Maxilla-first patient-specific osteosynthesis vs mandible-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using splints: a randomized controlled trial

Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 54; no. 8; pp. 720 - 726
Main Authors: van der Wel, H., Schepers, R.H., Baan, F., Spijkervet, F.K.L., Jansma, J., Kraeima, J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Denmark Elsevier Inc 01.08.2025
Subjects:
ISSN:0901-5027, 1399-0020, 1399-0020
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and manually bent osteosynthesis plates with the maxilla-first approach utilizing patient-specific osteosynthesis fixation in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. This multi-centre randomized controlled trial included 88 patients, with 77 completing the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the ‘mandible-first’ group (mandible-first with an intermediate splint) or the ‘maxilla-first with PSO’ group (maxilla-first with patient-specific osteosynthesis). Postoperative evaluation using cone beam computed tomography images showed significantly lower deviations from the preoperative plan in the maxilla-first with PSO group compared to the mandible-first group, for anteroposterior (median 1.0 mm vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.008) and left/right translations (median 0.4 mm vs 0.8 mm, P = 0.003), and yaw rotation (median 0.5° vs 1.0°, P = 0.013). Regarding clinical accuracy (categorized as optimal, good, or suboptimal), 59.5% of the patients in the maxilla-first with PSO group had an optimal or good result compared to 17.5% in the mandible-first group. The study findings suggest the maxilla-first PSO approach offers enhanced accuracy, supporting its adoption in orthognathic surgery for better surgical outcomes.
AbstractList Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and manually bent osteosynthesis plates with the maxilla-first approach utilizing patient-specific osteosynthesis fixation in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. This multi-centre randomized controlled trial included 88 patients, with 77 completing the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the ‘mandible-first’ group (mandible-first with an intermediate splint) or the ‘maxilla-first with PSO’ group (maxilla-first with patient-specific osteosynthesis). Postoperative evaluation using cone beam computed tomography images showed significantly lower deviations from the preoperative plan in the maxilla-first with PSO group compared to the mandible-first group, for anteroposterior (median 1.0 mm vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.008) and left/right translations (median 0.4 mm vs 0.8 mm, P = 0.003), and yaw rotation (median 0.5° vs 1.0°, P = 0.013). Regarding clinical accuracy (categorized as optimal, good, or suboptimal), 59.5% of the patients in the maxilla-first with PSO group had an optimal or good result compared to 17.5% in the mandible-first group. The study findings suggest the maxilla-first PSO approach offers enhanced accuracy, supporting its adoption in orthognathic surgery for better surgical outcomes.
Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and manually bent osteosynthesis plates with the maxilla-first approach utilizing patient-specific osteosynthesis fixation in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. This multi-centre randomized controlled trial included 88 patients, with 77 completing the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the 'mandible-first' group (mandible-first with an intermediate splint) or the 'maxilla-first with PSO' group (maxilla-first with patient-specific osteosynthesis). Postoperative evaluation using cone beam computed tomography images showed significantly lower deviations from the preoperative plan in the maxilla-first with PSO group compared to the mandible-first group, for anteroposterior (median 1.0 mm vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.008) and left/right translations (median 0.4 mm vs 0.8 mm, P = 0.003), and yaw rotation (median 0.5° vs 1.0°, P = 0.013). Regarding clinical accuracy (categorized as optimal, good, or suboptimal), 59.5% of the patients in the maxilla-first with PSO group had an optimal or good result compared to 17.5% in the mandible-first group. The study findings suggest the maxilla-first PSO approach offers enhanced accuracy, supporting its adoption in orthognathic surgery for better surgical outcomes.Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and manually bent osteosynthesis plates with the maxilla-first approach utilizing patient-specific osteosynthesis fixation in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. This multi-centre randomized controlled trial included 88 patients, with 77 completing the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the 'mandible-first' group (mandible-first with an intermediate splint) or the 'maxilla-first with PSO' group (maxilla-first with patient-specific osteosynthesis). Postoperative evaluation using cone beam computed tomography images showed significantly lower deviations from the preoperative plan in the maxilla-first with PSO group compared to the mandible-first group, for anteroposterior (median 1.0 mm vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.008) and left/right translations (median 0.4 mm vs 0.8 mm, P = 0.003), and yaw rotation (median 0.5° vs 1.0°, P = 0.013). Regarding clinical accuracy (categorized as optimal, good, or suboptimal), 59.5% of the patients in the maxilla-first with PSO group had an optimal or good result compared to 17.5% in the mandible-first group. The study findings suggest the maxilla-first PSO approach offers enhanced accuracy, supporting its adoption in orthognathic surgery for better surgical outcomes.
