Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Stigmatizing Language in Labor and Birth Clinical Notes
Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natura...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Maternal and child health journal Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 578 - 586 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2024
Springer Springer Nature B.V |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 1092-7875, 1573-6628, 1573-6628 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | Introduction
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.
Methods
We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.
Results
For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.
Conclusion
We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.
Significance
What is Already Known on this Subject?
Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records.
What this Study Adds?
We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.SignificanceWhat is Already Known on this Subject?Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records.What this Study Adds?We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities. Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. Methods We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks’ gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. Results For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. Conclusion We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Significance What is Already Known on this Subject? Traditional informatics methods include natural language processing, and these methods have been increasingly applied to the study of public health problems using electronic health records. What this Study Adds? We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically identify stigmatizing language in labor and birth clinical notes. These methods have not been applied to labor and birth clinical notes and have the potential to be a powerful tool in examining perinatal health inequities. Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.INTRODUCTIONStigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes.We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.METHODSWe analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories.For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.RESULTSFor marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes.We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning.CONCLUSIONWe identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias is the study of stigmatizing language in the electronic health record. The objective of our study was to develop automated natural language processing (NLP) methods to identify two types of stigmatizing language: marginalizing language and its complement, power/privilege language, accurately and automatically in labor and birth notes. We analyzed notes for all birthing people > 20 weeks' gestation admitted for labor and birth at two hospitals during 2017. We then employed text preprocessing techniques, specifically using TF-IDF values as inputs, and tested machine learning classification algorithms to identify stigmatizing and power/privilege language in clinical notes. The algorithms assessed included Decision Trees, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machines. Additionally, we applied a feature importance evaluation method (InfoGain) to discern words that are highly correlated with these language categories. For marginalizing language, Decision Trees yielded the best classification with an F-score of 0.73. For power/privilege language, Support Vector Machines performed optimally, achieving an F-score of 0.91. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the selected machine learning methods in classifying language categories in clinical notes. We identified well-performing machine learning methods to automatically detect stigmatizing language in clinical notes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to use NLP performance metrics to evaluate the performance of machine learning methods in discerning stigmatizing language. Future studies should delve deeper into refining and evaluating NLP methods, incorporating the latest algorithms rooted in deep learning. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Barcelona, Veronica Scharp, Danielle Davoudi, Anahita Cato, Kenrick Idnay, Betina R. Moen, Hans Topaz, Maxim |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Veronica orcidid: 0000-0003-3070-1716 surname: Barcelona fullname: Barcelona, Veronica email: vb2534@cumc.columbia.edu organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University – sequence: 2 givenname: Danielle surname: Scharp fullname: Scharp, Danielle organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University – sequence: 3 givenname: Hans surname: Moen fullname: Moen, Hans organization: Department of Computer Science, Aalto University – sequence: 4 givenname: Anahita surname: Davoudi fullname: Davoudi, Anahita organization: VNS Health – sequence: 5 givenname: Betina R. surname: Idnay fullname: Idnay, Betina R. organization: Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University – sequence: 6 givenname: Kenrick surname: Cato fullname: Cato, Kenrick organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University, University