Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Nine implants were planned on pre‐operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E im...
Uložené v:
| Vydané v: | Clinical oral implants research Ročník 20; číslo 10; s. 1156 - 1162 |
|---|---|
| Hlavní autori: | , , |
| Médium: | Journal Article |
| Jazyk: | English |
| Vydavateľské údaje: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2009
|
| Predmet: | |
| ISSN: | 0905-7161, 1600-0501, 1600-0501 |
| On-line prístup: | Získať plný text |
| Tagy: |
Pridať tag
Žiadne tagy, Buďte prvý, kto otaguje tento záznam!
|
| Abstract | Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).
Materials and methods: Nine implants were planned on pre‐operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre‐existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8‐mm‐diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post‐operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre‐operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann–Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B.
Results: The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm±0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm±0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm±0.38 SD and 0.49 mm±0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17±1.06°SD and 1.33±0.69°SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B.
Conclusions: Computer‐assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).Materials and methods: Nine implants were planned on pre-operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre-existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8-mm-diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post-operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre-operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B.Results: The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm plus or minus 0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm plus or minus 0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm plus or minus 0.38 SD and 0.49 mm plus or minus 0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17 plus or minus 1.06 degree SD and 1.33 plus or minus 0.69 degree SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B.Conclusions: Computer-assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy.To cite this article:Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 1156-1162.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Nine implants were planned on pre-operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre-existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8-mm-diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post-operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre-operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B. The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm+/-0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm+/-0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm+/-0.38 SD and 0.49 mm+/-0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17+/-1.06 degrees SD and 1.33+/-0.69 degrees SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B. Computer-assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Nine implants were planned on pre‐operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre‐existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8‐mm‐diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post‐operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre‐operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann–Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B. Results: The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm±0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm±0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm±0.38 SD and 0.49 mm±0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17±1.06°SD and 1.33±0.69°SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B. Conclusions: Computer‐assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Nine implants were planned on pre‐operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre‐existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8‐mm‐diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post‐operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre‐operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann–Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B. Results: The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm±0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm±0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm±0.38 SD and 0.49 mm±0.17 SD, respectively) were similar ( P >0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17±1.06°SD and 1.33±0.69°SD, P <0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B. Conclusions: