The Urine Microbiome of Healthy Men and Women Differs by Urine Collection Method
Purpose: Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus cat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International neurourology journal Jg. 24; H. 1; S. 41 - 51 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Korea (South)
Korean Continence Society
01.03.2020
대한배뇨장애요실금학회 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| ISSN: | 2093-6931, 2093-4777, 2093-6931 |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Abstract | Purpose: Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women.Methods: An asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing.Results: All organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men.Conclusions: Our findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Purpose Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women. Methods An asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing. Results All organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men. Conclusions Our findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens. Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women.PURPOSECompared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women.An asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing.METHODSAn asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing.All organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men.RESULTSAll organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men.Our findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens.CONCLUSIONOur findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens. Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women. An asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing. All organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men. Our findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens. Purpose: Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient, contamination by urethral microbiota may confound understanding of the bladder microbiome. Herein we compared the voiding- versus catheterization-associated urine microbiome of healthy men and women. Methods: An asymptomatic, healthy cohort of 6 women and 14 men underwent midstream urine collection, followed by sterile catheterization of the bladder after bladder refilling. Urine samples underwent urine dipstick testing and conventional microscopy and urine cultures. Samples also underwent Illumina MiSeq-based 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing. Results: All organisms identified by urine culture were also identified by 16S amplification; however, next-generation sequencing (NGS) also detected bacteria not identified by cultivation. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus were the most abundant species. Abundances of the 9 predominant bacterial genera differed between the urethra and bladder. Voided and catheterized microbiomes share all dominant (>1%) genera and Operational Taxonomic Units but in similar or different proportions. Hence, urethra and bladder microbiomes do not differ in taxonomic composition, but rather in taxonomic structure. Women had higher abundance of Lactobacillus and Prevotella than men. Conclusions: Our findings lend credence to the hypothesis that Lactobacilli are important members of the healthy urine microbiome. Our data also suggest that the microbiomes of the urethra and bladder differ from one another. In conclusion, urine collection method results in different 16S-based NGS data, likely due to the sensitivity of NGS methods enabling detection of urethral bacteria present in voided but not catheterized urine specimens. KCI Citation Count: 30 |
| Author | Hsieh, Michael Pérez-Losada, Marcos Sprague, Bruce M. Caldovic, Ljubica Chandal, Neel Ljungberg, Inger Pohl, Hans G. Groah, Suzanne L. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hans G. surname: Pohl fullname: Pohl, Hans G. – sequence: 2 givenname: Suzanne L. orcidid: 0000-0003-1213-1959 surname: Groah fullname: Groah, Suzanne L. – sequence: 3 givenname: Marcos orcidid: 0000-0002-2585-4657 surname: Pérez-Losada fullname: Pérez-Losada, Marcos – sequence: 4 givenname: Inger orcidid: 0000-0002-5209-3478 surname: Ljungberg fullname: Ljungberg, Inger – sequence: 5 givenname: Bruce M. orcidid: 0000-0003-1258-9409 surname: Sprague fullname: Sprague, Bruce M. – sequence: 6 givenname: Neel orcidid: 0000-0003-1101-5788 surname: Chandal fullname: Chandal, Neel – sequence: 7 givenname: Ljubica orcidid: 0000-0002-9140-5585 surname: Caldovic fullname: Caldovic, Ljubica – sequence: 8 givenname: Michael orcidid: 0000-0002-9650-2691 surname: Hsieh fullname: Hsieh, Michael |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002570715$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
| BookMark | eNp1kktvEzEUhS1UREvpmh2aJSySevz2BqkKj0ZqBUKpWFoe-7pxOrGLZ4KUf4-bpKhFwhtb1-d819Y9r9FRygkQetviKSctPY9pNW01VYSxaUvIC3RCsKYToWl79OR8jM6GYYXrYkxiLl-hY0pIJSh-gr4vltDclJiguY6u5C7mNTQ5NJdg-3G5ba4hNTb55metp-ZTDAHK0HTbg2mW-x7cGHOqynGZ_Rv0Mth-gLPDfopuvnxezC4nV9--zmcXVxPHNB0nwJVwFgOXbaeI4CxwTzzhmAqJnbRWOkqoEp2ATlEHHAImXbDaYys8aHqKPuy5qQRz56LJNu7222zuirn4sZgbSQnmmFXtfK_12a7MfYlrW7Y7w66Qy62xZYyuB6OVth4z6ZWjjBOlnQyMO6E8oyQQX1kf96z7TbcG7yCNxfbPoM9vUlzWN_02sqWCMVUB7w-Akn9tYBjNOg4O-t4myJvB1F9LIjBltErfPe31t8nj-KqA7wV1csNQIBgXR_swjdo69qbF5iEppibFHJJialKq7_wf3yP6f44_q4--qQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10096_024_04930_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fruro_2023_1212590 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers16020394 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijcp_14193 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_023_05703_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00467_021_05274_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41522_025_00823_6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2025_1512891 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_022_01088_8 crossref_primary_10_1128_cmr_00129_24 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_25530 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23020870 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_024_01877_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12941_024_00698_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s43856_025_00866_y crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2025_1562687 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11051207 