Values and Preferences of Physicians and Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Receive Oral Anticoagulation Therapy for Stroke Prevention

Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC t...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Canadian journal of cardiology Ročník 32; číslo 6; s. 747 - 753
Hlavní autoři: Andrade, Jason G., Krahn, Andrew D., Skanes, Allan C., Purdham, Daniel, Ciaccia, Antonio, Connors, Sean
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: England Elsevier Inc 01.06.2016
Témata:
ISSN:0828-282X, 1916-7075, 1916-7075
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Abstract Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation. Il y a actuellement pénurie de données réelles, tant du côté des médecins que des patients, en ce qui a trait au traitement préventif de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) par un anticoagulant oral chez les patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire non valvulaire. C’est pourquoi nous avons entrepris de sonder les patients et les médecins au sujet de leurs préférences et de leurs expériences à l’égard de la prise ou de la prescription du médicament, respectivement. Entre mai et septembre 2014, un sondage national a été mené auprès de patients (n = 266) et de médecins (n = 178) sélectionnés au hasard. On a demandé aux participants d’évaluer l’importance de diverses caractéristiques de ce type d’agent et de choisir les deux profils de médicament qu’ils préféraient (les caractéristiques étaient modifiées de manière progressive en vue de déterminer lesquelles étaient les plus prisées et/ou influaient sur le choix du traitement). Le sondage a aussi permis de vérifier l’observance du traitement et les habitudes de prescription du médicament. Les préférences différaient entre les patients et les médecins, mais dans les deux cas elles étaient essentiellement axées sur des caractéristiques liées à l’innocuité et, dans une moindre mesure, à l’efficacité. Lorsqu’ils se basaient uniquement sur le profil du médicament (le nom de l’agent n’était pas dévoilé), les médecins ont choisi le plus souvent l’apixaban (dans 61 % des cas), tandis que les patients n’ont pas semblé avoir de préférence significative pour un agent ou pour un autre (apixaban, rivaroxaban et warfarine). En dépit de cela, 49 % des médecins ont spontanément cité le rivaroxaban à titre de médicament de choix (vs l’apixaban dans 25 % des cas). L’observance du traitement était supérieure chez les patients à qui on avait prescrit un médicament à prise uniquotidienne (rivaroxaban ou warfarine) puisque dans environ 30 % des cas, les médicaments à prise biquotidienne n’étaient pris qu’une seule fois par jour, entraînant ainsi un nombre significativement plus élevé de doses manquées par rapport aux médicaments à prise uniquotidienne. Les ordonnances rédigées en pratique clinique ne reflètent pas les données recueillies lors du sondage, ce qui laisse penser que d’autres facteurs influent sur la prise de décision des médecins et des patients en matière d’anticoagulants oraux. De plus, les données relatives à l’observance du traitement et à l’écart entre la prise réelle et les schémas posologiques des médicaments sont inquiétantes et justifient la tenue d’études additionnelles.
AbstractList Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.
Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation. Il y a actuellement pénurie de données réelles, tant du côté des médecins que des patients, en ce qui a trait au traitement préventif de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) par un anticoagulant oral chez les patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire non valvulaire. C’est pourquoi nous avons entrepris de sonder les patients et les médecins au sujet de leurs préférences et de leurs expériences à l’égard de la prise ou de la prescription du médicament, respectivement. Entre mai et septembre 2014, un sondage national a été mené auprès de patients (n = 266) et de médecins (n = 178) sélectionnés au hasard. On a demandé aux participants d’évaluer l’importance de diverses caractéristiques de ce type d’agent et de choisir les deux profils de médicament qu’ils préféraient (les caractéristiques étaient modifiées de manière progressive en vue de déterminer lesquelles étaient les plus prisées et/ou influaient sur le choix du traitement). Le sondage a aussi permis de vérifier l’observance du traitement et les habitudes de prescription du médicament. Les préférences différaient entre les patients et les médecins, mais dans les deux cas elles étaient essentiellement axées sur des caractéristiques liées à l’innocuité et, dans une moindre mesure, à l’efficacité. Lorsqu’ils se basaient uniquement sur le profil du médicament (le nom de l’agent n’était pas dévoilé), les médecins ont choisi le plus souvent l’apixaban (dans 61 % des cas), tandis que les patients n’ont pas semblé avoir de préférence significative pour un agent ou pour un autre (apixaban, rivaroxaban et warfarine). En dépit de cela, 49 % des médecins ont spontanément cité le rivaroxaban à titre de médicament de choix (vs l’apixaban dans 25 % des cas). L’observance du traitement était supérieure chez les patients à qui on avait prescrit un médicament à prise uniquotidienne (rivaroxaban ou warfarine) puisque dans environ 30 % des cas, les médicaments à prise biquotidienne n’étaient pris qu’une seule fois par jour, entraînant ainsi un nombre significativement plus élevé de doses manquées par rapport aux médicaments à prise uniquotidienne. Les ordonnances rédigées en pratique clinique ne reflètent pas les données recueillies lors du sondage, ce qui laisse penser que d’autres facteurs influent sur la prise de décision des médecins et des patients en matière d’anticoagulants oraux. De plus, les données relatives à l’observance du traitement et à l’écart entre la prise réelle et les schémas posologiques des médicaments sont inquiétantes et justifient la tenue d’études additionnelles.
Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy.BACKGROUNDReal-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy.A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed.METHODSA national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed.The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications).RESULTSThe preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications).Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.CONCLUSIONSReal-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.
Abstract Background Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. Methods A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. Results The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). Conclusions Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.
Author Purdham, Daniel
Ciaccia, Antonio
Skanes, Allan C.
Connors, Sean
Andrade, Jason G.
Krahn, Andrew D.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jason G.
  surname: Andrade
  fullname: Andrade, Jason G.
  email: Jason.guy.andrade@umontreal.ca
  organization: Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Andrew D.
  surname: Krahn
  fullname: Krahn, Andrew D.
  organization: Heart Rhythm Services, the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Allan C.
  surname: Skanes
  fullname: Skanes, Allan C.
  organization: Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Purdham
  fullname: Purdham, Daniel
  organization: Bayer Healthcare, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Antonio
  surname: Ciaccia
  fullname: Ciaccia, Antonio
  organization: Bayer Healthcare, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Sean
  surname: Connors
  fullname: Connors, Sean
  organization: Department of Cardiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUk1v1DAQtVAR3Rb-AAfkI5cE24nzgRDSqqKAVNGKFsrNcuwJ623WXmwn0v4Q_i8Ou71UosiHkTXvvdG8NyfoyDoLCL2kJKeEVm_WuVormTNCeU7anLDiCVrQllZZTWp-hBakYU3GGvbjGJ2EsCakpHVdPUPHrKrrkhV8gX5_l8MIAUur8ZWHHjxYlf6ux1erXTDKSHvoymjAxoBvTVzhL85OcpjGQXq8jN7IAZ-bzpthSDBn8e3K4a-gwEyAL33qLm00ysmf4wFwswIvtzvcO4-vo3d3MM-f0oTUfY6e9nII8OJQT9G38w83Z5-yi8uPn8-WF5nipIpZQ3Xfad0rKVnfQctlp3RJqSStTo-mbVXVc922VaWBKMK07HlXcM112XIoTtHrve7Wu1_Jhig2JihIS1hwYxC0bllRU87qBH11gI7dBrTYerORfifurUyAZg9Q3oWQrBTKxL-7Ri_NICgRc2piLebUxJyaIK1IqSUqe0C9V3-U9G5PgmTQZMCLoMwcnjYeVBTamcfp7x_Q1WCsUXK4gx2EtRu9TdYLKgITRFzPtzSfEuWEli0jSeDtvwX-N_0P4kvc1g
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_36290_vnl_2017_125
crossref_primary_10_2217_cer_2019_0197
crossref_primary_10_5507_pol_2020_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_023_01078_6
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_4086
crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_14069
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40261_019_00763_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2018_1530205
crossref_primary_10_1177_1060028019828420
crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2018_1467885
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_suaa177
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_016_0458_7
crossref_primary_10_6061_clinics_2021_e2728
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12903_023_03427_8
crossref_primary_10_1177_11786329251341083
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2022_101978
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0166218
crossref_primary_10_1177_1753944718749739
crossref_primary_10_1111_cts_13230
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repce_2021_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_14779072_2020_1760092
crossref_primary_10_1177_1747493016687579
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2023_131618
crossref_primary_10_1002_phar_1884
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2024_1476464
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_020_02070_2
crossref_primary_10_1177_0897190020966174
crossref_primary_10_1111_jep_13628
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00228_024_03773_8
crossref_primary_10_1002_clc_22971
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12872_017_0692_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_1076029618807575
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_023_02544_8
crossref_primary_10_1160_TH16_10_0787
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_ehab408
crossref_primary_10_1080_14779072_2023_2275662
crossref_primary_10_1093_eurheartj_suw048
crossref_primary_10_33590_emj_10308910
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm8060863
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0042_1750385
crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S302016
crossref_primary_10_18087_cardio_2022_3_n1992
crossref_primary_10_2217_fca_2016_0070
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacc_2018_04_013
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_024_02859_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_thromres_2017_12_021
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_016_1452_2
crossref_primary_10_1177_1076029617693940
crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2017_1372418
crossref_primary_10_1002_bcp_70003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjca_2018_07_476
crossref_primary_10_18087_cardio_2019_11_n724
crossref_primary_10_1161_CIRCOUTCOMES_119_005600
crossref_primary_10_1177_1753944717749739
crossref_primary_10_36660_ijcs_20220115
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjca_2020_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nurpra_2021_09_016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_020_02194_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_clc_70038
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_020_00420_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2020_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_1074248420917811
crossref_primary_10_1177_1753944717714921
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0194099
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_022_11159_y
crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_13739
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anai_2021_10_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_repc_2020_10_017