Computer‐assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy. To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).Nine implants were planned on pre-operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre-existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8-mm-diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post-operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre-operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B.MATERIALS AND METHODSNine implants were planned on pre-operative CTs of six resin models, which were acquired with radiographic templates, using a planning software (E implants). Each resin model contained three pre-existing control implants (C implants). Radiographic templates were converted into operative guides containing 4.8-mm-diameter titanium sleeves. A single set of insertable sleeves was used for consecutively drilling the six models, followed by implant insertion through the guide sleeves. Models were further divided into group A (the first three models) and group B (the last three models). Post-operative CTs were used to compare implant positions with pre-operative planned positions. Statistical analysis included the Mann-Whitney U test for E and C implants and the Wilcoxon's signed ranks test for groups A and B.The mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm+/-0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm+/-0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm+/-0.38 SD and 0.49 mm+/-0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17+/-1.06 degrees SD and 1.33+/-0.69 degrees SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B.RESULTSThe mean apex depth deviations for E and C implants [0.49 mm+/-0.36 standard deviation (SD) and 0.32 mm+/-0.21 SD, respectively], and the mean apex radial deviations (0.63 mm+/-0.38 SD and 0.49 mm+/-0.17 SD, respectively) were similar (P>0.05). The mean angulation deviations for E and C implants were 2.17+/-1.06 degrees SD and 1.33+/-0.69 degrees SD, P<0.05. E implant deviations of all the parameters in group A were significantly smaller than E implant deviations in group B.Computer-assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy.CONCLUSIONSComputer-assisted implant planning and insertion provides good accuracy. Deviations are mainly related to system and reproducibility errors. Multiple use of drills and titanium sleeves significantly reduces system accuracy. |
| Author | Zuabi, Otman Machtei, Eli E. Horwitz, Jacob |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jacob surname: Horwitz fullname: Horwitz, Jacob organization: School of Graduate Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel – sequence: 2 givenname: Otman surname: Zuabi fullname: Zuabi, Otman organization: School of Graduate Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel – sequence: 3 givenname: Eli E. surname: Machtei fullname: Machtei, Eli E. organization: School of Graduate Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqNUcFu1DAUtFAR3RZ-AfkEp4TnTRzHSCCVFS1IK0BoERIXy2s7xUsSp7YDm349Dlv2wAHwwW_03sw8y3OGTnrXG4QwgZyk82yXkwogAwokXwLwHAgr63x_Dy2OgxO0AA40Y6Qip-gshB0AVLzmD9Ap4ZRwVrMF2l0oNXqpJuwaLLFy3TBG4-2t0Ti6zl17OXydsuvR6rljuqGV0WQyBBti6ti50UecbmU6k1CY0qB7jmWPbY-_2-gdDnHU00N0v5FtMI_u6jn6dPl6s3qTrd9fvV1drDNFoaizRkq2pUw1oAkjBeclaKMooSUoTSmjmhrelFJqIJIs9ZaXCkpeVlXd8FSLc_T04Dt4dzOaEEVngzJteqdxYxCsKKGsyJIl5pO_MpdQLzmv6kR8fEcct53RYvC2k34Sv_8xEV4eCMq7ELxphLJRRuv66KVtBQExByd2Ys5HzPmIOTjxKzixTwb1HwbHHf-WvjhIf9jWTP-tE6v1xxklfXbQz4nuj3rpv4mKFYyKz--uxObV-gtsEvhQ_ARtW7_K |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s12285_011_0256_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_12494 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajodo_2013_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2024_09_027 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11199035 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_020_0205_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2009_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcpe_12231 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40729_018_0146_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joen_2023_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oooo_2019_01_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13175178 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdent_2023_104748 crossref_primary_10_1097_ID_0000000000000853 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2013_07_029 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_67431 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10006_024_01269_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dental_2012_06_006 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm8020170 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12046 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12085 