AbstractPatient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced orthognathic surgery, enhancing surgical accuracy. This study compares the outcomes of the mandible-first approach using an intermediate splint and manually bent osteosynthesis plates with the maxilla-first approach utilizing patient-specific osteosynthesis fixation in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. This multi-centre randomized controlled trial included 88 patients, with 77 completing the study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the ‘mandible-first’ group (mandible-first with an intermediate splint) or the ‘maxilla-first with PSO’ group (maxilla-first with patient-specific osteosynthesis). Postoperative evaluation using cone beam computed tomography images showed significantly lower deviations from the preoperative plan in the maxilla-first with PSO group compared to the mandible-first group, for anteroposterior (median 1.0 mm vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.008) and left/right translations (median 0.4 mm vs 0.8 mm, P = 0.003), and yaw rotation (median 0.5° vs 1.0°, P = 0.013). Regarding clinical accuracy (categorized as optimal, good, or suboptimal), 59.5% of the patients in the maxilla-first with PSO group had an optimal or good result compared to 17.5% in the mandible-first group. The study findings suggest the maxilla-first PSO approach offers enhanced accuracy, supporting its adoption in orthognathic surgery for better surgical outcomes.
Author Kraeima, J.
Schepers, R.H.
Baan, F.
Jansma, J.
van der Wel, H.
Spijkervet, F.K.L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: H.
  surname: van der Wel
  fullname: van der Wel, H.
  email: h.van.der.wel@umcg.nl
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
– sequence: 2
  givenname: R.H.
  surname: Schepers
  fullname: Schepers, R.H.
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
– sequence: 3
  givenname: F.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3626-656X
  surname: Baan
  fullname: Baan, F.
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
– sequence: 4
  givenname: F.K.L.
  surname: Spijkervet
  fullname: Spijkervet, F.K.L.
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
– sequence: 5
  givenname: J.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2536-4786
  surname: Jansma
  fullname: Jansma, J.
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
– sequence: 6
  givenname: J.
  surname: Kraeima
  fullname: Kraeima, J.
  organization: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39909776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkl-L1DAUxYOsuLOrX8AH6aMvHW-a6Z8sIsjiP1jxQX0OaXo7k9omY266OH4Hv7MpM_uy4AqBhHJ-p9xz7gU7c94hY885rDnw6tWwtoOf1gUU5Rp4OtUjtuJCyhyggDO2Agk8L6Goz9kF0QAAUjT1E3aeNCDrulqxP5_1LzuOOu9toJjtdbToYk57NLa3JvMU0dPBxR2SpeyWskm7zrYjnojWTkeHcMh8iDu_dTruEklz2GL6OJN124z2o3WRrjKdhWTgJ_sbu8x4F4Mfx_SMwerxKXvc65Hw2em-ZN_fv_t2_TG_-fLh0_Xbm9yUUMW87lGICmWNtSy00NxoUYkGQMtSQtG3UuKm2GgNYGoUZdViX-q2gQpN03ZcXLKXR9998D9npKgmSwbTFA79TErwZFeVDdRJ-uIkndsJO7UPaeBwUHcRJkFzFJjgiQL2ytiYYlxG03ZUHNTSlhrU0pZa2lLA01nQ4h565_4g9PoIYQro1mJQZFJnBjsb0ETVefsw_uYeblIz1ujxBx6QBj8Hl6JXXFGhQH1ddmhZoaJM68M3S3ZX_zb439__AoCv2sY
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm15050186
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40902_025_00469_6
Cites_doi 10.1038/s41598-017-09488-4
10.1186/1746-160X-3-21
10.1016/j.ijom.2020.08.009
10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.023
10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.008
10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.025
10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.005
10.1371/journal.pone.0246196
10.1097/PRS.0000000000008427
10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.027
10.3390/jpm13010125
10.7812/TPP/21.054
10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.023
10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.025
10.1016/j.joms.2022.01.006
10.1371/journal.pone.0149625
10.1097/scs.0b013e318068434b
10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011
10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.005
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025 The Authors
The Authors
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025 The Authors
– notice: The Authors
– notice: Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 7X8
  name: MEDLINE - Academic
  url: https://search.proquest.com/medline
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Dentistry
EISSN 1399-0020
EndPage 726
ExternalDocumentID 39909776
10_1016_j_ijom_2025_01_016
S0901502725000141
1_s2_0_S0901502725000141
Genre Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
1B1
1OC
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
31~
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8-1
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGKA
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AFZJQ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJAOE
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDX
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
LH1
M27
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OF.