of Pennsylvania – sequence: 7 givenname: Maxim surname: Topaz fullname: Topaz, Maxim organization: School of Nursing, Columbia University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38147277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kk1r3DAQhkVJaZJt_0APxVAovTiVrC_7mCz9CCxpoc1ZyPLIq-CVUkk-pL--2mzSNGEJOmjQPO_LaGaO0YEPHhB6S_AJwVh-SgR3Ha9xQ2tMWy5r9gIdES5pLUTTHpQYd00tW8kP0XFKVxgXGWav0CFtCZONlEcILpPzY3Wh8xz1VK20H2c9QvUjBgPpNpdDdT6Az87eVD-zGzc6uz_bxD_Y-RL3IVbaD9WZi3ldLSfnnSmOFyFDeo1eWj0leHN3L9Dll8-_lt_q1fev58vTVW04IbnmhLZi0FrbgVlte6GHHjPB-t5YwFQQYVop5NBiKjkb-kZa0pQQmABuqaYL9HHnex3D7xlSVhuXDEyT9hDmpJoOCyI7XFq2QO-foFdhjr5UVygqmeC84w_UqCdQztuQozZbU3UqW86Y7BguVL2HGsFD6WmZmXXl-RF_socvZ4CNM3sFH_4TrEFPeZ3CNGcXfHoMvrv71dxvYFDX0W10vFH3Ay9AuwNMDClFsMq4rLc-pQQ3KYLVdrfUbrdUaZS63S3FirR5Ir13f1ZEd6JUYD9CfGjzM6q_kWrdfQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_eurjcn_zvaf020 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae290 crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_0009_70026 crossref_primary_10_1177_10848223251367385 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2025_105918 crossref_primary_10_1177_01939459241306946 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2025_9599 crossref_primary_10_2196_69753 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_outlook_2025_102472 crossref_primary_10_1093_jamia_ocae310 crossref_primary_10_2196_68955 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10943_025_02414_3 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1097/aco.0000000000001131 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967 10.1017/CBO9780511809071 10.1093/jamia/ocab275 10.1111/nin.12557 10.1111/inm.12763 10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2 10.1097/psy.0000000000001092 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903 10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005 10.1177/1049732305276687 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423 10.1186/1471-2393-14-58 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005333 10.1145/1656274.1656280 10.1055/s-0041-1739433 10.1080/01612840802694668 10.1007/BFb0026683 10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z 10.3389/frph.2021.684207 10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2 10.1186/s12889-019-8127-9 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007 10.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015 10.1093/tbm/iby029 10.1002/nur.20362 10.1002/nur.21768 10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7 10.1007/s10995-020-03020-3 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. – notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH K9- K9. KB0 M0R M0S M1P NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10995-023-03857-4 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Database Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Consumer Health Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic (retired) ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Family Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7RV name: Nursing & Allied Health Database url: https://search.proquest.com/nahs sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
| EISSN | 1573-6628 |
| EndPage | 586 |
| ExternalDocumentID | A785447940 38147277 10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | United States |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grantid: GBMF9048 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000936 – fundername: Data Science Institute, Columbia University grantid: Data Science Institute, Columbia University funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100018085 – fundername: Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation grantid: GBMF9048 – fundername: Data Science Institute, Columbia University grantid: Data Science Institute, Columbia University |
| GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 04C 06C 06D 0B8 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 1SB 203 29M 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 44B 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 6PF 78A 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDBF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACDTI ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUHS ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADOJX ADRFC ADTPH ADUKH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN AZQEC B-. B0M BA0 BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BKEYQ BKNYI BMSDO BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EAD EAP EBC EBD EBLON EBS ECF ECT EHN EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EN4 ENC EPL EPT ESBYG ESX EX3 F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IAO IEA IHE IHR IHW IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ INH INR IOF IPY ITC ITM IWAJR IXC IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ K9- KDC KOV KPH LAK LLZTM M0R M1P M4Y MA- N2Q NAPCQ NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9I O9J OAM OVD P2P P9S PF- PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOR QOS Q~Q R89 R9I RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZC RZE RZK S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SDH SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC TUS U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 WOW WQ9 YHZ YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7W Z82 Z83 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~8M ~A9 AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ABRTQ ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFFHD AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY NPM 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-51386daaafd4fafb6adb0464bbcfe03616c8767d803754db27f12375e46e5f3a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | RSV |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 13 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001131606200003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