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2011_02337_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2020_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1532_849X_2012_00870_x crossref_primary_10_1586_erd_09_61 crossref_primary_10_1597_13_333 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joms_2010_05_082 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_12_60145_0 crossref_primary_10_1108_RPJ_04_2018_0082 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2010_02070_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prosdent_2019_04_015 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2012_02436_x crossref_primary_10_1016_S0022_3913_13_60053_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9030709 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1708_8208_2011_00406_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_018_0606_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_ma14030615 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2011_02176_x crossref_primary_10_4041_kjod24_166 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cden_2014_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2012_02552_x crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12119 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oooo_2015_04_006 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0311026 crossref_primary_10_1111_clr_14185 crossref_primary_10_1111_cid_12313 crossref_primary_10_1111_prd_12292 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01430.x-i2 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.07.007 10.1002/jor.20383 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001069.x 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00991.x 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140118.x 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00006 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x 10.1016/S0022-3913(87)80146-4 10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0325 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90026-4 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02095-X |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 7QP 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01748.x |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Engineering Research Database MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Dentistry |
| EISSN | 1600-0501 |
| EndPage | 1162 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 19519787 10_1111_j_1600_0501_2009_01748_x CLR1748 ark_67375_WNG_TBLZ0TNG_P |
| Genre | article Evaluation Studies Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29B 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 6J9 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 CWXXS D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V8K V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WBNRW WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WPGGZ WQJ WXSBR XG1 YFH YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX CITATION O8X 34H AAHHS ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE CGR CUY CVF EBD ECM EIF NPM WRC 7QO 7QP 8FD FR3 P64 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5038-faa7b57cf0d17139940dec51540cd5575d5e9f4aad01a12db94c0494668f94943 |
| IEDL.DBID | DRFUL |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 75 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000269674300013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 12:30:38 EDT 2025 Mon Oct 06 17:59:23 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:47:34 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 21:26:56 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:09:31 EST 2025 Tue Nov 11 03:10:32 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:18:56 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 10 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5038-faa7b57cf0d17139940dec51540cd5575d5e9f4aad01a12db94c0494668f94943 |
| Notes | istex:FC1D2EC3A694374756DD4FC0EC88927827910C54 ark:/67375/WNG-TBLZ0TNG-P ArticleID:CLR1748 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 |
| PMID | 19519787 |
| PQID | 20829968 |
| PQPubID | 23462 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_734046127 proquest_miscellaneous_20829968 pubmed_primary_19519787 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2009_01748_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2009_01748_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0501_2009_01748_x_CLR1748 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_TBLZ0TNG_P |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | October 2009 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-10-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2009 text: October 2009 |
| PublicationDecade | 2000 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Denmark |
| PublicationTitle | Clinical oral implants research |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Oral Implants Res |