OQ0
OVD
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TEORI
UHS
UV1
WUQ
XV2
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
~HD
AFCTW
AGCQF
AGRNS
RIG
6I.
AAFTH
9DU
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-7fe336e97e792a3a1ca363800a95902fb99e424aa00c7e356bef5ab806ec8bd13
ISICitedReferencesCount 0
ISICitedReferencesURI http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001533670800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
ISSN 0901-5027
1399-0020
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 02:57:37 EDT 2025
Wed Jul 16 06:53:57 EDT 2025
Sat Nov 29 07:51:02 EST 2025
Tue Nov 18 22:35:05 EST 2025
Sat Aug 02 17:13:10 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 06:37:13 EDT 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:35:06 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Orthognathic surgery
Bone plates
Computer-aided design
Patient-specific computational modelling
Three-dimensional imaging
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c506t-7fe336e97e792a3a1ca363800a95902fb99e424aa00c7e356bef5ab806ec8bd13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-3626-656X
0000-0003-2536-4786
OpenAccessLink https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016
PMID 39909776
PQID 3163865807
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3163865807
pubmed_primary_39909776
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijom_2025_01_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijom_2025_01_016
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijom_2025_01_016
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0901502725000141
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijom_2025_01_016
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Denmark
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Denmark
PublicationTitle International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Harris, Taylor, Thielke, Payne, Gonzalez, Conde (bib10) 2009; 42
Kraeima, Schepers, Spijkervet, Maal, Baan, Witjes, Jansma (bib3) 2020; 49
Williams, Walker, Hughes, Goodson, Mustafa (bib20) 2022; 60
Diaconu, Holte, Berg-Beckhoff, Pinholt (bib6) 2023; 13
Stokbro, Liebregts, Baan, Bell, Maal, Thygesen, Xi (bib9) 2019; 77
Marchetti, Bianchi, Bassi, Gori, Lamberti, Sarti (bib14) 2007; 18
Heufelder, Wilde, Pietzka, Mascha, Winter, Schramm, Rana (bib1) 2017; 45
Liebregts, Baan, De Koning, Ongkosuwito, Bergé, Maal, Xi (bib8) 2017; 7
Jones, Amarista, Jeske, Szalay, Ellis (bib17) 2022; 80
Stokbro, Aagaard, Torkov, Bell, Thygesen (bib15) 2014; 43
Sun, Fallah (bib19) 2022; 26
Baan, Sabelis, Schreurs, Van De Steeg, Xi, Van Riet, Becking, Maal (bib13) 2021; 16
Proffit, Turvey, Phillips (bib16) 2007; 3
Li, Wei, Jiang, Qian, Zhang, Yu, Zhang, Wang (bib4) 2021; 148
Wong, Goonewardene, Allan, Mian, Rea (bib18) 2021; 50
Borba, Borges, Cé, Venturi, Naclério-Homem, Miloro (bib7) 2016; 45
Hanafy, Akoush, Abou-ElFetouh, Mounir (bib5) 2020; 49
Baan, Liebregts, Xi, Schreurs, De Koning, Bergé, Maal (bib12) 2016; 11
Li, Shen, Jiang, Li, Jiang, Xia, Shen, Wang (bib2) 2017; 46
Gaber, Shaheen, Falter, Araya, Politis, Swennen, Jacobs (bib11) 2017; 75
Baan (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib13) 2021; 16
Williams (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib20) 2022; 60
Heufelder (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib1) 2017; 45
Liebregts (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib8) 2017; 7
Gaber (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib11) 2017; 75
Kraeima (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib3) 2020; 49
Harris (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib10) 2009; 42
Marchetti (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib14) 2007; 18
Jones (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib17) 2022; 80
Stokbro (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib9) 2019; 77
Proffit (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib16) 2007; 3
Wong (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib18) 2021; 50
Borba (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib7) 2016; 45
Stokbro (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib15) 2014; 43
Baan (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib12) 2016; 11
Diaconu (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib6) 2023; 13
Sun (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib19) 2022; 26
Li (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib2) 2017; 46
Hanafy (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib5) 2020; 49
Li (10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib4) 2021; 148
References_xml – volume: 77
  start-page: 1882
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1893
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Does mandible-first sequencing increase maxillary surgical accuracy in bimaxillary procedures?