| IngestDate | Sun Nov 09 10:19:19 EST 2025 Wed Nov 05 09:31:25 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 13:48:45 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 11:55:42 EST 2025 Mon Nov 24 15:41:07 EST 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:05:45 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 03:28:59 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:05:56 EST 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:41:37 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 3 |
| Keywords | Electronic health records Bias Natural language processing |
| Language | English |
| License | 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-51386daaafd4fafb6adb0464bbcfe03616c8767d803754db27f12375e46e5f3a3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3070-1716 |
| PMID | 38147277 |
| PQID | 2937465595 |
| PQPubID | 46954 |
| PageCount | 9 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2906179002 proquest_journals_2937465595 gale_infotracmisc_A785447940 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A785447940 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A785447940 gale_healthsolutions_A785447940 pubmed_primary_38147277 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4 springer_journals_10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20240300 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 3 year: 2024 text: 20240300 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | New York |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Maternal and child health journal |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Matern Child Health J |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Matern Child Health J |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Springer US Springer Springer Nature B.V |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer – name: Springer Nature B.V |
| References | MartinJAOstermanMJKDescribing the increase in Preterm Births in the United States, 2014–2016NCHS data Brief2018(312)31218 CoyneITSampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?Journal of Advanced Nursing19972636236301:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitVylsA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x DrewniakDKronesTWildVDo attitudes and behavior of health care professionals exacerbate health care disparities among immigrant and ethnic minority groups? An integrative literature reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies201770899810.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015 BeachMCSahaSParkJTaylorJDrewPPlankECheeBTestimonial injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and womenJournal of General Internal Medicine20213661708171410.1007/s11606-021-06682-z[doi] KravitzESuhMRussellMOjedaALevisonJMcKinneyJScreening for Substance Use disorders during pregnancy: A decision at the intersection of racial and Reproductive JusticeAmerican Journal of Perinatology202110.1055/s-0041-1739433 EverettBGLimburgAMcKettaSHatzenbuehlerMLState-Level regulations regarding the protection of sexual minorities and birth outcomes: Results from a Population-based Cohort StudyPsychosomatic Medicine202284665866810.1097/psy.0000000000001092 KimHSefcikJSBradwayCCharacteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic reviewResearch in Nursing & Health201740123421:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFKlt77N10.1002/nur.21768 Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. MartinKStanfordCAn analysis of documentation language and word choice among forensic mental health nursesInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing20202961241125210.1111/inm.12763 LockeSBAl-AdelyAMooreSWilsonJKitchenANatural language processing in medicine: A reviewTrends in Anaesthesia and Critical care2021384910.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007 Manning, C. D. R., & Schütze, P., H (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 39). Cambridge University Press. HsiehHFShannonSEThree approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research20051591277128810.1177/1049732305276687 GohYCCaiXQTheseiraWKoGKhorKAEvaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstractsScientometrics20201252119712121:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhsVOjt7zM10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2 PhilipsbornRPSorscherEASexsonWEvansHHBorn on U.S. Soil: Access to Healthcare for neonates of non-citizensMaternal and Child Health Journal202125191410.1007/s10995-020-03020-3 MinehartRDBryantASJacksonJDalyJLRacial/Ethnic inequities in pregnancy-related morbidity and mortalityObstet Gynecol Clin North Am2021481315110.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005 LandauAYBlanchardACatoKAtkinsNSalazarSPattonDUTopazMConsiderations for development of Child Abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: A qualitative studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association202229351251910.1093/jamia/ocab275 Quinlan, J. R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. 58–60. https://books.google.com/books/about/C4_5.html?id=b3ujBQAAQBAJ. GodduAPO’ConorKJLanzkronSSaheedMOSahaSPeekMEBeachMCDo words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the transmission of Bias in the medical recordJournal of General Internal Medicine201833568569110.1007/s11606-017-4289-2[doi] Bridle, J. S. (1990). Probabilistic interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition. In F. F. Soulié, & J. Hérault (Eds.), Neurocomputing (Vol. 68). Springer. SandelowskiMWhat’s in a name? Qualitative description revisitedResearch in Nursing & Health2010331778410.1002/nur.20362 Tiwary, U. S. S., T (2008). Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1481140. TogiokaBMSeligmanKMDelgadoCMLimited English proficiency in the labor and delivery unitCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology202235328529110.1097/aco.0000000000001131 AlpertJMMorrisBBThomsonMDMatinKGeyerCEBrownRFOpenNotes in oncology: Oncologists’ perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes Translational Behavioral Medicine20199234735610.1093/tbm/iby029 OmenkaOIWatsonDPHendrieHCUnderstanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: A scoping reviewBMC Public Health20202012710.1186/s12889-019-8127-9 Barcelona, V., Scharp, D., Idnay, B. R., Moen, H., Goffman, D., Cato, K., & Topaz, M. (2023b). A qualitative analysis of stigmatizing language in birth admission clinical notes. Nursing Inquiry, e12557. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12557. SunMOliwaTPeekMETungELNegative patient descriptors: Documenting racial BiasHealth Aff (Millwood)202241220321110.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423 BertholdMRCDillNGabrielFKotterTRMeinlTOhlTThielPWiswedelKKNIME – the Konstanz Information MinerAcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter2009111263110.1145/1656274.1656280 HooverKLockhartSCallisterCHoltropJSCalcaterraSLExperiences of stigma in hospitals with addiction consultation services: A qualitative analysis of patients’ and hospital-based providers’ perspectivesJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment20221381087081:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XitVehurjK10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708 JindalMThorntonRLJMcRaeAUnakaNJohnsonTJMistryKBEffects of a curriculum addressing racism on Pediatric residents’ racial biases and EmpathyJ Grad Med Educ202214440741310.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1 Braveman, P., Dominguez, T. P., Burke, W., Dolan, S. M., Stevenson, D. K., Jackson, F. M., & Waddell, L. (2021). Explaining the black-white disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement from a Multi-disciplinary Scientific Work Group convened by the March of dimes [Review]. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.684207. Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. The Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition. MaloufRRedshawMKurinczukJJGrayRSystematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal periodBmc Pregnancy and Childbirth2014145810.1186/1471-2393-14-58 United States Department of Health and Human Services (2020). 08/04/2020). 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC health IT certification program National Archives. Retrieved November 5 from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification. HimmelsteinGBatesDZhouLExamination of stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health RecordJAMA Netw Open202251e214496710.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967 BarcelonaVHortonRLRivlinKHarkinsSGreenCRobinsonKTopazMThe Power of Language in Hospital Care for pregnant and Birthing people: A vision for changeObstetrics & Gynecology202310.1097/AOG.0000000000005333 ShattellMMStigmatizing language with unintended meanings: Persons with mental Illness or mentally ill persons?Issues in Mental Health Nursing200930319910.1080/01612840802694668 Park, J., Saha, S., Chee, B., Taylor, J., & Beach, M. C. (2021). Physician use of stigmatizing Language in Patient Medical records. JAMA Network open, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052. FernándezLFossaADongZDelbancoTElmoreJFitzgeraldPDesRochesCWords Matter: What do patients find judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient notes?Journal of General Internal Medicine20213692571257810.1007/s11606-020-06432-7 Vaswani, A. S., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, N., Jones, J., Gomez, L., Kaiser, A. N., & Polosukhin, L. (2017). I. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762. Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning, fourth edition. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=tZnSDwAAQBAJ. HallWJChapmanMVLeeKMMerinoYMThomasTWPayneBKCoyne-BeasleyTImplicit Racial/Ethnic Bias among Health Care Professionals and its influence on Health Care outcomes: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Public Health201510512e607610.2105/AJPH.2015.302903[doi] Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. European conference on machine learning Berlin, Heidelberg. K Martin (3857_CR30) 2020; 29 V Barcelona (3857_CR3) 2023 M Sandelowski (3857_CR36) 2010; 33 3857_CR33 3857_CR10 K Hoover (3857_CR19) 2022; 138 BG Everett (3857_CR12) 2022; 84 RP Philipsborn (3857_CR34) 2021; 25 3857_CR35 3857_CR18 3857_CR39 E Kravitz (3857_CR24) 2021 G Himmelstein (3857_CR17) 2022; 5 IT Coyne (3857_CR9) 1997; 26 D Drewniak (3857_CR11) 2017; 70 M Jindal (3857_CR21) 2022; 14 AP Goddu (3857_CR14) 2018; 33 OI Omenka (3857_CR32) 2020; 20 MM Shattell (3857_CR37) 2009; 30 MRC Berthold (3857_CR6) 2009; 11 JA Martin (3857_CR29) 2018; (312) WJ Hall (3857_CR16) 2015; 105 YC Goh (3857_CR15) 2020; 125 3857_CR22 3857_CR42 R Malouf (3857_CR27) 2014; 14 3857_CR41 AY Landau (3857_CR25) 2022; 29 HF Hsieh (3857_CR20) 2005; 15 3857_CR8 3857_CR7 M Sun (3857_CR38) 2022; 41 3857_CR28 SB Locke (3857_CR26) 2021; 38 RD Minehart (3857_CR31) 2021; 48 3857_CR4 JM Alpert (3857_CR2) 2019; 9 BM Togioka (3857_CR40) 2022; 35 H Kim (3857_CR23) 2017; 40 3857_CR1 MC Beach (3857_CR5) 2021; 36 L Fernández (3857_CR13) 2021; 36 |
| References_xml | – reference: ShattellMMStigmatizing language with unintended meanings: Persons with mental Illness or mentally ill persons?Issues in Mental Health Nursing200930319910.1080/01612840802694668 – reference: Vaswani, A. S., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, N., Jones, J., Gomez, L., Kaiser, A. N., & Polosukhin, L. (2017). I. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762. – reference: Quinlan, J. R. (2014). C4. 5: Programs for Machine Learning. 58–60. https://books.google.com/books/about/C4_5.html?id=b3ujBQAAQBAJ. – reference: Manning, C. D. R., & Schütze, P., H (2008). Introduction to information retrieval (Vol. 39). Cambridge University Press. – reference: PhilipsbornRPSorscherEASexsonWEvansHHBorn on U.S. Soil: Access to Healthcare for neonates of non-citizensMaternal and Child Health Journal202125191410.1007/s10995-020-03020-3 – reference: DrewniakDKronesTWildVDo attitudes and behavior of health care professionals exacerbate health care disparities among immigrant and ethnic minority groups? An integrative literature reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies201770899810.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015 – reference: GohYCCaiXQTheseiraWKoGKhorKAEvaluating human versus machine learning performance in classifying research abstractsScientometrics20201252119712121:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhsVOjt7zM10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2 – reference: HooverKLockhartSCallisterCHoltropJSCalcaterraSLExperiences of stigma in hospitals with addiction consultation services: A qualitative analysis of patients’ and hospital-based providers’ perspectivesJournal of Substance Abuse Treatment20221381087081:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XitVehurjK10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708 – reference: SandelowskiMWhat’s in a name? Qualitative description revisitedResearch in Nursing & Health2010331778410.1002/nur.20362 – reference: AlpertJMMorrisBBThomsonMDMatinKGeyerCEBrownRFOpenNotes in oncology: Oncologists’ perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes Translational Behavioral Medicine20199234735610.1093/tbm/iby029 – reference: Bridle, J. S. (1990). Probabilistic interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition. In F. F. Soulié, & J. Hérault (Eds.), Neurocomputing (Vol. 68). Springer. – reference: MartinJAOstermanMJKDescribing the increase in Preterm Births in the United States, 2014–2016NCHS data Brief2018(312)31218 – reference: BarcelonaVHortonRLRivlinKHarkinsSGreenCRobinsonKTopazMThe Power of Language in Hospital Care for pregnant and Birthing people: A vision for changeObstetrics & Gynecology202310.1097/AOG.0000000000005333 – reference: BeachMCSahaSParkJTaylorJDrewPPlankECheeBTestimonial injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and womenJournal of General Internal Medicine20213661708171410.1007/s11606-021-06682-z[doi] – reference: JindalMThorntonRLJMcRaeAUnakaNJohnsonTJMistryKBEffects of a curriculum addressing racism on Pediatric residents’ racial biases and EmpathyJ Grad Med Educ202214440741310.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1 – reference: Barcelona, V., Scharp, D., Idnay, B. R., Moen, H., Goffman, D., Cato, K., & Topaz, M. (2023b). A qualitative analysis of stigmatizing language in birth admission clinical notes. Nursing Inquiry, e12557. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12557. – reference: Ho, T. K. (1995). Random decision forests. The Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on document analysis and recognition. – reference: LockeSBAl-AdelyAMooreSWilsonJKitchenANatural language processing in medicine: A reviewTrends in Anaesthesia and Critical care2021384910.