| PublicationYear | 2009 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
| References | Kendoff, D., Citak, M., Gardner, M.J., Stübig, T., Krettek, C. & Hüfner, T. (2007) Improved accuracy of navigated drilling using a drill alignment device. Journal of Orthopedic Research 25: 951-957. Ruppin, J., Popovic, A., Strauss, M., Spüntrup, E., Steiner, A. & Stoll, C. (2008) Evaluation of accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clinical Oral Implant Research 19: 709-716. Loubele, M., Bogaerts, R., Van Dijck, E., Pauwels, R., Vanheusden, S., Suetens, P., Marchal, G., Sanderink, G. & Jacobs, R. (2008) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology Epub ahead of print. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002. Wishan, M.S., Bahat, O. & Krane, M. (1988) Computed tomography as an adjunct in dental implant surgery. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 8: 30-47. Barnett, B.G. & Krump, J.L. (1987) Implant dentistry: the significance of a team approach. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 58: 69-73. Lazzara, R.J. (1989) Use of osseointegrated implants for replacement of single teeth. Compendium 10: 550-554. Henry, P.J. (1989) Treatment planning for tissue integrated prosthesis. International Dental Journal 39: 171-182. Katsoulis, J., Pazera, P. & Mericske-Stern, R. (2008) Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Epub ahead of print. Ivančan, S., Sito, S. & Fabijanic, G. (2004) Effect of precision drill operating speed on the intra-row seed distribution for parsley. Biosystems Engineering 89: 373-376. Hanazawa, T., Sano, T., Seki, K. & Okano, T. (2004) Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 226-232. Birkfellner, W., Solar, P., Gahleitner, A., Huber, K., Kainberger, F., Kettenbach, J., Homolka, P., Diemling, M., Watzek, G. & Bergmann, H. (2001) In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 69-78. Finger, I.M. & Guerra, L.R. (1986) Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology. Dental Clinics of North America 30: 69-83. Chang, P.S., Parker, T.H., Patrick, C.W. Jr & Miller, M.J. (2003) The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 14: 164-170. Widmann, G., Widmann, R., Widmann, E., Jaschke, W. & Bale, R. (2007) Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 22: 72-78. Van Steenberghe, D., Naert, I., Andersson, M., Brajnovic, I., Van Cleynenbreugel, J. & Suetens, P. (2002) A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 17: 663-670. Jeffcoat, M., Jeffcoat, R.L., Reddy, M.S. & Berland, L. (1991) Planning interactive implant treatment with 3-D computed tomography. Journal of the American Dental Association 122: 40-44. Van Steenberghe, D., Malevez, C., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., Serhal, C.B., Dhoore, E., Schutyser, F., Suetens, P. & Jacobs, R. (2003) Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 131-136. Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B. & Brånemark, P.I. (1981) A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaws. International Journal of Oral Surgery 10: 387-416. Schnitman, P.A., Rubenstein, J.E., Woehrle, P.S., DaSilva, J.D. & Koch, G.G. (1988) Implants for partial edentulism. International Journal of Oral Implantology 5: 33-35. Sforza, N.M., Franchini, F., Lamma, A., Botticelli, S. & Ghigi, G. (2007) Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 27: 589-595. Brånemark, P.I., Hansson, B.O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindstrom, J., Hallen, O. & Ohman, A. (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 11 (Suppl. 16): 1-132. Adell, R. (1983) Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 50: 251-254. Van Assche, N., Van Steenberghe, D., Guerrero, M.E., Hirsch, E., Schutyser, F., Quirynen, M. & Jacobs, R. (2007) Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 34: 816-821. Bloem, T.J. (1989) Prosthodontic treatment. Shigaku 77 (SPEC): 1212-1222. Widmann, G. & Bale, R.J. (2006) Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 21: 305-313. Di Giacomo, G.A., Cury, P.R., De Araujo, N.S., Sendyk, W.R. & Sendyk, C.L. (2005) Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Journal of Periodontology 76: 503-507. Rubio Serrano, M., Albalat Estela, S., Peñarrocha Diago, M. & Peñarrocha Diago, M. (2008) Software applied to oral implantology: update. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal 13: E661-E665. Tallents, R.H., Jarvis, R., Macher, D.J. & Meitner, S. (1989) Provisional restorations. (Part III) partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants. Oral Health 79: 25-27. 