Asymmetrical predation intensity produces divergent antipredator behaviours in primary and secondary prey
It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The Journal of animal ecology Vol. 93; no. 12; pp. 2038 - 2050 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2024
John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| Subjects: | |
| ISSN: | 0021-8790, 1365-2656, 1365-2656 |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Abstract | It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads.
Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place.
We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts.
Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey.
Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses.
These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator-prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per-capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population- and community-level responses. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses. These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls ( Strix occidentalis ) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats ( Neotoma fuscipes ; primary prey) and deer mice ( Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator–prey dyads.Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place.We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky‐footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per‐capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts.Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey.Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population‐ and community‐level responses. These findings demonstrate that among a diverse prey guild within a spatially heterogeneous environment, asymmetrical predation between a primary and secondary prey species can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator-prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per-capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population- and community-level responses.It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which can produce nonconsumptive effects that cascade through trophic systems. Yet, determining how particular prey manage risk in natural settings remains challenging as empirical studies disproportionately focus on single predator-prey dyads. Here, we contrast foraging strategies within the context of a primary and secondary prey to explore how antipredator behaviours emerge as a product of predation intensity as well as the setting in which an encounter takes place. We studied the effects of spotted owls (Strix occidentalis) on two species experiencing asymmetrical risk: dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes; primary prey) and deer mice (Peromyscus spp.; alternative prey). Woodrats are most abundant within young forests, but predominantly captured by owls foraging within mature forests; in contrast, deer mice occur in high densities across forest types and seral stages and are consumed at lower per-capita rates overall. We deployed experimental foraging patches within areas of high and low spotted owl activity, created artificial risky and safe refuge treatments, and monitored behaviour throughout the entirety of prey foraging bouts. Woodrats were more vigilant and foraged less within mature forests and at riskier patches, although the effect of refuge treatment was contingent upon forest type. In contrast, deer mice only demonstrated consistent behavioural responses to riskier refuge treatments; forest type had little effect on perceived risk or the relative importance of refuge treatment. Thus, habitat can interact with predator activity to structure antipredator responses differently for primary versus secondary prey. Our findings show that asymmetrical predation can modulate both the magnitude of perceived risk and the strategies used to manage it, thus highlighting an important and understudied contingency in risk effects research. Evaluating the direct and indirect effects of predation through the paradigm of primary and secondary prey may improve our understanding of how nonconsumptive effects can extend to population- and community-level responses. |
| Author | Pauli, Jonathan N. Peery, M. Zachariah Kuntze, Corbin C. |
| AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin Madison Wisconsin USA |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Corbin C. orcidid: 0000-0002-5059-0278 surname: Kuntze fullname: Kuntze, Corbin C. email: kuntze@wisc.edu organization: University of Wisconsin – sequence: 2 givenname: M. Zachariah orcidid: 0000-0002-2545-9470 surname: Peery fullname: Peery, M. Zachariah organization: University of Wisconsin – sequence: 3 givenname: Jonathan N. orcidid: 0000-0001-5908-6628 surname: Pauli fullname: Pauli, Jonathan N. organization: University of Wisconsin |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39205404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqFks1v1DAQxS1URLeFMzcUiQuXtLbjr5zQqiq0qIILnC3Hnm1dJXaxk63y3-NtthVUQvXF8vj3np7Hc4QOQgyA0HuCT0hZp6QRvKaCixPCiBCv0OqpcoBWGFNSK9niQ3SU8y3GWFLcvEGHTUsxZ5itkF_neRhgTN6avrpL4MzoY6h8GCFkP86lFt1kIVfObyFdQxgrE0a_oDFVHdyYrY9TykVUaD-YNBfEVRlsDG53KvD8Fr3emD7Du_1-jH59Of95dlFf_fh6eba-qi3HVNSCtGCElGAZAUUpx6ZTlBEjDWeuA2VURzaWcAJWCKV4R7DrhFWYO0ata47R58X3buoGcLYETqbX-2A6Gq__vQn-Rl_HrSZEEE6FLA6f9g4p_p4gj3rw2ULfmwBxyrohnFEmmcAvo7htZctbzgv68Rl6W5oWSiuKYaNaJTFvCvXh7_RPsR9_rAB8AWyKOSfYaOvHhz8rj_G9JljvJkPv5kDv5kA_TEbRnT7TPVr_XyEWxb3vYX4J19_W388X4R_v2MsQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2024_122412 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_14166 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1890/06-0937.1 10.1098/rspb.2009.2036 10.1139/z90-092 10.1093/jmammal/gyw020 10.1111/ele.13319 10.1002/ecm.1509 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19278.x 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002431 10.1111/1365-2656.12148 10.1890/09-0787.1 10.2307/1381798 10.2307/3534041 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x 10.1002/ece3.2616 10.1890/11-0424.1 10.1038/41084 10.1007/s00442-015-3274-x 10.1139/cjz-2022-0154 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x 10.1111/1365-2656.12680 10.1111/ddi.12682 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.08.003 10.1007/s00442-018-4323-z 10.1086/303202 10.1890/13-1083.1 10.1890/08-2345.1 10.1111/ele.13614 10.1890/11-0327.1 10.1890/04-0232 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004 10.1111/1365-2656.13109 10.1007/BF00395696 10.1007/s00265-013-1609-3 10.1007/s00265-006-0172-6 10.1002/ecs2.2997 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108217 10.1080/15659801.2016.1233689 10.2307/3802590 10.1002/ecy.1916 10.2307/3809436 10.1093/ornithapp/duac024 10.2307/3545654 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.014 10.1890/04-0719 10.1086/284969 10.1093/jmammal/gyx177 10.1002/eap.2908 10.1111/1365-2656.14166 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01129.x 10.1007/s004420050360 10.1007/s00442-013-2760-2 10.1890/07-0260.1 10.1086/284719 10.1111/2041-210X.12584 10.1111/1365-2656.13850 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.024 10.1111/1365-2656.13213 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. 2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. – notice: 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. – notice: 2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2656.14166 |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Entomology Abstracts AGRICOLA CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Zoology Biology |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Kuntze et al |
| EISSN | 1365-2656 |
| EndPage | 2050 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC11615267 39205404 10_1111_1365_2656_14166 JANE14166 |
| Genre | researchArticle Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: U.S. Forest Service Region 5 and Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Sierra Pacific Industries funderid: 19‐JV‐11272138‐039 – fundername: U.S. Forest Service Region 5 and Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Sierra Pacific Industries grantid: 19-JV-11272138-039 – fundername: U.S. Forest Service Region 5 and Pacific Southwest Research Station, and Sierra Pacific Industries grantid: 19‐JV‐11272138‐039 |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 24P 29J 2AX 2WC 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHHS AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPFR ABPLY ABPQH ABPVW ABTAH ABTLG ABXSQ ABYAD ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHIC ACKIV ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACTWD ACUBG ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AHBTC AHXOZ AI. AILXY AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AQVQM AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DIK DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD ESX EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 F5P FVMVE G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HGLYW HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JSODD JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NHB O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TEORI TN5 UB1 UPT VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHG WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 YQT ZCG ZY4 ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT AAMMB AAYXX ABAWQ ABSQW ABUFD ACHJO AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY CITATION O8X CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5026-619ea677ec41e82250ab8241a7a54dbe8a8b1fc151ec66885b10db6c805d42cd3 |