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2022_1030315 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_673969 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_85482_1 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_98875_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_023_02815_y crossref_primary_10_1186_s12941_021_00428_9 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408363_2024_2331489 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2023_1308665 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12092068 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00192_022_05127_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_14712598_2025_2484303 crossref_primary_10_1002_ctd2_176 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12088_021_00991_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fruro_2024_1380340 crossref_primary_10_17116_repro20232905173 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcimb_2024_1377992 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2024_1459634 crossref_primary_10_1093_clinchem_hvab199 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12020281 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11912_024_01508_7 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_025_01011_z crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms13040948 crossref_primary_10_1128_jb_00105_25 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2024_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fsigen_2023_102865 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_infpip_2025_100476 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00510_21 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_25550 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms12122594 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pmr_2024_07_006 crossref_primary_10_46292_sci23_00004 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms23031336 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_025_01723_9 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000003634 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_023_01183_4 crossref_primary_10_1080_17460913_2024_2414671 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00240_022_01403_5 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00518_21 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11040525 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0253989 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_021_01204_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_888681 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmi_2022_08_010 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10060343 crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_70119 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_022_00611_3 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_01861_21 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_03292_x |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70378-0 10.1093/clinids/12.5.150 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90345-X 10.1056/NEJM200010053431402 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92478-8 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00248-6 10.1136/bmj.3.5662.75 10.1371/journal.pone.0105998 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.088 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90026-7 10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00008-4 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 10.1371/journal.pone.0019709 10.1001/archpedi.1980.04490010027010 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)81090-0 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 10.1016/S0022-3476(73)80030-7 10.1086/427507 10.1136/bmj.3.5662.81 10.3109/00365549109105181 10.1128/mBio.01283-14 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 10.1093/infdis/146.6.719 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 10.1128/JCM.02876-13 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2020 Korean Continence Society 2020 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2020 Korean Continence Society 2020 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR |
| DOI | 10.5213/inj.1938244.122 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 7X8 name: MEDLINE - Academic url: https://search.proquest.com/medline sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 2093-6931 |
| EndPage | 51 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_7320504 oai_doaj_org_article_989ad047d8c345289c7f45c68d432f2d PMC7136448 32252185 10_5213_inj_1938244_122 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01 DK113504 – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: R24 HD050846 – fundername: National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research grantid: 2R24HD050846-06 – fundername: NINDS NIH HHS |
| GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 53G 8JR 8XY AAKDD AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. F5P GROUPED_DOAJ HYE OK1 RPM 9ZL NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-e586ca0e571b82654f5d2d2503670c7aa7c32386b6eb83ce5ef02bfa9d0a6de93 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISICitedReferencesCount | 76 |
| ISICitedReferencesURI | http://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=Summon&SrcAuth=ProQuest&DestLinkType=CitingArticles&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=000522667400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| ISSN | 2093-6931 2093-4777 |
| IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:46:41 EST 2023 Fri Oct 03 12:28:05 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 04 01:46:24 EST 2025 Thu Oct 02 10:38:40 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:57:21 EST 2025 Tue Nov 18 22:29:55 EST 2025 Sat Nov 29 01:38:28 EST 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Bladder Bacteria Microbiota Urethra Microbiome |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c493t-e586ca0e571b82654f5d2d2503670c7aa7c32386b6eb83ce5ef02bfa9d0a6de93 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.1938244.122 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2585-4657 0000-0002-9650-2691 0000-0003-1258-9409 0000-0002-9140-5585 0000-0002-5209-3478 0000-0003-1213-1959 0000-0003-1101-5788 0000-0001-9679-0948 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/989ad047d8c345289c7f45c68d432f2d |
| PMID | 32252185 |