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40780_020_0157_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_020_5058_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11239_019_01915_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_016_0185_9
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.020
10.1185/03007995.2014.907140
10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303211
10.1182/blood-2014-03-563577
10.1056/NEJMra050100
10.1185/03007995.2014.933577
10.1056/NEJMoa1107039
10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
10.1007/s40271-013-0020-5
10.1093/europace/eus305
10.1016/j.cjca.2014.08.001
10.1186/1471-2261-13-108
10.1378/chest.11-2292
10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
10.1007/s12325-012-0040-x
10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 The Authors
The Authors
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 The Authors
– notice: The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1916-7075
EndPage 753
ExternalDocumentID 26774235
10_1016_j_cjca_2015_09_023
S0828282X15014920
1_s2_0_S0828282X15014920
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1P~
1~.
1~5
29B
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
8P~
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACIEU
ACJTP
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXBA
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
AXJTR
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
E3Z
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
HVGLF
HX~
HYE
HZ~
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OA~
OK1
OL0
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
ROL
RPM
SDF
SEL
SES
SJN
SNG
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TR2
Z5R
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
6I.
AAFTH
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AISVY
AJBFU
LCYCR
NAHTW
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-81dfbddfcaa2fbe95abcd411a09d9d91177c6f5d9966de0c02daf5b35d5d495e3
ISICitedReferencesCount 95
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000377022200011&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0828-282X
1916-7075
IngestDate Sun Nov 09 12:07:32 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:43:51 EST 2025
Sat Nov 29 05:42:40 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 21:13:47 EST 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:12:54 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 20:06:02 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:25:31 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-81dfbddfcaa2fbe95abcd411a09d9d91177c6f5d9966de0c02daf5b35d5d495e3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023
PMID 26774235
PQID 1792371527
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1792371527
pubmed_primary_26774235
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_cjca_2015_09_023
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cjca_2015_09_023
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_cjca_2015_09_023
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0828282X15014920
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_cjca_2015_09_023
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Canadian journal of cardiology
PublicationTitleAlternate Can J Cardiol
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Camm, Lip, De Caterina (bib9) 2012; 14
Larsen, Rasmussen, Skjoth (bib8) 2013; 61
Laliberte, Nelson, Lefebvre (bib13) 2012; 29
Ageno, Gallus, Wittkowsky (bib3) 2012; 141
Andrade, Khairy, Dobrev, Nattel (bib1) 2014; 114
Nelson, Song, Coleman (bib15) 2014; 30
Laliberte, Cloutier, Nelson (bib14) 2014; 30
Heeringa, van der Kuip, Hofman (bib2) 2006; 27
Bakhai, Sandberg, Mittendorf (bib11) 2013; 13
Osterberg, Blaschke (bib16) 2005; 353
Connolly, Ezekowitz, Yusuf (bib4) 2009; 361
Patel, Mahaffey, Garg (bib6) 2011; 365
Laliberte, Bookhart, Nelson (bib12) 2013; 6
Beyer-Westendorf, Forster, Pannach (bib7) 2014; 124
Granger, Alexander, McMurray (bib5) 2011; 365
Verma, Cairns, Mitchell (bib10) 2014; 30
Laliberte (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib14) 2014; 30
Ageno (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib3) 2012; 141
Camm (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib9) 2012; 14
Heeringa (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib2) 2006; 27
Patel (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib6) 2011; 365
Connolly (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib4) 2009; 361
Osterberg (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib16) 2005; 353
Verma (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib10) 2014; 30
Nelson (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib15) 2014; 30
Granger (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib5) 2011; 365
Laliberte (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib12) 2013; 6
Beyer-Westendorf (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib7) 2014; 124
Andrade (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib1) 2014; 114
Larsen (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib8) 2013; 61
Bakhai (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib11) 2013; 13
Laliberte (10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib13) 2012; 29
References_xml – volume: 365
  start-page: 981
  year: 2011
  end-page: 992
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 353
  start-page: 487
  year: 2005
  end-page: 497
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Adherence to medication
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 141
  start-page: e44S
  year: 2012
  end-page: e88S
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
  publication-title: Chest
– volume: 365
  start-page: 883
  year: 2011
  end-page: 891
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 29
  start-page: 675
  year: 2012
  end-page: 690
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
  publication-title: Adv Ther
– volume: 124
  start-page: 955
  year: 2014
  end-page: 962
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban bleeding in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAC registry
