Austin, P. C. (2009). Some Methods of Propensity‐Score Matching had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical journal, 51(1), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810488
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Austin, Peter C. "Some Methods of Propensity‐Score Matching Had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo Simulations." Biometrical Journal 51, no. 1 (2009): 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810488.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Austin, Peter C. "Some Methods of Propensity‐Score Matching Had Superior Performance to Others: Results of an Empirical Investigation and Monte Carlo Simulations." Biometrical Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, 2009, pp. 171-184, https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810488.