| IEDL.DBID | 24P |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 2 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=001299627700001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 04 02:04:10 EST 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:06:29 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 02 10:47:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:28:25 EDT 2025 Sat Jul 26 01:47:21 EDT 2025 Sat Nov 29 04:51:42 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:13:42 EST 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:12:17 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | asymmetrical predation risk management habitat domain optimal foraging antipredator behaviour hunting mode |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5026-619ea677ec41e82250ab8241a7a54dbe8a8b1fc151ec66885b10db6c805d42cd3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Handling Editor: Veronica Zamora Gutierrez |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2545-9470 0000-0002-5059-0278 0000-0001-5908-6628 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1365-2656.14166 |
| PMID | 39205404 |
| PQID | 3138987053 |
| PQPubID | 37522 |
| PageCount | 13 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11615267 proquest_miscellaneous_3154247460 proquest_miscellaneous_3099795955 proquest_journals_3138987053 pubmed_primary_39205404 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_1365_2656_14166 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_14166 wiley_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_14166_JANE14166 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2024 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2024 text: December 2024 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London – name: Hoboken |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of animal ecology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Ecol |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: John Wiley and Sons Inc |
| References | 1997; 113 1995; 74 2021; 24 2017; 7 2017; 86 2023; 33 2013; 67 2004; 7 2023; 101 1994; 25 2020; 11 2024 2014; 174 1974; 5 1997; 388 2006; 60 2019; 22 2015; 178 2010; 277 1986 2007; 9 2020; 89 2019; 238 2014; 95 2017; 127 2022; 124 2011; 120 1997; 61 2010; 79 2022; 92 2019; 34 2016; 97 2005; 86 1970; 51 1999; 1 2014; 83 2019; 189 2016; 12 2018; 24 1987; 130 1993; 57 2016; 7 2013; 36 1990; 68 2023 2006; 43 2011; 92 2017; 98 1999; 153 1988; 22 2016; 62 2001; 38 2010; 91 2018; 99 2007; 88 2003; 63 1990; 71 2023; 92 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_47_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_49_1 Brown J. S. (e_1_2_8_8_1) 1999; 1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 Bogiatto R. J. (e_1_2_8_5_1) 2003; 63 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_66_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_64_1 e_1_2_8_62_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_60_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_59_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_38_1 e_1_2_8_57_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 Kelt D. A. (e_1_2_8_27_1) 2017; 98 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_53_1 e_1_2_8_51_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_63_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_61_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_58_1 Wolf N. (e_1_2_8_65_1) 2007; 9 R Core Team (e_1_2_8_50_1) 2023 Brown J. S. (e_1_2_8_10_1) 2001; 38 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_56_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_54_1 e_1_2_8_52_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 11 issue: 1 year: 2020 article-title: Is your ad hoc model selection strategy affecting your multimodel inference? publication-title: Ecosphere – volume: 92 start-page: 2258 issue: 12 year: 2011 end-page: 2266 article-title: Landscape of fear influences the relative importance of consumptive and nonconsumptive predator effects publication-title: Ecology – volume: 38 start-page: 71 year: 2001 end-page: 87 article-title: Ecology of fear: Foraging games between predators and prey with pulsed resources publication-title: Annales Zoologici Fennici – volume: 113 start-page: 126 year: 1997 end-page: 132 article-title: A trophic cascade in a diverse arthropod community caused by a generalist arthropod predator publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 86 start-page: 501 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: 509 article-title: Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator‐prey interactions publication-title: Ecology – volume: 36 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 46 article-title: Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance publication-title: Ecography – volume: 189 start-page: 487 issue: 2 year: 2019 end-page: 500 article-title: Habitat use of sympatric prey suggests divergent anti‐predator responses to recolonizing gray wolves publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 7 start-page: 189 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 199 article-title: Spatial and temporal avoidance of risk within a large carnivore guild publication-title: Ecology and Evolution – volume: 174 start-page: 1301 issue: 4 year: 2014 end-page: 1309 article-title: Predator facilitation or interference: A game of vipers and owls publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 99 start-page: 341 issue: 2 year: 2018 end-page: 350 article-title: Changes in feeding behavior and patch use by herbivores in response to the introduction of a new predator publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 88 start-page: 2415 issue: 10 year: 2007 end-page: 2426 article-title: Predator diversity and trophic interactions publication-title: Ecology – volume: 97 start-page: 663 year: 2016 end-page: 688 article-title: 2016 guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 22 start-page: 37 year: 1988 end-page: 47 article-title: Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 33 issue: 8 year: 2023 article-title: Landscape heterogeneity provides co‐benefits to predator and prey publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 101 start-page: 473 year: 2023 end-page: 485 article-title: Food and cover resources for small mammals on an industrially logged landscape in the Sierra Nevada of California publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – year: 2024 – volume: 34 start-page: 355 issue: 4 year: 2019 end-page: 368 article-title: Landscapes of fear: Spatial patterns of risk perception and response publication-title: Trends in Ecology & Evolution – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2016 end-page: 11 article-title: Multiple stressors, state‐dependence and predation risk—Foraging trade‐offs: Toward a modern concept of trait‐mediated indirect effects in communities and ecosystems publication-title: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences – volume: 89 start-page: 589 issue: 2 year: 2020 end-page: 600 article-title: Ecological opportunity drives individual dietary specialization in leopards publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 7 start-page: 1325 issue: 11 year: 2016 end-page: 1330 article-title: BORIS: A free, versatile open‐source event‐logging software for video/audio coding and live observations publication-title: Methods in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 88 start-page: 2744 issue: 11 year: 2007 end-page: 2751 article-title: Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator‐prey interactions publication-title: Ecology – volume: 124 issue: 3 year: 2022 article-title: Large trees and forest heterogeneity facilitate prey capture by California spotted owls publication-title: Ornithological Applications – volume: 97 start-page: 966 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 977 article-title: Linking predation risk, ungulate antipredator responses, and patterns of vegetation in the high Andes publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – year: 1986 – volume: 98 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2017 end-page: 93 article-title: Diversity of small mammals in the Sierra Nevada: Filtering by natural selection or by anthropogenic activities? publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 43 start-page: 343 year: 2006 end-page: 352 article-title: Polyphagy complicates conservation biological control that targets generalist predators publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 5 start-page: 325 year: 1974 end-page: 383 article-title: The evolution of social behavior publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 277 start-page: 1469 issue: 1687 year: 2010 end-page: 1474 article-title: Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state‐dependent foraging publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences – volume: 86 start-page: 155 issue: 1 year: 2005 end-page: 163 article-title: Restitution of mass‐size residuals: Validating body condition indices publication-title: Ecology – volume: 178 start-page: 707 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 713 article-title: Foraging in groups affects giving‐up densities: Solo foragers quit sooner publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 61 start-page: 343 issue: 2 year: 1997 article-title: Between‐habitat movement of dusky‐footed woodrats and vulnerability to predation publication-title: The Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 238 year: 2019 article-title: Trophic interactions mediate the response of predator populations to habitat change publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 74 start-page: 251 year: 1995 end-page: 258 article-title: Titrating food and safety in a heterogeneous environment: When are the risky and safe patches of equal value? publication-title: Oikos – volume: 60 start-page: 457 issue: 4 year: 2006 end-page: 464 article-title: Meta‐analysis of foraging and predation risk trade‐offs in terrestrial systems publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 9 start-page: 1293 issue: 8 year: 2007 end-page: 1304 article-title: Strategy, compromise, and cheating in predator‐prey games publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology Research – volume: 91 start-page: 2995 issue: 10 year: 2010 end-page: 3007 article-title: Behavioral response races, predator‐prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey publication-title: Ecology – volume: 91 start-page: 2242 issue: 8 year: 2010 end-page: 2252 article-title: Cascading diversity effects transmitted exclusively by behavioral interactions publication-title: Ecology – volume: 92 start-page: 2190 issue: 12 year: 2011 end-page: 2195 article-title: Toward a predictive theory of risk effects: Hypotheses for prey attributes and compensatory mortality publication-title: Ecology – volume: 25 start-page: 495 year: 1994 end-page: 520 article-title: The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 89 start-page: 1302 issue: 6 year: 2020 end-page: 1316 article-title: Non‐consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 62 start-page: 118 issue: 3–4 year: 2016 end-page: 120 article-title: Fun and games: Predator‐prey foraging games and related interactions publication-title: Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution – volume: 1 start-page: 49 issue: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 71 article-title: Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology Research – volume: 24 start-page: 341 issue: 3 year: 2018 end-page: 351 article-title: Declining old‐forest species as a legacy of large trees lost publication-title: Diversity and Distributions – volume: 67 start-page: 1541 year: 2013 end-page: 1553 article-title: A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving‐up densities publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology – volume: 83 start-page: 504 issue: 2 year: 2014 end-page: 514 article-title: Does moonlight increase predation risk? Meta‐analysis reveals divergent responses of nocturnal mammals to lunar cycles publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 71 start-page: 591 issue: 4 year: 1990 end-page: 596 article-title: Rates of seed harvest by two species of gerbilline rodents publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – volume: 68 start-page: 619 issue: 4 year: 1990 end-page: 640 article-title: Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 95 start-page: 1141 issue: 5 year: 2014 end-page: 1152 article-title: The landscape of fear: The missing link to understand top‐down and bottom‐up controls of prey abundance? publication-title: Ecology – volume: 24 start-page: 113 issue: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 129 article-title: The context dependence of non‐consumptive predator effects publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 86 start-page: 749 issue: 4 year: 2017 end-page: 765 article-title: The many faces of fear: A synthesis of the methodological variation in characterizing predation risk publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 22 start-page: 1724 issue: 11 year: 2019 end-page: 1733 article-title: Do prey select for vacant hunting domains to minimize a multi‐predator threat? publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 388 start-page: 371 issue: 6640 year: 1997 end-page: 373 article-title: Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages publication-title: Nature – volume: 98 start-page: 2281 issue: 9 year: 2017 end-page: 2292 article-title: Toward a community ecology of landscapes: Predicting multiple predator‐prey interactions across geographic space publication-title: Ecology – volume: 57 start-page: 373 issue: 2 year: 1993 article-title: Dusky‐footed woodrat abundance in different‐aged forests in northwestern California publication-title: The Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 63 start-page: 258 issue: 2 year: 2003 end-page: 263 article-title: Food habits of great horned owls in northeastern California with notes on seasonal diet shifts publication-title: Western North American Naturalist – volume: 51 start-page: 29 issue: 3 year: 1970 end-page: 33 article-title: Comparative food habits of three owl species in Central Oregon publication-title: The Murrelet – volume: 7 start-page: 999 issue: 10 year: 2004 end-page: 1014 article-title: Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 92 issue: 3 year: 2022 article-title: Experimental repatriation of snowshoe hares along a southern range boundary reveals historical community interactions publication-title: Ecological Monographs – volume: 79 start-page: 531 issue: 3 year: 2010 end-page: 537 article-title: Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode publication-title: Animal Behaviour – volume: 130 start-page: 431 issue: 3 year: 1987 end-page: 447 article-title: Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator‐prey systems publication-title: The American Naturalist – volume: 92 start-page: 142 issue: 1 year: 2023 end-page: 157 article-title: Ungulate spatiotemporal responses to contrasting predation risk from wolves and snow leopards publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – year: 2023 – volume: 120 start-page: 1657 issue: 11 year: 2011 end-page: 1666 article-title: Risk management in optimal foragers: The effect of sightlines and predator type on patch use, time allocation, and vigilance in gerbils publication-title: Oikos – volume: 153 start-page: 649 issue: 6 year: 1999 end-page: 659 article-title: Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: The predation risk allocation hypothesis publication-title: The American Naturalist – volume: 127 start-page: 225 year: 2017 end-page: 231 article-title: Herbivores employ a suite of antipredator behaviours to minimize risk from ambush and cursorial predators publication-title: Animal Behaviour – ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 doi: 10.1890/06-0937.