  publication-title: Blood
– volume: 27
  start-page: 949
  year: 2006
  end-page: 953
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 6
  start-page: 213
  year: 2013
  end-page: 224
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Impact of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among patients with venous thromboembolism
  publication-title: Patient
– volume: 61
  start-page: 2264
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2273
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1385
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1413
  ident: bib9
  article-title: 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation–developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association
  publication-title: Europace
– volume: 361
  start-page: 1139
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1151
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1114
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1130
  ident: bib10
  article-title: 2014 Focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Can J Cardiol
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1453
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1468
  ident: bib1
  article-title: The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms
  publication-title: Circ Res
– volume: 13
  start-page: 108
  year: 2013
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Patient perspective on the management of atrial fibrillation in five European countries
  publication-title: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2461
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2469
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Medication persistence and discontinuation of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Cur Med Res Opin
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1317
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1325
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
  publication-title: Cur Med Res Opin
– volume: 61
  start-page: 2264
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib8
  article-title: Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.020
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1317
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib14
  article-title: Real-world comparative effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
  publication-title: Cur Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.907140
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1453
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib1
  article-title: The clinical profile and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: relationships among clinical features, epidemiology, and mechanisms
  publication-title: Circ Res
  doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303211
– volume: 124
  start-page: 955
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib7
  article-title: Rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban bleeding in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAC registry
  publication-title: Blood
  doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-563577
– volume: 353
  start-page: 487
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib16
  article-title: Adherence to medication
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMra050100
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2461
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib15
  article-title: Medication persistence and discontinuation of rivaroxaban versus warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Cur Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.933577
– volume: 365
  start-page: 981
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib5
  article-title: Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039
– volume: 365
  start-page: 883
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib6
  article-title: Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
– volume: 6
  start-page: 213
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib12
  article-title: Impact of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among patients with venous thromboembolism
  publication-title: Patient
  doi: 10.1007/s40271-013-0020-5
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1385
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib9
  article-title: 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation–developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association
  publication-title: Europace
  doi: 10.1093/europace/eus305
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1114
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib10
  article-title: 2014 Focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Can J Cardiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.08.001
– volume: 13
  start-page: 108
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib11
  article-title: Patient perspective on the management of atrial fibrillation in five European countries
  publication-title: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-108
– volume: 141
  start-page: e44S
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib3
  article-title: Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
  publication-title: Chest
  doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2292
– volume: 361
  start-page: 1139
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib4
  article-title: Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
– volume: 29
  start-page: 675
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib13
  article-title: Impact of daily dosing frequency on adherence to chronic medications among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients
  publication-title: Adv Ther
  doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0040-x
– volume: 27
  start-page: 949
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023_bib2
  article-title: Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825
SSID ssj0041776
Score 2.4426432
Snippet Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular...