1987; 58 2002; 17 1986; 30 2008; 19 2004; 89 1998 2003; 14 2008 2008; 13 1983; 50 2007; 34 1989; 77 1991; 122 1989; 10 2006; 21 2004; 15 1988; 5 1988; 8 2005; 76 1977; 11 2001; 12 1989; 79 2007; 22 1981; 10 2007; 25 1989; 39 2007; 27 e_1_2_7_5_1 Katsoulis J. (e_1_2_7_16_1) 2008 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 Finger I.M. (e_1_2_7_10_1) 1986; 30 Schnitman P.A. (e_1_2_7_22_1) 1988; 5 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 Brånemark P.I. (e_1_2_7_7_1) 1977; 11 e_1_2_7_11_1 Sforza N.M. (e_1_2_7_23_1) 2007; 27 e_1_2_7_26_1 Widmann G. (e_1_2_7_28_1) 2006; 21 Wishan M.S. (e_1_2_7_30_1) 1988; 8 Tallents R.H. (e_1_2_7_24_1) 1989; 79 e_1_2_7_25_1 Henry P.J. (e_1_2_7_13_1) 1989; 39 Widmann G. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 2007; 22 e_1_2_7_21_1 Van Steenberghe D. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 2002; 17 Bloem T.J. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1989; 77 Hanold L. (e_1_2_7_12_1) 1998 Lazzara R.J. (e_1_2_7_18_1) 1989; 10 Rubio Serrano M. (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2008; 13 |
| References_xml | – reference: Tallents, R.H., Jarvis, R., Macher, D.J. & Meitner, S. (1989) Provisional restorations. (Part III) partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants. Oral Health 79: 25-27. – reference: Hanazawa, T., Sano, T., Seki, K. & Okano, T. (2004) Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 226-232. – reference: Ivančan, S., Sito, S. & Fabijanic, G. (2004) Effect of precision drill operating speed on the intra-row seed distribution for parsley. Biosystems Engineering 89: 373-376. – reference: Birkfellner, W., Solar, P., Gahleitner, A., Huber, K., Kainberger, F., Kettenbach, J., Homolka, P., Diemling, M., Watzek, G. & Bergmann, H. (2001) In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 69-78. – reference: Bloem, T.J. (1989) Prosthodontic treatment. Shigaku 77 (SPEC): 1212-1222. – reference: Jeffcoat, M., Jeffcoat, R.L., Reddy, M.S. & Berland, L. (1991) Planning interactive implant treatment with 3-D computed tomography. Journal of the American Dental Association 122: 40-44. – reference: Rubio Serrano, M., Albalat Estela, S., Peñarrocha Diago, M. & Peñarrocha Diago, M. (2008) Software applied to oral implantology: update. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal 13: E661-E665. – reference: Di Giacomo, G.A., Cury, P.R., De Araujo, N.S., Sendyk, W.R. & Sendyk, C.L. (2005) Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Journal of Periodontology 76: 503-507. – reference: Sforza, N.M., Franchini, F., Lamma, A., Botticelli, S. & Ghigi, G. (2007) Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 27: 589-595. – reference: Van Steenberghe, D., Naert, I., Andersson, M., Brajnovic, I., Van Cleynenbreugel, J. & Suetens, P. (2002) A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 17: 663-670. – reference: Wishan, M.S., Bahat, O. & Krane, M. (1988) Computed tomography as an adjunct in dental implant surgery. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 8: 30-47. – reference: Widmann, G. & Bale, R.J. (2006) Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 21: 305-313. – reference: Chang, P.S., Parker, T.H., Patrick, C.W. Jr & Miller, M.J. (2003) The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 14: 164-170. – reference: Widmann, G., Widmann, R., Widmann, E., Jaschke, W. & Bale, R. (2007) Use of a surgical navigation system for CT-guided template production. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 22: 72-78. – reference: Schnitman, P.A., Rubenstein, J.E., Woehrle, P.S., DaSilva, J.D. & Koch, G.G. (1988) Implants for partial edentulism. International Journal of Oral Implantology 5: 33-35. – reference: Adell, R. (1983) Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 50: 251-254. – reference: Loubele, M., Bogaerts, R., Van Dijck, E., Pauwels, R., Vanheusden, S., Suetens, P., Marchal, G., Sanderink, G. & Jacobs, R. (2008) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. European Journal of Radiology Epub ahead of print. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002. – reference: Brånemark, P.I., Hansson, B.O., Adell, R., Breine, U., Lindstrom, J., Hallen, O. & Ohman, A. (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery 11 (Suppl. 16): 1-132. – reference: Lazzara, R.J. (1989) Use of osseointegrated implants for replacement of single teeth. Compendium 10: 550-554. – reference: Kendoff, D., Citak, M., Gardner, M.J., Stübig, T., Krettek, C. & Hüfner, T. (2007) Improved accuracy of navigated drilling using a drill alignment device. Journal of Orthopedic Research 25: 951-957. – reference: Henry, P.J. (1989) Treatment planning for tissue integrated prosthesis. International Dental Journal 39: 171-182. – reference: Van Steenberghe, D., Malevez, C., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., Serhal, C.B., Dhoore, E., Schutyser, F., Suetens, P. & Jacobs, R. (2003) Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 131-136. – reference: Barnett, B.G. & Krump, J.L. (1987) Implant dentistry: the significance of a team approach. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 58: 69-73. – reference: Van Assche, N., Van Steenberghe, D., Guerrero, M.E., Hirsch, E., Schutyser, F., Quirynen, M. & Jacobs, R. (2007) Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 34: 816-821. – reference: Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B. & Brånemark, P.I. (1981) A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaws. International Journal of Oral Surgery 10: 387-416. – reference: Katsoulis, J., Pazera, P. & Mericske-Stern, R. (2008) Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Epub ahead of print. – reference: Finger, I.M. & Guerra, L.R. (1986) Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology. Dental Clinics of North America 30: 69-83. – reference: Ruppin, J., Popovic, A., Strauss, M., Spüntrup, E., Steiner, A. & Stoll, C. (2008) Evaluation of accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clinical Oral Implant Research 19: 709-716. – volume: 58 start-page: 69 year: 1987 end-page: 73 article-title: Implant dentistry publication-title: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry – year: 2008 article-title: Prosthetically driven, computer‐guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla publication-title: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research – volume: 10 start-page: 550 year: 1989 end-page: 554 article-title: Use of osseointegrated implants for replacement of single teeth publication-title: Compendium – volume: 14 start-page: 164 year: 2003 end-page: 170 article-title: The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement publication-title: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery – volume: 5 start-page: 33 year: 1988 end-page: 35 article-title: Implants for partial edentulism publication-title: International Journal of Oral Implantology – volume: 89 start-page: 373 year: 2004 end-page: 376 article-title: Effect of precision drill operating speed on the intra‐row seed distribution for parsley publication-title: Biosystems Engineering – volume: 12 start-page: 69 year: 2001 end-page: 78 article-title: assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research – volume: 17 start-page: 663 year: 2002 end-page: 670 article-title: A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 122 start-page: 40 year: 1991 end-page: 44 article-title: Planning interactive implant treatment with 3‐D computed tomography publication-title: Journal of the American Dental Association – volume: 79 start-page: 25 year: 1989 end-page: 27 article-title: Provisional restorations. (Part III) partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants publication-title: Oral Health – volume: 50 start-page: 251 year: 1983 end-page: 254 article-title: Clinical results of osseointegrated implants supporting fixed prostheses in edentulous jaws publication-title: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry – volume: 10 start-page: 387 year: 1981 end-page: 416 article-title: A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaws publication-title: International Journal of Oral Surgery – volume: 77 start-page: 1212 issue: (SPEC) year: 1989 end-page: 1222 article-title: Prosthodontic treatment publication-title: Shigaku – volume: 21 start-page: 305 year: 2006 end-page: 313 article-title: Accuracy in computer‐aided implant surgery‐a review publication-title: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 25 start-page: 951 year: 2007 end-page: 957 article-title: Improved accuracy of navigated drilling using a drill alignment device publication-title: Journal of Orthopedic Research – volume: 13 start-page: E661 year: 2008 end-page: E665 article-title: Software applied to oral implantology publication-title: Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal – volume: 76 start-page: 503 year: 2005 end-page: 507 article-title: Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement publication-title: Journal of Periodontology – volume: 15 start-page: 226 year: 2004 end-page: 232 article-title: Radiologic measurements of the mandible publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research – volume: 11 start-page: 1 issue: (Suppl. 16) year: 1977 end-page: 132 article-title: Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10‐year period publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery – year: 2008 article-title: Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications publication-title: European Journal of Radiology – start-page: 101 year: 1998 – volume: 30 start-page: 69 year: 1986 end-page: 83 article-title: Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology publication-title: Dental Clinics of North America – volume: 34 start-page: 816 year: 2007 end-page: 821 article-title: Accuracy of implant placement based on pre‐surgical planning of three‐dimensional cone‐beam images publication-title: Journal of Clinical Periodontology – volume: 14 start-page: 131 year: 2003 end-page: 136 article-title: Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three‐dimensional CT‐based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers publication-title: Clinical Oral Implants Research – volume: 27 start-page: 589 year: 2007 end-page: 595 article-title: Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement publication-title: International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry – volume: 8 start-page: 30 year: 1988 end-page: 47 article-title: Computed tomography as an adjunct in dental implant surgery publication-title: International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry – volume: 39 start-page: 171 year: 1989 end-page: 182 article-title: Treatment planning for tissue integrated prosthesis publication-title: International Dental Journal – volume: 22 start-page: 72 year: 2007 end-page: 78 article-title: Use of a surgical navigation system for CT‐guided template production publication-title: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 19 start-page: 709 year: 2008 end-page: 716 article-title: Evaluation of accuracy of three different computer‐aided surgery systems in dental implantology publication-title: Clinical Oral Implant Research – volume: 39 start-page: 171 year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 article-title: Treatment planning for tissue integrated prosthesis publication-title: International Dental Journal – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01430.x-i2 – volume: 5 start-page: 33 year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 article-title: Implants for partial edentulism publication-title: International Journal of Oral Implantology – volume: 22 start-page: 72 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 article-title: Use of a surgical navigation system for CT‐guided template production publication-title: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.07.007 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1002/jor.20383 – volume: 11 start-page: 1 issue: 16 year: 1977 ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 article-title: Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10‐year period publication-title: Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery – year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 article-title: Prosthetically driven, computer‐guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla publication-title: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002 – volume: 27 start-page: 589 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 article-title: Accuracy of computerized tomography for the evaluation of mandibular sites prior to implant placement publication-title: International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001069.x – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00991.x – volume: 8 start-page: 30 year: 1988 ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 article-title: Computed tomography as an adjunct in dental implant surgery publication-title: International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4 – volume: 17 start-page: 663 year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 article-title: A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla publication-title: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 10 start-page: 550 year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 article-title: Use of osseointegrated implants for replacement of single teeth publication-title: Compendium – volume: 13 start-page: E661 year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 article-title: Software applied to oral implantology publication-title: Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal – volume: 21 start-page: 305 year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 article-title: Accuracy in computer‐aided implant surgery‐a review publication-title: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants – volume: 79 start-page: 25 year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 article-title: Provisional restorations. (Part III) partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants publication-title: Oral Health – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140118.x – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00006 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.503 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(87)80146-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1991.0325 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90026-4 – volume: 30 start-page: 69 year: 1986 ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 article-title: Prosthetic considerations in reconstructive implantology publication-title: Dental Clinics of North America doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)02095-X – volume: 77 start-page: 1212 year: 1989 ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 article-title: Prosthodontic treatment publication-title: Shigaku – start-page: 101 volume-title: Medication Use: A Systems Approach to Reducing Errors year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 |