| PQID | 2387260343 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 11 |
| ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_7320504 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_989ad047d8c345289c7f45c68d432f2d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7136448 proquest_miscellaneous_2387260343 pubmed_primary_32252185 crossref_citationtrail_10_5213_inj_1938244_122 crossref_primary_10_5213_inj_1938244_122 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-03-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2020 text: 2020-03-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
| PublicationTitle | International neurourology journal |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Int Neurourol J |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Korean Continence Society 대한배뇨장애요실금학회 |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Korean Continence Society – name: 대한배뇨장애요실금학회 |
| References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref14 ref31 Savage (ref9) 1975 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 KASS (ref1) 1956 ref2 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 Kunin (ref26) 1964 Fouts (ref23) 2012 ref24 ref25 ref22 ref21 (ref20) 2015 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 32615682 - Int Neurourol J. 2020 Jun;24(2):182-184 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70378-0 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.5.150 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90345-X – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010053431402 – start-page: 56 volume-title: Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract year: 1956 ident: ref1 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)92478-8 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00248-6 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5662.75 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105998 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.088 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00041 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90026-7 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.1016/S0891-5520(03)00008-4 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019709 – start-page: 91 volume-title: Urinary tract infection in school children: an epidemiologic, clinical and laboratory study year: 1964 ident: ref26 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1980.04490010027010 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)81090-0 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(73)80030-7 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1086/427507 – year: 2015 ident: ref20 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5662.81 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.3109/00365549109105181 – start-page: S90 volume-title: Natural history of covert bacteriuria in schoolgirls year: 1975 ident: ref9 – start-page: 174 volume-title: Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and meta-proteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury year: 2012 ident: ref23 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01283-14 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.6.719 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1128/JCM.02876-13 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x – reference: 32615682 - Int Neurourol J. 2020 Jun;24(2):182-184 |
| SSID | ssj0000447057 |
| Score | 2.4702384 |
| Snippet | Purpose: Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are... Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are convenient,... Purpose Compared to the microbiome of other body sites, the urinary microbiome remains poorly understood. Although noninvasive voided urine specimens are... |
| SourceID | nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 41 |
| SubjectTerms | bacteria bladder microbiome microbiota Original urethra 비뇨기과학 |
| Title | The Urine Microbiome of Healthy Men and Women Differs by Urine Collection Method |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252185 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2387260343 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7136448 https://doaj.org/article/989ad047d8c345289c7f45c68d432f2d https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002570715 |
| Volume | 24 |
| WOSCitedRecordID | wos000522667400007&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com%2F%23%21%2Fsearch%3Fho%3Df%26include.ft.matches%3Dt%26l%3Dnull%26q%3D |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| ispartofPNX | International Neurourology Journal, 2020, 24(1), , pp.41-51 |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2093-6931 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0000447057 issn: 2093-6931 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20100101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| link | http://cvtisr.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Jb9QwFLagQogLYicslUEcuKR1vOTFR7YKJKbqgUpzs7zSqJBBM1Ok_nuenXQ0g0BcOEVKbMl53_NbvHyPkFeBNy7XdKnRu7laNiBqB97VIRPJCCt8TAXpz3B83M3n-mSr1Fc-EzbSA4-CO9SdtoFJCJ0XUmF64CFJ5dsuSMETD9n6MtBbyVSxwVICKzSfHFP2WgLAyOuD3koc9gNaCC06dG0HDec7Lqkw96OjGZbpT0Hn72cnt5zR0R1ye4oi6Ztx9HfJtTjcIzdn0z75fXKC6NPTfLGPzvqRaul7pItEx1tHl3QWB2qHQEsBS_q-VElZUXc5dSrLCeXGA7bMJaYfkNOjD1_efayn2gm1l1qs66i61lsWFTQOMwglkwo8YLyTCds8WAteoLduXRtdh4iomBh3yerAbBuiFg_J3rAY4mNCJfNJiFZzhcGXjMx2GWAOuvHaJqYqcnAlPuMnYvFc3-KbwQQjy9ugvM0kb4PyrsjrTYcfI6fG35u-zXhsmmUy7PICVcRMKmL-pSIVeYlomnPfl_75-XVhzpcGU4ZPBgRnismKvLgC2-AMy9smdoiLi5VBMQFmfUKKijwawd-MJ5tDDJJQBrCjFjsD3v0y9GeFxRsakXPjJ__jD5-SWzyvA5Szcc_I3np5EZ-TG_7nul8t98l1mHf7ZYL8AlRkDzo |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Urine+Microbiome+of+Healthy+Men+and+Women+Differs+by+Urine+Collection+Method&rft.jtitle=International+neurourology+journal&rft.au=Hans+G.+Pohl&rft.au=Suzanne+L.+Groah&rft.au=Marcos+P%C3%A9rez-Losada&rft.au=Inger+Ljungberg&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.pub=Korean+Continence+Society&rft.issn=2093-4777&rft.eissn=2093-6931&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=51&rft_id=info:doi/10.5213%2Finj.1938244.122&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_989ad047d8c345289c7f45c68d432f2d |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2093-6931&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2093-6931&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2093-6931&client=summon |