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2036 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 doi: 10.1139/z90-092 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw020 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1111/ele.13319 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing year: 2023 ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 – volume: 9 start-page: 1293 issue: 8 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_8_65_1 article-title: Strategy, compromise, and cheating in predator‐prey games publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology Research – ident: e_1_2_8_62_1 doi: 10.1002/ecm.1509 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19278.x – volume: 63 start-page: 258 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 article-title: Food habits of great horned owls in northeastern California with notes on seasonal diet shifts publication-title: Western North American Naturalist – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002431 – ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12148 – ident: e_1_2_8_59_1 doi: 10.1890/09-0787.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.2307/1381798 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.2307/3534041 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1002/ece3.2616 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1890/11-0424.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1038/41084 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3274-x – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1139/cjz-2022-0154 – ident: e_1_2_8_58_1 doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyw078 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x – volume: 38 start-page: 71 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 article-title: Ecology of fear: Foraging games between predators and prey with pulsed resources publication-title: Annales Zoologici Fennici – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12680 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1111/ddi.12682 – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.08.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4323-z – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1086/303202 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1890/13-1083.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1890/08-2345.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_64_1 doi: 10.1111/ele.13614 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1890/11-0327.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 doi: 10.1890/04-0232 – volume: 1 start-page: 49 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 article-title: Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology Research – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13109 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00395696 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1007/s00265-013-1609-3 – ident: e_1_2_8_61_1 doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0172-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1002/ecs2.2997 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108217 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1080/15659801.2016.1233689 – ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 doi: 10.2307/3802590 – ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 doi: 10.1002/ecy.1916 – ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 doi: 10.2307/3809436 – ident: e_1_2_8_66_1 doi: 10.1093/ornithapp/duac024 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.2307/3545654 – ident: e_1_2_8_63_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.014 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1890/04-0719 – ident: e_1_2_8_60_1 doi: 10.1086/284969 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx177 – volume: 98 start-page: 85 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 article-title: Diversity of small mammals in the Sierra Nevada: Filtering by natural selection or by anthropogenic activities? publication-title: Journal of Mammalogy – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1002/eap.2908 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.14166 – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01129.x – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1007/s004420050360 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2760-2 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1890/07-0260.1 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1086/284719 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12584 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13850 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.024 – ident: e_1_2_8_57_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13213 |
