1ib-1y-CYPRh__1H104YcBUSjcaN_DCJCymlLriWOo9lkVOsL8-VLhHb_VghWogiaSfFFnkgNCK9iEoel5EOZYj3vQJXBY8C6tu_633qIxhEltpIa4oMFjcFtmDHlu2ZuujQpbiccPnAKZ53DX_4xnPB2tYHjm79z2_vNty0zJttGFO5AwtltQxLuza3YBlumBNMZgqz7kLZZlOwsWw7k7Ade7DLbGkFrTU1M4XO-ox9biZHxP5_0kIvPKnwM5oZk1XB3k2mzVdmO7Ees3GNNP8efLmUh74Pi1VdlQ-BFTJKUylj3BVq7qkkVb5SXhgGvtJI03IH_E4rMmU7ttPgkONs3muaNClDTcpaTcq4A6_7a05Mv5ILpVdJ2TJTc9uDXbYhkojT7AHPgVetBMEdfreStmoDn4Aahw0kXw4kj0zb9L8JrgwEEc_UcLlT4czi6Syb668Dz_plupJyBKuyPiUZouMpungHHhiL6V8B8lKOTF04sNaZ0Pzm_34_jy7-LauwhFaU7WyNtx_D9QDprslOXIHFZnpaPoFr6nszmU2fttDA4PCyrek3Mh2fTw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+Natural+Language+Processing+to+Identify+Stigmatizing+Language+in+Labor+and+Birth+Clinical+Notes&rft.jtitle=Maternal+and+child+health+journal&rft.au=Barcelona%2C+Veronica&rft.au=Scharp%2C+Danielle&rft.au=Moen%2C+Hans&rft.au=Davoudi%2C+Anahita&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10995-023-03857-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon