Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) and Feedback: Research Review and Recommendations

To provide a research review of the components and outcomes of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and recommendations for research and therapeutic practice. A narrative review of the three phases of ROM - data collection, feeding back data, and adapting therapy - and an overview of patient outcomes fr...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Psychotherapy research Ročník 33; číslo 7; s. 841 - 855
Hlavní autoři: Barkham, Michael, De Jong, Kim, Delgadillo, Jaime, Lutz, Wolfgang
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Routledge 03.10.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Témata:
Clinical outcomes
clinical support tools
Data collection
deterioration
Feedback
Graphs
measurement-based care
Medical treatment
outcome measures
Patients
psychotherapy outcome
ROM
routine outcome monitoring
Therapy
Treatment methods
feedback
ROM
measurement-based care
clinical support tools
deterioration
outcome measures
psychotherapy outcome
routine outcome monitoring
ISSN:1050-3307, 1468-4381, 1468-4381
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:To provide a research review of the components and outcomes of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and recommendations for research and therapeutic practice. A narrative review of the three phases of ROM - data collection, feeding back data, and adapting therapy - and an overview of patient outcomes from 11 meta-analytic studies. Patients support ROM when its purpose is clear and integrated within therapy. Greater frequency of data collection is more important for shorter-term therapies, and use of graphs, greater specificity of feedback, and alerts are helpful. Overall effects on patient outcomes are statistically significant (g ≈ 0.15) and increase when clinical support tools (CSTs) are used for not-on-track cases (g ≈ 0.36-0.53). Effects are additive to standard effects of psychological therapies. Organizational, personnel, and resource issues remain the greatest obstacles to the successful adoption of ROM. ROM offers a low-cost method for enhancing patient outcomes, on average resulting in an ≈ 8% advantage (success rate difference; SRD) over standard care. CSTs are particularly effective for not-on-track patients (SRD between ≈ 20% and 29%), but ROM does not work for all patients and successful implementation is a major challenge, along with securing appropriate cultural adaptations.
Bibliografie:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1050-3307
1468-4381
1468-4381
DOI:10.1080/10503307.2023.2181114