| SSID | ssj0007203 |
| Score | 2.4600623 |
| Snippet | It is widely recognized that predators can influence prey through both direct consumption and by inducing costly antipredator behaviours, the latter of which... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 2038 |
| SubjectTerms | animal ecology Animals Anti-predator behavior antipredator behaviour antipredatory behavior asymmetrical predation Asymmetry Behavioural Ecology Community Ecology Contingency deer Food Chain Foraging behavior forest types Forests habitat domain habitats hunting mode Macroecology Mice Neotoma Neotoma fuscipes optimal foraging Owls Peromyscus Peromyscus - physiology Predation Predators Predatory Behavior Prey prey species risk management Risk perception Sigmodontinae - physiology species Strigiformes - physiology Strix occidentalis Trophic Interactions |
| Title | Asymmetrical predation intensity produces divergent antipredator behaviours in primary and secondary prey |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2F1365-2656.14166 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39205404 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3138987053 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3099795955 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3154247460 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11615267 |
| Volume | 93 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos001299627700001&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library Full Collection 2020 customDbUrl: eissn: 1365-2656 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0007203 issn: 0021-8790 databaseCode: DRFUL dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEB_0TsEXvz-q5xHBB1-qaZu06eOit4gcyyEeLL6U5qNY8LpHuyvsf-9M0i23HiqCL0uWTnY3yUzmN5uZXwBeoxdq0DPoWCtuY_T4eaybhsdKlFRWSeXXnsT1tFgs1HJZno3ZhFQLE_ghpj_cyDL8fk0GXuvhipGP-VkyR2PHr7gJh0mSFaTYqTibNmM6ZQxZHgkafslHdh9K5vnlA_Yd0zW0eT1p8iqY9d5ofu8_jOM-3B2hKJsF3XkAN1z3EG6Hyym32Pq68q1H0M6G7cUFXb2FC8ouexfuYWJtSH9fb9ml5411A7OU5kHVWgxXrA2iq56NZACbfsBOKO0ZLlDEsoECckvvUHj7GM7nJ1_ef4zHKxpiIzF6w8CzdHVeFM6IxCHWkLzWCkFBXdRSWO1UrXTSGIQVzuS5UlIn3OrcKC6tSI3NnsBBt-rcM2AmwyA_4zY1eSOcq4mJ3zVGOC1dIXgTwdvd-lRm5C-nazS-V7s4hmayopms_ExG8GbqMA7s96JHuwWvRhseqozOcHE7k1kEr6bHaH10pFJ3brVBGSo8LmUp5R9kEKWmohA5j-Bp0KHp9yA6JcwsIlB72jUJEPv3_pOu_eZZwBPC6mleRPDOq9ffxlh9mi1OfOv5P_d4AXdSBHMhjecIDtb9xr2EW-bHuh36Y29x-Fos1TEcfvg8Pz_9CToSK_s |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwEB5BFwQX3o_AAkHiwCWQh504xwq2WqD0gHalFZcofkREYtNV0iL13zNju1HLChASN1cZt7U9Y38Tz3wD8ApPoQZPBhlJEesIT_w8kk0TR4KVlFZJ6deWxHVeLBbi7KzczYVx_BDjCzeyDLtfk4HTC-kdK_cBWjxHa8ffuAoHDJWJT-Dg_ZfZ6Xzcj-mi0QV6JGj7ZewJfiie55ev2D-bLgHOy3GTu3jWHkiz2_9jKHfgloej4dTpz124Yrp7cN0VqNxg6-vStu5DOx025-dUfgsXNbzojavFFLYuBH61CS8sd6wZQk2hHpSxFeKqtU502YeeEGDdD9gJpS3LBYrocCCnXNMnFN48gNPZ0cm748iXaYgURw8Onc_S1HlRGMUSg3iDx7UUCAzqouZMSyNqIZNGIbQwKs-F4DKJtcyViLlmqdLZQ5h0y848hlBl6OhnsU5V3jBjamLjN41iRnJTsLgJ4M12gSrlOcyplMb3auvL0ExWNJOVnckAXo8d_MB-L3q4XfHK2_FQZXSPi1sazwJ4OT5GC6RrlbozyzXKUPJxyUvO_yCDSDVlBcvjAB45JRr_DyJUws0sALGnXqMAMYDvP-nab5YJPCG8nuZFAG-tfv1tjNXH6eLItp78c48XcOP45PO8mn9YfHoKN1MEdy6s5xAmq35tnsE19WPVDv1zb4A_AQaPLvA |
| linkToPdf | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEB5BgYoLz1IMBYzEgYvp2t6118eINuJRRT2AVHGxvA8LS9SJ7AQp_56ZXcdKqKBC4raRZxPvY3a-yc58A_AGrVCNlkFFSjITocXPIlXXLJK8oLRKSr92JK5n-WwmLy6K7VwYzw8x_uFGmuHOa1JwuzD1lpYPAVoiQ23H37gJt7jAk5bYnfn5eBrTNaMP84hR8ws20PtQNM9vX7Brma7AzatRk9to1pmj6f3_MZAHcG8Ao-HE756HcMO2j-COL0-5xta3uWs9hmbSry8vqfgWLmm46KyvxBQ2PgB-uQ4XjjnW9qGhQA_K1wpxzRovOu_CgQ5g1fXYCaUdxwWKmLAnl9zQJxReH8DX6emX9x-ioUhDpAX6b-h6FrbK8txqHltEG4JVSiIsqPJKcKOsrKSKa43Awuosk1KomBmVacmE4Yk26RPYa-etfQqhTtHNT5lJdFZzayvi4re15lYJm3NWB_Bus0ClHhjMqZDGj3LjydBMljSTpZvJAN6OHYaB_Vn0aLPi5aDFfZnSLS4eaCIN4PX4GPWPLlWq1s5XKEOpx4UohPiLDOLUhOc8YwEc-k00vg_iU0LNPAC5s71GAeL_3n3SNt8dD3hMaD3J8gCO3f66bozlp8ns1LWe_XOPV7B_fjItzz7OPj-HuwkiOx_TcwR7y25lX8Bt_XPZ9N1Lp32_AOrALNk |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymmetrical+predation+intensity+produces+divergent+antipredator+behaviours+in+primary+and+secondary+prey&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+animal+ecology&rft.au=Kuntze%2C+Corbin+C.&rft.au=Peery%2C+M.+Zachariah&rft.au=Pauli%2C+Jonathan+N.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2038&rft.epage=2050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2F1365-2656.14166&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_1365_2656_14166 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |