Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict

Conflicts between people over wildlife are widespread and damaging to both the wildlife and people involved. Such issues are often termed human–wildlife conflicts. We argue that this term is misleading and may exacerbate the problems and hinder resolution. A review of 100 recent articles on human–wi...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:Oryx Ročník 49; číslo 2; s. 222 - 225
Hlavní autoři: Redpath, Stephen Mark, Bhatia, Saloni, Young, Juliette
Médium: Journal Article
Jazyk:angličtina
Vydáno: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.04.2015
Témata:
Biodiversity
Biologists
Biology
Citation indexes
Forum
human-wildlife relations
humans
livelihood
people
Science
Studies
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
human–wildlife impact
human–human conflict
human–wildlife conflict
Conflict resolution
ISSN:0030-6053, 1365-3008, 1365-3008
On-line přístup:Získat plný text
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
Popis
Shrnutí:Conflicts between people over wildlife are widespread and damaging to both the wildlife and people involved. Such issues are often termed human–wildlife conflicts. We argue that this term is misleading and may exacerbate the problems and hinder resolution. A review of 100 recent articles on human–wildlife conflicts reveals that 97 were between conservation and other human activities, particularly those associated with livelihoods. We suggest that we should distinguish between human–wildlife impacts and human–human conflicts and be explicit about the different interests involved in conflict. Those representing conservation interests should not only seek technical solutions to deal with the impacts but also consider their role and objectives, and focus on strategies likely to deliver long-term solutions for the benefit of biodiversity and the people involved.
Bibliografie:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0030-6053
1365-3008
1365-3008
DOI:10.1017/S0030605314000799