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1298
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1305
  ident: bib2
  article-title: A new approach of splint-less orthognathic surgery using a personalized orthognathic surgical guide system: a preliminary study
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 137
  year: 2022
  end-page: 142
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Efficacy and cost of maxillary patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: a review of three patient cases
  publication-title: Perm J
– volume: 60
  start-page: 537
  year: 2022
  end-page: 546
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Accuracy and cost effectiveness of a waferless osteotomy approach, using patient specific guides and plates in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 13
  start-page: 125
  year: 2023
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Three-dimensional accuracy and stability of personalized implants in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Pers Med
– volume: 80
  start-page: 827
  year: 2022
  end-page: 837
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary positioning with interim splints versus patient-specific guides and plates in executing a virtual bimaxillary surgical plan
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 49
  start-page: 62
  year: 2020
  end-page: 68
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Precision of orthognathic digital plan transfer using patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis versus mixed analogue–digitally planned surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 7
  start-page: 9314
  year: 2017
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Achievability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery
  publication-title: Sci Rep
– volume: 75
  start-page: 2430
  year: 2017
  end-page: 2440
  ident: bib11
  article-title: A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 18
  start-page: 826
  year: 2007
  end-page: 832
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillofacial virtual surgery
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
– volume: 49
  start-page: 454
  year: 2020
  end-page: 460
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Splintless surgery using patient-specific osteosynthesis in Le Fort I osteotomies: a randomized controlled multi-centre trial
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1578
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1585
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: J Craniomaxillofac Surg
– volume: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: bib12
  article-title: A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 3
  start-page: 21
  year: 2007
  ident: bib16
  article-title: The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension
  publication-title: Head Face Med
– volume: 43
  start-page: 957
  year: 2014
  end-page: 965
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 45
  start-page: 472
  year: 2016
  end-page: 475
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Mandible-first sequence in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 148
  start-page: 1101
  year: 2021
  end-page: 1110
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of the accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints in orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
– volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  year: 2009
  end-page: 381
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
– volume: 16
  year: 2021
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0—3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 50
  start-page: 494
  year: 2021
  end-page: 500
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
– volume: 7
  start-page: 9314
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib8
  article-title: Achievability of 3D planned bimaxillary osteotomies: maxilla-first versus mandible-first surgery
  publication-title: Sci Rep
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09488-4
– volume: 3
  start-page: 21
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib16
  article-title: The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension
  publication-title: Head Face Med
  doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-21
– volume: 50
  start-page: 494
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib18
  article-title: Accuracy of maxillary repositioning surgery using CAD/CAM customized surgical guides and fixation plates
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.08.009
– volume: 77
  start-page: 1882
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib9
  article-title: Does mandible-first sequencing increase maxillary surgical accuracy in bimaxillary procedures?
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.023
– volume: 45
  start-page: 472
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib7
  article-title: Mandible-first sequence in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.008
– volume: 46
  start-page: 1298
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib2
  article-title: A new approach of splint-less orthognathic surgery using a personalized orthognathic surgical guide system: a preliminary study
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.025
– volume: 49
  start-page: 454
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib3
  article-title: Splintless surgery using patient-specific osteosynthesis in Le Fort I osteotomies: a randomized controlled multi-centre trial
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.005
– volume: 16
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib13
  article-title: Validation of the OrthoGnathicAnalyser 2.0—3D accuracy assessment tool for bimaxillary surgery and genioplasty
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246196
– volume: 148
  start-page: 1101
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib4
  article-title: Randomized clinical trial of the accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints in orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008427
– volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib10
  article-title: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1578
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib1
  article-title: Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: J Craniomaxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.027
– volume: 13
  start-page: 125
  year: 2023
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib6
  article-title: Three-dimensional accuracy and stability of personalized implants in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
  publication-title: J Pers Med
  doi: 10.3390/jpm13010125
– volume: 26
  start-page: 137
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib19
  article-title: Efficacy and cost of maxillary patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: a review of three patient cases
  publication-title: Perm J
  doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.054
– volume: 49
  start-page: 62
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib5
  article-title: Precision of orthognathic digital plan transfer using patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis versus mixed analogue–digitally planned surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.023
– volume: 75
  start-page: 2430
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib11
  article-title: A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.025
– volume: 80
  start-page: 827
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib17
  article-title: Comparison of the accuracy of maxillary positioning with interim splints versus patient-specific guides and plates in executing a virtual bimaxillary surgical plan
  publication-title: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.01.006
– volume: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib12
  article-title: A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149625
– volume: 18
  start-page: 826
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib14
  article-title: Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation in maxillofacial virtual surgery
  publication-title: J Craniofac Surg
  doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e318068434b
– volume: 43
  start-page: 957
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib15
  article-title: Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery
  publication-title: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011
– volume: 60
  start-page: 537
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016_bib20
  article-title: Accuracy and cost effectiveness of a waferless osteotomy approach, using patient specific guides and plates in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.005
SSID ssj0009387
Score 2.4479346
Snippet Patient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly advanced...