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007 – reference: HsiehHFShannonSEThree approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research20051591277128810.1177/1049732305276687 – reference: FernándezLFossaADongZDelbancoTElmoreJFitzgeraldPDesRochesCWords Matter: What do patients find judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient notes?Journal of General Internal Medicine20213692571257810.1007/s11606-020-06432-7 – reference: BertholdMRCDillNGabrielFKotterTRMeinlTOhlTThielPWiswedelKKNIME – the Konstanz Information MinerAcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter2009111263110.1145/1656274.1656280 – reference: GodduAPO’ConorKJLanzkronSSaheedMOSahaSPeekMEBeachMCDo words Matter? Stigmatizing Language and the transmission of Bias in the medical recordJournal of General Internal Medicine201833568569110.1007/s11606-017-4289-2[doi] – reference: Alpaydin, E. (2020). Introduction to machine learning, fourth edition. MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=tZnSDwAAQBAJ. – reference: Park, J., Saha, S., Chee, B., Taylor, J., & Beach, M. C. (2021). Physician use of stigmatizing Language in Patient Medical records. JAMA Network open, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052. – reference: OmenkaOIWatsonDPHendrieHCUnderstanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: A scoping reviewBMC Public Health20202012710.1186/s12889-019-8127-9 – reference: MartinKStanfordCAn analysis of documentation language and word choice among forensic mental health nursesInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing20202961241125210.1111/inm.12763 – reference: Braveman, P., Dominguez, T. P., Burke, W., Dolan, S. M., Stevenson, D. K., Jackson, F. M., & Waddell, L. (2021). Explaining the black-white disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement from a Multi-disciplinary Scientific Work Group convened by the March of dimes [Review]. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.684207. – reference: MaloufRRedshawMKurinczukJJGrayRSystematic review of heath care interventions to improve outcomes for women with disability and their family during pregnancy, birth and postnatal periodBmc Pregnancy and Childbirth2014145810.1186/1471-2393-14-58 – reference: KimHSefcikJSBradwayCCharacteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic reviewResearch in Nursing & Health201740123421:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XitFKlt77N10.1002/nur.21768 – reference: SunMOliwaTPeekMETungELNegative patient descriptors: Documenting racial BiasHealth Aff (Millwood)202241220321110.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423 – reference: HallWJChapmanMVLeeKMMerinoYMThomasTWPayneBKCoyne-BeasleyTImplicit Racial/Ethnic Bias among Health Care Professionals and its influence on Health Care outcomes: A systematic reviewAmerican Journal of Public Health201510512e607610.2105/AJPH.2015.302903[doi] – reference: Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. European conference on machine learning Berlin, Heidelberg. – reference: KravitzESuhMRussellMOjedaALevisonJMcKinneyJScreening for Substance Use disorders during pregnancy: A decision at the intersection of racial and Reproductive JusticeAmerican Journal of Perinatology202110.1055/s-0041-1739433 – reference: TogiokaBMSeligmanKMDelgadoCMLimited English proficiency in the labor and delivery unitCurrent Opinion in Anaesthesiology202235328529110.1097/aco.0000000000001131 – reference: EverettBGLimburgAMcKettaSHatzenbuehlerMLState-Level regulations regarding the protection of sexual minorities and birth outcomes: Results from a Population-based Cohort StudyPsychosomatic Medicine202284665866810.1097/psy.0000000000001092 – reference: LandauAYBlanchardACatoKAtkinsNSalazarSPattonDUTopazMConsiderations for development of Child Abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: A qualitative studyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association202229351251910.1093/jamia/ocab275 – reference: Tiwary, U. S. S., T (2008). Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval. Oxford University Press, Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/1481140. – reference: HimmelsteinGBatesDZhouLExamination of stigmatizing Language in the Electronic Health RecordJAMA Netw Open202251e214496710.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967 – reference: MinehartRDBryantASJacksonJDalyJLRacial/Ethnic inequities in pregnancy-related morbidity and mortalityObstet Gynecol Clin North Am2021481315110.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005 – reference: CoyneITSampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?Journal of Advanced Nursing19972636236301:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitVylsA%3D%3D10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x – reference: United States Department of Health and Human Services (2020). 08/04/2020). 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, information blocking, and the ONC health IT certification program National Archives. Retrieved November 5 from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/05/01/2020-07419/21st-century-cures-act-interoperability-information-blocking-and-the-onc-health-it-certification. – reference: Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. – volume: 35 start-page: 285 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR40 publication-title: Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology doi: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001131 – volume: 138 start-page: 108708 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR19 publication-title: Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108708 – ident: 3857_CR18 – volume: 5 start-page: e2144967 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR17 