| SSID | ssj0006989 |
| Score | 2.2349627 |
| Snippet | Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).
Materials and methods: Nine... Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer‐assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Materials and methods: Nine... To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT). Nine implants were planned on pre-operative... AbstractObjectives: To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).Materials and methods:... To evaluate the accuracy of computer-assisted 3D planning and implant insertion using computerized tomography (CT).OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the accuracy of... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1156 |
| SubjectTerms | computed tomography Computer-Aided Design computer-assisted surgery dental implant Dental Implantation, Endosseous - instrumentation Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Models Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional in vitro Reproducibility of Results Statistics, Nonparametric Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods surgical template Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
| Title | Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: an in vitro study |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-TBLZ0TNG-P/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2009.01748.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19519787 https://www.proquest.com/docview/20829968 https://www.proquest.com/docview/734046127 |
| Volume | 20 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000269674300013&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1600-0501 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006989 issn: 0905-7161 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19990101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB7BLhJceD_Co_iAuAXFednmVloWDqtVVW3Fikvk2E4V0SZVulsVTvwEfiO_hBknXVipSBXiFMuJLXsyY3-2x98AvDIIu50sXYhTkwhTxV2oSleiLie2qlyecG58sAkxm8nFQu0N_k90F6bnh1hvuJFl-PGaDFyXp5tGntOt6CziA-0kgmv5BvHkOEY1zkYw3t2fHEzX4zKFSvTMe1EW4iqBb_r1XFrXxmQ1JrmfX4ZEN4Gtn5kmd_5nn-7C7QGfsu1eoe7BNdfch5u75FNEYeEeQLNtzKrT5itrK6aZGaJC1N-cZcv2eGDA_vn9x-GqtpTnjk-OENBiDuJ06pxlNWU1S-Ydwmh7kvWE0m-ZbljdsLN62bXMM98-hIPJ-_nOx3AI2hAaYpYJK61FmQlTRZbjAlipNLLOIGpKI2MzBIc2c6pKtbYR1zy2pUoNcdTkuawUPpNHMGraxj0Blqg8jm2WiLJE4Bm50gphTWwT4bRUpgpAXPydwgyM5hRY46j4Y2WD8ixInhRvUxVensV5AHxd8qRn9bhCmddeAdYFdPeFvOJEVnyafSjm76afozkm9gJ4eaEhBdoqHcDoxrWrU6xO4uyfywDYX74QSUoM-LEI4HGvW7_bp-iOscQ3uVehKze82JnuU-rpvxZ8Brf8GZp3YXwOo2W3ci_ghjlDzeu24LpYyK3B2H4Bgl8n5Q |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hLlK5lPIOr_qAuAXl7ZhbabsUEVZVtRUVF8uxHRTRJlW6WxVO_Qn9jfwSZpx0YaUiVYhTIieOnMk38Wd7_A3AK4202-al9bFr4n4iQuuL0paI5dhUlc3iMNQu2QSfTPLDQ7E3pAOivTC9PsRiwo08w_2vycFpQnrZyzPaFp0G4aA7iew6f4OEcpQgqhDuo-398UGx-DFTrkQnvRekPg4TwuXAnmuftdRbjcjw59dR0WVm67qm8d3_-lLrsDYwVLbZQ-oe3LLNfVjdpqgiSgz3AJpNreed0t9ZWzHF9JAXov5hDZu1x4MG9s-Ly6_z2lCZPT45QkqLJcjU6e0Mq6momTEXEkYTlKyXlH7LVMPqhp3Vs65lTvv2IRyMd6Zbu_6QtsHXpC3jV0rxMuW6CkyIQ2AhksBYjbwpCbRJkR6a1IoqUcoEoQojU4pEk0pNluWVwGP8CFaatrFPgMUiiyKTxrwskXoGtjScGx2ZmFuVC115wK8-j9SDpjml1jiSf4xt0J6S7EkZN4V09pTnHoSLmie9rscN6rx2CFhUUN03iovjqfw8eS-n74ovwRRP9jzYuIKIRG-lJRjV2HZ-io_Lsf_Pcg_YX-7gcUIa-BH34HEPrt_tE7TLOMcrmcPQjRsut4p9Onv6rxU3YHV3-qmQxYfJx2dwx62ouYDG57Ay6-b2BdzWZ4jC7uXgc78ARB8q7Q |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwEB6hFgEX3o_wWh8Qt6C4eTjmtmwpIKqqWnXFiovl2A6K2E2q0K4WTvwEfiO_hBknW6i0SCvEKZETR85kJv5sj78P4JlB2O3ywoXYNYkwkdyFsnAF-nJsy9JlMefGi02I2Sw_PJTzXg6I9sJ0_BCbCTeKDP-_pgB3S1tuR3lG26LTiPe8k4iu8xcIKIcJacoMYDjenxxMNz9m0kr01HtRGuIwgW8n9pz7rK3eakiGPz0Pim4jW981TW7815e6Cdd7hMp2O5e6BZdcfRuujimriITh7kC9a8y61eYra0qmmel1IapvzrJVc9xzYP_8_uPTurJU5o6XRwhpsQSROr2dZRUV1SvmU8JogpJ1lNIvma5ZVbOTatU2zHPf3oWDyevF3tuwl20IDXHLhKXWokiFKSPLcQgsZRJZZxA3JZGxKcJDmzpZJlrbiGs-soVMDLHUZFleSjzG92BQN7V7ACzGzziyaSyKAqFn5AorhDUjGwunc2nKAMTZ51Gm5zQnaY0j9cfYBu2pyJ6kuCmVt6c6DYBvai47Xo8L1HnuPWBTQbefKS9OpOrD7I1avJp-jBZ4Mg9g58xFFEYrLcHo2jXrL_i4HPv_LA-A_eUOESfEgT8SAdzvnOt3-yTtMs7xSuZ96MINV3vTfTp7-K8Vd-DKfDxR03ez94_gml9Q8_mMj2GwatfuCVw2J-iE7dM-5H4BjrwqaA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy+of+a+computerized+tomography-guided+template-assisted+implant+placement+system%3A+an+in+vitro+study&rft.jtitle=Clinical+oral+implants+research&rft.au=Horwitz%2C+Jacob&rft.au=Zuabi%2C+Otman&rft.au=Machtei%2C+Eli+E&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2009.01748.x&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19519787&rft.externalDocID=19519787 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0905-7161&client=summon |