Abstract Background Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 747
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation - drug therapy
Cardiovascular
Dabigatran - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Compliance
Pyrazoles - therapeutic use
Pyridones - therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Stroke - prevention & control
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
Warfarin - therapeutic use
Title Values and Preferences of Physicians and Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Who Receive Oral Anticoagulation Therapy for Stroke Prevention
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0828282X15014920
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0828282X15014920
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.09.023
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774235
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1792371527
Volume 32
WOSCitedRecordID wos000377022200011&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1916-7075
  dateEnd: 20170930
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0041776
  issn: 0828-282X
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 20081101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLa6DSFeEHfKZTISb1GmJK3j5rEaGzBBmdQBfbMcO2F0VTL1pv0R_ha_iXNiOwkdGxcJVYqquI6Tns_Hl3znO4S8jBMmw7SvfM0C6ffjIPelZMwPFUtUBL4yiKtA4Xd8NBpMJslxp_PdxcKsZ7woBhcXyfl_NTWcA2Nj6OxfmLu-KJyA72B0OILZ4fhHhv8kZ-DqbRSAk5E1XDe3i2FLjaQqMmCXp96oLOAu1hUrdWhyeRxiOMDMkOW8z6clzjEzZBp9wKj-YQFNl_KLzf-F3A3UJ6h4i-PlvDzLPKcPZU2_KYjQUq1QFS22vcOPTEurCXwkMU3i6716cAAHWTRsTO9VXTI-kzb1wBDuu_D265Lj1VzbkHATVd_e7gjjhpZl9uBcHM5PNFHU4fNh8Thp-_Vm33TDSXOj8WnHe27Eii8NJWZXY7qnpgr1qUJW6eGa4OgNie4xto_Nh_iWNomCLbITcZaAl90Zvj2YHLm5QT_kVbrD-n5tGJdhHG62dNVU6aqlUDUlOrlDbtu1DB0aDN4lnay4R26-t2yN--SbgSIFsNEWFGmZ0waKptRCkSIUaQuK1ECRtqFIAYrUQpEiFOkGFKmFIgUoUgNF2kDxAfl4eHCy_8a3aUB8xYJ46cOKKk-1zpWUUZ5m4FxSpfthKINEwwdZByrOmcaVu84CFURa5iztMc00LP-z3kOyXZRF9pjQgOcSJmNxnrFeP9JcapmliRpwDcscrXSXhO4fF8pq5GOqlplwZMipQCsJtJIIEgFW6hKvrnNuFGKu_XXPGVK42GcYrQWg7tpa_Fe1soXtqAsRikUkAnEJiV3C6pp2Tm3myr9t8YVDmYABB98iQgcuV9ASKo5yzIbdJY8M_OrnjmKOzA_25J-e8im51fT4Z2R7OV9lz8kNtV5-Xcx3yRafDHZth_oB4sgMdQ
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Values+and+Preferences+of+Physicians+and+Patients+With+Nonvalvular+Atrial+Fibrillation+Who+Receive+Oral+Anticoagulation+Therapy+for+Stroke+Prevention&rft.jtitle=Canadian+journal+of+cardiology&rft.au=Andrade%2C+Jason+G.&rft.au=Krahn%2C+Andrew+D.&rft.au=Skanes%2C+Allan+C.&rft.au=Purdham%2C+Daniel&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0828-282X&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=747&rft.epage=753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.cjca.2015.09.023&rft.externalDocID=S0828282X15014920
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0828-282X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0828-282X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0828-282X&client=summon