publication-title: JAMA Netw Open doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44967 – ident: 3857_CR28 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809071 – ident: 3857_CR39 – volume: (312) start-page: 1 issue: 312 year: 2018 ident: 3857_CR29 publication-title: NCHS data Brief – volume: 29 start-page: 512 issue: 3 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR25 publication-title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab275 – ident: 3857_CR4 doi: 10.1111/nin.12557 – volume: 29 start-page: 1241 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 3857_CR30 publication-title: International Journal of Mental Health Nursing doi: 10.1111/inm.12763 – volume: 125 start-page: 1197 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 3857_CR15 publication-title: Scientometrics doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03614-2 – volume: 84 start-page: 658 issue: 6 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR12 publication-title: Psychosomatic Medicine doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001092 – ident: 3857_CR33 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052 – volume: 105 start-page: e60 issue: 12 year: 2015 ident: 3857_CR16 publication-title: American Journal of Public Health doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903 – ident: 3857_CR8 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28 – ident: 3857_CR1 – volume: 48 start-page: 31 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR31 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.11.005 – volume: 15 start-page: 1277 issue: 9 year: 2005 ident: 3857_CR20 publication-title: Qualitative Health Research doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 – volume: 41 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR38 publication-title: Health Aff (Millwood) doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01423 – volume: 14 start-page: 58 year: 2014 ident: 3857_CR27 publication-title: Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-58 – ident: 3857_CR41 – year: 2023 ident: 3857_CR3 publication-title: Obstetrics & Gynecology doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005333 – volume: 11 start-page: 26 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: 3857_CR6 publication-title: AcM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter doi: 10.1145/1656274.1656280 – year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR24 publication-title: American Journal of Perinatology doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739433 – volume: 30 start-page: 199 issue: 3 year: 2009 ident: 3857_CR37 publication-title: Issues in Mental Health Nursing doi: 10.1080/01612840802694668 – ident: 3857_CR22 doi: 10.1007/BFb0026683 – volume: 36 start-page: 1708 issue: 6 year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR5 publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z – ident: 3857_CR7 doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.684207 – volume: 33 start-page: 685 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 3857_CR14 publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4289-2 – volume: 20 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 3857_CR32 publication-title: BMC Public Health doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8127-9 – ident: 3857_CR10 – volume: 38 start-page: 4 year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR26 publication-title: Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical care doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2021.02.007 – volume: 14 start-page: 407 issue: 4 year: 2022 ident: 3857_CR21 publication-title: J Grad Med Educ doi: 10.4300/jgme-d-21-01048.1 – ident: 3857_CR35 – volume: 26 start-page: 623 issue: 3 year: 1997 ident: 3857_CR9 publication-title: Journal of Advanced Nursing doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x – volume: 70 start-page: 89 year: 2017 ident: 3857_CR11 publication-title: International Journal of Nursing Studies doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.015 – volume: 9 start-page: 347 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 3857_CR2 publication-title: Translational Behavioral Medicine doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby029 – volume: 33 start-page: 77 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 3857_CR36 publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health doi: 10.1002/nur.20362 – volume: 40 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 3857_CR23 publication-title: Research in Nursing & Health doi: 10.1002/nur.21768 – ident: 3857_CR42 – volume: 36 start-page: 2571 issue: 9 year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR13 publication-title: Journal of General Internal Medicine doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06432-7 – volume: 25 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 3857_CR34 publication-title: Maternal and Child Health Journal doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03020-3 |
| SSID | ssj0010004 |
| Score | 2.4463284 |
| Snippet | Introduction
Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to... Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to identify bias... Introduction Stigma and bias related to race and other minoritized statuses may underlie disparities in pregnancy and birth outcomes. One emerging method to... |