AbstractPatient-specific osteosynthesis plates and three-dimensional virtual surgical planning with patient-specific surgical guides have significantly...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 720
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Bone Plates
Computer-aided design
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Mandible - surgery
Maxilla - surgery
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Orthognathic surgery
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Orthognathic Surgical Procedures - methods
Patient-specific computational modelling
Splints
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Three-dimensional imaging
Treatment Outcome
Title Maxilla-first patient-specific osteosynthesis vs mandible-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery using splints: a randomized controlled trial
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0901502725000141
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0901502725000141
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.016
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39909776
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3163865807
Volume 54
WOSCitedRecordID wos001533670800005&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals 2021
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1399-0020
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0009387
  issn: 0901-5027
  databaseCode: AIEXJ
  dateStart: 19950201
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
link http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZ2QbAXxJ1ymYzEWxXk2E0d8zZgExcxITZE3ywncaClS6qlrQr_gd_F3-Kc2GnTwQY8IFVRlMSx0vPF5_jkfJ8JeazyXKAQWsCskEGP90ygokwGSW6Qdx3znJt6sQl5eBgPBurdxsaPhgszH8uiiBcLNfmvpoZjYGykzv6DuZc3hQOwD0aHLZgdtn9l-LdmgSsJBfkQArtGNzVARiVWBXWR1FFWXwsI_FCLZF5hAWs2TMbWt0iGJ-4O-PH9dPq5_IT5dWhZOQZ1d1anFyqk8k4rR5YGh5eVJ8NvNmtq38ewW68I0o5-19OPLdGKWiYAU_iu6zI3dSa_anG2PdUKpS8-usqC5UeuIwDexK_19n51-Jlxyd1V7fJkOPqCFZ614znovvGUC5_04NGy5A58lhuoBaonMM7aI7mTo_aIjVvDsnTX_eIuXOZi9GQ4KlGVgDsJV0f-bEFlclJjBbpkEC6fUe52sYA_tUm2uYwUDK_be6_2B69X-s8ilp6z5coLz3a5Qy43NzkvRDpvClSHQsfXyFU_h6F7DnvXyYYtbpArL7DuDJcOvEm-r2GQnsUgXccgnVd0HYO0hUHaxiD1iKA1BqnH4FNq6AqBdIVAWiPwFvlwsH_8_GXg1_0IUhg1poHMrRB9q6SVihthwtQIcBOMGYViQ3milMVRxTCWSiuifmLzyCQx69s0TrJQ3CZbRVnYu4RC-Bqp2PaVELYneirOwpQJjLHjHk8z3iFh81fr1Ivi49osY91UP440WkqjpTQL4dfvkO6yzcRJwlx4tWgsqBuyM7hnDRC8sJX8XStb-Vez0qGuuGb6iNU5Sy55VKc7wg6Jli19EO2C4z_2-KiBlwYPg58NTWHLWaUFTtlgosJkh9xxuFs-dwPZe-eeuU92Vi_wA7I1PZ3Zh-RSOgdInu6STTmId_3L8hN7uv8t
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maxilla-first+patient-specific+osteosynthesis+vs+mandible-first+bimaxillary+orthognathic+surgery+using+splints%3A+a+randomized+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+oral+and+maxillofacial+surgery&rft.au=van+der+Wel%2C+H&rft.au=Schepers%2C+R+H&rft.au=Baan%2C+F&rft.au=Spijkervet%2C+F+K+L&rft.date=2025-08-01&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijom.2025.01.016&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39909776&rft.externalDocID=39909776
thumbnail_m http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F09015027%2FS0901502725X00084%2Fcov150h.gif