| SourceID | proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 578 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Analysis Bias Childrens health Computational linguistics Decision trees Deep learning Demographic aspects Electronic health records Gynecology Health aspects Health disparities Health problems Informatics Investment bankers Language Language processing Machine learning Maternal & child health Maternal and Child Health Maternal health services Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Natural language interfaces Natural language processing Pediatrics Performance evaluation Population Economics Power Public Health Sociology Stigma Stigma (Social psychology) Support vector machines |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3da9RAEB-0igjFj_rR2KoriD7UxXxssslTqWLxQQ9BhXtbNptsPShJvUsF_eud2d3LmaJ98e1gJ3eXzOzMLzM7vwF4Hos2S8u85nGWWy5SXfDapAkvMdZKLYxohHbDJuRsVs7n1aeQcFuFY5Vrn-gcddMbypG_xrAkieuryg_PvnOaGkXV1TBC4ypco7HZZOdyPr5wUeraVZXjClEkAvPQNBNa53xvcsapNia5mASmi-75j_h0oWDq4tDx7f-9gztwKyBQduRN5i5cabsduPEx1Nh3YNtn8phvULoHrTtVwGbaMXSwDyHByUKLAa0NPfMNv_Yn-zwsTggF_6KFUXjR4Wc0N6a7hr1ZLIdvLDCSnrJZj3D3Pnw9fvfl7XsehjNwgxht4HmSlUWjtbaNsNrWhW5qKpPWtbEthsWkMOhoZVO6IbtNnUqLQVLmrSja3GY6ewBbXd-1u8AanVeV1gW-HVkRm7IyiTFxlqWJsQhX6giStWaUCczlNEDjVG04l0mbCrWpnDaViOBgvObM83ZcKv2UFK587-m46dWRLHNBHPxxBC-dBG17_G2jQ_cC3gERaE0kX0wkTzx9-N8E9yeCuK_NdHltRir4lZXa2FAEz8ZlupLOynVtf04yBEsrDHURPPRWOz4CxGcCEauM4NXajDdf_u_n8-jy_7IHN1PEev5o3j5sDcvz9jFcNz-GxWr5xO3J3269OFI priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Stigmatizing Language in Labor and Birth Clinical Notes |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-023-03857-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38147277 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2937465595 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2906179002 |
| Volume | 28 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001131606200003&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAVX databaseName: SpringerLINK Contemporary 1997-Present customDbUrl: eissn: 1573-6628 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0010004 issn: 1092-7875 databaseCode: RSV dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-content-type=%22Journal%22 providerName: Springer Nature |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3da9RAEB9sKyKIH1VrtNYVRB80kI9NdvPYlhYf7FGuWu4tbDbZelBy5S4V9K93ZneTNqUK-rIk7C9fk9mdXzI7MwDvIt6kicyqMEozE_JE5WGlkziUaGuF4prXXNliE2IykbNZceyDwlb9avfeJWln6mvBbi6aOA3JmyVCvgYbaO4kFWyYnpwOvgOiKdbHWSB3RDruQ2VuP8fIHN2clK9ZpRtuUmt9Dh_9330_hoeebbJdpx5P4E7TbsK9I-9P34QH7q8dc8FIT6GxKwjYRNlsHOyL_5nJfDgB9XUL5oJ7zU920s3PiPH-oo4BPG9xG1WLqbZme_Nl95357KPnbLJAavsMvh0efN3_HPpCDKFGPtaFWZzKvFZKmZobZapc1RW5RKtKmwZNYJxrnFRFLW1B3bpKhEGDKLKG501mUpU-h_V20TYvgNUqKwqlcvwSMjzSstCx1lGaJrE2SE2qAOL-fZTaZymnYhnn5VV-ZZJnifIsrTxLHsDH4ZgLl6Pjr-g39JpLF2c6DPByV8iMU779KIAPFkFDHK-tlY9UwCegZFkj5PsR8sylCr8NuD0C4hjW4-5e50o_h6xKJGKCstsVWQBvh246ktbFtc3ikjBEQQs0awFsOV0dRIBcjCM7FQF86hXz6uR_ls_Lf4O_gvsJ8jy3LG8b1rvlZfMa7uof3Xy13IE1MT2ldiZsK7GV-_EObOwdTI6nuHcUUYvj9zdgiDSD |
| linkProvider | Springer Nature |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Zb9QwEB6VggAJcZQrUKiROB4gIodzPSBUClWrbiMkitQ34zhxWalKym4KKj-K38hM7GRJBX3rA28reZJsnJlvPttzADz1eBUGaVS4XhhplwcydgsV-G6KvjaRXPGSy67ZRJLn6f5-9nEJfvW5MBRW2WNiB9Rlo2iP_DW6pYRqfWXR26NvLnWNotPVvoWGUYud6uQHLtnmb7bf4_d9FgSbH_Y2tlzbVcBVSC5aN_LDNC6llLrkWuoilmVB53tFoXSFeO7HChEiKdOuO2xZBIlGdE-iisdVpEMZ4n0vwEWqZEcWlW4MISW0Vd6dYnsZslZcCNgkHZuqZ3KhQ5fO4hKXjxzhaXfwhz88dUDb-b3NG__bjN2E65Zhs3VjErdgqapX4PKujSFYgWtmp5KZBKzbUHVREyyXXQUSNrEbuMymUNBY2zCT0KxP2Kd2ekAs_ycNDMLTGn-jOTFZl-zddNZ-Zbbi6iHLG6Tzd-Dzubz0XVium7q6D6yUUZZJGePqT3NPpZnylfLCMPCVRjpWOOD3miCUrcxODUIOxaKmNGmPQO0RnfYI7sDL4ZojU5fkTOk1UjBhcmsHUBPrSRpx6jHgOfCikyBYw2crabMz8A2oQNhI8vlI8sCUR_-b4OpIEHFLjYd7tRUWN-diobMOPBmG6UqKBayr5phkiHZn6ModuGesZJgC5J8cGXniwKvebBY3__f8PDj7v6zBla293YmYbOc7D-FqgLzWhCGuwnI7O64ewSX1vZ3OZ487PGDw5bzN6TcGWpZI |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1bT9RAFD5BNMTEeMFbFWVMvDxIQy_TTvtgDIobCbAhiglvZTrt4Cakxd2iwZ_mr_OczrRrifLGg2-bzGl32z3nO9_MuQE893gZBkmUu14YaZcHMnZzFfhugr5WSK54wWU7bEKMx8nBQbq3AL-6WhhKq-wwsQXqolZ0Rr6ObklQr680Wtc2LWJvc_T25JtLE6Qo0tqN0zAqsl2e_cDt2-zN1ib-1y-CYPRh__1H104YcBUSjcaN_DCJCymlLriWOo9lkVOsL8-VLhHb_VghWogiaSfFFnkgNCK9iEoel5EOZYj3vQJXBY8C6tu_633qIxhEltpIa4oMFjcFtmDHlu2ZuujQpbiccPnAKZ53DX_4xnPB2tYHjm79z2_vNty0zJttGFO5AwtltQxLuza3YBlumBNMZgqz7kLZZlOwsWw7k7Ade7DLbGkFrTU1M4XO-ox9biZHxP5_0kIvPKnwM5oZk1XB3k2mzVdmO7Ees3GNNP8efLmUh74Pi1VdlQ-BFTJKUylj3BVq7qkkVb5SXhgGvtJI03IH_E4rMmU7ttPgkONs3muaNClDTcpaTcq4A6_7a05Mv5ILpVdJ2TJTc9uDXbYhkojT7AHPgVetBMEdfreStmoDn4Aahw0kXw4kj0zb9L8JrgwEEc_UcLlT4czi6Syb668Dz_plupJyBKuyPiUZouMpungHHhiL6V8B8lKOTF04sNaZ0Pzm_34_jy7-LauwhFaU7WyNtx_D9QDprslOXIHFZnpaPoFr6nszmU2fttDA4PCyrek3Mh2fTw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using+Natural+Language+Processing+to+Identify+Stigmatizing+Language+in+Labor+and+Birth+Clinical+Notes&rft.jtitle=Maternal+and+child+health+journal&rft.au=Barcelona%2C+Veronica&rft.au=Scharp%2C+Danielle&rft.au=Moen%2C+Hans&rft.au=Davoudi%2C+Anahita&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10995-023-03857-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s10995_023_03857_4 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1092-7875&client=summon |